Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Are we there yet? Your second Travel Megathread (threadbans in OP}

1134135137139140327

Comments

  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    corkonion wrote: »
    The MHQ is a farce, people from all over the world flying into Heathrow or Amsterdam to get a connecting flight to Ireland, let’s say a passenger from Brazil sits next to a passenger from the uk, the Brazilian gets quarantined while the UK person doesn’t, yet last week a New Zealander was forced to quarantine because her flight changeover was in Doha or somewhere like that. An absolute shambles

    Do you want them to quarantine everyone........ :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    And Israel is still there :o




    Do you not know that isn't an official government website?


    You probably shouldn't base your decisions on the webdesigner the tifco group hired.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Who gives a shite what the lawyers say.


    No locked doors and no agents of the state monitoring them directly or preventing egress.


    Private security do not have any power to detain you.

    They are the lawyers representing the State. If it's not detention why didn't the State argue that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    They are the lawyers representing the State. If it's not detention why didn't the State argue that?


    What difference does it make what they call it?


    Maybe they should rename it to "fluffy bunny love and joy camp"


    I don't see the point in arguing semantics.


    If they left the hotel, they would have been asked to return by the Gardai. I can't remember what they call it. They explain/ask/educate/whatever before arrest.


    If they had refused to return, the Gardai would not have forced them back to the hotel. Instead they would have been arrested and brought to the barracks and placed on remand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭corkonion


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Do you want them to quarantine everyone........ :)

    I don’t believe that people that are fully vaccinated and pass 2 covid tests should be detained at all. Or people coming from covid free countries like New Zealand simply because their connecting flight was in Doha.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    What difference does it make what they call it?


    Maybe they should rename it to "fluffy bunny love and joy camp"


    I don't see the point in arguing semantics.


    If they left the hotel, they would have been asked to return by the Gardai. I can't remember what they call it. They explain/ask/educate/whatever before arrest.


    If they had refused to return, the Gardai would not have forced them back to the hotel. Instead they would have been arrested and brought to the barracks and placed on remand.

    A massive difference. Calling it detention means it comes under the remit of Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution which has now led to the two detainees being released and a High Court enquiry into their detention. If they argued it wasn't a detention then it wouldn't be before the court as a Constitutional matter. You don't seem to understand what's at play here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    A massive difference. Calling it detention means it comes under the remit of Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution which has now led to the two detainees being released and a High Court enquiry into their detention. If they argued it wasn't a detention then it wouldn't be before the court as a Constitutional matter. You don't seem to understand what's at play here.




    Well I thought you were debating as regards what people on boards.ie call it, not legal technicalities.


    A similar argument can be made against the Public Health Act which is used to enforce people staying in their home, or elsewhere, after they are deemed to be a risk to public health


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    corkonion wrote: »
    I don’t believe that people that are fully vaccinated and pass 2 covid tests should be detained at all. Or people coming from covid free countries like New Zealand simply because their connecting flight was in Doha.




    I understand. But unfortunately the public health experts have to make their decisions based on these silly things called science and facts, rather than what random posters on boards.ie believe.


  • Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    A massive difference. Calling it detention means it comes under the remit of Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution which has now led to the two detainees being released and a High Court enquiry into their detention. If they argued it wasn't a detention then it wouldn't be before the court as a Constitutional matter. You don't seem to understand what's at play here.

    Israel was removed from the list and there was an appeal process.

    The challenges are now not going ahead and fyi, being allowed challenge a law doesn't mean you have a strong case.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,014 ✭✭✭✭Corholio


    If they are very serious about the variants, which I have always had no problem with, then these should have been attempted to be contained properly. There have been cases of both variants here before the MHQ, but these were allowed to wander around just like the UK one, no doubt the numbers they are quoting now about the amount of variant cases spread from these initial cases. Are they afraid because they'd be detaining a whole lot of Irish people? Foreigners are easier facebook group fodder. Britain were literally chasing cases around villages there.

    This and the lack of transparency on why some countries are and aren't added to the MHQ, these embarrassing latest cases and no inkling of a basic roadmap other than cheap sound bytes displays a half assed approach that they wrap up in a 'serious' ribbon by adding a load of countries rapidly. Some see the ribbon and not the mess underneath, and are chuffed by that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Israel was removed from the list and there was an appeal process.

    The challenges are now not going ahead and fyi, being allowed challenge a law doesn't mean you have a strong case.

    Not sure if you've read up on the cases but they were denied their appeals and were released by the courts. They were also told that just because Israel was removed from the list wasn't grounds to end their MHQ early.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,275 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    The court cases are dropped, so why would they be removed?

    The cases are being heard tomorrow.

    Edit:
    The Times say they are released pending court hearings
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/two-travellers-from-israel-released-from-mandatory-hotel-quarantine-1.4534430#.YHMRpHql10U.twitter


    RTE says the court cases have been dropped
    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0411/1209125-court-quarantine/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies




    The whole thing is a fiasco and poorly thought out. But hardly fair if sports teams are exempt and hard cases (funerals, visits to sick relatives etc.) are not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,931 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Keep all new variants out. Remember Christmas? How can anyone seriously argue against restrictions unless they are involved in aviation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    jellies wrote: »
    The whole thing is a fiasco and poorly thought out. But hardly fair if sports teams are exempt and hard cases (funerals, visits to sick relatives etc.) are not.




    I don't think there will be exemptions. Or that there should be. I mean for sports.


    Was there not a recent story about a rugby player for a French team who went back to SA to get his pilots licence or something and then couldn't come to Ireland to play a match?


    If they want the match to go ahead, they could try to have it played elsewhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    jellies wrote: »
    The whole thing is a fiasco and poorly thought out. But hardly fair if sports teams are exempt and hard cases (funerals, visits to sick relatives etc.) are not.

    It will be harder for them to get an exception for sports than for a local lockdown.

    When there is a local lockdown, the essential travel (or work related travel) is allowed. So it is really a matter of explaining that professional sports is more important than sports as a leisure, or any leisure outdoor activity, they are higher on the priority list so they get an exemption, fair enough.

    For MHQ, for them to get an exemption, that means you judge on the reason for travel and not only country of origin and vaccines. Any other reason more essential than professional sports should also be allowed if they allow sport. So funerals, wedding, any other business related travel. It would be hard to swallow to give them an exemption if traveling for a funeral does not get any.
    And if there is a positive test in their team (they are public figures so it will be known) in the following week, that is a disaster


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 860 ✭✭✭UDAWINNER


    If you can't get an exemption for a funeral, there better be no exemption for a feckin rugby game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    saabsaab wrote: »
    Keep all new variants out. Remember Christmas? How can anyone seriously argue against restrictions unless they are involved in aviation.


    How will these restrictions keep new variants out while the border with NI is open, connectivity to the UK does not involve quarantine, Ro-Ro drivers are not quarantined etc. ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    jellies wrote: »
    How will these restrictions keep new variants out while the border with NI is open, connectivity to the UK does not involve quarantine, Ro-Ro drivers are not quarantined etc. ?

    I was wondering about that- will truck driver’s arriving at Rosslare and Dublin have to spend 2 weeks in MHQ?

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    I was wondering about that- will truck driver’s arriving at Rosslare and Dublin have to spend 2 weeks in MHQ?

    Nope. Here is the exemptions list from citizensinformation.ie. They are not even tested as far as I know.

    The exceptions are:

    People travelling for urgent medical reasons
    People arriving who have a mandatory legal obligation, for example, an arrest warrant or an extradition order
    Gardaí or defence forces carrying out their duties
    Diplomats or elected representatives carrying out essential functions
    International transport workers who hold Annex 3 certificate and are carrying out their duties as drivers of a heavy goods vehicle
    Airline pilots or aircrew, maritime master or maritime crew carrying out their duties
    Members of the Oireachtas (Irish parliament) or the European Parliament carrying out their duties


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 610 ✭✭✭kerrylad1


    Just to show how much of a joke this all is.Dropped off a few groceries their,to my old lad.Home from what some here call his "jollies" in lanza last saturday.He could have jogged around limerick licking everyone last 8 days.Not 1 call or text, to check up on him.Yet they were willing to detain people with negative pcr tests and fully jabbed,from visiting dying relatives.What the hell is going on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    kerrylad1 wrote: »
    Just to show how much of a joke this all is.Dropped off a few groceries their,to my old lad.Home from what some here call his "jollies" in lanza last saturday.He could have jogged around limerick licking everyone last 8 days.Not 1 call or text, to check up on him.Yet they were willing to detain people with negative pcr tests and fully jabbed,from visiting dying relatives.What the hell is going on?




    Given your paragraph above, and ignoring your oul' fella's unusual penchant for jogging around and licking people, how can you not understand the need for centralized managed facilities for arrivals from countries which are high risk?




    Whatever about jogging around and licking people in general, I definitely wouldn't be doing it to Limerick people. If you selected a random Limerick person to lick, you'd be lucky if they only had scabies. Allegedly.






    (Collison brothers. If you are reading this, you can send me a few quid. I'm only joking. I won't mention stab city or anything)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭jellies


    kerrylad1 wrote: »
    Just to show how much of a joke this all is.Dropped off a few groceries their,to my old lad.Home from what some here call his "jollies" in lanza last saturday.He could have jogged around limerick licking everyone last 8 days.Not 1 call or text, to check up on him.Yet they were willing to detain people with negative pcr tests and fully jabbed,from visiting dying relatives.What the hell is going on?

    At the start of this pandemic (about a year ago) I know someone that went home to Canada. The police escorted them home and called by every day to make sure they were at home and adhering to their home quarantine. This is how you do things properly.

    In Ireland have not done the basics properly for a year and now we throw a half-baked MHQ system on top which will also not be done properly. Hope your aul fella enjoyed his jollies :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 610 ✭✭✭kerrylad1


    jellies wrote: »
    At the start of this pandemic (about a year ago) I know someone that went home to Canada. The police escorted them home and called by every day to make sure they were at home and adhering to their home quarantine. This is how you do things properly.

    In Ireland have not done the basics properly for a year and now we throw a half-baked MHQ system on top which will also not be done properly. Hope your aul fella enjoyed his jollies :)
    He had a lovely time.Like a new man.My sister who went crazy when i booked his "jollies",even thanked me the other day,saying how happy he seems since he returned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭sy_flembeck


    A similar argument can be made against the Public Health Act which is used to enforce people staying in their home, or elsewhere, after they are deemed to be a risk to public health

    No, it can't. It's much bigger than that. The crucial word here is 'detention'. It either is or it isn't. This will be a very interesting week.

    Perhaps this is why FG 'acquiesced' on the subject. Perhaps they plan ahead a little better than FF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,889 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I don't think there will be exemptions. Or that there should be. I mean for sports.


    Was there not a recent story about a rugby player for a French team who went back to SA to get his pilots licence or something and then couldn't come to Ireland to play a match?


    If they want the match to go ahead, they could try to have it played elsewhere.

    Yes this did happen to the SA international player Rynhardt Elstadt who plays club rugby for toulouse, he had to miss the Munster V Toulouse game because he went back to South Africa last week

    On a related note, it seems Leinsters game against La Rochelle could be called off and the South African involvement in the rainbow cup could be in jeopardy for the same reason


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,262 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    saabsaab wrote: »
    Keep all new variants out. Remember Christmas? How can anyone seriously argue against restrictions unless they are involved in aviation.

    or countless other industries affected by lockdowns

    obviously not yours

    /and just to repeat ad infinitum the restrictions will never keep variants out - they are pointless/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,931 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Tazz T wrote: »
    or countless other industries affected by lockdowns

    obviously not yours

    /and just to repeat ad infinitum the restrictions will never keep variants out - they are pointless/


    The virus affects everyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,262 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    I'm confused now. you just said it only affected 'aviation'


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement