Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part IX *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

1161162164166167328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    PeterPan92 wrote: »
    Level 3 worked. People were able to go out enough that it was beneficial for mental health, while not having the huge impact on numbers that Level 2 during December.

    Nah sorry, but you have it wrong. We were also at level 3 for December.

    The idea that any level simply works or doesn't work is false anyway.
    The messaging that goes along with changes in levels is equally if not more important. Certainly when the restrictions are unenforced, as opposed to enforced via closure.
    And then there's other important factors such as weather to consider too.

    There's no perfect set of restrictions. It's a fluid situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭PeterPan92


    Nah sorry, but you have it wrong. We were also at level 3 for December.

    The idea that any level simply works or doesn't work is false anyway.
    The messaging that goes along with changes in levels is equally if not more important. Certainly when the restrictions are unenforced, as opposed to enforced via closure.
    And then there's other important factors such as weather to consider too.

    There's no perfect set of restrictions. It's a fluid situation.
    Well, something has to give come April 5th. People aren't going to go along with this indefinitely. They have no plan for reopening, no structure like the UK have. Just "stay in lockdown for another 5 weeks and we will reassess".

    If this goes on, those idiots protesting will keep on doing so, and I fear that they will gain more support. We need structure and hope now, not a neverending groundhog day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭Russman


    We did, but it was pretty short lived. If we do the same this summer, but earlier, I'll personally be happy enough.

    I agree, and I think it will be much "better" this summer than last year tbh, with no sting in the tail autumn wave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    More than 100,000 have died of Covid-19 in Italy
    Italy's coronavirus death toll passed the 100,000 mark on Monday and Prime Minister Mario Draghi warned that the situation was worsening again with a jump in hospitalisations. Italy is the seventh country in the world to reach the bleak milestone, following the United States, Brazil, Mexico, India, Russia and Britain

    Lockdown by next week? These are the new Covid restrictions Italy is considering


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,025 ✭✭✭growleaves


    PeterPan92 wrote: »
    Well, something has to give come April 5th. People aren't going to go along with this indefinitely. They have no plan for reopening, no structure like the UK have. Just "stay in lockdown for another 5 weeks and we will reassess".

    If this goes on, those idiots protesting will keep on doing so, and I fear that they will gain more support. We need structure and hope now, not a neverending groundhog day.

    We went to Level 3 for three weeks and supporters of restrictions have been dining out on it ever since.

    There's talk of more lockdowns this Autumn and into 2022.

    I have no doubt that restrictionists will be using 3-5 weeks of Level 3 in mid-summer to try to justify another half-year of Level 5 and the cancellation of next Christmas.

    If the strategy is maxmium lock-up, maximum indebtedness and zero flexibility then yes of course people are going to object and protest.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    PeterPan92 wrote: »
    Well, something has to give come April 5th. People aren't going to go along with this indefinitely. They have no plan for reopening, no structure like the UK have. Just "stay in lockdown for another 5 weeks and we will reassess".

    If this goes on, those idiots protesting will keep on doing so, and I fear that they will gain more support. We need structure and hope now, not a neverending groundhog day.

    I completely understand your sentiment, but unfortunately we're leading the way when it comes to figuring out how best to deal with the B117 variant.
    There are not many countries we can learn from, so we have to proceed very cautiously.

    At the moment we're testing the waters with schools. If that goes well (or if it goes well in England), then I think they can start to be a little more forthcoming with plans and dates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,656 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    The czech republic is one of those strange ones I alluded to earlier this month when I calculated the death rate as a % of the entire population and over 65s

    They have 10.65 million and an adult population over 65 of 2.1m

    Theyve had 22,000 death - 92.4 % of them in over 65s which is 20328 deaths in over 65s.

    Their % of the population as a % of the lot has a death rate of 0.2% - elsewhere its 0.08%

    In over 65s its 0.95% of the over 65s have died - elsewhere its 0.52 - 0.6%

    When you look at it this way they are in a fairly bad state.

    They do have very high male obesity rates, the most dangerous conditions for Covid complications. That may have an impact, but it wouldn’t explain the massive death rate

    https://content.sciendo.com/configurable/contentpage/journals$002fcejpp$002fahead-of-print$002farticle-10.2478-cejpp-2019-00010$002farticle-10.2478-cejpp-2019-00010.xml
    The Czech Republic has a significant and increasing trend in BMI and obesity for both men and women, which is shown in Figure 2. Men have much higher level of BMI in comparison to other groups of European countries, whereas BMI of women is comparable to that of those in Estonia and Slovenia (East)
    In 2015, the obesity rate for Czech men is 35%, which is almost twice as higher as that for men in Italy and Spain (South) and more than 50% higher than that for men in West.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Klonker wrote: »
    Only one metric but did any other EU country not open pubs at all last summer? For some reason I doubt it. During the same period Ireland had some of the lowest covid rates in the EU.

    One other European 'country' didn't open pubs last summer. In fact their 'wet' pubs have been closed for longer than ours.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, Getdown Services, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,544 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Saw a clip of MM RTE interview and as per usual the easing is down to NPHET advice and we know that won't want to much easing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭Russman


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    Saw a clip of MM RTE interview and as per usual the easing is down to NPHET advice and we know that won't want to much easing

    I dunno, to be fair the last good number of NPHET briefings have been very positive. I think we might be surprised what opens in April.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,544 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Russman wrote: »
    I dunno, to be fair the last good number of NPHET briefings have been very positive. I think we might be surprised what opens in April.

    Dr Tony has to come back and we all knw the massive impact he made upon his first return. Personally think he should step down due to his personal situation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭the kelt


    Russman wrote: »
    I dunno, to be fair the last good number of NPHET briefings have been very positive. I think we might be surprised what opens in April.

    We might even end up with a flip where NPHET are the optimistic ones and the Government are there "oh i dont know now!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭Elessar


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    Dr Tony has to come back and we all knw the massive impact he made upon his first return. Personally think he should step down due to his personal situation

    NAIL > HEAD

    Just wait until headmaster Tony gets back. There will be a noticeable change of tone towards more restrictions, less positivity. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if he immediately changed NPHETs tack to maximum level 5 until May/June.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭Klonker


    Penfailed wrote: »
    One other European 'country' didn't open pubs last summer. In fact their 'wet' pubs have been closed for longer than ours.

    Which country was that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,046 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    Saw a clip of MM RTE interview and as per usual the easing is down to NPHET advice and we know that won't want to much easing

    MM is such a weak leader. Total waste of space. Only covering his own rear end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,503 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    JDxtra wrote: »
    MM is such a weak leader. Total waste of space. Only covering his own rear end.

    ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 860 ✭✭✭OwenM


    JDxtra wrote: »
    MM is such a weak leader. Total waste of space. Only covering his own rear end.


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinio...-31005407.html

    "He too was accused of being indecisive as a minister, ordering too many reports.
    It emerged in 2004 that more than €30m was spent by Martin on 115 reports while he was at the Department of Health.
    Martin was accused of wasting millions in taxpayers' money after the figures were confirmed by the Health Minister, Ms Harney."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-new...-36479981.html

    "former Fianna Fáil minister Pat Carey said of Martin's last term in government: "He can't make a decision, and won't make a decision, and he analyses everything to the point of almost having to bring in a consultant to analyse his analysis.""


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 860 ✭✭✭OwenM


    OwenM wrote: »
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinio...-31005407.html

    "He too was accused of being indecisive as a minister, ordering too many reports.
    It emerged in 2004 that more than €30m was spent by Martin on 115 reports while he was at the Department of Health.
    Martin was accused of wasting millions in taxpayers' money after the figures were confirmed by the Health Minister, Ms Harney."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-new...-36479981.html

    "former Fianna Fáil minister Pat Carey said of Martin's last term in government: "He can't make a decision, and won't make a decision, and he analyses everything to the point of almost having to bring in a consultant to analyse his analysis.""

    48 months as Minister for health, 115 reports. That's around one report every 6 weeks, throwing wheelbarrow loads of taxpayers money at consultancies just so he can avoid making a decision and when one does have to be made it is someone else's fault. He's pathetic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    This was amazingly accurate


    https://twitter.com/ZubyMusic/status/1369299906586935302

    If you posted this anywhere last year, you'd be meet with howls of: "nonsense", "lunatic", "conspiracy theorist". The man on the street is nearly always wiser than all the supposed intellectuals who are slaves to the opinions of "experts"

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    TomTomTim wrote: »
    This was amazingly accurate


    https://twitter.com/ZubyMusic/status/1369299906586935302

    If you posted this anywhere last year, you'd be meet with howls of: "nonsense", "lunatic", "conspiracy theorist". The man on the street is nearly always wiser than all the supposed intellectuals who are slaves to the opinions of "experts"

    So it's a global conspiracy to stop us working, and thereby become...

    *checks notes*

    ...slaves?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    TomTomTim wrote: »
    This was amazingly accurate


    https://twitter.com/ZubyMusic/status/1369299906586935302

    If you posted this anywhere last year, you'd be meet with howls of: "nonsense", "lunatic", "conspiracy theorist". The man on the street is nearly always wiser than all the supposed intellectuals who are slaves to the opinions of "experts"

    Another advert for why long term steroid use is bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭Riodej1578




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    https://twitter.com/ClaireByrneLive/status/1369052409859895305

    Well it seems hard to refute any longer, it is becoming increasingly evident that there is a significant amount of the population who are not just accepting but supportive of restrictions of varying severity continuing indefinitely without any strong reason for them to be there, and really no positive news is going to change their minds. By the time significantly more than 50% of the population are vaccineted, hospitalisations will be negligent, and deaths will be almost zero, and the population is well aware of that. It is simply impossible to justify the response in the poll above unless RTE coverage of the pandemic has seriously driven sanity off the deep end even among young people , but I think the only explanation is unfortunately that many people are prioritising whatever convenience/personal benefits gained during restrictions in favour of reopening of society, ignorant or inconsiderate of the impact it will have on so many other people.

    Whatever the reason, it's pretty scary. How will we ever find a way out given this, the vaccine seemed to be our way out of this but when almost half of Irish people are seemingly loving the current set up, and as we know it's the cautious portion of the population who are listened to under these circumstances, well then it doesn't seem they will allow full return to normality until every last man, woman and child on the island is vaccinated. This will take a very long time, not to the mention this green pass system that will inevitably be put in place and put life on hold for young unvaccinated people for even longer.
    It also makes me think the whole zero covid thing so many people supported was just a ploy, they knew how unfeasible it was but wanted an excuse to maintain restrictions for far longer than they needed to be there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    wakka12 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/ClaireByrneLive/status/1369052409859895305

    Well it seems hard to refute any longer, it is becoming increasingly evident that there is a significant amount of the population who are not just accepting but supportive of restrictions of varying severity continuing indefinitely without any strong reason for them to be there, and really no positive news is going to change their minds. By the time significantly more than 50% of the population are vaccineted, hospitalisations will be negligent, and deaths will be almost zero, and the population is well aware of that. It is simply impossible to justify the response in the poll above unless RTE coverage of the pandemic has seriously driven sanity off the deep end even among young people , but I think the only explanation is unfortunately that many people are prioritising whatever convenience/personal benefits gained during restrictions in favour of reopening of society, ignorant or inconsiderate of the impact it will have on so many other people.

    Whatever the reason, it's pretty scary. How will we ever find a way out given this, the vaccine seemed to be our way out of this but when almost half of Irish people are seemingly loving the current set up, and as we know it's the cautious portion of the population who are listened to under these circumstances, well then it doesn't seem they will allow full return to normality until every last man, woman and child on the island is vaccinated. This will take a very long time, not to the mention this green pass system that will inevitably be put in place and put life on hold for young unvaccinated people for even longer.
    It also makes me think the whole zero covid thing so many people supported was just a ploy, they knew how unfeasible it was but wanted an excuse to maintain restrictions for far longer than they needed to be there.

    Can you point out where in the survey question the word "indefinitely" appears?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,046 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    wakka12 wrote: »
    I'd like to know who they have on this panel. Is it slanted to skew results or cause shock?

    This actual question should have been put to ONLY those who would have had an interest in attending music festivals. These results are meaningless if most of the respondents have no interest anyways.

    CB Live again, bloody joke of a show now at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    JDxtra wrote: »
    I'd like to know who they have on this panel. Is it slanted to skew results or cause shock?

    This actual question should have been put to ONLY those who would have had an interest in attending music festivals.

    Even if it skews older all those older people know they will be safe and well from COVID by the time summer festivals roll around and they know young people are not affected so the poll result is disturbing no matter what way you look at it.

    And as for the indefinite question well who knows how many more delays there will be and the optimistic goal for 'large majority' vaccinated is early Autumn 2021 so another 7 months away, 7 months of restrictions on livelihoods of people in entertainment and hospitality and leisure for young people. Seeing as we know by then with only the young healthy still needing to be vaccinated, probably with waning desire for vaccine uptake by that point due to lack of need as they don't suffer major effects anyway and just general disillusionment and anger, how could that not constitute indefinite support for completely unnecessary restrictions at that point. It is completely absurd and indefensible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    JDxtra wrote: »
    I'd like to know who they have on this panel. Is it slanted to skew results or cause shock?

    This actual question should have been put to ONLY those who would have had an interest in attending music festivals. These results are meaningless if most of the respondents have no interest anyways.

    CB Live again, bloody joke of a show now at this stage.

    You are guaranteed to sully the data if you narrow the subset in that way.

    It also doesn't guarantee a different result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    Micheál on the news smiling like a simp applauding the vaccine rollout despite it being an absolute unmerciful disaster. Did he hit his head recently or??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    One of thresholds for easing restrictions according to The WHO is two weeks of a positivity rate of 5% or lower in testing

    7-day day positivity is 3.8% today last Tuesday it was 4.2%


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,025 ✭✭✭growleaves


    One of thresholds for easing restrictions according to The WHO is two weeks of a positivity rate of 5% or lower in testing

    7-day day positivity is 3.8% today last Tuesday it was 4.2%

    Despite people's impressions, seeming objective criteria has far less meaning in this 'crisis' than they think.

    We'll be nearer to a return to a normal way of life when we stop hearing the word "cautious".

    There always reasons, excuses, justifications to be scared in life.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement