Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Maritime News Thread

1181921232428

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,722 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I'd get 2 really big ships, one on either side, with a towline attached, one on the bow, and one on the stern, and try and gently twist it off the bank.....

    basically get 2 massive ships to act as tugs......

    finding 2 willing captains (with the approval to do so from head office mind), would be the difficult part..


  • Registered Users Posts: 552 ✭✭✭pawdee


    Just go around the Cape of Good Hope? Not that much of a hardship surely!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,430 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    There was talk of taking containers off to lighten the load which would raise it in the water but that in itself would be a huge operation given the height of the ship and where it is in the canal and the number you would need to take off. Likely you bring another smaller container ship with its own cranes alongside.

    Sunday/Monday supposed to be highest tide so potentially best chance of it clearing then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    pawdee wrote: »
    Just go around the Cape of Good Hope? Not that much of a hardship surely!

    just the matter of an extra 4600Nm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭Odelay


    josip wrote: »
    From my rural background, my instinct could be to pull it out from the same direction it went in.
    But all 3 tugs are on the wrong side for that.
    Is that because the tugs are based north of where it grounded and can't get around or would there be other thinking behind what they are trying?

    They’re trying the pushy pushy turnie turnie method.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,154 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    This demonstrates how easily those with ill intent can easily shut down one of the world's major shipping choke points. While the world focused on airport security after 9/11, a ship of this size having even the most minor of incidents in the wrong place, lets say off the UK coast, could shut sown the largest ports in Europe for weeks, and hugely impact european Trade. Just look at the panic since the UK stopped becoming a land bridge? Imagine if all the ships that go to Rotterdam, Hamburg or Antwerp, could no longer use the channel because a ship of this size had dumped its load of containers into the water?
    The reliance of the sea lanes as a means of supply is often taken for granted. The ease of which they can be shut down more so.


    Interesting point, but it would be interesting to find anywhere else in the world, apart from some sections of the Panama Canal that would have such a big impact.
    Your Rotterdam-Channel-container example would be a tiny fraction of the inconvenience of this I think.

    • Ships could still make slow way in the Channel.
    • Multiple ships could be brought in to remove the containers.
    • Ships could be diverted to alternative ports.
    • Only Northern Europe would be affected
    Even further up the Suez and they might been able to use the spare channel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,722 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    Imagine if all the ships that go to Rotterdam, Hamburg or Antwerp, could no longer use the channel because a ship of this size had dumped its load of containers into the water?

    I'd imagine though the repercussions of such an incident in the English Channel wouldn't be as harsh as they are now with the Suez canal blocked...

    If 1 of the channels in the English Channel was fouled, could/would they operate a stop/go system like we see on our roads, and go to a single directional lane only, getting outbound traffic to depart at the right time, and inbound traffic to slow on approach to the channel to arrive as the 'gate' opens.. Time the gates with the tides to get traffic through quicker...

    Would still be havoc though!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    It seems to be all tugs that are around it, surely a suction dredge would be available, used for maintenance on the canal? the ship is 16 metres deep, the further out the reach from the Bank the less effective the excavators will be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,154 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Has Musk not offered to free it yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭kub


    yiddo59 wrote: »
    Irish Ferries to charter Blue Star 1. Extra tonnage on the Cherbourg run?

    https://www.niferry.co.uk/irish-ferries-to-charter-greek-ferry-blue-star-1/




    Irish Ferries also said today it would add the RoRo passenger ferry Blue Star 1 to its Rosslare to Pembroke Dock route.



    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/0326/1206241-irish-ferries-new-route/


    Irish Ferries must see some potential here, it seems to go against the common avoid the landbridge mentality by Irish hauliers, The Isle of Innishmore is going to operate a new IF service between Dover and Calais.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭Yakov P. Golyadkin


    scotchy wrote: »
    Still in Dun Laoghaire this evening.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2021/0327/1206508-sailor-repatriation/

    Most of the crew have left.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000



    Handy little end of first quarter sales boost there.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,430 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Potential for the trawler to end up being auctioned off on the cheap me thinks.


    Good to see the crew getting home.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    https://www.thejournal.ie/ellie-adham-rescue-5393581-Mar2021/?amp=1&utm_source=twitter_short&__twitter_impression=true

    Glad to see this hopefully coming to a happy ending. Tough night for the crew.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I think that article is wrong in saying there are windows knocked in on the trawler, a tug was going to tow it and they blew in windows, they returned to port on their own power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Looks like the tow line has broken again, no longer under tow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Helicopter hovering directly above and another nearby for cover, at a guess they are taking crew off.
    Boat is listing, taking crew off, one helicopter away, presume with some or all of the crew, the second one is on scene now


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    I think that article is wrong in saying there are windows knocked in on the trawler, a tug was going to tow it and they blew in windows, they returned to port on their own power.

    Correct, the tug had the windows knocked in. Sounds treacherous enough now with the crew being airlifted but glad all are safe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,430 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Hopefully the boat can be saved, always loved the rather flash paint design on it...
    astillerosriadeaviles-ellie_adham_01-1.jpg
    https://www.shipyards.es/en/ellie-adhamh-2


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    Looking at marine traffic the GB Shaw was doing 19 knots towards castletown 5 hours ago. Wonder have they abandoned the trawler altogether now. It's a dirty night out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    It looks like the tug nomad is trying to get her under tow, the gb Shaw might need to head for a damage assessment, there may have been a collision while trying to get the tow line connected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Unfortunately the boat sank around midday, thankfully no lives lost, a big blow for the crew, owners etc in a very uncertain time for the industry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    Unfortunately the boat sank around midday, thankfully no lives lost, a big blow for the crew, owners etc in a very uncertain time for the industry.

    Very big blow but thankfully all safe. Cheers for the info.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,299 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Jim Gazebo wrote: »
    Very big blow but thankfully all safe. Cheers for the info.

    They have had some ordeal, under tow by another fishing vessel but after the tow line broke they had to abandon the tow, a tug that was on the way back from Spain was diverted, they hit a rogue wave that put in their front windows with such a volume of water that it blew out the wheelhouse door at the back, luckily no one hurt and able to return to port with emergency controls, the lifeboat went out to standby the tug. The gb Shaw went to take the boat under tow but with atrocious conditions and a collision had difficulty to get the line across and the lifeboat was sent out to get the line over.
    At some stage yesterday it was decided to get the crew off,the boat had taken a bad list, 4 liferafts were lost in attempts to get them off, 1 helicopter failed and eventually a winch woman managed to get aboard with extreme bravery. A big shout out to the rescue services for going above and beyond.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    A very difficult operation in extremely hazardous conditions. It does however highlight once again how we, as an island nation, cannot offer the correct level of protection to our waters, our coastline and our environment.

    The next Irish naval vessel should look like this, so when that little fishing boat becomes a ferry, container ship or nuclear submarine, we have the ability to deal effectively and professionally with the job.

    new_ml150003070.jpg?mh=447&mw=980&thn=0&hash=05194D549F2DF35BA3921A8366B9B1B8727CEBFD


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Ever given seems to be on the move, listing a bit to port though.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Could they not have diverted one of the three large ocean going Oil Rig/Tug vessels from the Kinsale Gas Platform to tow the Trawler, they are pretty big and well equipped and it would have been no problem to them maybe slow in the conditions but they probably would have saved her they were not very far from the Trawlers position.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    I don;t believe there are any large tugs as part of the current operations at the Kinsale field, just supply boats to take the offloaded components ashore. However, there'd be questions over why the NS couldn't do the job and are they not fit for purpose etc. etc. Even if it means we will damage a naval ship in the process, we send these lads out to tow stricken vessels (including that burning Canadian sub off the NW coast that time).

    Ships in danger need the right type of vessel to rescue them, in all weathers.

    awash%20bergen%2016x9.jpg

    awash%20bergen%202.jpg

    Bergen%20rigging.jpg

    vikingfjord%20from%20bergen.jpg

    https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/grounding-narrowly-averted-off-norway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,154 ✭✭✭✭josip


    This photo really brought it home to me how poor the sight lines are on a ship of this size.
    ErHYqyB.png
    Even from the bridge wings there must be a blind spot of 200m in front of the bow?
    I assume they have cameras aiding with that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,722 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    (Note to windsurfers/saily types, shouting at the bow of a ship this size will not get the attention of the crew, no matter how loud you shout. Steam will not give way to sail in this situation).

    Certainly not in a channel, shipping lane or TSS, but out in the open ocean, and with AIS, ships of this size are happy to adjust their course by a degree or 2 to avoid getting too close to a yacht sailing... (who does still have the right of way). Its usually always amicable though, with the ships willing to make a small adjustment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,154 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    Not at all. If something is that close you won't be able to do anything but hit it. Set your radar alarm for 5 miles and you might have enough time to react if something gets in front of you. Takes a few miles to bring it to a full stop, and even changing course there is quite a delay between putting the helm over and the ship reacting. When manouvering you usually have a first or second officer with a radio telling the Skipper/pilot what he is dealing with.
    (Note to windsurfers/saily types, shouting at the bow of a ship this size will not get the attention of the crew, no matter how loud you shout. Steam will not give way to sail in this situation).


    Tx. I also found this
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a3hLZJZmlI&t=125s
    from which I can see that this container ship left a gap in the containers at the prow for better visibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    A very difficult operation in extremely hazardous conditions. It does however highlight once again how we, as an island nation, cannot offer the correct level of protection to our waters, our coastline and our environment.

    The next Irish naval vessel should look like this, so when that little fishing boat becomes a ferry, container ship or nuclear submarine, we have the ability to deal effectively and professionally with the job.

    new_ml150003070.jpg?mh=447&mw=980&thn=0&hash=05194D549F2DF35BA3921A8366B9B1B8727CEBFD

    Yup ... It's probably something we should have gone with earlier , less naval looking and more multipurpose ... Honestly think some of the oilrig service vessels are a good starting point ..
    They're not fast in good weather but can keep going in very poor conditions , which is usually when they're needed ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 ✭✭✭RadioRetro


    Certainly not in a channel, shipping lane or TSS, but out in the open ocean, and with AIS, ships of this size are happy to adjust their course by a degree or 2 to avoid getting too close to a yacht sailing... (who does still have the right of way). Its usually always amicable though, with the ships willing to make a small adjustment.

    Feck all yachts have AIS, just the larger ones. Your typical pleasure cruisers don't from what I observe (or not).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,722 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    RadioRetro wrote: »
    Feck all yachts have AIS, just the larger ones. Your typical pleasure cruisers don't from what I observe (or not).

    No,

    The lads knocking around Dublin Bay won’t have it. I don’t have it. But anyone sailing across an ocean, or sailing solo will have it... even if just a Class B receiver so they can get the alerts that they are going to pass by something too close for comfort...

    It’s not that expensive these days.... particularly the Class B receivers.... even some VHF radios have it built in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    The French have a very nice vessel based in Brest, the Abeille Bourbon.
    Long term leased to the French Navy.
    Very nice looking vessel and 200t Bollard pull.
    12513958_1026028780753653_8294251646777947657_o.jpg
    12471460_1026028647420333_6214018555257423157_o.jpg
    12473626_1026028717420326_8144572671601261277_o.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,430 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    I see Ever Globe went South through the Suez this evening, sister ship of Ever Given, I'd say they had their very best men/women on watch :D
    https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:5928921/mmsi:354977000/imo:9786841/vessel:EVER_GLOBE

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden-class_container_ship


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    If the NS and the RNLI couldn't maintain a tow there was less chance the support vessels working in the Kinsale field were doing it. They are not designed to tow casualty vessels, they tow large floating platforms using pre-attached cables and chains. Think there is one Anchor Cranker there (or due) but it is designed to haul an anchor of a Semi-sub onto its deck, not pass a floating rope to a trawler.
    Then you get involved in the whole area of liability. NS, coasties and rnli were able to put a team aboard with pumps to try and stop the ingress of Water. Anchor Cranker crews only do that when their own boat is sinking.
    The local salvage Tug must have been otherwised engaged in Bantry Bay.

    Any of the vessels that can tow out there would have a had a better shot than the navy. Those navy ships are not built for that job, and the crews are not used to that job either. I was surprised the ocean challenger (ex thrax) was not sent out.

    It's interesting how the Ellie adhamh went from drifting in relative safety to the weather to taking on water all of a sudden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 700 ✭✭✭Mick Tator


    Jim Gazebo wrote: »
    Any of the vessels that can tow out there would have a had a better shot than the navy. Those navy ships are not built for that job, and the crews are not used to that job either. I was surprised the ocean challenger (ex thrax) was not sent out.

    It's interesting how the Ellie adhamh went from drifting in relative safety to the weather to taking on water all of a sudden.


    The wind got up and from Saturday it was blowing stink until it eased off earlier today.
    As for earlier comments on AIS, in the Kenmare River/Bay there is just one boat (a RIB) with AIS, all others that I have seen are during the summer and invariably visiting yachts. It's not exactly the Channel down here!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Jim Gazebo wrote: »
    Any of the vessels that can tow out there would have a had a better shot than the navy. Those navy ships are not built for that job, and the crews are not used to that job either. I was surprised the ocean challenger (ex thrax) was not sent out.

    It's interesting how the Ellie adhamh went from drifting in relative safety to the weather to taking on water all of a sudden.


    Ocean challenger was too busy getting that yoke out of the Suez canal


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    If the NS and the RNLI couldn't maintain a tow there was less chance the support vessels working in the Kinsale field were doing it. They are not designed to tow casualty vessels, they tow large floating platforms using pre-attached cables and chains. Think there is one Anchor Cranker there (or due) but it is designed to haul an anchor of a Semi-sub onto its deck, not pass a floating rope to a trawler.
    Then you get involved in the whole area of liability. NS, coasties and rnli were able to put a team aboard with pumps to try and stop the ingress of Water. Anchor Cranker crews only do that when their own boat is sinking.
    The local salvage Tug must have been otherwised engaged in Bantry Bay.

    Are you telling me that this ship the "Vos Pathfinder" which was stationed at the Kinsale field could not have carried out the tow, she is a big ship and classed for SAR Tug and Rig support vessel, see the details below. Its a pity no one had the cop on to call her in she was close enough to the Trawler. Well done to the Navy and the RNLI in very difficult conditions.

    https://www.vroon.nl/Files/VesselParticulars/VOS%20PATHFINDER20170209104438.pdf

    https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/errvs-versatility-expands-use-beyond-standby-and-rescue-64604


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    That would mean the Pathfinder leaving the job she is doing (standby, safety and close support) and the repercussions that would have on the safety of the people on the platform, up to and including possibly having to evacuate them by helicopter until the standby boat is back on station.

    If the fishing boat was a danger to the platform, then that's another story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,722 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Yeah, I would have assumed there would be very few reasons a support boat would be allowed to leave it's station supporting an oil/gas rig...

    particularly when the weather is pants!!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    josip wrote: »
    This photo really brought it home to me how poor the sight lines are on a ship of this size.
    ErHYqyB.png
    Even from the bridge wings there must be a blind spot of 200m in front of the bow?
    I assume they have cameras aiding with that?

    All very large ships have poor line of sight forward and it's an issue the Bridge Team will factor into their safe navigation of the ship. They will all know the blind sectors ahead, the shadow sectors of the radars and the stopping distances and times of the ship.

    They will do everything in their power to stop their ship getting into a "close quarters" situation.

    This is also why you see a harbour patrol craft escorting these big container ships in the Solent in England where leisure vessels will try to dart across in front of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    That would mean the Pathfinder leaving the job she is doing (standby, safety and close support) and the repercussions that would have on the safety of the people on the platform, up to and including possibly having to evacuate them by helicopter until the standby boat is back on station.

    If the fishing boat was a danger to the platform, then that's another story.

    She was one of three at the platform on the day but she would certainly have done the job, its so sad that the Trawler went down she nearly made it ashore on her own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Jim Gazebo wrote: »
    Any of the vessels that can tow out there would have a had a better shot than the navy. Those navy ships are not built for that job, and the crews are not used to that job either. I was surprised the ocean challenger (ex thrax) was not sent out.

    It's interesting how the Ellie adhamh went from drifting in relative safety to the weather to taking on water all of a sudden.

    Take a look at the Navy towing the Trawler in very difficult conditions

    https://www.facebook.com/irishnavalservice/


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Of course there is also the video of the fishing boat coming into contact with the LÉ GEORGE BERNARD SHAW (P64) as they try to manoeuvre to pass the tow line across. But we don't talk about that...

    Some ships are for towing and others for patrolling.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    As Stevie Wonder, Elton John and Dionne Warwick once sang...Thats what fenders for.

    Not in a (reportedly) 6m swell :pac: ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,970 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    Not in a (reportedly) 6m swell :pac: ;)

    Where is the video to be seen


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Storm 10 wrote: »
    Where is the video to be seen

    is it not the video on the NS FB page that you linked to? or is that from a different incident?


Advertisement