Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIV-249,437 ROI(4,906 deaths) 120,195 NI (2,145 deaths)(01/05)Read OP

1189190192194195324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 ✭✭✭✭WoollyRedHat


    prunudo wrote: »
    Was anything of interest said at the briefing?

    Cross-posting from Vaccine thread:

    From watching the conference it seems there may be provision for those under 60 to take AZ vaccine still, once they accept the risk as outlined to them individually, relative to their age group, that was my interpretation anyway. Presumably a waiver like that of which was previously alluded to in this thread would have to be devised in such an eventuality.

    They also stated this decision was being made out of abundance of caution and is tied in to the current epidemiological situation i.e. if rates of Covid were higher, they would have in all likelihood have gone lower in terms of age recommendation to take AZ vaccine, weighing up the current risk of getting Covid relative to the age groups and risk of this rare severe adverse reaction to taking AZ vaccine and working off the relative data available to them currently


    ETA: first point may only happen in a situation where there is a shortage of other vaccines and a surplus of the AZ one, with risks of taking this for under 60 age cohort made clear on individual level depending on their age range.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    They also made the point that there are other severe outcomes from the disease not including death which may make the low risk of the clotting event worth it in the younger group. Very confusing. Would be great to get a plain English explanation.

    Ronan Glynn on CB now explaining.

    549944.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 969 ✭✭✭alentejo


    The AZ decision will push back any kind of normal Summer in Ireland this year. Young people have a longer queue to get a vaccine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,302 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    alentejo wrote: »
    The AZ decision will push back any kind of normal Summer in Ireland this year. Young people have a longer queue to get a vaccine.

    Wait and see. There'll be sufficient Pfizer, Moderna etc to make SFA of a difference in the timeline,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,302 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    They also made the point that there are other severe outcomes from the disease not including death which may make the low risk of the clotting event worth it in the younger group...

    Any chance you could make all those pictures a bit smaller???????:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    Wait and see. There'll be sufficient Pfizer, Moderna etc to make SFA of a difference in the timeline,


    I've thought for a while that **** all will open here till July at the earliest in terms of hospitality. Now I'm thinking it could be August as we are at least 4 months behind the UK and they are only starting to open up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    alentejo wrote: »
    The AZ decision will push back any kind of normal Summer in Ireland this year. Young people have a longer queue to get a vaccine.

    Could we open pop up vaccination centres instead of pop up testing centres and allow people to take the AZ vaccine if they sign a waiver and weigh up the risks themselves?

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    They also made the point that there are other severe outcomes from the disease not including death which may make the low risk of the clotting event worth it in the younger group. Very confusing. Would be great to get a plain English explanation.

    Ronan Glynn on CB now explaining.

    549944.jpeg


    Risk of severe disease and death are lower in the younger age groups but can be higher for those younger with certain high risk conditions , so that would be taken into account if necessary .
    However it looks like nobody bar those already vaccinated with their first dose will be offered AZ in the under 60 age groups, high risk or low risk , unless they run out of vaccines , and hopefully that won't happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    RedPaddyX wrote: »
    Listening to David McWilliams podcast earlier - some very interesting stats, eg

    - Ireland has lowest old people demographic in Europe, ie our vulnerable pop is way lower
    - we spend the most per head of population on our health service. Yet still have by far lowest number of ICU beds per pop.
    - we have locked down for longer than nearly every other country (231days vs 41days in Denmark for example)

    In other words our handling of this has been a disaster/poor. And our health service is grossly mismanaged. And we’ve also destroyed - continue to even further destroy our economy.

    https://overcast.fm/+SE4yimgo0

    The first and last point of the three predated the pandemic.
    The middle one re lockdown is valid .
    One would expect an economist to be concerned about the economy , as one would expect public health to be concerned about infected cases .
    No surprise David McWilliams has something to say .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Few cans on the beach the way to go according to CB. Watch out for the airflow though. Not being downwind of someone is age old advice.:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Discussion on Claire Byrne is a rerun from April 2020 right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Jesus this show exists in a parallel universe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    France said under 55s who received a first injection of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine should be given a jab from a different producer for their second dose, a ruling affecting more than 500,000 people

    Is this how vaccines work? Is there any grounds to suggest that this works?

    This mixing of different vaccines increases my hesitancy ten fold, is it now a pick and mix at the cinema?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 ✭✭✭✭WoollyRedHat


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    Is this how vaccines work? Is there any grounds to suggest that this works?

    This mixing of different vaccines increases my hesitancy ten fold, is it now a pick and mix at the cinema?.

    No what France are doing has not been sanctioned, they are taking a risk from what I can see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭RedPaddyX


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    The first and last point of the three predated the pandemic.
    The middle one re lockdown is valid .
    One would expect an economist to be concerned about the economy , as one would expect public health to be concerned about infected cases .
    No surprise David McWilliams has something to say .

    Just listen to the first 15min of the podcast and you’ll get the context. The basic message is our results of handling the pandemic are much poorer than they should have been despite doing much further damage to our economy. The extreme damage being caused to multiple sectors of economy (small business ecosystem, aviation, tourism, multinationals) is detrimental.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Halfdane wrote: »
    At what point does the first dose start to become ineffective? At first there was a four week gap between shots, then 12, now 16. Surely that could have negative effects on the overall efficacy of the vaccine? I’ve seen no data related to a 16 week wait and efficacy figures.

    Still 4 week gap for Pfizer and Moderna , they have always been that .
    AZ were 12 week and they are now talking about those who have got the first vaccine and are low risk or young waiting 16weeks before they get the 2nd dose.
    These would be mainly healthcare workers , as over 70 s don't get AZ .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    RedPaddyX wrote: »
    Just listen to the first 15min of the podcast and you’ll get the context. The basic message is our results of handling the pandemic are much poorer than they should have been despite doing much further damage to our economy. The extreme damage being caused to multiple sectors of economy (small business ecosystem, aviation, tourism, multinationals) is detrimental.

    I will but can't promise to agree with Mr McWilliams ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭Gael23




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No what France are doing has not been sanctioned, they are taking a risk from what I can see.

    Kingston Mills tonight saying not a risk as such as both will give immunity , but outside of regulations alright and would be difficult to work out immunity being given .
    Might be better !
    But then effectively ditching AZ which will result on pressure on other supplies.
    There has been discussion about just one dose of Pfizer for example witha later booster , for example , as one dose gives such good immunity .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 ✭✭Halfdane


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Still 4 week gap for Pfizer and Moderna , they have always been that .
    AZ were 12 week and they are now talking about those who have got the first vaccine and are low risk or young waiting 16weeks before they get the 2nd dose.
    These would be mainly healthcare workers , as over 70 s don't get AZ .

    Correct! I have had my first dose of AZ three weeks ago. I’m wondering does the 16 week wait affect efficacy though? Based on what I read when they were changing it to 12 weeks that was kind of considered the cut off point for the first dose’s effectiveness. Surely an extra four weeks could reduce the supposed 82% final efficacy?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,435 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Gael23 wrote: »

    Heartwarming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Gael23 wrote: »

    Of course they are

    The next 6 weeks is vital

    Just hold on a little longer

    Then rinse and repeat at the end of June


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,320 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Halfdane wrote: »
    Correct! I have had my first dose of AZ three weeks ago. I’m wondering does the 16 week wait affect efficacy though? Based on what I read when they were changing it to 12 weeks that was kind of considered the cut off point for the first dose’s effectiveness. Surely an extra four weeks could reduce the supposed 82% final efficacy?

    I don't know is the answer .
    The trials have not been done for AZ on that gap.
    Have they spaced them out that much in UK I wonder ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭RGS


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Of course they are

    The next 6 weeks is vital

    Just hold on a little longer

    Then rinse and repeat at the end of June

    Rinse repeat July, August, September and so on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,435 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The poor weather is keeping numbers down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,435 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    I wonder how Irish jealousy of England's situation manifest itself in the next few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    I wonder how Irish jealousy of England's situation manifest itself in the next few weeks.

    Not going to be happy really especially when easing of restrictions is put back thanks to self inflicted wounds of messing about with AZ by NIAC today

    We'll fall further behind the UK and Northern Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    I wonder how Irish jealousy of England's situation manifest itself in the next few weeks.

    If there’s no considerable give in May there’s going to be problems


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Why?

    Afraid of losing the limelight

    Attention seeking egotists at this stage.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement