Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part VIII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

1199200202204205331

Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    polesheep wrote: »
    That thinking is why it will never happen.

    That was a joke - I agree with you. The Irish populace has lost their will to question our leaders and will swallow anything that Nphet or the government advises them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,037 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    That was a joke - I agree with you. The Irish populace has lost their will to question our leaders and will swallow anything that Nphet or the government advises them.

    If people think it is a legitimate function of government that you can be barred from seeing your own family for months or years at a time, there are no words.

    A medieval king or Roman emperor who tried that would have just been laughed at.

    A few white coats and some blather-words like 'consensus' are all it takes apparently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    The next few months are going to be extremely mentally taxing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    The next few months are going to be extremely mentally taxing.

    And the next ten years are going to be extremely financially taxing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    growleaves wrote: »
    If people think it is a legitimate function of government that you can be barred from seeing your own family for months or years at a time, there are no words.

    A medieval king or Roman emperor who tried that would have just been laughed at.

    A few white coats and some blather-words like 'consensus' are all it takes apparently.

    Are people really adhering to this? I know I'm not and from what I can see neither are my neighbours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭SnuggyBear


    Could we get a bloody number on where case and vaccinations need to be for certain things to open up. Is that too much to ask after a year?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 199 ✭✭Morries Wigs


    polesheep wrote: »
    Are people really adhering to this? I know I'm not and from what I can see neither are my neighbours.

    after cases went nuts in january I can tell you most people are going along with it from what ive seen and know-people have been conditioned into it the pavlov dog experiment springs to mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭SnuggyBear


    after cases went nuts in january I can tell you most people are going along with it from what ive seen and know-people have been conditioned into it the pavlov dog experiment springs to mind

    Everyone I know is seeing family just not having big gatherings.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 199 ✭✭Morries Wigs


    SnuggyBear wrote: »
    Everyone I know is seeing family just not having big gatherings.

    maybe thats why we are where we are just a thought


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭SnuggyBear


    maybe thats why we are where we are just a thought

    You are not going to stop most people from seeing family. People will make their own risk assessment.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    SnuggyBear wrote: »
    Could we get a bloody number on where case and vaccinations need to be for certain things to open up. Is that too much to ask after a year?

    When the moon is in the Seventh House
    And Jupiter aligns with Mars
    Then peace will guide the planets
    And love will steer the stars
    This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius


    That's when we are opening back up again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭showpony1


    SnuggyBear wrote: »
    Could we get a bloody number on where case and vaccinations need to be for certain things to open up. Is that too much to ask after a year?


    no because once we get to low cases we can't let our work go to waste and remain vigilant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    kieran26 wrote: »
    Interesting,

    I was stopped by a Garda at a checkpoint on Saturday evening and was told i couldn't go to get a takeaway in the town 10km from our village because getting a takeaway wasn't essential.
    I questioned him on it and said surely getting food is esential he insisted it wasn't and that i should turn around. I wouldn't mind if i was taking the piss but i think i was being reasonable.
    I have questioned it with the Superintendent but haven't received a response yet.

    Seems to me Guardi don't all know what they are enforcing and a heavy handered ham fisted approach will only lead to resentment an lead to more lack of compliance.

    You may have hit the bullseye here for sure !

    It does appear that Gardaí are widely variant in their attitude to questioning ?

    Perhaps you could send the Superintendent this clip and ask for his comments on Garda policy in cases such as yours...If it matters ?

    https://www.facebook.com/100787891843724/videos/431422881384022


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 199 ✭✭Morries Wigs


    SnuggyBear wrote: »
    You are not going to stop most people from seeing family. People will make their own risk assessment.

    you are if some of the family live in different locations over 5km or in different parts of ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭SnuggyBear


    showpony1 wrote: »
    no because once we get to low cases we can't let our work go to waste and remain vigilant.

    I've been vigilant for nearly a year. I want to know when I can work again. Seriously is that too much to ask?


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    showpony1 wrote: »
    no because once we get to low cases we can't let our work go to waste and remain vigilant.

    And on and on and on and on - there will always be some excuse to keep us compliant.

    Even if the vaccine brings cases to zero and there are zero infections this lot are so cautious that they will keep us in lockdown "just in case" there is a new variant or some other bull**** like that and you know something? Us idiots will go along with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    copeyhagen wrote: »
    serious question, wtf happens when all these vulnerable people are dead. not being a prick, but is it possible that could happen?

    It is possible .

    85 is 5 years beyond the life expectancy for a gentleman in Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭St.Spodo


    We have spent so much time debating the zero covid strategy, because its proponents are relatively transparent about its benefits, the level of sacrifice it would take to get there, the medium term cost (international travel) and so on. One thing I have found frustrating is that there has been no critical assessment of whatever alternative the government is proposing and there has been little political urgency to demand that they explain clearly the costs, benefits and ultimate objectives of their plan to deal with covid-19. This would allow us to weigh what we are doing against the alternative strategies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭allaboutt


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    And on and on and on and on - there will always be some excuse to keep us compliant.

    Even if the vaccine brings cases to zero and there are zero infections this lot are so cautious that they will keep us in lockdown "just in case" there is a new variant or some other bull**** like that and you know something? Us idiots will go along with it.


    fair play to yeah. summed it up brillant..

    absolute nonsense now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,898 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    polesheep wrote: »
    Are people really adhering to this? I know I'm not and from what I can see neither are my neighbours.

    I'm not anyway and know quite a few that aren't either.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Unbelievable, with the country going broke the Department of health is hiring yet more big wig managers breaking their own pay caps.

    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1359182387712839688


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭walus


    polesheep wrote: »
    And the next ten years are going to be extremely financially taxing.

    Make it twenty I’d say.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    polesheep wrote: »
    Are people really adhering to this? I know I'm not and from what I can see neither are my neighbours.

    Nope, life’s too short


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    In Germany there is a story running in Die Welt about spring last year and how the home office (Innenmninsterium) worked with the RKI and other institutes and scientists to produce a 'shock model' which was then communicated to the general population through the leading media.

    Die Welt has 200 pages of internal communication between high ranking home office staff and those institutes that suggest a certain outcome of those models were desired as they were planning to prepare the population logistically and mentally for repressive measures.

    Leading to a worst case shock scenario in which 57 million Germans get infected in a short space of time and 1 million would die.

    In other words those worst case models weren't the best thing they knew at the time. And it was understandable that we needed to be careful. And what choice did the poor politicians have? No those worst case models were actually ordered by the government.

    Couldnt make it up. Wasn't quite sure if I was allowed to post this here or of I should go to the CT forum.

    The distinction between CT and Reality has long since been blurred.....:)

    My choice is between....

    https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/29/business/elon-musk-nyt-podcast-covid-vaccine/index.html

    or putting my money on Bill......N' Melinda ;)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grv1RJkdyqI&ab_channel=Veritasium

    So,forget your misgivings about posting.....if the New World Order can do it...so can YOU :D !


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    growleaves wrote: »
    If people think it is a legitimate function of government that you can be barred from seeing your own family for months or years at a time, there are no words.

    A medieval king or Roman emperor who tried that would have just been laughed at.

    A few white coats and some blather-words like 'consensus' are all it takes apparently.

    Them Germans have a term for it.....
    Es zu Ihrer Sicherheit

    Although it sounds much better in Hugo Boss mode.....:)


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,459 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    From the Guardian
    Covid travel rule-breakers could face 10-year jail terms, says Hancock
    Health secretary sets out new measures as Scottish government announces even stricter plans

    Looks like across the water they're determined to go full mental.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭walus


    From the Guardian



    Looks like across the water they're determined to go full mental.

    Wait until they borrow those ideas here.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭uli84


    From the Guardian



    Looks like across the water they're determined to go full mental.

    Wow, soon we will witness the return of capital punishment


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    From the Guardian



    Looks like across the water they're determined to go full mental.

    I'd be very slow to believe anything published in The Guardian, their standards have fallen off a cliff in recent years, they are in the gutter with the tabloids, this could well be a good example!!

    The Brits won't stand for this kind of police state...the government parties would be wiped out after a ton of riots/protests.

    We have enough people here in Ireland that would encourage this kind of policy however, so I hope it doesn't gain traction.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    The next few months are going to be extremely mentally taxing.
    polesheep wrote: »
    And the next ten years are going to be extremely financially taxing.

    :(


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement