Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

Muahahaha wrote: »

Incredible that the Democrat representative has to ask that military members who are sympathetic to Trump not be employed on Bidens inauguration day.

This is the most concerning idea, that there are many cops and military in the states who are sympathetic to Trump, who have been radicalised, and who will cooperate with outside attempts to get at members of Biden's administration if not Biden himself, some time during the next four years.

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

I hope she's been having a chat with the FBI about her people who were outside possibly rioting, participating in an insurrection..

https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1348311925138939905?s=19

She was also directing traffic via Twitter during the riots, trying go keep them up to speed on Pelosis movements in order for them to locate her. The FBI will surely be hwvingv words, at the very least.

Oh, and here's something for the "free speech" posters to intentionally ignore:

https://twitter.com/Bri4CO/status/1347196470693228544

duploelabs wrote: »

In addition to not being effective against state crimes and the IRS, the pardon power cannot work in relation to crimes committed which an impeachment has been brought against

Which is what the impeachment is all about, that and not running in 2024

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

The Harris Administration state that economic business relief will be made based in part on race & gender, that they will be made a priority. We get a glimpse into the systemic racial discrimination that white people can expect to face in the coming years. This sort of blatant Democratic racism is nothing new.


There's me thinking that businesses received aid based on government economic criteria, not to prioritize businesses based on skin color or gender, you'd have thought that aid would be equally provided or distributed to business suffering. Discrimination based on race and sex includes white people and remains unlawful under federal law. I thought their goal was to unify the country. Nothing says unity and healing like segregation. The Democrats want to prove they're not racist & sexist by being racist & sexist!


Biden hasn't even started the job yet and here he is promoting his intentions for the implementation of institutionalized racism.

https://twitter.com/Transition46/status/1348403213200990209

5 people died last week because of Donny, but yeah, so anyway, go on...?

briany wrote: »

If Trump were free and able to run again for 2024, I would expect him to win the Republican nomination quite comfortably, but he is now too polarising to win the presidency.

If it's normal voting in person then he'd win easily. Right now no one is representing 150m of his supporters in US.
And what if he did win? Suddenly that is not democracy, and he would spent another 4 years getting bashed constantly by the Left.
US Politics is a joke, they all claim democracy is the most important thing, but hound and harass who even wins the vote.
It's sad really .

Trump has 150m supporters in the US???

Really????

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

The Harris Administration state that economic business relief will be made based in part on race & gender, that they will be made a priority. We get a glimpse into the systemic racial discrimination that white people can expect to face in the coming years. This sort of blatant Democratic racism is nothing new.


There's me thinking that businesses received aid based on government economic criteria, not to prioritize businesses based on skin color or gender, you'd have thought that aid would be equally provided or distributed to business suffering. Discrimination based on race and sex includes white people and remains unlawful under federal law. I thought their goal was to unify the country. Nothing says unity and healing like segregation. The Democrats want to prove they're not racist & sexist by being racist & sexist!


Biden hasn't even started the job yet and here he is promoting his intentions for the implementation of institutionalized racism.

https://twitter.com/Transition46/status/1348403213200990209

The first round of the pandemic help for businesses you wanna guess who was most discriminated against..

"But black-owned businesses appear to be benefiting less from the small-business rescue program. Only 12 percent of black and Hispanic business owners who applied for a PPP loan received it between April 30 and May 12, according to a survey from Color of Change and UnidosUS, two groups advocate for racial equality. That's despite 50 percent of those business owners requesting less than $20,000 in aid. There remains close to $130 billion left in the fund."

"The Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program is a driver of racial inequality, rather than a means to provide desperately needed relief for the small businesses at the heart of Black and Brown communities,” Rashad Robinson, the president of Color of Change, said in a statement."

"Another report, this one from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, found that small black-owned firms have more trouble securing loans and tend to have less cash on hand. Black businesses applied for smaller loans, on average, and were twice as likely to be rejected by lenders compared to white-owned businesses."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/black-business-owners-hit-hardest-by-coronavirus-pandemic

A link from within the article

https://www.unidosus.org/about-us/media/press/releases/051820-UnidosUS-Press-Release-COVID-19-Survey-Black-and-Latino-Small-Business

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

The Harris Administration state that economic business relief will be made based in part on race & gender, that they will be made a priority. We get a glimpse into the systemic racial discrimination that white people can expect to face in the coming years. This sort of blatant Democratic racism is nothing new.


There's me thinking that businesses received aid based on government economic criteria, not to prioritize businesses based on skin color or gender, you'd have thought that aid would be equally provided or distributed to business suffering. Discrimination based on race and sex includes white people and remains unlawful under federal law. I thought their goal was to unify the country. Nothing says unity and healing like segregation. The Democrats want to prove they're not racist & sexist by being racist & sexist!


Biden hasn't even started the job yet and here he is promoting his intentions for the implementation of institutionalized racism.

Weird how you see people having equal access to resources needed to reopen and rebuild." as racist against white people. Eaqual access is racist, apparently. Just shows how you view people who are not white - not deserving of equal treatment, and giving it to them is a disgrace.

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

If it's normal voting in person then he'd win easily. Right now no one is representing 150m of his supporters in US.
And what if he did win? Suddenly that is not democracy, and he would spent another 4 years getting bashed constantly by the Left.
US Politics is a joke, they all claim democracy is the most important thing, but hound and harass who even wins the vote.
It's sad really .

Whether it’s mail in voting or not is irrelevant as we’ve seen though the 60 odd lawsuits since the election. Trump will lose because while his supporters will go out and vote for him, he will encourage anyone who does not want him to be president to also vote. Americans have seen where being lax with voting gets them in 2016.

Wasn't there a group of women, Trump supporters arguing how the large democratic cities swing votes for states, whole state can be red, except the capitol city which is blue, and has more of a population.
The said they were encouraging women to fck their way to power by having lots of kids.

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

Can't embed the link

https://youtu.be/bNQLSEz3tpY

It is very sad..

That's the thinking, bringing Hitler into was a bad idea though.

Carfacemandog wrote: »

She was also directing traffic via Twitter during the riots, trying go keep them up to speed on Pelosis movements in order for them to locate her. The FBI will surely be hwvingv words, at the very least.

Oh, and here's something for the "free speech" posters to intentionally ignore:

https://twitter.com/Bri4CO/status/1347196470693228544

I would like to think it was caused by the moment she was living in being scared and the few brain cells that she has over loaded and it was a mistake, but I'm not so sure on it..

Free speech when it affects them but fook everyone else.. hopefully the user goes after her with 1A

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

by that "logic" Biden has 160M supporters.

Logic!? Get outta here with that nonsense.

So now we're counting hypothetical children of trump supporters as trump supporters?

How insecure is MAGA exactly?

And doesn't that mean Biden has the support of 160 million voters and their kids?