Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

1233234236238239309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,110 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,113 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    No sure if posted previously but you've got to watch Morning Joe on MSNBC, not your typical us network show and it's fair to say it's presenters seething over what's happened, also fair to say there's history between the Shows hosts and trump. It's a riveting watch

    https://youtu.be/AREpAuOXC60

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,110 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    robinph wrote: »
    Would Eisenhower count as modern enough? Did he stand for any political position before president?

    Closest he came to having one was serving as military governor of Germany.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    When you think about it on a very simple level, how the f**k is this even a debate? He was on TV for years saying he could only lose a democraticly run election if he is cheated. He never accepted the result. People close to him were concerned he wasn’t going to leave quietly or peacefully. And it’s actually hard to not qualify what happened as a coup attempt last week given what we know.

    Seems like people can’t grasp the severity of what happened. It’s crazy. He’s not any shred of evidence and he’s causing riots. I suppose when you look at how America ignores its culture of systematic racism it shouldn’t surprise me. But I think what happened last week is far bigger and potentially far more damaging long term to USA then most have factored in.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sure Hannity isn't a reporter though even his employer (Fox) admitted in court that he is an entertainer. Pity so many Americans take his shìt spitting seriously though.

    He's about one step up from an online conspiracy theorist, and that's being generous to him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,110 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    It's awful.stuff but Pelosi doesn't help things either. She's the wrong person to have speaking out. The Dems really need somebody else leading Congress.

    https://twitter.com/RepWillBailey/status/1348774981560369154?s=19

    100% right

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,463 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    everlast75 wrote: »
    We are probably due a caravan travelling up from the South soon too

    Before the 2018 election the Republicans were screaming about the caravans - day after the election we heard no more until, funnily enough Trump actually mentioned the caravans in his speech last Wednesday:

    But now the caravans, they think Biden’s getting in, the caravans are forming again. They want to come in again and rip off our country. Can’t let it happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭tigger123


    everlast75 wrote: »

    How many (estimate) would be required from the Republican side to actually achieve impeachment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,074 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,984 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    tigger123 wrote: »
    How many (estimate) would be required from the Republican side to actually achieve impeachment?


    They have the votes in the house to Impeach which is a simple majority, however it needs 2/3rds majority in the senate to convict.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,443 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    tigger123 wrote: »
    How many (estimate) would be required from the Republican side to actually achieve impeachment?

    16 isn't it? (66 total needed).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭MeMen2_MoRi_


    Apologies if this has been posted already I've been skipping past pages!

    An op-ed from Fiona Hill, she was a witness in trump's first impeachment hearings.. She walks you through the steps that led to last Wednesday.

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/01/11/capitol-riot-self-coup-trump-fiona-hill-457549


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,734 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    astrofool wrote: »
    16 isn't it? (66 total needed).

    And considering most GOP senators aren't arguing that Trump is innocent but rather that its pointless, will only cause further divide etc., making them have to actually vote on it will force them to either back Trump or dump him.

    If they back him even though he's clearly guilty, its going to be used against them in every future argument or election campaign. If they vote against him, they risk losing the Trump die-hards in their constituencies.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,785 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Penn wrote: »
    And considering most GOP senators aren't arguing that Trump is innocent but rather that its pointless, will only cause further divide etc., making them have to actually vote on it will force them to either back Trump or dump him.

    If they back him even though he's clearly guilty, its going to be used against them in every future argument or election campaign. If they vote against him, they risk losing the Trump die-hards in their constituencies.

    Yeah.. The GOP Senators are clearly lining up the "Now is not the time" and the "Sure isn't he leaving next week anyway" defences for not voting for impeachment.

    They will say that censure is the better option blah blah blah.

    Spineless Amoral Cowards one and all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    No sure if posted previously but you've got to watch Morning Joe on MSNBC, not your typical us network show and it's fair to say it's presenters seething over what's happened, also fair to say there's history between the Shows hosts and trump. It's a riveting watch

    https://youtu.be/AREpAuOXC60
    They used to be friends, both Mika (his wife) and himself were really pally with Trump and they have a lot of bad blood now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,734 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Sheldon Adelson, one of the GOP's largest donors, has died.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Drumpot wrote: »
    When you think about it on a very simple level, how the f**k is this even a debate? He was on TV for years saying he could only lose a democraticly run election if he is cheated. He never accepted the result. People close to him were concerned he wasn’t going to leave quietly or peacefully. And it’s actually hard to not qualify what happened as a coup attempt last week given what we know.

    Seems like people can’t grasp the severity of what happened. It’s crazy. He’s not any shred of evidence and he’s causing riots. I suppose when you look at how America ignores its culture of systematic racism it shouldn’t surprise me. But I think what happened last week is far bigger and potentially far more damaging long term to USA then most have factored in.

    This should rightfully launch Bill Maher into a bigger spotlight. He just has a talk show on HBO, but he has, the entire presidency, been predicting that Trump would never concede and would never go willingly and will have to be dragged out kicking and screaming. Just about every week for the past 2 years, "what happens if Trump doesn't leave?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,367 ✭✭✭randd1


    Overheal wrote: »
    This should rightfully launch Bill Maher into a bigger spotlight. He just has a talk show on HBO, but he has, the entire presidency, been predicting that Trump would never concede and would never go willingly and will have to be dragged out kicking and screaming. Just about every week for the past 2 years, "what happens if Trump doesn't leave?"

    Well, he was right wasn't he?

    I like Maher I have to say, he doesn't pull his punches when he's going after repeated mistakes by republicans and regularly shows them up for the hypocrites they are, and he's not shy about having a go at the democrats for their crap either, and is likely have someone on the show from the right as from the left. Regularly has a pop at American excess too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    Maher used to have a show on ABC years ago but they kicked him to the kerb after he said the 9/11 terrorists weren't cowards as they died for their cause


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    Billy Mays wrote: »
    Maher used to have a show on ABC years ago but they kicked him to the kerb after he said the 9/11 terrorists weren't cowards as they died for their cause

    Wasn’t it that he said nobody who flies a plane into a building is a coward?

    I get what he was getting at but at the time he said, it would have been very tone-deaf.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Billy Mays wrote: »
    Maher used to have a show on ABC years ago but they kicked him to the kerb after he said the 9/11 terrorists weren't cowards as they died for their cause

    He's a very critical thinker, and I don't think anyone watches the show who isn't intellectually confronted by some of his views.

    For that scandal I think he was right to point out that to them they were all heroes, died heroes, and were immortalized as recruitment tools. There were not enough voices in the GWB/early post-9/11 era that pushed back on this idea that 'terrorists hate us for our freedom' when it runs far deeper and off to the side than that. Maher didn't back down from using empathy as a tool to really think about why they did it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,364 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    Yeah something along those lines

    Think he also said America were bigger cowards cos they launch missiles from 500 miles away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,074 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Billy Mays wrote: »
    Maher used to have a show on ABC years ago but they kicked him to the kerb after he said the 9/11 terrorists weren't cowards as they died for their cause

    And therein lies the absolute insanity and hypocrisy of the current attempts to downplay the events of last week.

    Americans were deeply unhappy with remarks such as Mahers after the 9/11 attacks, yet many republicans think that the defence that 'these people were fighting for what they believed in' in relation to MAGA supporters is somehow different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    flazio wrote: »
    If any Capitol employee, be they politicians or staff dies from Covid related illness in the next few weeks, it should be added to the 5 deaths so far from the storming.

    Unfortunately there is deniability; Pelosi had asked another Democratic representative, who was in quarantine after testing positive, to come to the chamber for the electoral count procession. She was clear to travel but these whackadoodles will still bicker like hell about it.

    https://twitter.com/RepGwenMoore/status/1345781291749404673?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,395 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    So it turns out an impeachment won't stop Trump from running again nor will he lose his pension and other benefits.

    So this is an unnecessary drama with just a few days left before he leaves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Billy Mays wrote: »
    Yeah something along those lines

    Think he also said America were bigger cowards cos they launch missiles from 500 miles away

    Being too honest about it. from that perspective.

    atwar-wikileaks-blogSpan.jpg

    And honesty about THAT ^ is why Chelsea Manning is still in prison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    So it turns out an impeachment won't stop Trump from running again nor will he lose his pension and other benefits.

    So this is an unnecessary drama with just a few days left before he leaves.

    Stop regurgitating incorrect tweets etc. you saw.

    Impeachment, upon conviction, removes the defendant from office and lifetime bans them from doing so. Strip him of his post-presidential honors, his presidential library, office & staff, pension, and travel & security budget.

    The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So it turns out an impeachment won't stop Trump from running again nor will he lose his pension and other benefits.

    So this is an unnecessary drama with just a few days left before he leaves.

    Do you ever stop talking utter drivel?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,395 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Overheal wrote: »
    Stop regurgitating incorrect tweets etc. you saw.

    Impeachment, upon conviction, removes the defendant from office and lifetime bans them from doing so. Strip him of his post-presidential honors, his presidential library, office & staff, pension, and travel & security budget.

    The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

    Well the conviction seems highly unlikely.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement