Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Can we have some fcuking control on the airports from high risk countries please?

1155156158160161212

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Not really how it works considering it's a right as defined by the united nations in regards human displacement.



    indeed. Course the mother then declared it a false positive and people just blindly believed her.

    Don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story Niner

    https://www.independent.ie/news/covid-tests-on-two-mothers-who-travelled-to-dubai-have-returned-negative-results-40281331.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Jack1985 wrote: »
    Yep, it's painful for everyone concerned and each country having different policies makes it a mess, a centralised EU approach can't arrive quick enough.
    The EU have no competency here, it's up to individual countries and we are the only ones doing it. Not sure quite what you're angling for here TBH. but it looks very like a permanent plan. Bear in mind that the hotel regime has produced 10 positive cases so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 Alast


    is_that_so wrote: »
    The EU have no competency here, it's up to individual countries and we are the only ones doing it. Not sure quite what you're angling for here TBH. but it looks very like a permanent plan. Bear in mind that the hotel regime has produced 10 positive cases so far.


    10 cases over 3(?) weeks vs 400+ cases every day in the "wild"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Alast wrote: »
    10 cases over 3(?) weeks vs 400+ cases every day in the "wild"
    Indeed and those in quarantine could be at risk when they leave. There are skewed priorities at work but legislation will pass very easily when there are no dissenting voices against it.


  • Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not really how it works considering it's a right as defined by the united nations in regards human displacement.
    When faced with inconvenient information like "right to return" you lie and misrepresent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Feria40


    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭a_squirrelman


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(
    People have totally lost their minds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,082 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    People have totally lost their minds.

    People just want the virus under control

    If that’s losing our minds, well, maybe it’s warranted at this stage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭muddypuppy


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(

    There is already a cap in place. They might not call it a cap, but airlines are not supposed to let you board without a MHQ reservation, so the cap is how many rooms are left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Economics101


    People will always jump agree with nice-sounding but fundamentally daft and unimplementable proposals. They never think of all the legal, logistical and other aspects.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭Lmkrnr


    People who want to travel need to fight back. Closing the borders somewhat is a year to late. The government got it wrong, spectacularly wrong. Now they are making it up as they go along using Nephet as the shield.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭a_squirrelman


    People just want the virus under control

    If that’s losing our minds, well, maybe it’s warranted at this stage


    Then people need to look closer to home. There is a huge amount of people not following rules in Ireland. But as usual it's easier to point fingers at someone else.


    Someone posted earlier about the TEN cases found from travel, but yeah ignore the 400 per day in the community.


    Cue the usual responses: "covid didn't just magically get here" "christmas something something UK"


  • Posts: 669 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(

    It's The Journal, I'm surprised it's not 95%.


  • Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jack1985 wrote: »
    Sorry that's actually not the case. The Indepedent confirmed it was a false-positive.

    https://www.independent.ie/news/covid-tests-on-two-mothers-who-travelled-to-dubai-have-returned-negative-results-40281331.html

    If you test positive in MHQ your stay increases from 10 to 20 to days. They were both negative.
    faceman wrote: »

    Indeed. It's almost like there's no way for it to be denied by anyone including the hse isn't it?

    Lucky that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    People just want the virus under control

    If that’s losing our minds, well, maybe it’s warranted at this stage
    As has been the case throughout this they are looking at scapegoats for the continued restrictions. As usual one element of the strategy is not going to be the answer. Travel might seed cases assuming people do not follow protocols but nowhere near as much as the daily reports of far more risky behaviour within the community that is driving cases. Break the transmissions in the community and the very odd case from travel is going to have very little impact.


  • Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When faced with inconvenient information like "right to return" you lie and misrepresent.

    Excuse me?

    I have spoken in detail about right to return on more then one occasion.

    Perhaps you should look beyond a wiki entry that you scanned


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,954 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    Alast wrote: »
    10 cases over 3(?) weeks vs 400+ cases every day in the "wild"
    yep, approx 5500 to 6000 cases in Ireland in the past fortnight , any of which could be the legendary "seed" of a super spreader event.

    But of course that wont happen because the variant barely spreads in Ireland as irish people have a secret skill in not being able to spread the virus.

    Its the lads off the plane are the problem, tourists, maurading about the place .... even if the numbers (and logic that closed hotels or inter country travel bans) suggest otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,654 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(

    85% or something thought we should take the apple tax money too

    Just wait until the courts rule against MHQ - should be fun


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Lmkrnr wrote: »
    People who want to travel need to fight back. Closing the borders somewhat is a year to late. The government got it wrong, spectacularly wrong. Now they are making it up as they go along using Nephet as the shield.
    The argument for a long time last year was that it was a very low number travelling and that the positivity rates were so low. Community behaviour is and always has been the big problem. Also it is clear there is only one political entity who do not agree with the MHQ and they ran the country until July.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    People just want the virus under control

    If that’s losing our minds, well, maybe it’s warranted at this stage

    Hahahahahahahaha. Hilarious.

    As documented in research in China, we now have unprecedented levels of non compliance with covid rules. Travel is going to become worse. There’s already “underground” travel operators offering Irish travellers way to get around the rules getting to Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,435 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(

    Typical Irish, they support it until their own family are affected by it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,082 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    is_that_so wrote: »
    As has been the case throughout this they are looking at scapegoats for the continued restrictions. As usual one element of the strategy is not going to be the answer. Travel might seed cases assuming people do not follow protocols but nowhere near as much as the daily reports of far more risky behaviour within the community that is driving cases. Break the transmissions in the community and the very odd case from travel is going to have very little impact.

    Travel is a huge part of the problem though

    I can’t emphasise this enough

    Ppl are sick of getting the r rate down only to see it rise from travel cases imported into the state.

    Often from non essential travel.

    It is infuriating.

    We need to get that turned off or down to a manageable trickle

    hotel quarantine addresses that but probably doesn’t go far enough.


  • Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Feria40 wrote: »
    There is a poll on the Journal this morning asking if the government should cap the number of arrivals into the country.

    Unbelievably 65% say yes.

    I don't know what so say :(

    Your first mistake was reading the journal

    Your second was admitting it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Travel is a huge part of the problem though

    I can’t emphasise this enough

    Ppl are sick of getting the r rate down only to see it rise from travel cases imported into the state.

    Often from non essential travel.

    It is infuriating.

    We need to get that turned off or down to a manageable trickle

    hotel quarantine addresses that but probably doesn’t go far enough.

    Even if you lock borders it still gets in and we are not an isolated rock in the South Pacific. So-called bad behaviour is what spreads it and continues to spread it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    Travel is part of the problem though

    Ppl are sick of getting the r rate down only to see it rise from travel cases imported into the state.

    Often from non essential travel.

    It is infuriating.

    We need to get that turned off or down to a manageable trickle

    hotel quarantine addresses that but probably doesn’t go far enough.

    The R rate rose only because of travel cases!? That's bonkers. Cases are created from transmission, not from individuals travelling. Only the initial entry can be blamed on travel. The R rate is the result of transmission, lots of reasons for increased transmission which upped the rate.

    But Irish people good......travellers bad right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,082 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Corholio wrote: »
    The R rate rose only because of travel cases!? That's bonkers. Cases are created from transmission, not from individuals travelling. Only the initial entry can be blamed on travel. The R rate is the result of transmission, lots of reasons for increased transmission which upped the rate.

    But Irish people good......travellers bad right?

    I don’t blame travel solely, far from it. But I acknowledge travel is a big problem in importing in new cases and spreading it. We are only fooling ourselves denying that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    I don’t blame travel solely, far from it. But I acknowledge travel is a big problem in importing in new cases and spreading it

    But transmission is much, much more of a factor. New 'cases' can be created and multiplied in a very short time with recklessness in every day settings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Corholio wrote: »
    But transmission is much, much more of a factor. New 'cases' can be created and multiplied in a very short time with recklessness in every day settings.

    We have controls on community transmission through national lockdowns though, are you suggesting we shouldn't be attempting to control infection from abroad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    We have controls on community transmission through national lockdowns though, are you suggesting we shouldn't be attempting to control infection from abroad?

    The initial point argued was that the R rate rose because of travel. I never said we shouldn't be attempting, but you very well know that.

    From someone who said the only thing that stressed you in the last year was the rugby, you seem quite bothered about the whole thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Corholio wrote: »
    The initial point argued was that the R rate rose because of travel. I never said we shouldn't be attempting, but you very well know that.

    From someone who said the only thing that stressed you in the last year was the rugby, you seem quite bothered about the whole thing.

    So you agree with quarantine then?


Advertisement