Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

14546485051225

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,947 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Boris will probably bring back that Internal Market Bill now.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,220 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Boris will probably bring back that Internal Market Bill now.

    If he has a shred of brains he won’t. This would be the time to take the high moral ground and let the EU implode.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 727 ✭✭✭NeuralNetwork


    The whole thing seems like a major over reaction now and has rather huge implications on this island.

    What's going on behind the scenes to have driven it to this level?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    https://www.theguardian.com./australia-news/2021/jan/29/australia-in-talks-with-who-and-europe-over-certainty-of-covid-vaccine-supplies

    Today is an ironic day isn't it, talk of Drug companies moving production to the US because of protectionism and article.16 being triggered not by the DUP's stupidity but by the EU (instantly too AFAIK a month long dialogue is mentioned but not required)

    Then Asia
    https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/davos-2021-japan-korea-vaccine-nationalism-covid-19-coronavirus-eu-122117522.html?guccounter=1

    Would be a bit silly to move to the US when US have already been blocking exports out of there, and UK are effectively doing it too if they won't share the AZ vaccines they're producing with the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    titan18 wrote: »
    Would be a bit silly to move to the US when US have already been blocking exports out of there, and UK are effectively doing it too if they won't share the AZ vaccines they're producing with the EU.
    I don't think it is the case that the UK Government have prohibited AZ selling to the EU. What seems to have happened is that the UK got in with a deal with AZ earlier and possibly on better terms than the deal between the EU and AZ.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    I don't think it is the case that the UK Governmeht have prohibited AZ exporting to the EU.

    I felt this was as good as saying it wouldn't be allowed

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-55838272


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I don't think it is the case that the UK Governmeht have prohibited AZ exporting to the EU.

    Is this not what all the hassle is about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Ok can someone bring me up to speed on this please, as I though AZ were in the wrong as they weren’t providing the EU with vaccines from the UK site as per the contract they signed with the EU.
    However this is from what I’ve heard on RTE so there’s probably an agenda.

    They certainly haven't been delivering the promised number of vaccines, but I think it's the Belgian plant output that's in dispute. Whose fault it is still seems to be in dispute, but it seems someone in the EU is so mad they've lashed out blindly by triggering article 16, which may be the bigger, more longterm issue for us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    The UK approved the AZ vaccine earlier than the EU (have the EMA approved it yet?)

    I see they have approved it just today.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55862233

    But this is many months after the UK approved it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Arlene Foster
    "the European Union has once again shown it is prepared to use Northern Ireland when it suits their interests but in the most despicable manner"

    She could very easily substitute European Union for Great Britain in that sentence and it would be pretty accurate over the last couple of years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    jackboy wrote: »
    If he has a shred of brains he won’t. This would be the time to take the high moral ground and let the EU implode.

    Its not going to implode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,220 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Call me Al wrote: »
    Its not going to implode.

    It’s a long slow process but it has been imploding for a long while now. Brexit was a disaster and the EU need to show solidarity to prevent others leaving. This is not how to do that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I don't think so.

    The UK approved the AZ vaccine earlier than the EU (have the EMA approved it yet?) and entered into a contract with AZ earlier, and possibly on better terms, than the EU. But none of that is legally preventing AZ from solving its manufacturing problems and supplying the EU.

    What the hassle appears to be about is that the EU is unhappy that they are getting fewer vaccines initially from AZ than expected so are threatening to control exports of vaccines outside the EU.

    So is it possible the UK government has applied pressure to AZ by saying no or very little AZ vaccines are leaving the UK and that is what’s delaying the vaccine delivery for the EU?
    Would that explain why the EU have triggered article 16 in retaliation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    tom1ie wrote: »
    So is it possible the UK government has applied pressure to AZ by saying no or very little AZ vaccines are leaving the UK and that is what’s delaying the vaccine delivery for the EU?
    Would that explain why the EU have triggered article 16 in retaliation?
    I don't think so, though it could emerge. The EU aren't alleging that. They are not happy with AZ not delivering the amount the EU expected. AZ are countering that the contract only states "best effort" will be made and that is what they have done. EU then places control on exports of vaccines (not merely AZ).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    tom1ie wrote: »
    So is it possible the UK government has applied pressure to AZ by saying no or very little AZ vaccines are leaving the UK and that is what’s delaying the vaccine delivery for the EU?
    Would that explain why the EU have triggered article 16 in retaliation?

    But triggering art 16 doesn't hurt the UK.

    It only does damage to one of their own members.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    tom1ie wrote: »
    So is it possible the UK government has applied pressure to AZ by saying no or very little AZ vaccines are leaving the UK and that is what’s delaying the vaccine delivery for the EU?
    Would that explain why the EU have triggered article 16 in retaliation?

    Uk Has just left EU under brexit, the first crisis after that and the UK has a better plan, the EU needs to save face so no one else leaves so are doing everything to escalte and distract from EU failure

    The EU had exactly the same clause in its contract about supply from its belgium factory that the UK did, if the UK factory failed the EU would not share. They are all trying to save their jobs and dont care about Ireland, NI or UK, just themselves - People can all see their true colours now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭landofthetree




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    mista11 wrote: »
    Uk Has just left EU under brexit, the first crisis after that and the UK has a better plan, the EU needs to save face so no one else leaves so are doing everything to escalte and distract from EU failure

    The EU had exactly the same clause in its contract about supply from its belgium factory that the UK did, if the UK factory failed the EU would not share. They are all trying to save their jobs and dont care about Ireland, NI or UK, just themselves - People can all see their true colours now

    5 years since joining and this is your first post? Playing the long game I see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    mista11 wrote: »
    Uk Has just left EU under brexit, the first crisis after that and the UK has a better plan, the EU needs to save face so no one else leaves so are doing everything to escalte and distract from EU failure

    The EU had exactly the same clause in its contract about supply from its belgium factory that the UK did, if the UK factory failed the EU would not share. They are all trying to save their jobs and dont care about Ireland, NI or UK, just themselves - People can all see their true colours now




    Jaysus, was it worth the wait?




    Fair play though. I'd never remember me password for that long


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I don't think so, though it could emerge. The EU aren't alleging that. They are not happy with AZ not delivering the amount the EU expected. AZ are countering that the contract only states "best effort" will be made and that is what they have done. EU then places control on exports of vaccines (not merely AZ).

    I heard something about the UK plants not being used to fulfill the EU order, so the EU are saying that not best effort?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    Jaysus, was it worth the wait?




    Fair play though. I'd never remember me password for that long

    Nice reply - very insightful


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,201 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    This is certainly turning very very ugly and invoking Article 16 is an astonishing move. The contract (Subject to Belgium law) seems clearly to support AZ argument. The EU seems now to be acting in desperation. Shocking developments on what should be a good news day on AZ"s vaccine approval and the fact the EMA approving it for over 65"s.

    Not sure what the petulant EU is playing at but this is really quite appalling.

    I can see the Brits pulling the plug on the Brexit agreement over this

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭t8010789


    I listened to an interview with Kate Bingham on BBC Radio 4 today, former chair of Uk vaccine task force, she was been interviewed on the new Novavax vaccine findings along with the order of 60m doses the uk had placed with production happening in the Uk. She explained how contracts for this and others had been signed back in May and scaling up of manufacturing had started voluntarily between companies from February, hence why they are considered ahead of the game for vaccine rollout.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    t8010789 wrote: »
    I listened to an interview with Kate Bingham on BBC Radio 4 today, former chair of Uk vaccine task force, she was been interviewed on the new Novavax vaccine findings along with the order of 60m doses the uk had placed with production happening in the Uk. She explained how contracts for this and others had been signed back in May and scaling up of manufacturing had started voluntarily between companies from February, hence why they are considered ahead of the game for vaccine rollout.

    Is that the one where she also decided to abandon dry January and open a bottle of wineðŸ˜


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭JPup


    I see they have approved it just today.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55862233

    But this is many months after the UK approved it.

    It is one month since the UK approved it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Some reports on the Brexit thread that the EU hasn't actually done the deed yet or are walking it back. Hopefully they see sense.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    tom1ie wrote: »
    So is it possible the UK government has applied pressure to AZ by saying no or very little AZ vaccines are leaving the UK and that is what’s delaying the vaccine delivery for the EU?
    Would that explain why the EU have triggered article 16 in retaliation?

    I think it is fair to say that every country is putting pressure on vaccine producers at the moment and if they aren’t, then they ducking should be. That’s what they’re paid to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,013 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    This is certainly turning very very ugly and invoking Article 16 is an astonishing move. The contract (Subject to Belgium law) seems clearly to support AZ argument. The EU seems now to be acting in desperation. Shocking developments on what should be a good news day on AZ"s vaccine approval and the fact the EMA approving it for over 65"s.

    Not sure what the petulant EU is playing at but this is really quite appalling.

    I can see the Brits pulling the plug on the Brexit agreement over this

    Gas!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,566 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Even the Archbishop of Canterbury has condemned the move by the EU.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,947 ✭✭✭brickster69


    EU decision to invoke Article 16, without prior notice has managed to unite the British and Irish governments, Labour, the DUP and SDLP in disagreement with the move.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



Advertisement