Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

13031333536225

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭gally74


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Let's be honest, its AZ that hold all the power in this argument.

    The EU commission can huff and puff all they want, but its not like they can cancel orders or anything, they need AZ.

    Incorrect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭micks_address


    Renault 5 wrote: »
    But thats not how it was.

    EU requested months ago for AZ to have 80m doses ready within Q1 and another 80m doses ready for Q2.

    This is an agreement the EU had with AZ which AZ are not denying.

    Sure but the point is they had to manufacture it and failed to meet the target in that manufacturing plant. What do the EU want? A sorry we failed to meet our target but we will catch up asap promise?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭SheepsClothing


    Whatever the rights or the wrongs of it all, there's no getting away from the fact that the EU are looking like the fish at the table currently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,412 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    gally74 wrote: »
    Incorrect.

    What have I said that's incorrect?

    If AZ can't produce enough of the vaccine to fulfil orders, how can EU make them go faster?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭mick087


    There is no evidence from the trial to show this. UK are taking a gamble here.
    We should go by what the trial showed and no shortcuts


    Remember this is an emergency situation.
    Emergency measures are required.

    The UK's chief medical officers have defended the Covid vaccination plan.
    Are we being slow out the blocks again like the EU commission was on ordering this vaccine?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sure but the point is they had to manufacture it and failed to meet the target in that manufacturing plant. What do the EU want? A sorry we failed to meet our target but we will catch up asap promise?

    They want to know why other countries orders are being fulfilled on time, and they are the only ones suffering a major shortfall. It's a fair question.

    Why isn't everyone's supply being reduced proportionally? The EU say that their agreement lists four plants, including two in the UK, as suppliers. So the argument from AZ that EU stock can only come from an EU plants doesn't seem credible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,892 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    NIMAN wrote: »
    What have I said that's incorrect?

    If AZ can't produce enough of the vaccine to fulfil orders, how can EU make them go faster?

    AZ can put money into fixing whatever the problem is.

    If there is a problem, fix it. and fix it now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,944 ✭✭✭brickster69


    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 171 ✭✭Renault 5


    Sure but the point is they had to manufacture it and failed to meet the target in that manufacturing plant. What do the EU want? A sorry we failed to meet our target but we will catch up asap promise?

    The EU are simply looking for answers and AZ are very vague when answering them.

    I would think here are some of the questions.

    1. In which facilities was EU money invested in.

    2. How many doses have been produced so far in the Dutch and Belgian facilities.

    3.Where are these doses that were produced in the above facilities atm.

    4. IF the above doses are not in storage, where they distributed to any countries outside of the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,565 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    micosoft wrote: »
    And what happens when Germany, France, Belgium, Italy all decide to jump the queue too? And then we discover we are 14 or 15 back?

    I mean, apart from being an appallingly unethical idea that we show no solidarity with poorer EU countries, it is just not a clever idea because the other EU countries aren't stupid and have managed (the not very difficult task) of looking one step further on your logic. That logic would mean everybody would lose badly and vaccines would take much much longer in a chaotic free for all.

    This is aside from the absurd fallacy that we can't somehow trust the EU because one supplier have not delivered on their commitments.

    You don't think these countries are already trying to source vaccines for themselves?

    Ethics and "looking good" comes second when it comes to the health of the nation.

    As someone with elderly grandparents who have been stuck at home the past year, I don't really care about hurting the EU's feelings and I suspect most people feel the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Renault 5 wrote: »
    The EU are simply looking for answers and AZ are very vague when answering them.

    I would think here are some of the questions.

    1. In which facilities was EU money invested in.

    2. How many doses have been produced so far in the Dutch and Belgian facilities.

    3.Where are these doses that were produced in the above facilities atm.

    4. IF the above doses are not in storage, where they distributed to any countries outside of the EU.

    My understanding is

    Eu money was invested in 2uk and 2 eu plants. These were named in the contract.

    The UK plants were listed as primary production sites for the eu vaccine supply.

    Astra Zenaca is now trying to say that the EU will be supplied by the EU plants while the UK plants will supply the UK and other countries.

    EDIT: I suspect that AZ has stockpiled doses from the EU plants for the EU but the UK plants are also named in the EU contract. I suspect that AZ has had genuine production problems across all plants. It just feels bad that we are the only one to suffer.

    If AZ had of said we have production problems everyone is getting their deliveries cut by 20% the EU probably would have moved on. Instead we are trying to claim what the contract allows us to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,518 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Renault 5 wrote: »
    The EU are simply looking for answers and AZ are very vague when answering them.

    I would think here are some of the questions.

    1. In which facilities was EU money invested in.

    2. How many doses have been produced so far in the Dutch and Belgian facilities.

    3.Where are these doses that were produced in the above facilities atm.

    4. IF the above doses are not in storage, where they distributed to any countries outside of the EU.

    They are all interesting questions.

    The EU paid money upfront to have this company produce these vaccines.
    It has come out, very, very late in the day (as far as we know...who knew what when is another question) that they haven't got a hope of delivering on their huge order in Q1 this year.

    I mean it may come good at some point later in the year (we hope), or next year for all I know but being 60% down on a target is quite bad.

    The CEO was somewhat arrogant in that interview that was linked here (blaming the EU really + bringing in a contrast with the UK).
    I suppose you'd expect from a leader of a giant company who (like others in that priest class) believes governments are merely their servants/supplicants to come up with bales of cash on demand. What they think of us peons probably doesn't bear printing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,200 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Billy Kelleher (Irish MEP) getting his Arse handed to him on Claire Byrne at the moment

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,129 ✭✭✭gifted


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Billy Kelleher (Irish MEP) getting his Arse handed to him on Claire Byrne at the moment


    And that's a surprise?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭MoyVilla9


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Billy Kelleher (Irish MEP) getting his Arse handed to him on Claire Byrne at the moment

    This is mortifying to listen to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,200 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    gifted wrote: »
    And that's a surprise?

    No but enjoyable to listen to, EU have messed up here and it's embarrassing for a British MP to explain it

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,200 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    MoyVilla9 wrote: »
    This is mortifying to listen to.

    Couldn't agree more

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,200 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Just amazing, a British MP basically saying if they were still in the EU their vaccine Roll out would be far less than it is. EU took 3 months to sign contract.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,474 ✭✭✭micks_address


    My understanding is

    Eu money was invested in 2uk and 2 eu plants. These were named in the contract.

    The UK plants were listed as primary production sites for the eu vaccine supply.

    Astra Zenaca is now trying to say that the EU will be supplied by the EU plants while the UK plants will supply the UK and other countries.

    If the UK plant was listed as EU manufacturing then there's definitely some redress due... a free months supply to the EU? Last thing that's needed is some kind of legal entanglement which means the EU supply stops altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,200 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    If the UK plant was listed as EU manufacturing then there's definitely some redress due... a free months supply to the EU? Last thing that's needed is some kind of legal entanglement which means the EU supply stops altogether.

    Just one slight problem with that argument, Britain no longer in the EU.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭bobmalooka


    You don't think these countries are already trying to source vaccines for themselves?

    Ethics and "looking good" comes second when it comes to the health of the nation.

    As someone with elderly grandparents who have been stuck at home the past year, I don't really care about hurting the EU's feelings and I suspect most people feel the same.

    You keep missing the glaringly obvious point - going on a solo run isn’t just an exercise in appeasing our neighbours. It is an act of pooling resources and influence.

    People seem to think that countries going on a solo run is something that would occur in a bubble where all other things remain constant.

    If every EU country goes on a solo run take a few guesses how we would fare out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,892 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Just amazing, a British MP basically saying if they were still in the EU their vaccine Roll out would be far less than it is. EU took 3 months to sign contract.

    A British MP basically lying. Just amazing alright! Who'd have thought it!

    Britian went on their own with regulation and purchasing prior to leaving the EU and within the EU rules. Ireland could have done the same (and still could) while within the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,892 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Just one slight problem with that argument, Britain no longer in the EU.

    Why is that a problem?

    Does import and export of good and services between EU and non-EU countries not still happen?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Just one slight problem with that argument, Britain no longer in the EU.

    According to quotes from an EC official last night the European Commission contract with Astra Zenaca names 4 plants as being primary production facilities for the EU supplies of the vaccine.

    The fact that some of those plants are outside the EU does not mean that Astra Zenaca are not bound by the contract.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭mick087


    bobmalooka wrote: »
    If every EU country goes on a solo run take a few guesses how we would fare out.

    Very true but how do you think the EU commission has fared out so far?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    How long will it take for Sanofi to switch across to the Pfizer product?
    Is this a 6+ month project? Or can something like this be done swiftly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭mick087


    According to quotes from an EC official last night the European Commission contract with Astra Zenaca names 4 plants as being primary production facilities for the EU supplies of the vaccine.

    The fact that some of those plants are outside the EU does not mean that Astra Zenaca are not bound by the contract.

    Let the courts decide about the contract.

    What is the EU commissions plan B? What are the plans now for the vaccine?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,944 ✭✭✭brickster69


    According to quotes from an EC official last night the European Commission contract with Astra Zenaca names 4 plants as being primary production facilities for the EU supplies of the vaccine.

    The fact that some of those plants are outside the EU does not mean that Astra Zenaca are not bound by the contract.

    According to the CEO there are 4 plants for AZ in the EU. Italy, Germany, Holland & Belgium. Without knowing for sure, it is not difficult to imagine the EU to only use EU plants

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    According to the CEO there are 4 plants for AZ in the EU. Italy, Germany, Holland & Belgium. Without knowing for sure, it is not difficult to imagine the EU to only use EU plants

    The EU have stated that two of the four plants listed in the agreement are in the UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,944 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Looks like Serbia are going full steam ahead.

    https://twitter.com/marcusa38668771/status/1354734973484470272/photo/2

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



Advertisement