Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

1302303305307308334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    So apparently Trump has $170 million from that fund to fight the fraud, formerly election donations. He can use this money as he pleases. Nice way to pay off a few debts.
    The amount of idiots that funded him is unbelievable. That's from the US news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭85603


    he's on youtube now from the whitehouse telling the world that he actually won.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Also, at no stage have I defended Trump's pardons. He's a despicable person who does despicable things.

    you called my post foundless(sic). My reply showed that it wasn't. nothing more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I think he has gone full Donald, meant to type groundless, but it came out as foundless. Never go full Donald, admit the obvious.

    they seem to have a lot in common with someone they claim to not like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    I think at this stage Trump will just drag it out to gather more money from the vulnerable and use it to cut a deal on his debts. That seems to be his sole motive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    85603 wrote: »
    he's on youtube now from the whitehouse telling the world that he actually won.

    I would mind, its not really doing numbers over there.

    Weird how none of the networks seem to have picked it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,284 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1334263576354230274?s=19

    I prefer presidents who don't have dirt on them by people would could divulge it

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,322 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    you called my post foundless(sic). My reply showed that it wasn't. nothing more.
    Your suggestion that I'm a closet a Trump fan was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭maebee


    Anyone see the video of Trump at the whitehouse? Says if he doesn't win this then he will try again in four years.

    Listen to the bint filming, hacking her guts up, another superspreader event hosted by the idiot in chief.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13356403/trump-confirms-run-president-2024-four-years/

    I got to 14 seconds and ditched it at "We love you President". Also it's a Sun video. Major YUK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,284 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    everlast75 wrote: »

    Was doing quite a heavy and in-depth "conflict of interest" training session in work recently. Trump placing underqualified family members as presidential advisors was highlighted, it's literally a textbook example.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Was doing quite a heavy and in-depth "conflict of interest" training session in work recently. Trump placing underqualified family members as presidential advisors was highlighted, it's literally a textbook example.

    Its a very very basic principle. To see it in a Government Administration let alone the US has been utterly shocking. The type of thing you would see in tin pot dictatorships.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Gunmonkey


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Was doing quite a heavy and in-depth "conflict of interest" training session in work recently. Trump placing underqualified family members as presidential advisors was highlighted, it's literally a textbook example.

    Well Ivanka has a lot of experience with consultancy, after seeing those large payments she received for doing so for the Trump company anyways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,284 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Your suggestion that I'm a closet a Trump fan was.

    i never suggested that. another lie from you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    as per usual you hold everybody other than trump to a much higher standard.

    i never suggested that. another lie from you
    What was that about then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    What was that about then?

    i thought it was very clear english.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    i thought it was very clear english.
    Well it seemed to me to be suggesting that I support Trump.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Well it seemed to me to be suggesting that I support Trump.

    what you infer from what I write does not mean I implied it. what you infer is an issue for you alone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    what you infer from what I write does not mean I implied it. what you infer is an issue for you alone.
    It would be a lot easier if you just said there was no intent to infer that. You still haven't denied it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    It would be a lot easier if you just said there was no intent to infer that. You still haven't denied it.

    why am I obliged to deny something that only existed in your mind. The issue is yours not mine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    why am I obliged to deny something that only existed in your mind. The issue is yours not mine.
    Ah right, playing the awkward game. It's very easy to take the assumption from what you said that you were suggesting I'm a fan of Trump but obviously you are very moody so I'll just leave it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,284 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Isn't it funny that those on here, who were banging on about Hunter Biden's laptop are AWOL now that Trump is talking about pardoning his kids?

    Wtf is that about.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,926 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    everlast75 wrote:
    Isn't it funny that those on here, who were banging on about Hunter Biden's laptop are AWOL now that Trump is talking about pardoning his kids?[

    Wtf is that about.
    Agendas.
    Same as others on here seen nothing wrong with posting unsubstantiated rumours about Trump. Agendas there too.

    Sadly the social media world is full of agendas and followers, the truth be damned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    eagle eye wrote: »
    It would be a lot easier if you just said there was no intent to infer that. You still haven't denied it.

    It actually wouldn't because it wouldn't make any sense. You need to look up the word "infer" in the dictionary, because you are using it incorrectly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Agendas.
    Same as others on here seen nothing wrong with posting unsubstantiated rumours about Trump. Agendas there too.

    Sadly the social media world is full of agendas and followers, the truth be damned.

    "both sides"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Isn't it funny that those on here, who were banging on about Hunter Biden's laptop are AWOL now that Trump is talking about pardoning his kids?

    Wtf is that about.

    Stood down. There are armies of these people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,044 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Isn't it funny that those on here, who were banging on about Hunter Biden's laptop are AWOL now that Trump is talking about pardoning his kids?

    Wtf is that about.

    It's about shills, gloating and being full of bullshit to try and big up their dear leader, scuttling back under their rocks when that same dear leader shows himself to be nothing but a con man.

    If they have any sense at all, they'll be reassessing just what it is about themselves that allowed them to become besotted with such an obvious shyster in the first place.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Carfacemandog


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Isn't it funny that those on here, who were banging on about Hunter Biden's laptop are AWOL now that Trump is talking about pardoning his kids?

    Wtf is that about.

    The same thing that's up with the getting "ever so offended" about things they happily ignore or even actively support if Trump or his followers involved.

    See: all the riot/protest/BLM threads. Some of the most pathetic reading on this entire website.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement