Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIII-231,484 ROI(4,610 deaths)116,197 NI (2,107 deaths)(23/03)Read OP

1136137139141142326

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭Dermot224


    Really time to start opening up. 5km should be scrapped immediately and construction reopened.

    From what I can see,construction is open all over the place. LOTS of people ignoring the 5k rule. I have to travel for work and on about 10 trips from Dublin to Wexford/ Waterford areas in the last mont or so I have only been stopped once at a checkpoint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,627 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas



    Not at all. The government will use that scapegoat for as long as possible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,467 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Positive briefing there from Prof Nolan, says the rate of decrease has accelerated again in the last 14-21 days compared to earlier in Feb


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Vicxas wrote: »
    Not at all. The government will use that scapegoat for as long as possible

    It can't be used when it's not true.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Christ it's the same questions every week at this press briefing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭Dermot224


    687 last monday the 1st
    686 the previous monday the 22nd
    821 the previous monday the 15th

    Good figures so. Let's hope they keep going in the right direction


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Positive briefing there from Prof Nolan, says the rate of decrease has accelerated again in the last 14-21 days compared to earlier in Feb

    Wonder if the plateau was related to the increased testing of close contacts?


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    This question about buying oversupply of the vaccine again.

    It’s really not rocket science as to why we’re buying more than we need.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭Klonker


    Christ it's the same questions every week at this press briefing.

    I haven't watched one in ages. What sort of questions do they be asking?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    Klonker wrote: »
    I haven't watched one in ages. What sort of questions do they be asking?

    I've got a question. How dare you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    It can't be used when it's not true.

    Weren't we running on a pre determined timetable at the time? Cases rising before restrictions lifting is evidence that the population was acting ahead of the government (shut what harm will me doing this do??) The "be grand" attitude strikes again.
    If anything is taught the government to keep the population in the dark for as long as possible, simply because a huge proportion of people cannot behave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Klonker wrote: »
    I haven't watched one in ages. What sort of questions do they be asking?

    Why aren't we doing antigen testing.
    Where will be in two weeks.
    Why did we buy so many vaccines.
    When will x be vaccinated.
    How is the priority groups for vaccinations being set up.
    When will we know when we are opening up.

    The questions I've already seen today that I've heard last time I watched one of these.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    7 day average in cases for every Monday this year.

    8/3 - 487
    1/3 - 654
    22/2 - 773
    15/2 - 862
    8/2 - 991
    1/2 - 1244
    25/1 - 2018
    18/1 - 3201
    11/1 - 6370
    4/1 - 3015


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Weren't we running on a pre determined timetable at the time? Cases rising before restrictions lifting is evidence that the population was acting ahead of the government (shut what harm will me doing this do??) The "be grand" attitude strikes again.
    If anything is taught the government to keep the population in the dark for as long as possible, simply because a huge proportion of people cannot behave.
    Changing the narrative to suit new information? lol.
    To think you accused another poster of being a circus employee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Changing the narrative to suit new information? lol.
    To think you accused another poster of being a circus employee.

    Changing what narrative? It's not the first time I've said that the population are ahead of the government regulations and that's why we can't get dates for loosening

    It's also evidence that people were going to do whatever they wanted at Christmas

    Yeah and that guy was a clown for suggesting that we were under house arrest. FFS, hyperbole of the highest order.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    7 day average in cases for every Monday this year.

    8/3 - 487
    1/3 - 654
    22/2 - 773
    15/2 - 862
    8/2 - 991
    1/2 - 1244
    25/1 - 2018
    18/1 - 3201
    11/1 - 6370
    4/1 - 3015

    if it went about

    15/3 - 350
    22/3 - 220
    29/3 - 160

    Obviously schools are the wild card here but we would be about okay to let us start moving again in April even though we know the government (rather than NPHET I suspect) will cast as dark a cloud as they can lest they "do the wrong thing" (in their own minds) again. It could be their reaction to the Christmas **** up that keeps us lockdown rather than the actual case load.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Positive briefing there from Prof Nolan, says the rate of decrease has accelerated again in the last 14-21 days compared to earlier in Feb


    Did he mention the R0 number?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Changing what narrative? It's not the first time I've said that the population are ahead of the government regulations and that's why we can't get dates for loosening

    It's also evidence that people were going to do whatever they wanted at Christmas

    No you are claiming it's evidence that's your opinion nothing else. Anyway I'm not replying further to you as you incapable of polite exchange as evidenced by your behaviour towards another poster today. Hopefully the mods will examine your posting history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,733 ✭✭✭thebiglad


    if it went about

    15/3 - 350
    22/3 - 220
    29/3 - 160

    Obviously schools are the wild card here but we would be about okay to let us start moving again in April even though we know the government (rather than NPHET I suspect) will cast as dark a cloud as they can lest they "do the wrong thing" (in their own minds) again. It could be their reaction to the Christmas **** up that keeps us lockdown rather than the actual case load.

    Probably as important now is to overlay the hospital/ICU numbers as these are also dropping fast and that is more of an indicator of progress - in another 3 weeks a large portion of 'vulnerable' persons will have received at least their 1st vaccination (which we know from UK has a high protection on its own) so, arguably by April they should find it harder to make excuses to maintain the lockdown (that's not to say they won't try - UK variant etc is on standby to keep us in).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    No you are claiming it's evidence that's your opinion nothing else. Anyway I'm not replying further to you as you incapable of polite exchange as evidenced by your behaviour towards another poster today. Hopefully the mods will examine your posting history.

    Report my posts if you have a problem with them. Thx :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Back from a badly needed break

    Slide1.jpg
    Slide2.jpg
    Slide3.jpg
    Slide4.jpg
    Slide5.jpg
    Slide6.jpg
    Slide7.jpg
    Slide8.jpg
    Slide9.jpg
    Slide10.jpg
    Slide12.jpg
    Slide13.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Did he mention the R0 number?

    They only mention that on Thursday.

    One of the journalists trying to spread the narrative that the covid vaccine causes male infertility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    if it went about

    15/3 - 350
    22/3 - 220
    29/3 - 160

    Obviously schools are the wild card here but we would be about okay to let us start moving again in April even though we know the government (rather than NPHET I suspect) will cast as dark a cloud as they can lest they "do the wrong thing" (in their own minds) again. It could be their reaction to the Christmas **** up that keeps us lockdown rather than the actual case load.

    If the progress continues on these weekly case loads, those in hospital decrease and the positivity in testing stays well below 5% we should be in a position to move into level 4 restrictions for April 5th.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Pathologist has sadly confirmed that those 4 still births from last week were as a result of covid-19.

    I presume there will be posters here apologising for their posting that called the guarded cautious statement from Glynn as scaremongering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,291 ✭✭✭✭Arghus



    I think this has already been covered previously on the thread. AFAIK the date of November 22nd is more to do with how HIQA picks a date where it determines one phase of the pandemic to be over and for the next one to have begun - i.e, for reporting purposes and surveillance the second wave ended on November 21st. November 22nd was the start of the next reporting period, but it doesn't mean that in real terms the actual third wave began on that date - cases still fell from where they were on the 22nd of November until the beginning of December. Cases were 318 on November 22nd, on December 3rd it was 183.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Interesting that Glynn is now pleased with 48% feeling the worst of the pandemic is behind us. Such attitudes have been rebuked in the past!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    7 day average in cases for every Monday this year.

    8/3 - 487
    1/3 - 654
    22/2 - 773
    15/2 - 862
    8/2 - 991
    1/2 - 1244
    25/1 - 2018
    18/1 - 3201
    11/1 - 6370
    4/1 - 3015


    Decrease in 7 day average from prior week:
    • 8/3 (Today) - 26%
    • 1/3 - 15%
    • 22/2 - 10%
    • 15/2 - 13%
    • 8/2 - 20%
    • 1/2 - 38%
    • 25/1 - 37%
    • 18/1 - 50%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Interesting that Glynn is now pleased with 48% feeling the worst of the pandemic is behind us. Such attitudes have been rebuked in the past!

    George Lee was worth 52% of the vote


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 903 ✭✭✭big syke


    Pathologist has sadly confirmed that those 4 still births from last week were as a result of covid-19.

    I presume there will be posters here apologising for their posting that called the guarded cautious statement from Glynn as scaremongering.

    Was that actually said? Big news if so...


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement