Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

1…138139141143144…757

Comments

  • #4202
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    And which posts of mine are you bothered with exactly?

    Being honest its the stupid childish things like "will i take you by the hand" "im proud of you". No reasonable adult talks like that. You are very aggressive in your posting. No need for it. Argue all you want but that stuff is unnecessary.


  • #4203
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Being honest its the stupid childish things like "will i take you by the hand" "im proud of you". No reasonable adult talks like that. You are very aggressive in your posting. No need for it. Argue all you want but that stuff is unnecessary.

    And what is the context behind me doing that?

    1) First poster is demanding we always answer his questions, but refused to answer a single one of our questions.

    2) Second poster is a rereg who constantly posts nothing but lies, nonsense or drivel and who has been banned from this thread.

    Now, who is the childish one? How about you contribute to the thread by discussing Biden's policies rather than being faux outraged?


  • #4204
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    And what is the context behind me doing that?

    1) First poster is demanding we always answer his questions, but refused to answer a single one of our questions.

    2) Second poster is a rereg who constantly posts nothing but lies, nonsense or drivel and who has been banned from this thread.

    Now, who is the childish one? How about you contribute to the thread by discussing Biden's policies rather than being faux outraged?

    Why respond to some obvious trolls. Im not faux outraged i dont do that ****.


  • #4205
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Why respond to some obvious trolls. Im not faux outraged i dont do that ****.

    Well if they are such obvious trolls, why do you not seem upset with them too? Why do you consider them an obvious troll and not me?


  • #4206
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Well if they are such obvious trolls, why do you not seem upset with them too? Why do you consider them an obvious troll and not me?

    Your account is here years so your obviously not a troll. One account is named real Donald trump, its obvious hes trolling.


  • Advertisement
  • #4207
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Your account is here years so your obviously not a troll. One account is named real Donald trump, its obvious hes trolling.

    If someone's username is a celebrity, they are definitely a troll and can never be just a fan?

    If you wish to be constructive, why don't you respond to the discussion between y0ssar1an22 and I rather than backseat modding?


  • #4208
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    If someone's username is a celebrity, they are definitely a troll and can never be just a fan?

    If you wish to be constructive, why don't you respond to the discussion between y0ssar1an22 and I rather than backseat modding?

    IMO a troll. Nope not getting involved. I bid ye good night.


  • #4209
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    IMO a troll. Nope not getting involved. I bid ye good night.

    Thank you for being so constructive in this thread, I have learned so much about Joe Biden's presidency from you. Perhaps stick to Facebook next time you get that urge to feel superior.


  • #4210
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Thank you for being so constructive in this thread, I have learned so much about Joe Biden's presidency from you. Perhaps stick to Facebook next time you get that urge to feel superior.

    Me feel superior, your lack of self awareness is mind boggling, im not the one saying to posters "im proud of you" "will i take you by the hand". Your posting since 8:35am yesterday. You seriously need a break, you come across as a very angry individual.


  • #4211
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Me feel superior, your lack of self awareness is mind boggling, im not the one saying to posters "im proud of you" "will i take you by the hand". Your posting since 8:35am yesterday. You seriously need a break, you come across as a very angry individual.

    Wow, you really do not seem to understand the idea that people go on the internet at different times of the day or can have a tab open while they are at work. I find that interesting.

    And yes, you are backseat modding and have contributed nothing to the thread. And yes, I must be the angry individual of the two of us, which is why I burst into this thread with nothing to say except telling people want they should or should not do. There is one of us who is condescending, and there is one of us that is angry. I'll let you figure out which way that goes.

    And the fact that you said good night but still replied also suggests that you have to get the last word in.

    Thank you for your time.


  • Advertisement
  • #4212
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Wow, you really do not seem to understand the idea that people go on the internet at different times of the day or can have a tab open while they are at work. I find that interesting.

    And yes, you are backseat modding and have contributed nothing to the thread. And yes, I must be the angry individual of the two of us, which is why I burst into this thread with nothing to say except telling people want they should or should not do. There is one of us who is condescending, and there is one of us that is angry. I'll let you figure out which way that goes.

    And the fact that you said good night but still replied also suggests that you have to get the last word in.

    Thank you for your time.

    Yes i maybe backseat modding but you need to be called out for your passive aggressive posting. Its quite clear its you who is the angry and condescending one. Im just pointing it out. Im here until 8am at work so i will reply if i want to. Its quite obvious you try to always have the last word, you are constantly on this thread. See " I'll Let you figure it out", again with the condescension, its all over your posts and you cant even see it.


  • #4213
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Yes i maybe backseat modding but you need to be called out for your passive aggressive posting.

    That's not for you to decide. If that's the case, report my posts and the mods will deal with it. That will then give you time to discuss Joe Biden's presidency.

    Also, I would strongly recommend not admitting to backseat modding. That's a big no no.
    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Im here until 8am at work so i will reply if i want to.

    Oh great. I can walk you through why my condescending tone is justified.

    Real Donald Trump suggested at least five times that no one has answered his question. URL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565615"]1[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565559"]2[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565528"]3[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116564999"]4[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116564814"]5[/URL

    Instead, I have answered his question (at least twice) as have others. Not only that, but he has acknowledged that he has received his answer several times.

    So why do you believe that a condescending tone is not justified when addressing this poster, a poster who constantly completely ignores what you are saying?


  • #4214
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    That's not for you to decide. If that's the case, report my posts and the mods will deal with it. That will then give you time to discuss Joe Biden's presidency.

    Also, I would strongly recommend not admitting to backseat modding. That's a big no no.



    Oh great. I can walk you through why my condescending tone is justified.

    Real Donald Trump suggested at least five times that no one has answered his question. URL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565615"]1[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565559"]2[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116565528"]3[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116564999"]4[/URLURL="https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=116564814"]5[/URL

    Instead, I have answered his question (at least twice) as have others. Not only that, but he has acknowledged that he has received his answer several times.

    So why do you believe that a condescending tone is not justified when addressing this poster, a poster who constantly completely ignores what you are saying?


    If a poster constantly ignores what you are saying, do the sensible thing and ignore them. In real life i avoid people i find condescending, on here i try to ignore it but hey im bored at work so said i would waste a couple of hours. you clearly post accurate stuff so i just don't think you need the added extras to get your point across. look i hope we can agree to disagree so, no point endless back and forth on here at this hour.


  • #4215
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    If a poster constantly ignores what you are saying, do the sensible thing and ignore them. In real life i avoid people i find condescending, on here i try to ignore it but hey im bored at work so said i would waste a couple of hours. you clearly post accurate stuff so i just don't think you need the added extras to get your point across. look i hope we can agree to disagree so, no point endless back and forth on here at this hour.

    That is a fair comment. :)

    Just to clarify, you do however agree that, if I did stupidly decide to keep replying to this poster, that my condescending tone is justified based on the above?


  • #4216
    newhouse87
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Deleted User wrote: »
    That is a fair comment. :)

    Just to clarify, you do however agree that, if I did stupidly decide to keep replying to this poster, that my condescending tone is justified based on the above?

    Yeah man i get that. My point is you are smarter than that, you dont need it. time for some Netflix to finish this night shift. Good night.


  • #4217
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    newhouse87 wrote: »
    Yeah man i get that. My point is you are smarter than that, you done need it. time for some Netflix to finish this night shift. Good night.

    Not as smart as you seem to think. Have a good one.


  • #4218
    Tell me how
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,152 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Quantum Baloney wrote: »
    74M voted for Trump 4 months ago.
    Since then he has;

    [*]Tried to claim victory -- Biden is a weak candidate, dangerous to leave power in his hands when the plausibility of voter fraud was high

    [*]Refused to accept defeat -- Same as above

    [*]Blocked his admin from carrying out an orderly transfer of power -- Same as above

    [*]Brought 60+ cases to court in an attempt to over turn the election, all of which were thrown out -- Legally entitled to call into question shenanigans by the Democrats.

    [*]Tried to strong arm State officers to prevent them certifying the results -- untrue

    [*]Tried to coerce state officials in to 'finding' just enough votes so as to mean that he won the election in Georgia -- untrue

    [*]Incited a crowd to storm the Captiol and carry out an insurrection -- untrue, please don't be a history revisionist

    [*]told the people that had done that he loved them -- Trump is the most widely loved president in the last hundred years in America

    [*]Crawled away from the White House with his tail between his legs -- Your fantasies are not reality

    [*]Didn't attend the inauguration -- Camilla/Biden are gangsters and weak candidates

    [*]Is still trying to stay relevant by releasing statements related to the current administration -- Trump will be the next president of the USA if Joe survives his term

    Genuine question, do you believe this tripe?

    It has no grounding in reality.


  • #4219
    Tokyo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,655 ✭✭✭✭Tokyo


    Real Donald Trump wrote: »
    It's obvious his handlers don't want Biden in a room without teleprompter. You can't rehearse, when dealing with the media :rolleyes:
    Real Donald Trump wrote: »
    Did he write that down on the card he carries?
    Real Donald Trump wrote: »
    I'm asking the same question, ****ing it up, even when reading from a teleprompter
    Real Donald Trump wrote: »
    FFS his own people even cut him off
    Real Donald Trump wrote: »
    Biden still won't take questions without a teleprompter? answer that please, face the American public, stop shying away

    Mod: @Real Donald Trump - you seem to think you're circumventing the initial mod warning of making references such as "Sleepy Joe" etc. You're not. Don't post in the thread again.


  • #4220
    Faugheen
    Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    The ‘Biden is a weak candidate’ nonsense again.

    Such bollocks. Biden is one of the best candidates the Democrats have had in the last 60 years.

    JFK
    Johnson
    Humphrey
    McGovern
    Carter
    Mondale
    Dukakis
    Bill Clinton
    Al Gore
    Kerry
    Obama
    Hillary
    Biden

    How many of those 13 people since the 1960 election were better candidates than Biden?

    JFK, Bill and Obama. That’s it.

    Weak candidate my arse. He convinced voters to do so by Mail-in, which led to his victory. Whether they were voting for him or against Trump, they listened to him.


  • #4221
    Cody montana
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Faugheen wrote: »
    The ‘Biden is a weak candidate’ nonsense again.

    Such bollocks. Biden is one of the best candidates the Democrats have had in the last 60 years.

    JFK
    Johnson
    Humphrey
    McGovern
    Carter
    Mondale
    Dukakis
    Bill Clinton
    Al Gore
    Kerry
    Obama
    Hillary
    Biden

    How many of those 13 people since the 1960 election were better candidates than Biden?

    JFK, Bill and Obama. That’s it.

    Weak candidate my arse. He convinced voters to do so by Mail-in, which led to his victory. Whether they were voting for him or against Trump, they listened to him.

    Highest amount of votes in US history.
    For someone in his late 70s.
    Not bad.


  • Advertisement
  • #4222
    Faugheen
    Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Highest amount of votes in US history.
    For someone in his late 70s.
    Not bad.

    It’s just a buzzword really, isn’t it?

    Absolutely zero basis for it. He’s one of the best they’ve ever had.


  • #4223
    Professor Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Faugheen wrote: »
    It’s just a buzzword really, isn’t it?

    Absolutely zero basis for it. He’s one of the best they’ve ever had.

    Even if he's not, who cares? What is infinitely more important is the policies he and his administration are pushing through.


  • #4224
    eagle eye
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,875 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Faugheen wrote:
    Such bollocks. Biden is one of the best candidates the Democrats have had in the last 60 years.
    He's been impressive as POTUS. He didn't look like a great candidate before the election in fairness right up until the second debate.
    He won the election but not by landslide which suggests he didn't impress beforehand but if he continues what he's been doing to this point and goes for a second term I think he'll win by landslide.


  • #4225
    Faugheen
    Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    eagle eye wrote: »
    He's been impressive as POTUS. He didn't look like a great candidate before the election in fairness right up until the second debate.
    He won the election but not by landslide which suggests he didn't impress beforehand but if he continues what he's been doing to this point and goes for a second term I think he'll win by landslide.

    Most votes ever, a large portion through the method he encouraged.

    That’s quite a strong candidate to me who people listened to.


  • #4226
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    eagle eye wrote: »
    He's been impressive as POTUS. He didn't look like a great candidate before the election in fairness right up until the second debate.
    He won the election but not by landslide which suggests he didn't impress beforehand but if he continues what he's been doing to this point and goes for a second term I think he'll win by landslide.

    Wow, that's fairly optimistic, a second term? I genuinely can't see him finishing out his first term


  • #4227
    salmocab
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,722 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Wow, that's fairly optimistic, a second term? I genuinely can't see him finishing out his first term

    Why not?


  • #4228
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    salmocab wrote: »
    Why not?

    Everything I see from him shows serious cognitive decline.


  • #4229
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,893 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Everything I see from him shows serious cognitive decline.

    Are you a mental health expert? Were you concerned about the previous POTUS cognitive decline?


  • #4230
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Everything I see from him shows serious cognitive decline.

    What about the "getting **** done" to you is a signal of cognitive decline?


  • Advertisement
  • #4231
    Professor Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Are you a mental health expert? Were you concerned about the previous POTUS cognitive decline?

    I'm not a mental health expert but I have a friend who is. She said that the previous incumbent has textbook Narcissistic Personality Disorder which drove his terrible presidency.


Advertisement