Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

WandaVision - Disney+ (***Spoilers***)

1282931333442

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,095 ✭✭✭OU812


    gmisk wrote: »
    Well she did turn her coven and her mother into prunes....not to mention kidnapping the kids (even if they aren't real) oh and killing the dog...so I am edging towards bad
    pjohnson wrote: »
    Good point re. Sparky.


    No coming back from that. #TeamSparky
    kerplun k wrote: »
    Poor Sparky. It’s a shame he had to get caught up in all this.

    Did we see the body? Standard Hollywood rules, no body = no death & you don't kill the dog !


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Also, anyone else suspicious of the rabbit? Sort of feel like he's a character in disguise.... I may be losing it..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Also, anyone else suspicious of the rabbit? Sort of feel like he's a character in disguise.... I may be losing it..

    It did eat a bird which isn't usual rabbit behaviour AFAIK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,758 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Also, anyone else suspicious of the rabbit? Sort of feel like he's a character in disguise.... I may be losing it..

    I just assumed a witches familiar


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,542 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Also, anyone else suspicious of the rabbit? Sort of feel like he's a character in disguise.... I may be losing it..

    I'm trying to get serene in my expectations now. For now I will believe it's just a fcuked up rabbit. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,843 ✭✭✭GSPfan


    I had a bizarre thought. Someone said a while ago that it wouldn’t make sense for Fox’s Quicksilver to be in Wandavision anyway because he was a teenager in the 70’s and this is set in 2023. But.... didn’t he appear in Wandavision in the 80’s sitcom era so........ yeah it’s a stretch.

    I don’t want Fox’s Quicksilver in the MCU but it would be cool if they acknowledged that this version of him was pulled in from a multiverse version of Pietro. I still think it might happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,593 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    OU812 wrote: »
    Did we see the body? Standard Hollywood rules, no body = no death & you don't kill the dog !

    The thing about the dog is, was he actually real, or did Agatha just create the illusion of a dog, and then replace it what looked like a dead dog to test Wanda and see what she could do.

    "You can do that?!"
    FunLover18 wrote: »
    It did eat a bird which isn't usual rabbit behaviour AFAIK.

    It looks like it reverted to a cicada by the time it got to Senor Scratchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,843 ✭✭✭GSPfan


    I think it’s pretty certain that the rabbit is not a rabbit. I’m not saying it’s a person, but it could easily be a snake or something. Changing one animal into another and then having the rabbit devour it was some not so subtle hinting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,838 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Also, anyone else suspicious of the rabbit? Sort of feel like he's a character in disguise.... I may be losing it..
    My guess possible comic book spoilers
    I am pretty sure Agatha's son in the comics was Nicholas Scratch (rabbit in wandavision is called senor scratchy) he had magic powers so I guess that could be him, he used to fight the fantastic 4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Going into the last episode I think they had too many red hearings in this.

    There’s too many lose ends to tie up. It’s gonna be a big task to close everything out satisfyingly with about 40m of storytelling left.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,838 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    kerplun k wrote: »
    Going into the last episode I think they had too many red hearings in this.

    There’s too many lose ends to tie up. It’s gonna be a big task to close everything out satisfyingly with about 40m of storytelling left.
    Rumour has it that it will be 50 minutes.
    They have done a great job up til now imo so let's see!


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 31,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    kerplun k wrote: »
    Going into the last episode I think they had too many red hearings in this.

    There’s too many lose ends to tie up. It’s gonna be a big task to close everything out satisfyingly with about 40m of storytelling left.

    I wonder if they might deliberately leave some loose ends untied. That could be the hook to get people looking forward to the next few films. I'm sure they'll cover all the most important angles, but some mysteries could be kept.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,423 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    GSPfan wrote: »
    I don’t want Fox’s Quicksilver in the MCU but it would be cool if they acknowledged that this version of him was pulled in from a multiverse version of Pietro. I still think it might happen.

    Similar to the JK Simmons being a J Jonah Jameson in the MCU was what most thought. It doesnt necessarily make Sony-verse JJJ cannon and that therefore Maguire's version is the same as Hollands version. Or mean that Jameson is a time traveller.

    If Peters is REALLY just John Doe Quicksilver it's a pointless clickbait casting that has needlessly pìssed off X-Men fans. Hell the earlier rumors of Evan Peters actually playing Mephisto wouldn't have been near as badly recieved as trolling Peters as a Quicksilver for near half a season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    iguana wrote: »
    I was kind of disappointed by this episode. I felt that it totally did away with the best twists in the previous episodes like Fox universe Pietro and it being "Agatha All Along." Fox universe Pietro appearing was the first main introduction of the multiverse, which we know is coming. I grew up as an enormous X-Men comic fan and I hated the Fox X-Men movies. But I loved the twist of Evan Peters appearing as Pietro. I never took it to be a sign that the X-Men coming to the MCU would in any way be the Fox X-Men just an acknowledgement that those movies existed and the Pietro was the one character who'd appeared in both. If he's really just a random Westview resident that Agatha cast a spell on to think he was Pietro, that's extremely disappointing.

    As mentioned by someone else, the random resident angle doesn't explain his powers. They've also start ticking off some of the earlier adverts in that episode, I doubt they never touch on Nexus. If they confirm that it is just a random resident then it kills X-Men multiverse cross-over, which would be my preference.
    This episode also spoiled last weeks reveal about Agatha. It wasn't her all along. She had nothing to do with any of it and is just as clueless as anyone. I always like Agatha, from her first days as Franklin Richards' nanny, so I'm happy for her not to be a villain. But that she's just a clueless witch who 'all along' was just bumbling about trying to find out what was going on, is also disappointing.

    This seems more like you took a huge jump of what 'all along' meant. They even gave a montage of her actions, that didn't include her creating the Hex. What she was 'all along' involved in was causing everything that was going wrong for Wanda in the Hex, resulting in her to become more and more isolated from Vision so Agatha could see how it would impact the Hex and get her away from Vision.
    This episode also just goes reverts to backing up what we saw from the end of episode two, Wanda is responsible for everything happening in Westview because she is grieving.

    Presumably next week, we'll find out that's not actually true and Hayward somehow engineered the whole thing. He was clearly needling her by showing her Vision being dismantled as he wanted her to resurrect him. He even told her that she had the power to do that and was watching her with anticipation as she took in the view of him in pieces. I'm assuming that he was responsible for putting the deed to the plot for the house in Westview in her car and when she arrived some external force he arranged/knew about triggered her to hex the whole town. So presumably next week, things will get more complex again but this week really took the complexity that had been building up and wiped a lot of it away.

    Isn't this what all mystery shows do to the audience, twisting them back and forth? They pointed to grief and then that Wanda might be doing it maliciously, despite how much it was hurting others, now they show she didn't have anything to do with it and in some cases the residents seem happier than their life before. Hayward doing more bad stuff wouldn't be a shock at all

    As far as taking away mystery or complexity, they still have an enormous amount to cover in the last episode (or last two if rumours are true). It would be crazy to not start to narrow down some angles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Zardoz wrote: »
    The best episode of the series by a distance.

    They could have made 2 episodes out of that content and cut one or 2 of the earlier goofball sitcom episodes.

    Similar to the Agatha reveal last week, I simply don't see how this episode hits without the earlier episodes to build out the story. It only worked so well because we saw her and Vision happily living out their sitcom lives, it wouldn't have been the same if everything went to crap on day 1. You need to earn good reveals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Sakana


    So Dome Vision is just a conjuration that gained independent thought?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Similar to the Agatha reveal last week, I simply don't see how this episode hits without the earlier episodes to build out the story. It only worked so well because we saw her and Vision happily living out their sitcom lives, it wouldn't have been the same if everything went to crap on day 1. You need to earn good reveals.

    Yeah, that moment where she steps into the fantasy for the first time with a big smile on her face is heartbreaking. Definitely would not have had the same effect without the build up. I honestly think that people have forgotten how to watch television because of streaming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭paulbok


    Beginning to think we may have over-thought the plot in this. Might not be the clever introduction of the x-men /F4 /mephisto many of us believed during the last few weeks.

    Just as likely that Agatha is the big bad, that all the magic types mixing has just got out of hand and the only "big" appearance will be Dr Strange appearing to try and clean up the mess, with the finale or end credit scene briefly setting up/hinting at the multiverse of madness or another Marvel show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    paulbok wrote: »
    Beginning to think we may have over-thought the plot in this. Might not be the clever introduction of the x-men /F4 /mephisto many of us believed during the last few weeks.

    Just as likely that Agatha is the big bad, that all the magic types mixing has just got out of hand and the only "big" appearance will be Dr Strange appearing to try and clean up the mess, with the finale or end credit scene briefly setting up/hinting at the multiverse of madness or another Marvel show.

    Agree with this.
    TBF, They left so many bread crumbs and red hearings, it wasn't peoples fault for over thinking things.

    Its gonna be impossible to answer all those lingering questions in the final. The casting of Evan Peters as Pietro looks like it was just a big troll move.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 293 ✭✭joficeduns1


    There was so much speculation overall it'd have been a clusterf*ck to wrap it all up. That being said, there was legitimate threads being shown by Marvel, which I'm sure will payoff eventually.

    I hope we get some payoff for Pietro, I don't believe Marvel would use that actor with that character as a troll move.

    Fingers crossed for a strange appearance tomorrow. 😇


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,593 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    See the thing is, *should we* be expecting things to be wrapped up? We can only assume something huge is going to be revealed tomorrow which will have huge ramifications for the MCU into the future. We're not going to get a neatly tied up ending, not for everything anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,026 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I really disagree with the idea that casting Evan Peters as Fake Pietro was a troll move. There was never any indication whatsoever that he was actually the Fox version of Pietro, and straight off the bat Darcy said "She recast Pietro?"

    It's a nod, a wink, a reference. It's a fan-service joke that we as the audience get, but just because people choose to read too much into it and it ends up not meaning what they presumed it did doesn't make it "trolling".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    He was only cast for the Kick Ass joke :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,275 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Similar to the Agatha reveal last week, I simply don't see how this episode hits without the earlier episodes to build out the story. It only worked so well because we saw her and Vision happily living out their sitcom lives, it wouldn't have been the same if everything went to crap on day 1. You need to earn good reveals.

    The first 3 episodes were sitcom filler.
    You could easily have scrapped 1 of those and still had the same emotional impact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Penn wrote: »
    I really disagree with the idea that casting Evan Peters as Fake Pietro was a troll move. There was never any indication whatsoever that he was actually the Fox version of Pietro, and straight off the bat Darcy said "She recast Pietro?"

    It's a nod, a wink, a reference. It's a fan-service joke that we as the audience get, but just because people choose to read too much into it and it ends up not meaning what they presumed it did doesn't make it "trolling".

    If it ends up being nothing it points to them having decided to kill the theory that the Fox X-Men universe characters being in their 'multiverse' and that they could at some point come over to the MCU. That alone makes it more than a pure troll.

    That however doesn't align with all the rumours regarding the upcoming Spider-man bringing back old characters. Wandavision also advertising the Nexus and having Pietro there is a bit too coincidental for my liking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    If it ends up being nothing it points to them having decided to kill the theory that the Fox X-Men universe characters being in their 'multiverse' and that they could at some point come over to the MCU. That alone makes it more than a pure troll.

    That however doesn't align with all the rumours regarding the upcoming Spider-man bringing back old characters. Wandavision also advertising the Nexus and having Pietro there is a bit too coincidental for my liking.

    Spider-Man is a separate beast though because it's owned and made by Sony in conjunction with Marvel. Sony already have the Spider-Verse and the casting rumours reek of Sony decision making, they've wanted their own Spider-Man cinematic universe since before the initial deal with Marvel, the AG movies were heavily setting up a Sinister Six spinoff that going to be written by Drew Goddard iirc and they had even announced plans for a Black Cat and a Silver Sable movie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Zardoz wrote: »
    The first 3 episodes were sitcom filler.
    You could easily have scrapped 1 of those and still had the same emotional impact.

    In the 3rd episode they introduced 2 well known and key characters, who may continue in the MCU, and also broke the bubble of what was happening outside the Hex. That is hardly filler.

    You're entitled to not enjoy it but if you don't have the patience for 2 episodes of character and world building, totaling less than an hour of viewing and each including several moments that provide payoffs later, then a lot of TV simply isn't for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Penn wrote: »
    I really disagree with the idea that casting Evan Peters as Fake Pietro was a troll move. There was never any indication whatsoever that he was actually the Fox version of Pietro, and straight off the bat Darcy said "She recast Pietro?"

    It's a nod, a wink, a reference. It's a fan-service joke that we as the audience get, but just because people choose to read too much into it and it ends up not meaning what they presumed it did doesn't make it "trolling".

    To me this just reads like a defence for what would be a blatant bait-and-switch to their audience. They knew what they were doing when they did it. If by taking this approach, their finale fizzles out like a wet fart, then they have to own the consequences of promising much and delivering little. Wagging a finger at the fans and saying 'it's your fault for getting your hopes up' won't wash.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,309 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    Spider-Man is a separate beast though because it's owned and made by Sony in conjunction with Marvel. Sony already have the Spider-Verse and the casting rumours reek of Sony decision making, they've wanted their own Spider-Man cinematic universe since before the initial deal with Marvel, the AG movies were heavily setting up a Sinister Six spinoff that going to be written by Drew Goddard iirc and they had even announced plans for a Black Cat and a Silver Sable movie.

    I do get those significant differences, however the MCU has for the most part been built in a very consistent way that is relatively easy to understand by the audience. I just don't see them trying to sell both:

    - All the stuff that happened in other Spider-Man movies produced by another studio that they don't have the rights to happened in their wider MCU multi-verse
    - Nothing that happened in other X-Men movies produced by another studio that they now have the rights to happened in their wider MCU multi-verse

    I especially don't see them doing the above while also inserting an X-Men character as Pietro into Wandavision as just a throwaway nod to the audience - making things even more confusing.

    I really want the old X-Men universe to stay dead but at this point from going off previous MCU approaches I'm not confident


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,275 ✭✭✭Zardoz


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    In the 3rd episode they introduced 2 well known and key characters, who may continue in the MCU, and also broke the bubble of what was happening outside the Hex. That is hardly filler.

    You're entitled to not enjoy it but if you don't have the patience for 2 episodes of character and world building, totaling less than an hour of viewing and each including several moments that provide payoffs later, then a lot of TV simply isn't for you.

    Less of the condescending attitude please, I have plenty of patience and like slow burning shows especially dark gritty ones.

    The first 3 episodes aped every sitcom cliche, but had genuine fun with almost none of them, and weren't in any way funny.
    It was genre-surfing as a sort of filler, a sketch that lasts half an hour but without any laughs, just to get to the few hints in each episode as to what really is going on.


Advertisement