Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine and testing procedures Megathread Part 2 [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1291292294296297331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    Great to see some of the poorer countries starting to get supplied

    https://twitter.com/Citi973/status/1357584264724938752

    Hmm i wonder will ursula being throwing a fit over that one? I seriously doubt it somehow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    This is a contradiction. Either the data says that single doses are very effective (implying prioritisation of giving 1 dose to as many as possible is the more optimal plan) or "the data stretching out doses is non-existent for Pfizer/BioNTech" (implying it's a reckless gamble without evidence).

    If single doses offer a large degree of protection, and the point of deferring a second dose is to alleviate shortages and give more people their first dose, then how is the data non-existent?

    First dose is known to generate a protective immune response in X% of recipients.

    Second dose given within a specific timeframe is known to generate a stronger immune response in X + Y% of recipients.

    What we do know is that the value "X" is good. Very good, in fact, compared to many other vaccines.

    What we don't know;

    - Whether the immune response generated by the single dose remains protective beyond the timeframe
    - Whether a second dose outside of this timeframe generates the stronger immune response, and in X + Y% of recipients.

    The gamble here is that stretching out the doses will be effective over the medium to long-term when compared to the tested regimen.

    That is data we don't have. The indications are good that it'll work out. But it's an unknown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,750 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Edit: the dialogue in parts of the UK press and political establishment is also because they got criticism for not joining the UK scheme and prophecies that the UK would be massively behind.


    I don't remember seeing any of these 'prophecies'.
    Were they real or imagined up by Boris?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭Icantthinkof1


    The HSE vaccine rollout page was updated today.
    No mention of vaccinating the over 70’s; did they not say they would start vaccinating them from the 8th of Feb?!

    ‘8 to 14 February

    We plan to give around 29,000 vaccinations this week.

    15,000 vaccinations will be given to frontline healthcare workers.

    5,000 vaccines will be given to GPs. These will be key vaccinators in the community.

    9,000 vaccinations will be given to staff and residents of long-term care facilities. 1,000 of these will be second doses.’


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    29,000 vaccines seems quite small

    Is that the quantity that we're only receiving this week?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    29,000 vaccines seems quite small

    Is that the quantity that we're only receiving this week?

    Nope its not what we're receiving this week. Pfizer have committed to normal delivery schedule according to reports, increases in 2 weeks time.

    Was stated during yesterday's HSE press conference that the plan now needs to be recalibrated for next week and going forward based on only using Pfizer and Moderna for the over 70s.

    The majority of these stocks need to be held when they arrive for this age group. Essentially they need to reinstate the buffer while drawing up the logistical plan to ensure that there are enough dose 2 available for those that need Pfizer and Moderna while pivoting to AstraZeneca now for healthcare workers.

    So based on the latest guidance they need to with the deliveries
    1) Ensure supply for dose 2 of Pfizer & Moderna for HCW, nursing homes etc
    2) Ensure supply for dose 1 of Pfizer & Moderna for long term care settings.
    3) Ensure supply for dose 1 for over 85s of Pfizer and Moderna
    4) Pivot the plan for HCW to now use AstraZeneca

    1-3 pose a logistical issue as you basically need to hold onto supply when it comes in and stop dose 1 temporarily in most settings except long term care to maintain the dosing schedule for dose 2 and building stock to start over 85s


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 112 ✭✭frozen3


    Nope its not what we're receiving this week.

    Was stated during yesterday's HSE press conference that the plan now needs to be recalibrated for next week and going forward based on only using Pfizer and Moderna for the over 70s.

    The majority of these stocks need to be held when they arrive for this age group. Essentially they need to reinstate the buffer while drawing up the logistical plan to ensure that there are enough dose 2 available for those that need Pfizer and Moderna while pivoting to AstraZeneca now for healthcare workers

    That sounds like an absolute mess

    We will have more under 70s vaccinated than over 70s vaccinated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Martin was on Prime Time last night and he was asked would we be doing like the Germans and buy extra vaccines ourselves along with what the EU would allocate to us, same as the other day when asked if we could buy off the Brits he refused to answer but continued spluttering his way through the rest of the interview.

    The guy is useless, at least Varadkar is saying we should be looking at all options including Sputnik V.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    frozen3 wrote: »
    That sounds like an absolute mess

    We will have more under 70s vaccinated than over 70s vaccinated?

    Well yeah when your vaccinating health care workers your going to have more for the moment.

    A parallel rollout of AZ to the groups that can get it and Pfizer & Moderna to the over 70s doesn't really change much when you look at the rollout as a whole. If anything it speeds up the short term rollout as you'll be progessing down the tiered list while at the same time giving Pfizer & Moderna to the over 70s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭Icantthinkof1


    In relation to the AZ vaccine it is estimated to have is it 60% efficacy?
    Would that mean that 4 out of every 10 people would still be at risk of developing severe Covid and being hospitalised/ admitted to ICU?
    (Apologies if this has already been answered/ discussed this thread moves fast so is sometimes hard to keep up)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    In relation to the AZ vaccine it is estimated to have is it 60% efficacy?
    Would that mean that 4 out of every 10 people would still be at risk of developing severe Covid and being hospitalised/ admitted to ICU?


    I heard Dr Campbell claim 76% after the first jab(28-90 days) and 82% after the second.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    In relation to the AZ vaccine it is estimated to have is it 60% efficacy?
    Would that mean that 4 out of every 10 would still be at risk of being hospitalised/ admitted to ICU?

    Its been a while since I looked at the AZ data and don't have it to hand but off the top of my head I believe there wasn't any severe cases and 0 hospitalistions in the trial when looked at 22 days after first dose.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In relation to the AZ vaccine it is estimated to have is it 60% efficacy?
    Would that mean that 4 out of every 10 people would still be at risk of developing severe Covid and being hospitalised/ admitted to ICU?

    No. In the trials it showed 100% efficacy against severe disease. None of the participants were admitted to hospital.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Deathofcool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭Icantthinkof1


    Its been a while since I looked at the AZ data and don't have it to hand but off the top of my head I believe there wasn't any severe cases and 0 hospitalistions in the trial when looked at 22 days after first dose.

    That’s good to know thank you. I have medical conditions that put me in the high risk category and was nervous that I would still have a 40%+ chance of being hospitalised if offered the AZ vaccine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    That was a worry. Fantastic news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭Icantthinkof1


    Hardyn wrote: »
    No. In the trials it showed 100% efficacy against severe disease. None of the participants were admitted to hospital.

    That’s great to know! Thank you for posting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭Cole


    The HSE vaccine rollout page was updated today.
    No mention of vaccinating the over 70’s; did they not say they would start vaccinating them from the 8th of Feb?!

    15th...Stephen Donnelly on Radio 1 now. 70% of GPs will vaccinate through their surgeries and the others (smaller etc.) will come together in a hub of some form.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 112 ✭✭frozen3


    In relation to the AZ vaccine it is estimated to have is it 60% efficacy?
    Would that mean that 4 out of every 10 people would still be at risk of developing severe Covid and being hospitalised/ admitted to ICU?
    (Apologies if this has already been answered/ discussed this thread moves fast so is sometimes hard to keep up)

    If its 60% efficacy

    4/10 can get it alright but less than 5% of those infected will end up in hospital based on UK data

    Out of 100 people, 2 will end up in hospital and that's vulnerable group, non vulnerable group is basically 0 hospitalisations, its very rare.

    With no vaccine, 20 people out of 100 in vulnerable group are being hospitalised

    The vaccine even at 60% efficacy gives about 10 times protection for hospital in vulnerable and even higher in non vulnerable


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Martin was on Prime Time last night and he was asked would we be doing like the Germans and buy extra vaccines ourselves along with what the EU would allocate to us, same as the other day when asked if we could buy off the Brits he refused to answer but continued spluttering his way through the rest of the interview.

    The guy is useless, at least Varadkar is saying we should be looking at all options including Sputnik V.

    Did we not literally just order additional doses from Moderna?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Cole wrote: »
    15th...Stephen Donnelly on Radio 1 now. 70% of GPs will vaccinate through their surgeries and the others (smaller etc.) will come together in a hub of some form.

    Makes sense. From reading the various reports seems to indicate that rural GPs will come together in larger settings which makes sense compared to those in built up areas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭political analyst


    This is from the Turkish state-run news agency Anadolu.

    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/eu-is-open-to-buying-russian-chinese-vaccines-/2130239
    The European Union is open to buying COVID-19 vaccines developed in China and Russia if the jabs meet certain criteria, the European Commission’s spokesperson confirmed on Monday.

    Besides clinically proven efficiency and safety, the bloc requires vaccines producers to fit into “the right budget” and “to have right production capacities in the territory of the EU so that they could supply more quickly to EU citizens”, Stefan De Keersmaecker said at the European Commission’s daily press briefing.

    “If companies feel they can meet these criteria, they can get in touch with the European Commission”, the spokesperson for health added.

    De Keersmaecker also mentioned that the European Medicine Agency and developers of the Russian Sputnik V vaccines are “in contact”, but “at this stage, no request for marketing authorization has been made”.

    I'm surprised that the EU would trust vaccines made in either Russia or China, to be honest.

    The mention of anything made in a Russian lab reminds me of Salisbury.

    If it's made in a Chinese lab, it reminds me of the intro to the 1970s post-apocalyptic TV drama series Survivors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    21,600 AZ doses arriving this weekend


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    21,600 AZ doses arriving this weekend, all to be rolled out straight away.

    190,000 total for February of AZ deliveries


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    This is from the Turkish state-run news agency Anadolu.

    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/eu-is-open-to-buying-russian-chinese-vaccines-/2130239



    I'm surprised that the EU would trust vaccines made in either Russia or China, to be honest.

    The mention of anything made in a Russian lab reminds me of Salisbury.

    If it's made in a Chinese lab, it reminds me of the intro to the 1970s post-apocalyptic TV drama series Survivors.

    I would have no problem trusting a Russian Vaccine.
    A Chinese on the other hand , no thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭Icantthinkof1


    21,600 AZ doses arriving this weekend, all to be rolled out straight away.

    190,000 total for February of AZ deliveries

    190,000 is a fantastic amount! Have Ireland given any indication as to how long the 2nd AZ vaccine will be spaced out for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Leo Varadkar:

    “Even if Ireland hits zero cases, crowds at matches and concerts would still be banned” He added “We really need to get people vaccinated and that’s what it’s all about”

    On a positive note there must be a plan to open up travel within the country by summer as Leo has said he’s booked a Sligo staycation this summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Leo Varadkar:

    “Even if Ireland hits zero cases, crowds at matches and concerts would still be banned” He added “We really need to get people vaccinated and that’s what it’s all about”

    On a positive note there must be a plan to open up travel within the country by summer as Leo said he’s booked a Sligo staycation this summer.

    Any chance of a link there?

    Also he says I hope and I believe at least a dozen times in that holiday announcement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Leo Varadkar:

    “Even if Ireland hits zero cases, crowds at matches and concerts would still be banned” He added “We really need to get people vaccinated and that’s what it’s all about”

    On a positive note there must be a plan to open up travel within the country by summer as Leo said he’s booked a Sligo staycation this summer.

    There is little point in listening to a word this guy says. He is unbelievably inconsistent and I swear to god, I think he just makes up stuff on the spot.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Leo's a funny one. He's not a fan of zero-covid or extreme mandatory quarantine approaches so comes out with scary sounding strawmen like "forever border closures" and "armed guards outside hotel room doors". These then tend to get taken out of context and attributed as his actual viewpoints as opposed to the extreme scenario he's putting forward to scare people away.

    As a friend of mine put it, this would be a typical Leo sounding quote: "'I'm fully in favour myself, but just so you know that it would involve some small babies being eaten."


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement