Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

briany wrote: »

If Trump were free and able to run again for 2024, I would expect him to win the Republican nomination quite comfortably, but he is now too polarising to win the presidency.

If it's normal voting in person then he'd win easily. Right now no one is representing 150m of his supporters in US.
And what if he did win? Suddenly that is not democracy, and he would spent another 4 years getting bashed constantly by the Left.
US Politics is a joke, they all claim democracy is the most important thing, but hound and harass who even wins the vote.
It's sad really .

Trump has 150m supporters in the US???

Really????

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

The Harris Administration state that economic business relief will be made based in part on race & gender, that they will be made a priority. We get a glimpse into the systemic racial discrimination that white people can expect to face in the coming years. This sort of blatant Democratic racism is nothing new.


There's me thinking that businesses received aid based on government economic criteria, not to prioritize businesses based on skin color or gender, you'd have thought that aid would be equally provided or distributed to business suffering. Discrimination based on race and sex includes white people and remains unlawful under federal law. I thought their goal was to unify the country. Nothing says unity and healing like segregation. The Democrats want to prove they're not racist & sexist by being racist & sexist!


Biden hasn't even started the job yet and here he is promoting his intentions for the implementation of institutionalized racism.

https://twitter.com/Transition46/status/1348403213200990209

The first round of the pandemic help for businesses you wanna guess who was most discriminated against..

"But black-owned businesses appear to be benefiting less from the small-business rescue program. Only 12 percent of black and Hispanic business owners who applied for a PPP loan received it between April 30 and May 12, according to a survey from Color of Change and UnidosUS, two groups advocate for racial equality. That's despite 50 percent of those business owners requesting less than $20,000 in aid. There remains close to $130 billion left in the fund."

"The Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program is a driver of racial inequality, rather than a means to provide desperately needed relief for the small businesses at the heart of Black and Brown communities,” Rashad Robinson, the president of Color of Change, said in a statement."

"Another report, this one from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, found that small black-owned firms have more trouble securing loans and tend to have less cash on hand. Black businesses applied for smaller loans, on average, and were twice as likely to be rejected by lenders compared to white-owned businesses."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/black-business-owners-hit-hardest-by-coronavirus-pandemic

A link from within the article

https://www.unidosus.org/about-us/media/press/releases/051820-UnidosUS-Press-Release-COVID-19-Survey-Black-and-Latino-Small-Business

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

The Harris Administration state that economic business relief will be made based in part on race & gender, that they will be made a priority. We get a glimpse into the systemic racial discrimination that white people can expect to face in the coming years. This sort of blatant Democratic racism is nothing new.


There's me thinking that businesses received aid based on government economic criteria, not to prioritize businesses based on skin color or gender, you'd have thought that aid would be equally provided or distributed to business suffering. Discrimination based on race and sex includes white people and remains unlawful under federal law. I thought their goal was to unify the country. Nothing says unity and healing like segregation. The Democrats want to prove they're not racist & sexist by being racist & sexist!


Biden hasn't even started the job yet and here he is promoting his intentions for the implementation of institutionalized racism.

Weird how you see people having equal access to resources needed to reopen and rebuild." as racist against white people. Eaqual access is racist, apparently. Just shows how you view people who are not white - not deserving of equal treatment, and giving it to them is a disgrace.

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

If it's normal voting in person then he'd win easily. Right now no one is representing 150m of his supporters in US.
And what if he did win? Suddenly that is not democracy, and he would spent another 4 years getting bashed constantly by the Left.
US Politics is a joke, they all claim democracy is the most important thing, but hound and harass who even wins the vote.
It's sad really .

Whether it’s mail in voting or not is irrelevant as we’ve seen though the 60 odd lawsuits since the election. Trump will lose because while his supporters will go out and vote for him, he will encourage anyone who does not want him to be president to also vote. Americans have seen where being lax with voting gets them in 2016.

Carfacemandog wrote: »

She was also directing traffic via Twitter during the riots, trying go keep them up to speed on Pelosis movements in order for them to locate her. The FBI will surely be hwvingv words, at the very least.

Oh, and here's something for the "free speech" posters to intentionally ignore:

https://twitter.com/Bri4CO/status/1347196470693228544

I would like to think it was caused by the moment she was living in being scared and the few brain cells that she has over loaded and it was a mistake, but I'm not so sure on it..

Free speech when it affects them but fook everyone else.. hopefully the user goes after her with 1A

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

That's the thinking, bringing Hitler into was a bad idea though.

Was it a bad idea or was it intentional, because ya know, she knows the people she is talking to too? I know where my thoughts are.

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

by that "logic" Biden has 160M supporters.

True, works both ways.


Democrats like the 2.5 kids , the dog named rover, and the white picket fence.
While republicans could have 10 plus kids lol .

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

True, works both ways.


Democrats like the 2.5 kids , the dog named rover, and the white picket fence.
While republicans could have 10 plus kids lol .

Yes, unprotected sex among uneducated conservatives sure has led to a popular rising of stupid people.

Overheal wrote: »

Yes, unprotected sex among uneducated conservatives sure has led to a popular rising of stupid people.

All the while needing socialism to survive?? Lol

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

USA is a split country. No bringing it together.
Live and let live is the answer, but you have Kamala coming out with


I would give lawmakers in Congress 100 days to pass “reasonable gun safety laws,” “If they fail to do it,” “then I will take executive action.”


Why not concentrate on other things, stirring the pot is not productive .

The congress write laws. How is that not inherently 'stirring the pot' and how is it not capitulating to terrorism to avoid talking about the issue because you're afraid of stirring the pot?

I worry about the data leak. Some nut job taking vigilante action would just escalate things. The terrorists need to be brought to justice and vigilante behaviour is obviously not justice. I know that was not what people have in mind but it just takes one.

For a group calling Biden a communist and the most extreme left wing ticket ever they sure are now suddenly interest in unity and sure what's a little treason between colleagues.

This is just like walking up to someone and pu ching them and then asking to suddenly be friends when you realise they are still standing.

May as well let everyone go from prison. It is just increasing the divide between them, their families and the rest of the country by putting them in jail sure.