Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXX-113,332 ROI(2,282 deaths) 81,251 NI (1,384 deaths) (05/01) Read OP

1171172174176177330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,384 ✭✭✭Duffy the Vampire Slayer


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    I think seasonal is the wrong word. It clearly spreads at similar pace in populations with low susceptibility as we see with many AMerican states and European countries seeing peaks within the same period, almost to the exact day, despite differencesin restrictions.

    But Brazil has now overtaken it's winter peak , as has South Africa nad Colombia who are in high summer season so it's quite evidently not seasonal, the low cases in summer in Europe coincided with extremely reduced rates of ifnections after continent widelockdowns ended in late Spring.

    Colombia doesn't have seasons in the sense Irish people would be familiar with. November is generally the wettest, coldest month in Bogotá, immediately followed by the driest warmest month in December.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,160 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Ficheall wrote: »
    By the end of last January it was clear covid was going to be a problem, and there was a fear that people wouldn't take it seriously enough until it was too late. It feels like that again.

    Nurses on the UK news talking about how the number of previously healthy 20/30 year olds they're seeing with breathing difficulties is on the up.. And unaffected people over here claiming it's overblown and nothing to worry about.

    This thing is going to get worse before it gets better, vaccines or not.

    Ah, I see your point.

    I'm in full agreement. It's still not really hitting home to a lot of people how serious this is. Look at the amount of hospitalisations now - and we're not even peaking yet. That's genuinely scary to me. To be fair, I think there's more acknowledgement than usual that this is a grave situation. Most can't deny it at this stage - except for the few permanently chronically deluded posters who seem to simply not reside mentally in the real world.

    I know we're all gluttons on here for all Covid related news, but out there, in daily life, it really hasn't filtered down to people I work with or know how rough these next weeks will be.

    Personally, it reminds me a bit more of early March where the news and the informed commentary was telling us to get ready and be prepared, but, yet, life was still going on as normal and no-one seemed the least bit concerned when you stepped outside the front door and it was hard to square that circle in my head that told me that something was coming that could turn all of this quickly arse over tit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Better to let him visit his grandkids and then kill off all his elderly neighbors?

    There is a formal structure in place for support bubbles and for good reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    The CSO website website listed figures under 5 as .. with an *
    It;s not accurate with figures under 5, the daily HPSC reports list all deaths, thats what you should be using.

    42 deaths in a population of 5 mil is low yes, but if we had a serial killer targeting under 65's with 42 deaths already.... well there would be public outcry, people would be terrified. Because it's a virus.... those deaths seem to be acceptable to you.

    If someone under 5 died of this we would know about it, we have to accept some death though or else we will be locked down forever. We accept it in all aspects of life but for some reason we cannot accept it if its from covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Juwwi wrote: »
    3 million per hour hour since March ?

    The fact most don’t know this shows it’s a tunnel vision exercise


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    niallo27 wrote: »
    If someone under 5 died of this we would know about it, we have to accept some death though or else we will be locked down forever. We accept it in all aspects of life but for some reason we cannot accept it if its from covid.

    You've gone from zero deaths in the past 6 weeks for under 65, despite it been proven that 40+ have died, to underlying conditions, to accepting it to now accepting a child dying.

    Man up and accept the thread you read on reddit was false, it happens to us all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Niall, over the last six months we suppressed the virus to **** with restrictions that you moaned about every single ****ing day.
    We've recently stopped suppressing it and we're now one of the worst covid hotspots on the planet.

    There's going to be further deaths in all sorts of age categories because of this

    The way you are going on, you would think we will all be dead in a month. How many do you think will die, 5k 10k 50k. H9nest question how many do you think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭the corpo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    You've gone from zero deaths in the past 6 weeks for under 65, despite it been proven that 40+ have died, to underlying conditions, to accepting it to now accepting a child dying.

    Man up and accept the thread you read on reddit was false, it happens to us all.

    I already did say it was wrong if you read back, can you admit 40+ plus people is tiny in the grand scheme of things or do you want zero deaths from covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭embraer170


    niallo27 wrote: »
    If someone under 5 died of this we would know about it, we have to accept some death though or else we will be locked down forever. We accept it in all aspects of life but for some reason we cannot accept it if its from covid.

    We accept it for aspects of life yes, but look at the real impact of COVID.

    The UK is seeing almost 1000 deaths in a day (and Germany the same). That is more than 5 Ryanair aircraft crashing daily killing everyone onboard, and for one country alone (again one country, ONE day, and not counting other health impacts). That is something no one would or should accept.

    Now of course people will come and say these were old people, etc. but still these were fellow humans who had months if not years left to live, to make the best of their retirement, grandkids, etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,216 ✭✭✭khalessi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Ignoring the economic catastrophe coming in the next few years in Ireland, the current measures since March have cost €3 million per hour.

    Every day is critical

    The HSE won’t improve in my lifetime that’s for sure

    If it was only Ireland struggling with the pandemic, fair enough. But it's almost every country worldwide suffering mentally, physically and financially.
    The term a rising tide lifts all boats, well there must be an opposite version for a tide lowering, because all boats are sinking worldwide. This is not something specific with Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    niallo27 wrote: »
    I already did say it was wrong if you read back, can you admit 40+ plus people is tiny in the grand scheme of things or do you want zero deaths from covid.

    Not tiny, it's still 40+ deaths which possibly could have been lower maybe avoided.
    The issue I have is when you place a value on those lives.
    40 is ok. is 400, 4000, 40000?
    That becomes a slippery slope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,160 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    The fact most don’t know this shows it’s tunnel vision exercise

    So what's the alternative Fintan?

    Just sit back and let it wash over us?

    It's been made very clear that if we continue as we are we won't have a functional health system by the end of the month - the numbers do not lie, we will simply run out of space if we keep going like this and admission numbers will worsen before they get better. These are undeniable facts now.

    What's your plausible suggestion to rectify or curtail that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    niallo27 wrote: »
    The way you are going on, you would think we will all be dead in a month. How many do you think will die, 5k 10k 50k. H9nest question how many do you think.

    I'd like help in working this out.

    How can we get solid hospitalisation, ICU and death per case data?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    embraer170 wrote: »
    We accept it for aspects of life yes, but look at the real impact of COVID.

    The UK is seeing almost 1000 deaths in a day (and Germany the same). That is more than 5 Ryanair aircraft crashing daily killing everyone onboard, and for one country alone (again one country, ONE day, and not counting other health impacts). That is something no one would or should accept.

    Now of course people will come and say these were old people, etc. but still these were fellow humans who had months if not years left to live, to make the best of their retirement, grandkids, etc.

    We need to have an adult conversation about death being a consequence of life.

    2020 was the worst year for death in the UK since 2008.

    12 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Not tiny, it's still 40+ deaths which possibly could have been lower maybe avoided.
    The issue I have is when you place a value on those lives.
    40 is ok. is 400, 4000, 40000?
    That becomes a slippery slope.

    It's a slippery slope the other way as well, do we lock everyone away until we get these numbers to zero or close to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Arghus wrote: »
    So what's the alternative Fintan?

    Just sit back and let it wash over us?

    It's been made very clear that if we continue as we are we won't have a functional health system by the end of the month - the numbers do not lie, we will simply run out of space if we keep going like this and admission numbers will worsen before they get better. These are undeniable facts now.

    What's your plausible suggestion to rectify or curtail that?

    Hello Argus.

    What’s my plausible suggestion?

    It’s that community transmission is not the biggest issue we have seen so far.

    It’s transmission within care homes, nursing homes and hospital settings.

    Something is wrong in those places.

    We need to know why it’s spreading in those places regardless of if it can be counteracted or not.

    5km restrictions won’t solve those issues


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    niallo27 wrote: »
    It's a slippery slope the other way as well, do we lock everyone away until we get these numbers to zero or close to it.

    No, as been proven by the multiple lockdowns and reopens.
    You downplay the ~40 deaths (excluding the 1264 which were hospitalized among those age groups) It;s not only deaths that are the issue. If covid had a 0% mortality rate, the hospitals would still be filled with patients and causing knock on effects to treatment and elective care.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,474 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Hello Argus.

    What’s my plausible suggestion?

    It’s that community transmission is not the biggest issue we have seen so far.

    It’s transmission within care homes, nursing homes and hospital settings.

    Something is wrong in those places.

    We need to know why it’s spreading in those places regardless of if it can be counteracted or not.

    5km restrictions won’t solve those issues

    It's spreading between everyone Fintan, mostly young people.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Not tiny, it's still 40+ deaths which possibly could have been lower maybe avoided.
    The issue I have is when you place a value on those lives.
    40 is ok. is 400, 4000, 40000?
    That becomes a slippery slope.

    Well, probably not even 4000 under 65's would die of COVID even if everyone in Ireland got it.
    I really don't get the obsession with under 65 deaths, nobody has said they are at risk and they are not the ones to be worrying about. Some people overemphasize the risk to younger folk in order to I don't know deceive or scare people into thinking it's scarier than it is, and likewise people on the other side regularly hit us with these figures as if they've blown open some horrendous scandal we are completely oblivious to , meaning they think anyone over 65 is completely expandable.

    There are enough people in society who are within this at risk group that COVID becomes a threat to major loss of life and by now I would have thought vast vast majority of people following restrictions are not doing it necessarily for their own health but that of older family and friends and people in the community.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,923 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    I went to restaurants and pubs serving food. I also went shopping. At all times, the protocols left me feeling safe. I didn't go to any house parties though.

    I'm sure you did feel safe. I'd imagine that most people who end up with a positive swab would say they had been safe if they were asked prior to developing symptoms. I doubt the majority of people go out with the intention to catch Covid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 423 ✭✭AutoTuning


    Seems we have the test & trace but never the isolate step.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,593 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    I see UK stepping in to help us, we can't help ourselves that's for sure. Where is EU when you want them??? No where .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,160 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Hello Argus.

    What’s my plausible suggestion?

    It’s that community transmission is not the biggest issue we have seen so far.

    It’s transmission within care homes, nursing homes and hospital settings.

    Something is wrong in those places.

    We need to know why it’s spreading in those places regardless of if it can be counteracted or not.

    5km restrictions won’t solve those issues

    It's hospitals and ICUs that are filling up now.

    It's spreading everywhere now, between every age group.

    What should we do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    Well, probably not even 4000 under 65's would die of COVID even if everyone in Ireland got it.
    I really don't get the obsession with under 65 deaths, nobody has said they are at risk and they are not the ones to be worrying about. Some people overemphasize the risk to younger folk in order to I don't know deceive or scare people into thinking it's scarier than it is, and likewise people on the other side regularly hit us with these figures as if they've blown open some horrendous scandal we are completely oblivious to , meaning they think anyone over 65 is completely expandable.

    There are enough people in society who are within this at risk group that COVID becomes a threat to major loss of life and by now I would have thought vast vast majority of people following restrictions are not doing it necessarily for their own health but that of older family and friends and people in the community.
    I was just reply to the OP who read on reddit that nobody under 65 has died in Ireland from Covid in the past 6 months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭CharlieHaghy


    Numbers are holding same as yesterday. This 9,000 cases is scaremongering from TH.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I see UK stepping in to help us, we can't help ourselves that's for sure. Where is EU when you want them??? No where .

    What the hell are you talking about?
    UK stepping in to help what exactly?
    We can't help ourselves with what?
    We are the EU, the EU is us ffs, they are not some mystical thing floating in the clouds above brussels ffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    I was just reply to the OP who read on reddit that nobody under 65 has died in Ireland from Covid in the past 6 months.

    Yes I know, I was just commenting on how it crops up a lot. It's an undeniably small proportion of the COVID deaths that receives unnecessarily large attention seeing as it's not the at risk group at all or the source of the very high numbers of excess deaths worldwide.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 293 ✭✭Tpcl20


    Statement from 1st Dec to 1st Jan:
    Hospitalisations
    0 to 4 is +4
    5 to 14 is +13
    15 to 24 is +53
    25 to 34 is +69
    35 to 44 is +55
    45 to 54 is +88
    55 to 64 is +107
    65 to 74 is +138
    75 to 84 is +167
    85+ has an error. It says 8,121 which would be 7,100ish too many. Maybe 812 which is a difference of 108. 85+ has 108 of a difference so it's probably that.

    Two unknown age as well.

    That's a stark reminder that no matter what age you are, you should be insulating yourself as best you can, because you don't know what outcome this will have for you.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement