Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXIX-85,394 ROI(2,200 deaths) 62,723 NI (1,240 deaths) (26/12) Read OP

16364666869318

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    UK Vaccine opinion polls -
    https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-britons-back-air-travel-ban-for-people-whove-not-received-coronavirus-vaccine-poll-suggests-12154203
    • Only 20% say they would not get the vaccine.
    • 54% felt it would be acceptable to limit air travel to only people who have been vaccinated.
    • For transport in general, such as buses and trains, around a third (36%) thought it would be okay to limit travel to vaccinated people.
    • The percentage in support of limiting access to restaurants was 39%, and 44% for cinemas.

      None that surprising but the most bizarre one is this -
    • '11% say they could stop following social distancing after they get vaccinated'..did I read this one right have I misinterpreted something about this line I don't understand how the figure could be that small??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,879 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    how much do people expect cases to start to rise now starting in the next few days? thurday is 10 days since end of level 5 and then sunday since pubs re-opened. hopefully not enough to go back to level 5 in january but i fear we will
    Bit late responding to you but it's anybody's guess how things will be at the weekend. On Friday/Saturday there'll be data to go by to predict what the next couple of weeks will.look like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    None that surprising but the most bizarre one is this - [*]'11% say they could stop following social distancing after they get vaccinated'..did I read this one right have I misinterpreted something about this line I don't understand how the figure could be that small??
    [/LIST]
    It's mentioned later on that this is the % who would ignore any rules in place after they were vaccinated. We know that we will need people to continue social distancing, wearing masks etc after they've been vaccinated as we don't know yet whether they can still spread the virus. That 11% are effectively saying "screw that, I'm not following any more rules".

    It's good news in my opinion - the message has got through to the other 89% that until we have most of the population vaccinated, we are going to have to continue to be careful. There is a risk that vaccinated people could become large-scale spreaders of the virus if they go back to normal life while vaccinations are still in progress.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭Ironhead93


    They did say even if they introduce a circuit breaker non-essential retail will remain open, so aside from the hospitality sector being fcuked over (again) i doubt it will be that much different from level 3


  • Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hmmm wrote: »
    It's mentioned later on that this is the % who would ignore any rules in place after they were vaccinated. We know that we will need people to continue social distancing, wearing masks etc after they've been vaccinated as we don't know yet whether they can still spread the virus. That 11% are effectively saying "screw that, I'm not following any more rules".

    It's good news in my opinion - the message has got through to the other 89% that until we have most of the population vaccinated, we are going to have to continue to be careful. There is a risk that vaccinated people could become large-scale spreaders of the virus if they go back to normal life while vaccinations are still in progress.

    Do you think will this have an impact on easing of restrictions?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    The vaccine is the game changer. This will enable level 1 by late Spring. And we need to be pushing to ensure as many as possible are vaccinated asap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭majcos


    HSE operations report 7/12 as of 8pm

    216 Covid cases hospitalised - decrease from 231

    ICU Covid cases 28 - unchanged
    Ventilated 18 - unchanged
    1 death in ICU last 24 hours


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,879 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The vaccine is the game changer. This will enable level 1 by late Spring. And we need to be pushing to ensure as many as possible are vaccinated asap.
    You do know that there's no guarantees that those vaccinated can't still carry and spread the virus?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Before March 99.99% of people didnt know what PCR was, now its like an everyday word. Its almost comical reading some of the stuff on here, most 'experts' wouldn't know an analyzer if it fell out of the sky and hit them on the head never mind take them apart fix them and put them back together again.


    Actually only takes 3.5 hrs to run the (94) PCR tests, of course the logistics of getting to the lab etc adds to that time.

    Quick tests like Cepheid Genexpert IV are semi portable and about the size of a large desktop laser printer, can run 4 tests in 45 mins.

    POC like 15min Abbott NOW is not PCR but an isothermal NAT, size of a small inkjet printer. Very portable.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,788 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    eagle eye wrote: »
    You do know that there's no guarantees that those vaccinated can't still carry and spread the virus?

    The first group being vaccinated are those at risk of severe covid-19 resulting in potential hospitalisation and death. Should these people be protected from hospitalisation and death, spread of the virus becomes a secondary issue.

    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    marno21 wrote: »
    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths.


    But Murphy's law telling anything that can go wrong will go wrong.


    I do not mean it will not work, most likely it will work. But i wouldn't relax until the issue completely resolved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,879 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    marno21 wrote:
    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.

    No, you see how it goes and react accordingly as we've done up to now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep


    72sheep wrote: »
    Consider me triggered :-) The vast vast majority of the psychological issues are going to be due to NPHET's lockdown response to Covid - and not the virus itself. I wonder whatever happened to the speculated physical risks of the virus e.g lung scarring and whatever else they were forewarning about previously. If this report is true then it's a very aggressive stance for NPHET to be taking. Maybe they can't quite believe how submissive the populus has been and are establishing the narrative for the next phases while everyone's still stunned.

    [Probably bad karma to respond to my own post but I'll risk it.]

    Wowee, I just looked at that 'Public Opinion Tracking Research' CMO report for first time. This content is a wet dream for CMO lawyers and HR team going forwards - and conveniently the source material behind all those slides is entirely fabricable and impossible to invalidate. Great work.

    I'm also not sure how surveying the populus on how they "feel" made it to near the top of the priorities list when we're on the precipice of our health system melting down. If CMO leadership were assured of their actions then they would not need - or have the resources available - to take the pulse of the public mood.

    Hopefully via FOI we'll be able to see who proposed this particular report so we can give them all the due "credit" they deserve over the years to come :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    eagle eye wrote: »
    You do know that there's no guarantees that those vaccinated can't still carry and spread the virus?

    That is why the more people vaccinated the better. Like it or not, normal life will resume. And this virus does not kill people stone dead in the street.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    marno21 wrote: »
    The first group being vaccinated are those at risk of severe covid-19 resulting in potential hospitalisation and death. Should these people be protected from hospitalisation and death, spread of the virus becomes a secondary issue.

    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.

    Well said. Unfortunately it seems that there are people who are addicted to lock downs, restrictions and media attention. They seem to ignore the far greater and long term damage of such lockdowns.

    It will be nice to see queues for car parks again, people commuting to work, not having to wear a mask while shopping, having a game of golf followed by a meal with friends, a random pint in town while reading the Christmas bumper edition of the RTÉ guide, heading to the airport on holidays without guilt and fear of RTÉ following you around with a camera.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Well said. Unfortunately it seems that there are people who are addicted to lock downs, restrictions and media attention. They seem to ignore the far greater and long term damage of such lockdowns.

    It will be nice to see queues for car parks again, people commuting to work, not having to wear a mask while shopping, having a game of golf followed by a meal with friends, a random pint in town while reading the Christmas bumper edition of the RTÉ guide, heading to the airport on holidays without guilt and fear of RTÉ following you around with a camera.

    It does seem that some people have got themselves into what seems like a comfortzone when it comes to lockdowns!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,879 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It does seem that some people have got themselves into what seems like a comfortzone when it comes to lockdowns!
    There's lots and lots of people far happier in lockdown because it's less likely they'll pick up the virus.
    Nobody ever talks about the stress and trauma they suffer from when everything is open and numbers are rising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    marno21 wrote: »
    The first group being vaccinated are those at risk of severe covid-19 resulting in potential hospitalisation and death. Should these people be protected from hospitalisation and death, spread of the virus becomes a secondary issue.

    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.

    How long will this this take to vaccinate 99% of vulnerable people ? I have not really seen much about the vaccine rollout in this country. Am hoping given our small population it might be relatively soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    eagle eye wrote: »
    There's lots and lots of people far happier in lockdown because it's less likely they'll pick up the virus.
    Nobody ever talks about the stress and trauma they suffer from when everything is open and numbers are rising.

    People's circumstances likely to dictate how they respond. A young family likely to have a much different attitude than an older more vulnerable family. Most people probably realise this. I don't think anyone feels comfortable in a pandemic for a number of reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,654 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    wadacrack wrote: »
    People's circumstances likely to dictate how they respond. A young family likely to have a much different attitude than an older more vulnerable family. Most people probably realise this. I don't think anyone feels comfortable in a pandemic for a number of reasons.

    Yeah I don't know one family or person who are happy to be in lockdown


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    marno21 wrote: »
    The first group being vaccinated are those at risk of severe covid-19 resulting in potential hospitalisation and death. Should these people be protected from hospitalisation and death, spread of the virus becomes a secondary issue.

    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.

    Lockdowns aren't just determined by deathes. They're determined mostly by load on and availability of of the health system. Vaccines should reduce the load. However, we don't yet know vaccine efficacy in various vulnerable groups and demographics. We'll only know early Feb for sure if older groups aren't being protected by the vaccine. Then you have to consider the person who got the vaccine today, needs a second dose on schedule and only one month after that second dose are they considered immune. That's what's been tested so far. Maybe that latter window will shorten to a week. Maybe it won't. We'll just have to wait and see.

    It won't be until at least February before anyplace can really start planning about return to normality. Make no mistake though we are getting closer to that point. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Russman


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Lockdowns aren't just determined by deathes. They're determined mostly by load on and availability of of the health system. Vaccines should reduce the load. However, we don't yet know vaccine efficacy in various vulnerable groups and demographics. We'll only know early Feb for sure if older groups aren't being protected by the vaccine. Then you have to consider the person who got the vaccine today, needs a second dose on schedule and only one month after that second dose are they considered immune. That's what's been tested so far. Maybe that latter window will shorten to a week. Maybe it won't. We'll just have to wait and see.

    It won't be until at least February before anyplace can really start planning about return to normality. Make no mistake though we are getting closer to that point. :)

    This exactly. Its not going to be a lightbulb moment where we're all of a sudden back to normal. I think we're definitely rounding the final bend and there's an end in sight thankfully, but I'd say realistically it'll still be late spring/summer before we'll be in that space.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    marno21 wrote: »
    The first group being vaccinated are those at risk of severe covid-19 resulting in potential hospitalisation and death. Should these people be protected from hospitalisation and death, spread of the virus becomes a secondary issue.

    Jonathan Van Tam reckons that the first wave of vaccinations will eliminate 99% of deaths. That makes this virus a completely different kettle of fish. Even Ireland’s relatively high CFR of 2.8% becomes 0.028% if 99% of deaths are eliminated. You don’t have lockdowns when there’s a .028% risk of death.

    Not to be cynical but I really can't imagine rules like face masks being dropped even if it was spreading solely in the young population and IFR became lower than flu


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    Not to be cynical but I really can't imagine rules like face masks being dropped even if it was spreading solely in the young population and IFR became lower than flu
    Face masks will be one of the last rules to drop, purely because they offer a good deal of impact for very little cost. There's nothing stopping an almost complete reopening while still keeping facemasks in place.

    As IFR drops though, usage will naturally wane, people will consider them less necessary and will just stop wearing them regardless of what rules are in place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    Not to be cynical but I really can't imagine rules like face masks being dropped even if it was spreading solely in the young population and IFR became lower than flu

    They'll be dropped damn fast. As is often said, we don't often do riots or large scale protests in this country. What we do is turn a blind eye to whatever rule or law we don't like, as was be seen with the last failed lockdown. The British called us lawless and ungovernable because of it, but when you think about it, it's a lot more civilised than smashing the place up and cracking heads. Once the vaccines start rolling out most people will drop the masks, other than those who wish to wear them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I do wonder though if we should adopt an approach of encouraging masks every winter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,879 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I do wonder though if we should adopt an approach of encouraging masks every winter.

    It'd make an awful lot of sense for employers to insist that anybody who wished to continue working with cold or flu like symptoms have to wear a mask.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    PCR is performed in a laboratory. That cannot be performed in nursing homes.

    Must be getting my tests mixed up, this one takes 15 minutes to get result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,903 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Yeah I don't know one family or person who are happy to be in lockdown

    Nothing stopping them staying in lockdown for as long as they want. Have no visitors, stay within 5km of their house etc etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I do wonder though if we should adopt an approach of encouraging masks every winter.

    There really is not good evidence of justification for their usage without other restrictons. American cities have near 100% mask usage and still cases growing massively. It doesn't disprove that they might have some benefit but masks alone don't seem to do much. Maybe with the less contagious flu masks might have a more prnounced impact though. If they were found to be effective for flu I'd say it'd be a good idea to maintain mandate on public transport from December -February,

    But countries in East Asia with mask culture stll have large flu outbreaks too.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement