Joe Biden Presidency thread Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21

04-03-2021 05:06PM

stefanovich wrote: »

Giving 400 million dollars to the #1 sponsor of terrorism is sane?

Since it was a 40 year dispute that the US were gonna lose before the Hague, it was the best choice. Losing that case would have cost them ten billion dollars....

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 05:06PM

stefanovich wrote: »

Giving 400 million dollars to the #1 sponsor of terrorism is sane?

I think you will find the #1 sponsor of terrorism is Saudi Arabia, they don't get money though, they just spend billions on war machines.

Thankfully Biden has put a stop to that.

Cody montana · 04-03-2021 05:13PM

stefanovich wrote: »

Giving 400 million dollars to the #1 sponsor of terrorism is sane?

You are very uninformed.

04-03-2021 05:58PM

stefanovich wrote: »

Does being better on Iran include bombing their proxies in Syria?

As others have said you probably would have been a big fan of these bombings in the Trump era. And, no the US shouldn’t have destabilised the place in the first place.

Iran, or Hezbollah, was actually fighting ISIS in Syria.

CtevenSrowder · 04-03-2021 06:13PM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

sure. that would really fit in with your posting history.

I guess humour isn't allowed on the thread so:rolleyes:

04-03-2021 07:58PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So pretty much the same as every president since WW2? Can you show me your posts where you criticised the last administration for thier stance on Israel?

You are right about the post war US stance on Israel
(actually post 1963) but why is trump still being mentioned in this thread?

04-03-2021 08:04PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So pretty much the same as every president since WW2? Can you show me your posts where you criticised the last administration for thier stance on Israel?

I will say this again.

I am a socialist. You're not going to tie me up on Trump fever.

Can you explain to me why your boy is continuing Trump's policies, including keeping the embassy in Jerusalem?

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 08:06PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

You are right about the post war US stance on Israel
(actually post 1963) but why is trump still being mentioned in this thread?

Probably for the same reason Biden gets mentioned in the Trump thread. By the way I said last administration not Trump.

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 08:08PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I will say this again.

I am a socialist. You're not going to tie me up on Trump fever.

Can you explain to me why your boy is continuing Trump's policies, including keeping the embassy in Jerusalem?

Not my boy, I didn't vote for him. He probably has other things to sort at home first, ya know...the 500,000 and rising from covid, the unrest still going on over the attempted coup, trying to get stimulus packages and such passed so poor people can feed thier kids and other important things.

04-03-2021 08:10PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Not my boy, I didn't vote for him. He probably has other things to sort at home first, ya know...the 500,000 and rising from covid, the unrest still going on over the attempted coup, trying to get stimulus packages and such passed so poor people can feed thier kids and other important things.

The stimulus package that's he trying to cull the number of qualifying Americans from?

shtpEdthePlum · 04-03-2021 08:13PM

Lads is there a president in the US at the moment, I heard whittering about "teachers will be prioritised for vaccines" this week, but honestly I've hardly heard a peep out of that side of the world all month. It's been blissful.

Not to be naïve, I know there's always shenanigans. But no dramatic headlines involving the US which signal an apocalyptic-level atrocity for a full month is pretty nice after the last half a decade.

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 08:14PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

The stimulus package that's he trying to cull the number of qualifying Americans from?

Is it him personally? Or is it members of his administration?

04-03-2021 08:24PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Is it him personally? Or is it members of his administration?

It's both.

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 08:24PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

It's both.

Can you show me quotes from Biden stating this?

Curse These Metal Hands · 04-03-2021 08:27PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Can you show me quotes from Biden stating this?

Are you suggesting his administration is acting against his will?

Timberrrrrrrr · 04-03-2021 08:32PM

Curse These Metal Hands wrote: »

Are you suggesting his administration is acting against his will?

You made a claim, the onus is on you to back that claim up with evidence. If you can't produce evidence for your claim then I and others will believe that you made the claim up out of thin air.

04-03-2021 08:39PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Probably for the same reason Biden gets mentioned in the Trump thread. By the way I said last administration not Trump.

Not similar and not an answer either. The similarity would be if Obama was being mentioned in the Trump thread.

But Trump... is going to wear thin after a while.

04-03-2021 08:45PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

You made a claim, the onus is on you to back that claim up with evidence. If you can't produce evidence for your claim then I and others will believe that you made the claim up out of thin air.

There are no cheques. If they do come, millions will be left short.

Cody montana · 04-03-2021 08:52PM

Deleted User wrote: »

There are no cheques. If they do come, millions will be left short.

You mean the wealthy won't get a cheque?
Good!

astrofool · 04-03-2021 08:53PM

Deleted User wrote: »

I will say this again.

I am a socialist. You're not going to tie me up on Trump fever.

Can you explain to me why your boy is continuing Trump's policies, including keeping the embassy in Jerusalem?

As a socialist, can you please outline your solution for the Middle East, including Israel and Palestine.

Yeah_Right · 04-03-2021 08:54PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Another doozy from the Buddy Biden administration

https://twitter.com/SecBlinken/status/1367287375701938180

I don't see what the problem is with the US supporting Israel. I think it's a good thing and long may it continue.

everlast75 · 04-03-2021 09:02PM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

But Trump... is going to wear thin after a while.

Isn't he still the president.... Really???

I mean Joe cheated, didn't he?

Curse These Metal Hands · 04-03-2021 10:24PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

You made a claim, the onus is on you to back that claim up with evidence. If you can't produce evidence for your claim then I and others will believe that you made the claim up out of thin air.

I didn't make any claim.

silverharp · 05-03-2021 10:24AM

oh dear Pelosi needs to go

https://twitter.com/mbracemoore/status/1367488052285878278

Professor Moriarty · 05-03-2021 10:32AM

silverharp wrote: »

oh dear Pelosi needs to go

https://twitter.com/mbracemoore/status/1367488052285878278

If that's the best the Republicans can come up with, the Dems are a slam dunk for the next elections.

silverharp · 05-03-2021 10:52AM

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

If that's the best the Republicans can come up with, the Dems are a slam dunk for the next elections.

thats a weird bar you put on that :pac: , its pretty clear Biden wont do a full term, he will be replaced after the mid terms, that will shake the sandbox.

extra gravy · 05-03-2021 10:53AM

Trumpsters suddenly "concerned" about the Presidency being made a joke of

Didn't bother them for the last 4 years when it was an actual joke. The hypocrisy is on show early today.

ohnonotgmail · 05-03-2021 10:55AM

silverharp wrote: »

thats a weird bar you put on that :pac: , its pretty clear Biden wont do a full term, he will be replaced after the mid terms, that will shake the sandbox.

clear to who? this is just a continuation of the sleepy joe stuff from before the election.

duploelabs · 05-03-2021 11:00AM

silverharp wrote: »

thats a weird bar you put on that :pac: , its pretty clear Biden wont do a full term, he will be replaced after the mid terms, that will shake the sandbox.

Would you just stop with these fantasies, completely unfounded and not worthy of any kind of serious discussion

salmocab · 05-03-2021 11:01AM

Replaced? I think this is for the conspiracy forum.

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Comments

Joe Biden Presidency thread Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21