Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXII-215,743 ROI (4,137 deaths)111,166 NI (2,036 deaths)(22/02)Read OP

1118119121123124333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    GP referral data from yesterday. Downward trend continues, about 20% down on the same day last week.

    https://tomorrowscare.ie/covid/2021-02-03_COVID_GP_Survey_Results.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    My brother messaged me from Scotland today he is due to get his vaccine on 10th February, he is 64 with no underlying conditions. Just wondering when we'll get to category 7 over here which is my group, I'm 55 with underlying conditions.

    Probably April, maybe a bit earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Galwayhurl


    1 in 6 Brits have received their first dose. Got to admire that.


  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Galwayhurl wrote: »
    1 in 6 Brits have received their first dose. Got to admire that.

    Vaxit means Vaxit - and we'll make the best of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,277 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    AstraZeneca approved for all ages but if timely access seems others would be preferred for over 70

    https://twitter.com/juneshannon/status/1356987201163317253


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    frozen3 wrote: »
    Sorry to be blunt but Covid would have been a non issue then

    The people it affects, the 65 years + would have all been dead anyway

    1918 was the opposite, affected the young

    These blanket statements are always a bit oversimplied. It's a spectrum. It's not like there's no risk for a 64 year old just because they're not that in 'that' age group. The IFR in early 60's is about 1%. Would you not be careful to try and avoid contracting COVID if you were 60?Because I would certainly be taking precautions not to get it if I was late 50's or early 60's. And that's just mortality, not to mention hospitalisation rate.

    In the UK , about 100,000 people under 55 have been hospitalised so far, so it's not no risk for the late middle aged groups, even though they are not 'old'. The only age group in Europe that has not seen major increase in mortality rates since March, is under 45, death rate in children and young adults is actually below average since then. All other age groups have seen significant increase however.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Galwayhurl wrote: »
    1 in 6 Brits have received their first dose. Got to admire that.

    Boris got one over on the labour guy

    https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/1356977156094627843

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    1201 Swabs
    6.6% positivity rate

    decent results for a Wednesday, 28% lower swabs than last Wednesday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    1,201 positive tests on 18,289 swabs, 6.57%

    Yeah, not bad at all for a Wednesday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,057 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    1201 Swabs
    6.6% positivity rate

    decent results for a Wednesday, 28% lower swabs than last Wednesday

    I checked the site as it was updating and it had like 2500 swabs on 24kish tests and was like wtf happened.

    Thankfully it's a better number than that


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    titan18 wrote: »
    I checked the site as it was updating and it had like 2500 swabs on 24kish tests and was like wtf happened.

    Thankfully it's a better number than that

    Me too - it was stuck sometime in January for a minute or so, freaked out a bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 314 ✭✭Golfman64


    1201 Swabs
    6.6% positivity rate

    decent results for a Wednesday, 28% lower swabs than last Wednesday

    Superb stuff - really coming down nicely. Another couple of weeks and we should be at a point where real planning towards reopening in March can start.


  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Golfman64 wrote: »
    Superb stuff - really coming down nicely. Another couple of weeks and we should be at a point where real planning towards reopening
    pubs
    in March can start.

    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,161 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Positive swabs on the last 3 Wednesdays

    13 Jan - 3932
    20 Jan - 2786
    27 Jan - 1668


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Flowergirl201


    Me too - it was stuck sometime in January for a minute or so, freaked out a bit.

    Same here, was nearly reaching for the wine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    GP referral data from yesterday. Downward trend continues, about 20% down on the same day last week.

    https://tomorrowscare.ie/covid/2021-02-03_COVID_GP_Survey_Results.pdf

    That looks quite promising. Hopefully in a good position in 3 to 4 weeks. Maybe some good news on vaccines in that time. The data coming out over the last few days regarding how effective they are looks very encouraging


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Same here, was nearly reaching for the wine

    Oh, have some wine anyway! :)


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Positive swabs on the last 3 Wednesdays

    13 Jan - 3932
    20 Jan - 2786
    27 Jan - 1668

    And possibly add 10% to those figures as contacts were not being tested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,605 ✭✭✭tigger123


    Are we at the point yet that the resumption of contact testing is going to impact the daily figures?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    tigger123 wrote: »
    Are we at the point yet that the resumption of contact testing is going to impact the daily figures?

    Should already be in the data. They resumed close contact test referrals on Friday I think.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Steve012


    We're all fooked?
    Maybe mother nature wants rid of us, can't say I blame her tbh.

    We're all Fooked ? 😂🤣


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,314 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I think you really need to go back 9 months and reundestand the argument. There's so many misconceptions in your post it's impossible to know where to begin.

    Each time or resource a hospital spends treating a covid patient is time they can't treat or resource another non covid patient. If the idea is to let covid explode in hospitals and increase their capacity to absorb this explosion like a sponge then you're going to have a mess of serious illness, death and burnt out traumatised staff. Not just exclusively from covid either.

    Also, fundamentally, you're trying to keep people out of hospital and being seriously ill in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,314 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    tigger123 wrote: »
    Are we at the point yet that the resumption of contact testing is going to impact the daily figures?

    Resumed at the end of last week, so, yeah, it's there by now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    silverharp wrote: »

    That is awkward but there's nothing stopping any EU country from approving a vaccine. I guess we did it out of solidarity for being last.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭Galwayhurl


    Breaking

    94 additional deaths confirmed.

    1,013 new cases.


    47 of these deaths occurred in February, 44 occurred in January, 2 in December and 1 in November.

    The median age of those who died is 82 years and the age range is 36-100 years.


    Cases: 337 in Dublin, 96 in Galway, 65 in Cork, 60 in Kildare, 48 in Louth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    That is awkward but there's nothing stopping any EU country from approving a vaccine. I guess we did it out of solidarity for being last.

    We can approve any vaccine we like on an emergency basis but will have zero supplies until the EU supplies get released following EMA approval.

    I suppose we could approve the Sputnik vaccine or one of the Chinese ones, and do a separate supply deal. But I'm not sure how many people would want one of those.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Lollipop95


    The cases are very slow in going down :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,404 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Why don't they announce each day with the death and new case figures how many people have been vaccinated that day? Mix some good news with the bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,507 ✭✭✭harr


    Why don't they announce each day with the death and new case figures how many people have been vaccinated that day? Mix some good news with the bad.
    Because that would probably show them them up in regards to the trickle of vaccines they are giving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,039 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Why don't they announce each day with the death and new case figures how many people have been vaccinated that day? Mix some good news with the bad.
    There's no guarantee the vaccinated number would be perceived as good news.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement