Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXIX-85,394 ROI(2,200 deaths) 62,723 NI (1,240 deaths) (26/12) Read OP

19091939596318

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    It is a restriction, designed to keep you at your table for longer and to drink less alcohol in the limited time that you are supposed to have available to you - all designed to limit the spread of the virus, by limiting the potential for an increased amount of contacts per person.

    It's just that simple. The only simpler alternative, or maybe the easiest to understand and with less scope for 'clever' workarounds, would be to go back to total closure.


    And with the number of people playing the "coot hoor" card over the last few days, that may well be an option that comes into play before Christmas, in order to avoid the sort of lockdown that has just been announced for Germany. It's better than the alternative!

    Germany is going into total lockdown from Dec 16 to Jan 10, including schools, and Bavaria are also operating a curfew.

    Is that what people here want, because the behaviour of some is certainly going to make that a possible scenario.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Stheno wrote: »
    The police have told both venues they must serve food

    no serving drink until they clear their plate?


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And with the number of people playing the "coot hoor" card over the last few days, that may well be an option that comes into play before Christmas, in order to avoid the sort of lockdown that has just been announced for Germany. It's better than the alternative!

    Germany is going into total lockdown from Dec 16 to Jan 10, including schools, and Bavaria are also operating a curfew.

    Is that what people here want, because the behaviour of some is certainly going to make that a possible scenario.

    That’s probably why people are trying to squeeze in the partying and shopping while they can

    I’ve done most of my Christmas socialising now. Anything more is a bonus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,138 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    It is a restriction, designed to keep you at your table for longer and to drink less alcohol in the limited time that you are supposed to have available to you - all designed to limit the spread of the virus, by limiting the potential for an increased amount of contacts per person.

    It's just that simple. The only simpler alternative, or maybe the easiest to understand and with less scope for 'clever' workarounds, would be to go back to total closure.

    But your supposed to stay at your table at all times food or not are you not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭GeorgeBailey


    And with the number of people playing the "coot hoor" card over the last few days, that may well be an option that comes into play before Christmas, in order to avoid the sort of lockdown that has just been announced for Germany. It's better than the alternative!

    Germany is going into total lockdown from Dec 16 to Jan 10, including schools, and Bavaria are also operating a curfew.

    Is that what people here want, because the behaviour of some is certainly going to make that a possible scenario.

    In January? Sure, why not. Worst month of the year. Would far rather have a half normal christmas time followed by a January lockdown than a quiet and lonely December followed by a quiet and lonely January just to keep shops open.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    And with the number of people playing the "coot hoor" card over the last few days, that may well be an option that comes into play before Christmas, in order to avoid the sort of lockdown that has just been announced for Germany. It's better than the alternative!

    Germany is going into total lockdown from Dec 16 to Jan 10, including schools, and Bavaria are also operating a curfew.

    Is that what people here want, because the behaviour of some is certainly going to make that a possible scenario.
    While a January lockdown is not a given it is widely expected and I think many accept that is the price for a level of semi-normality for Christmas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    It is a restriction, designed to keep you at your table for longer and to drink less alcohol in the limited time that you are supposed to have available to you - all designed to limit the spread of the virus, by limiting the potential for an increased amount of contacts per person.

    It's just that simple. The only simpler alternative, or maybe the easiest to understand and with less scope for 'clever' workarounds, would be to go back to total closure.

    I would have thought food was primary reason for going there as they supposed to operating like a restaurant rather than a pub, sure you could provide table service in a drink only pub if that’s the case.

    Maybe only serving soft drinks with the food is the answer.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,685 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    I would have thought food was primary reason for going there as they supposed to operating like a restaurant rather than a pub, sure you could provide table service in a drink only pub if that’s the case.

    Maybe only serving soft drinks with the food is the answer.

    I think one of the issues is people essentially pub crawling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭jackboy


    So, are the restrictions going to level 2 before Christmas?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    jackboy wrote: »
    So, are the restrictions going to level 2 before Christmas?

    No


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭harr


    jackboy wrote: »
    So, are the restrictions going to level 2 before Christmas?
    Level 3 with some differences, travel outside your own County allowed from the 18th to midnight on the 6th of January. Then back into level 3 from the 7th


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,789 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Are house visits currently allowed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,439 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Are house visits currently allowed?

    Christmas changes here
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/ad569-level-3/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Are house visits currently allowed?

    No. But many people have continued to do them in a limited fashion. People are deciding for themselves safe practices. However, NPHET have lost many with the negative messaging.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,138 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Fair play to the GAA for getting the all irelands run off without much fuss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    A piece about the possible influence of autoantibodies on long COVID.
    Further tests revealed that the more “autoantibodies” patients had in their blood, the worse their disease. The Covid-19 patients had more antibodies that had turned on them than people with lupus, an autoimmune disease caused by similar wayward antibodies.
    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/dec/13/autoantibodies-may-be-driving-severe-covid-cases-study-shows


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,169 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    And with the number of people playing the "coot hoor" card over the last few days,

    What number is that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,807 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Fair play to the GAA for getting the all irelands run off without much fuss.
    Indeed, very smooth and well run season with lots of drama


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,751 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Fair play to the GAA for getting the all irelands run off without much fuss.

    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,956 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Fair play to the GAA for getting the all irelands run off without much fuss.


    Been much smoother than i expected, only one game not played


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,466 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.

    Probably shouldn't have messed it up for themselves during the club championships then......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,956 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.


    Ya thought an exception might have been made for the finals, few hundred tickets for each team. It would also have been a chance to trial new procedures etc for allowing limited attendances which is going to have to happen at some stage in 2021. Even the U-20's today couldnt wait on for the Senior final, its a bit much imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,792 ✭✭✭oceanman


    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.
    thats one of the reasons we have the lowest incidence rate in europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.
    Ya thought an exception might have been made for the finals, few hundred tickets for each team. It would also have been a chance to trial new procedures etc for allowing limited attendances which is going to have to happen at some stage in 2021. Even the U-20's today couldnt wait on for the Senior final, its a bit much imo

    Were family allowed into soccer finals in the last 2 weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Lowest incidence rate in Europe and the players still can’t have a couple of family members attend the finals in a stadium with over 80,000 capacity.
    It was after some county club finals that things really took off a few months ago!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,956 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Were family allowed into soccer finals in the last 2 weeks

    No and i think they should have been, it would only have been a few games, national finals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,956 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It was after some county club finals that things really took off a few months ago!

    They were completely different situations in fairness


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    No and i think they should have been, it would only have been a few games, national finals.

    That be reason of no one at the All Ireland then.

    also the camogie finals also


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,461 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    They were completely different situations in fairness

    How so its all GAA


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    They were completely different situations in fairness
    While not their fault, it was still very bad optics for the GAA and we got a lot of cases from those events in some parts of the country. They were never going to get any dispensation for this especially as the current public health message is not to congregate.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement