Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1279280282284285325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    ixoy wrote: »
    Would they have to use their own supply though in such cases rather than the EU supply already bought?

    Yes, the EU offered but the UK opted out of being part of the EU purchasing arrangement. It wasn't Brexity enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Pasteur. wrote: »
    Can't see the US having the authority to requisition vaccines from Belgium
    The US doesn't give a sh1t about soveriegnty or jurisdiction.

    They would threaten Pfizer with massive fines or potentially even executives with criminal charges if they refused to bring stocks back to the US. The US likes to falsely believe that companies with a US HQ are "American" and therefore have a duty to be loyal to America.

    Now, when it all shakes out, nothing would ultimately happen. Supreme courts and international courts would find Pfizer well within their rights to refuse to import stuff produced outside of the US, and fines and criminal charges declared a massive overstep in executive power.

    But that wouldn't stop a mad scramble initially to try and avert a major incident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    There's not a hope in hell the US are going taking vaccines from Belgium, that's not gonna happen. The EU would have a coronary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 256 ✭✭Pasteur.


    seamus wrote: »
    The US doesn't give a sh1t about soveriegnty or jurisdiction.

    They would threaten Pfizer with massive fines or potentially even executives with criminal charges if they refused to bring stocks back to the US. The US likes to falsely believe that companies with a US HQ are "American" and therefore have a duty to be loyal to America.

    Now, when it all shakes out, nothing would ultimately happen. Supreme courts and international courts would find Pfizer well within their rights to refuse to import stuff produced outside of the US, and fines and criminal charges declared a massive overstep in executive power.

    But that wouldn't stop a mad scramble initially to try and avert a major incident.

    Yes they do what they want and are hypocritical about it

    See it in so many areas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    There's not a hope in hell the US are going taking vaccines from Belgium, that's not gonna happen. The EU would have a coronary.
    No, of course not. But that doesn't mean the lunatic in charge of the asylum won't try.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    It’s a pity Trump didn’t take the actual Virus as serious as the Vaccine.

    There were plenty of reports in the early days of PPE being taken by the US that was destined for elsewhere.

    Trump only knows one way to operate and that’s to Bully, when he can do it now in the name of the Greatest county in the world he will have plenty of support.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    Trump's alter ego BoJo has no qualms about breaking agreements with other countries so I doubt the elder lemon would too concerned.
    However, Executive Order or not I can't see the administration in the US following through on this, Trump is in his death throes never, I hope, to recover, and saner heads can see that despite all their power, the US still needs friends around the world to look after their interests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    I don't think that the US would go as far as try and seize supplies, and probably what we'll see is something vague wrapped in a US flag but with no real impact. However it's a risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    To be honest I think the UK just want to be first. Today they ha r a picture of the first person in the world receiving the vaccine on UK soil


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Gael23 wrote: »
    To be honest I think the UK just want to be first. Today they ha r a picture of the first person in the world receiving the vaccine on UK soil
    And fair play to them for it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    They selected an Irish person to take the risk of having the first dose though :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    And fair play to them for it

    Why do you say that? They had little input in its development, all they did really was to bite the bullet on floating it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Marhay70 wrote: »
    Why do you say that? They had little input in its development, all they did really was to bite the bullet on floating it.
    I think any country who leads the way in vaccinations should be commended. There's very little to lose - any potential negatives are heavily outweighed by positives.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    hmmm wrote: »
    I don't think that the US would go as far as try and seize supplies, and probably what we'll see is something vague wrapped in a US flag but with no real impact. However it's a risk.

    If anything it could slow down production in the US. It may be moved elsewhere if the manufacturers can't guarantee the ability to export.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    Does anybody know how the UK are tracking who has received the vaccine? Is it linked to their PPS equivalent or a register or something else? Will they call back the patient on the 21st day for the 2nd jab? Did a bit of googling but couldn't find much.

    That logistical challenge is where I fear the HSE may fall short.

    Momentous day and can't help feeling a bit jealous looking across the border but we will get there shortly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    Does anybody know how the UK are tracking who has received the vaccine? Is it linked to their PPS equivalent or a register or something else? Will they call back the patient on the 21st day for the 2nd jab? Did a bit of googling but couldn't find much.

    That logistical challenge is where I fear the HSE may fall short.

    Momentous day and can't help feeling a bit jealous looking across the border but we will get there shortly.

    When you get First Vac you receive a card stating the Date and Time of your second Vac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    I think any country who leads the way in vaccinations should be commended. There's very little to lose - any potential negatives are heavily outweighed by positives.

    Sorry, can't agree with you there, it was simply an attempt at political recovery by a PM who has made such a huge fcuk up of the pandemic to date, but we'll argue the toss elsewhere.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Here we go:

    https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1336283483799490561

    Looking forward to this getting underway. I am in the 2nd from last group so it will be sometime before I see one, but the comfort and security for those in the initial groups once they receive this and the population as a whole starts getting it will be wonderful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    marno21 wrote: »
    Here we go:

    https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1336283483799490561

    Looking forward to this getting underway. I am in the 2nd from last group so it will be sometime before I see one, but the comfort and security for those in the initial groups once they receive this and the population as a whole starts getting it will be wonderful.

    Which Category do Adults with Special Needs (living with an elderly Parent) fit ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Which Category do Adults with Special Needs (living with an elderly Parent) fit ?

    Those over 70 and people with special medical needs I think


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    Those over 70 and people with special medical needs I think

    OK so they would be in the same Category then. The over 70s Parent and the Special Needs Adult Child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    marno21 wrote: »
    Here we go:

    https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1336283483799490561

    Looking forward to this getting underway. I am in the 2nd from last group so it will be sometime before I see one, but the comfort and security for those in the initial groups once they receive this and the population as a whole starts getting it will be wonderful.

    I can see every cnut and his mother trying to get into the 6th category - "Key Workers (to be further refined)"

    I wish they'd give an estimate for the time they think it will take each group to be vaccinated though. I know there's still no vaccine approved and supply is hard to predict just now, but I'd love to know how long they think each category might take or how many people might be in each category. 15 categories - does that mean 15 months ? 12 months ? 6 months ?

    Still, great to think there's some sort of an end in sight, even if its still some time away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    We should start seen the benefits of this pretty quickly when rolled out.

    Hard to believe the end game is here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Im under 65 on immune suppressant medication but I fall into categoty 7.

    Number 6will be highly abused


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    We should start seen the benefits of this pretty quickly when rolled out.

    Hard to believe the end game is here

    Yeah, realistically once the first few bands are done there's little need for restrictions, it'll cover an awful lot of people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Around the middle of page 2 is where we'll start seeing the move towards the full end of restrictions. That'll be 3 months or so.

    If it seems like a lot of categories to get through before we get to the "end", remember that it's not about categories it's about the number in each. The first 2 pages make up about 50% of the population, the last page is 50%.

    The "All adults who don't fit in any other category" is the largest single category.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    Second from last myself too. Parents, parents in law and girlfriend are up near the very start.

    Normality will resume momentarily, please hold... :D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Number 6will be highly abused

    Absolutely. Unless the further refining of it leads to a proper definition.
    For the sake of fairness you'd hope it needs more than a letter written to yourself saying you're essential, like in the lockdowns !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Im under 65 on immune suppressant medication but I fall into categoty 7.

    Number 6will be highly abused

    My friend is in the same position, Im very surprised that group is so far down the list.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭Mervyn Skidmore


    Sorry if it's been asked before but will it be possible to pay for it if you need it sooner than when your category comes up?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement