Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIV-249,437 ROI(4,906 deaths) 120,195 NI (2,145 deaths)(01/05)Read OP

1194195197199200324

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    aidoh wrote: »
    Sounds like only you've been whipped into a frenzy mo chara.

    Again, why are you calling me out instead of the poster posting blatant misinformation and painting it as a fact.

    That post was a ‘look at this absolute disgrace’ and painted it as something it wasn’t.

    Is it ok to do that, in your opinion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Otherwise is it possible to still hit 80% first doses by end of June with the decision yesterday?

    He says June but we all know he means July or August.


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mloc123 wrote: »
    Is this is a good thing?

    Surely if there are risks reported with a vaccine, it is good practice to pause while they are investigated fully.

    It absolutely is a good thing. I've managed to get slot for Thursday - 2nd jab July 1st - so booking my flight to London now


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So Glynn is basically saying that IF we can get one dose into 80% of the population, then he HOPES that we can have a “greater level of reopening “.

    Anyone’s guess what he means by that but it sure doesn’t sound like normality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,265 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    It absolutely is a good thing. I've managed to get slot for Thursday - 2nd jab July 1st - so booking my flight to London now

    Do you mind me asking what group you are in ?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    Do you mind me asking what group you are in ?

    I'm 45. It's all age based (being done in London - am still registered with a practice there, and have an NHS number)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    So Glynn is basically saying that IF we can get one dose into 80% of the population, then he HOPES that we can have a “greater level of reopening “.

    Anyone’s guess what he means by that but it sure doesn’t sound like normality.

    All over 16+ could be vaccinated and Nphet wont want things to open up. Then the message will be 25% of our population are under 16. We cant have herd immunity. Lockdown of some form must continue.

    This isnt going to end this year. At best we might get out door activities and inter county travel for 6-8 weeks in the summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,265 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I'm 45. It's all age based (being done in London - am still registered with a practice there, and have an NHS number)

    Thank you . I have family in London so thats good to hear


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    All over 16+ could be vaccinated and Nphet wont want things to open up. Then the message will be 25% of our population are under 16. We cant have herd immunity. Lockdown of some form must continue.

    This isnt going to end this year. At best we might get out door activities and inter county travel for 6-8 weeks in the summer.

    And if that did happen, then people would still blame NPHET instead of the actual decision makers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    I'm 45. It's all age based (being done in London - am still registered with a practice there, and have an NHS number)

    Out of interest, would this clear the travel fine? I presume it being a medical appointment and all?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    Do you think we can track properly how many people are vaccinated in Ireland?

    We can know how many vaccines were given in Ireland , but what will be the part of people that will get a vaccine somewhere else ?
    There are people who manage to get a shot early in Northern Ireland or England, people coming from Dubai or Israel who are already vaccinated (as seen in the MHQ court cases), and the 500k people living in Ireland that have another nationality and that may get the shot in their country later in the year.

    Maybe with 3millions vaccine given in Ireland we will actually have 3.5millions people vaccinated. Or do you reckon that there is not a big difference in numbers ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,061 ✭✭✭Polar101


    zebastein wrote: »

    Maybe with 3millions vaccine given in Ireland we will actually have 3.5millions people vaccinated. Or do you reckon that there is not a big difference in numbers ?

    I doubt hundreds of thousands of people will fly somewhere else for a vaccine. The only country where people would realistically head to is the UK, but even if a few thousand get their vaccine there, it's not going to make a huge difference. The EU is going to finish vaccinations at more or less the same pace, so vaccine tourism inside the EU won't be very popular.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    zebastein wrote: »
    Do you think we can track properly how many people are vaccinated in Ireland?

    I find it interesting that Glynn is talking about getting 80% vaccinated before thinking about maybe suggesting possibly letting people maybe live their lives.

    Why is number of people vaccinated the key metric and not the number of people actually dying?

    I guess we can look forward to another summer where deaths are zero but these cowardly ****s still won't let society breathe.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    “I hope we can shortly move away from the focus, spotlight and the front of the newspapers. None of us want that contrary to what public opinion says.”

    Ronan Glynn clearly reads boards and Twitter so. How people can genuinely think they want all of this is absolutely mental.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Faugheen wrote: »
    “I hope we can shortly move away from the focus, spotlight and the front of the newspapers. None of us want that contrary to what public opinion says.”

    Ronan Glynn clearly reads boards and Twitter so. How people can genuinely think they want all of this is absolutely mental.

    Must have been some other Ronan Glynn live on TV a few nights ago.


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Faugheen wrote: »
    “I hope we can shortly move away from the focus, spotlight and the front of the newspapers. None of us want that contrary to what public opinion says.”

    Ronan Glynn clearly reads boards and Twitter so. How people can genuinely think they want all of this is absolutely mental.

    They can say no to radio interviews and appearances on the late late.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    https://twitter.com/RTENewsAtOne/status/1381949962951491586?s=20


    Why is the deputy CMO the person communicating that there will be a plan?

    Where is the Taoiseach/MoH?


  • Posts: 3,270 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Faugheen wrote: »
    “I hope we can shortly move away from the focus, spotlight and the front of the newspapers. None of us want that contrary to what public opinion says.”

    Ronan Glynn clearly reads boards and Twitter so. How people can genuinely think they want all of this is absolutely mental.

    and yet you're reading and posting on said boards forum..you're a veritable yang/yang kind poster alright, "people" being the dullards and bottom feeders eh!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,853 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Stheno wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/RTENewsAtOne/status/1381949962951491586?s=20


    Why is the deputy CMO the person communicating that there will be a plan?

    Where is the Taoiseach/MoH?

    And yet some posters will screech that the restrictions are nothing to do with NPHET.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭Doctors room ghost


    Stheno wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/RTENewsAtOne/status/1381949962951491586?s=20


    Why is the deputy CMO the person communicating that there will be a plan?

    Where is the Taoiseach/MoH?






    There is no official driver of the clown bus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭shamco


    robbiezero wrote: »
    And yet some posters will screech that the restrictions are nothing to do with NPHET.

    Well at least we know who is in charge. What a useless government we have?. I thought Haughey, Bertie and Cowen were bad but MM takes the biscuit he seems to have gone into hiding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Stheno wrote: »
    Why is the deputy CMO the person communicating that there will be a plan?

    Where is the Taoiseach/MoH?
    It's pretty shocking. The whole week has been shocking, and even the way TDs are asking questions is shocking.

    NPHET advise and have a difficult job to do which they are doing well. Government decides, and take into account wider considerations. Instead the Government is nowhere, and the MoH seems completely tangled up in the distraction of MHQ.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    They can say no to radio interviews and appearances on the late late.

    They can, then what?

    The Health Minister doesn’t know his arse from his elbow. The government try to be diplomatic rather than honest. Throw in Ronan Glynn and NPHET not communicating then you will have the same contrarians here demanding that they explain their actions.

    Ronan Glynn is the only one giving any communications when he shouldn’t have to. He’s asked multiple times to explain his reasons for NPHETs recommendations and because the government point to them, the focus and pressure is on them to explain.

    It goes back to what I have been saying for a long time. So many people are being taken as fools by the government.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    rusty cole wrote: »
    and yet you're reading and posting on said boards forum..you're a veritable yang/yang kind poster alright, "people" being the dullards and bottom feeders eh!

    You have a real habit of making up terms and attributing them to people who haven’t said them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,289 ✭✭✭✭Eod100




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    robbiezero wrote: »
    And yet some posters will screech that the restrictions are nothing to do with NPHET.
    Who "screeches" this?

    I think you'll find the contention is that NPHET are not in charge. And they're not. The buck stops with Michael Martin and Stephen Donnelly.

    Unfortunately the latter is a complete fraud, more concerned with tweets and likes than actually knowing anything about his job and doing it.

    Throughout this pandemic, NPHET have produced their recommendations; their plan on what direction restrictions should take.

    They don't implement that plan. The government do. And they don't have to follow NPHET's advice, as we have seen continually. And that hasn't changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    seamus wrote: »
    Who "screeches" this?

    I think you'll find the contention is that NPHET are not in charge. And they're not. The buck stops with Michael Martin and Stephen Donnelly.

    Unfortunately the latter is a complete fraud, more concerned with tweets and likes than actually knowing anything about his job and doing it.

    Throughout this pandemic, NPHET have produced their recommendations; their plan on what direction restrictions should take.

    They don't implement that plan. The government do. And they don't have to follow NPHET's advice, as we have seen continually. And that hasn't changed.

    We are where we are because of NPHET playing politics last Autumn and attempting to strongarm the government into putting their restrictions in place.

    They weren't content to just advise - they demanded that the restrictions they "recommended" be put in place immediately.

    Any reference to the buck stops with the government is just semantics. Its clear as day who is running the show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Eod100 wrote: »

    The good news keeps on rolling :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,220 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Eod100 wrote: »

    We need a new plan, back to the hospital number/icu metric of opening up society. Less of being tied to vaccinated numbers and being at the mercy of pharmaceutical companies over promising and causing delays in supply..


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    timmyntc wrote: »
    We are where we are because of NPHET playing politics last Autumn and attempting to strongarm the government into putting their restrictions in place.

    They weren't content to just advise - they demanded that the restrictions they "recommended" be put in place immediately.

    Any reference to the buck stops with the government is just semantics. Its clear as day who is running the show.

    And initially the government said no.

    What you forget is that there was such public outcry over that that there were demands for NPHET to explain. Leo Varadkar slaughtered them on Claire Byrne and only days later, they implemented the measures.

    The government decides. It’s just convenient for them to implement everything and blame the public health advice.

    As was said, this government are a shower of cowards and can’t even show up and take ownership of their own mess. They’ve ignored NPHET for nearly a year and continue to ignore NPHET as we speak.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement