Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1191192194196197325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    hmmm wrote: »
    What else did Luke have to say? Also I'm not sure why he seems to be selling bathroom fittings, but I don't watch the LLS myself.

    https://twitter.com/annettesphotos/status/1327367754995949572

    Basically his contact in Pfizer has said safety data will be released next week and that it is safe and expects EUA from both the fda and ema not long after possibly the first week in December. Reckons similar time line for the moderna vaccine. Didn’t mention anything else. One comment he did make from hopefully by summer 21 we’ll be able to nearly fully relax, also said even if restrictions end there will be a lot of hesitant people and we probably won’t see full stadiums or gigs. Oh and needs at least 70% uptake of the vaccines to bring R0 to near 0.2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Cork2021 wrote: »
    Basically his contact in Pfizer has said safety data will be released next week and that it is safe and expects EUA from both the fda and ema not long after possibly the first week in December. Reckons similar time line for the moderna vaccine. Didn’t mention anything else. One comment he did make from hopefully by summer 21 we’ll be able to nearly fully relax, also said even if restrictions end there will be a lot of hesitant people and we probably won’t see full stadiums or gigs. Oh and needs at least 70% uptake of the vaccines to bring R0 to near 0.2

    Can understand people being hesitant at first to go back to a stadium or gig for example. Like everything though slowly people become more comfortable again.

    In terms of vaccine, Pfizer had said they expected safety data around next week, good that Moderna doesn't seem to be too far behind either. Looking good to potentially have 3 with EUA for January


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,832 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Luke said there's five more following those, so eight by the summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭lbj666


    Can understand people being hesitant at first to go back to a stadium or gig for example. Like everything though slowly people become more comfortable again.

    In terms of vaccine, Pfizer had said they expected safety data around next week, good that Moderna doesn't seem to be too far behind either. Looking good to potentially have 3 with EUA for January

    Authorities will be far more hesitant than gig goers, mass gatherings are going to be a very gradually introduced thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Cork2021 wrote: »
    Oh and needs at least 70% uptake of the vaccines to bring R0 to near 0.2

    I've been wondering about the 70% figure. Is that of total population including children? As far as I'm aware at this point only Pfizer/Biontech have tested on children and that's only in the 12-18 age range. So if the vaccine won't be given to pre-pubescent children for quite some time, does that mean we need a much higher proportion of adults to take the vaccine to bring us to 70%?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    iguana wrote: »
    I've been wondering about the 70% figure. Is that of total population including children? As far as I'm aware at this point only Pfizer/Biontech have tested on children and that's only in the 12-18 age range. So if the vaccine won't be given to pre-pubescent children for quite some time, does that mean we need a much higher proportion of adults to take the vaccine to bring us to 70%?

    That’s something I haven’t a clue about. Maybe Hmmzis or Hmmm could answer that one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,832 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The famous herd immunity, now it becomes a real factor to be considered with vaccines. I see the 70% but I think I've seen, in relation to other vaccines like 90%.
    Would that work out then as 70% uptake multiplied by 90% efficacy, resulting in a true immunity in the population of 63%?
    Whilst 90% by 90% would give 81% population immunity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    Water John wrote: »
    The famous herd immunity, now it becomes a real factor to be considered with vaccines. I see the 70% but I think I've seen, in relation to other vaccines like 90%.
    Would that work out then as 70% uptake multiplied by 90% efficacy, resulting in a true immunity in the population of 63%?
    Whilst 90% by 90% would give 81% population immunity.

    The inate infectivity of the virus also has to be considered. A virus like measles is super infectious(R0 between 12 and 18), so you need a super high level of immunity (>90%) to stop it spreading through the population. Covid 19 is not in that league at all so a far lower level of immunity is required to suppress it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,506 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    iguana wrote: »
    I've been wondering about the 70% figure. Is that of total population including children? As far as I'm aware at this point only Pfizer/Biontech have tested on children and that's only in the 12-18 age range. So if the vaccine won't be given to pre-pubescent children for quite some time, does that mean we need a much higher proportion of adults to take the vaccine to bring us to 70%?

    Not sure whether previously infected people would help boost the % also?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,832 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The inate infectivity of the virus also has to be considered. A virus like measles is super infectious(R0 between 12 and 18), so you need a super high level of immunity (>90%) to stop it spreading through the population. Covid 19 is not in that league at all so a far lower level of immunity is required to suppress it.

    Yes should have thought of that aspect.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,281 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Avian flu now spreading in Belgium. Factory farming and cheap meat and our diets need to change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Water John wrote: »
    Luke said there's five more following those, so eight by the summer.


    I'm allergic to RTE, did they actually have some positivity on last night?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭JacksonHeightsOwn


    The inate infectivity of the virus also has to be considered. A virus like measles is super infectious(R0 between 12 and 18), so you need a super high level of immunity (>90%) to stop it spreading through the population. Covid 19 is not in that league at all so a far lower level of immunity is required to suppress it.

    Is measles really more contagious than covid? U didn't know that...

    I have a friend who is one of those thick anti vaxxers and in a text exchange with him last night I did say, "how did you cope when you got measles as a kid" in fairness to him, good reply was simply. "well played....... Check mate"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,832 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It was good luck that MERS had a low infectivity as it had a 33% mortality. In ways we missed a bullet. Covid 19 could have been a lot worse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Whatever happened to the Russia vaccine? After the initial announcement I've seen nothing popping up in the media

    Another "we're better than America" lie from Putin?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    Water John wrote: »
    It was good luck that MERS had a low infectivity as it had a 33% mortality. In ways we missed a bullet. Covid 19 could have been a lot worse.




    Am I right in thinking now since the mRNA vaccine seems to be working so well, that scientists can now create a successful MERS vaccine with this tech?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking now since the mRNA vaccine seems to be working so well, that scientists can now create a successful MERS vaccine with this tech?
    I guess so, that also uses a spike protein. The trouble with something like MERS is so few people get it, the cost of phase 1-3 trials are prohibitive.

    I don't think the big countries will allow themselves to get caught out like with Covid again - imagine if this had a 20% fatality rate. I'd say we'll see a few mRNA plants being built which will stand semi-idle unless needed to rapidly build vaccines for new emerging viruses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    hmmm wrote: »
    I guess so, that also uses a spike protein. The trouble with something like MERS is so few people get it, the cost of phase 1-3 trials are prohibitive.

    I don't think the big countries will allow themselves to get caught out like with Covid again - imagine if this had a 20% fatality rate. I'd say we'll see a few mRNA plants being built which will stand semi-idle unless needed to rapidly build vaccines for new emerging viruses.


    I think either way, we hit an absolute milestone in scientific advancement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Avian flu now spreading in Belgium. Factory farming and cheap meat and our diets need to change.

    This is a vaccine thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Avian flu now spreading in Belgium. Factory farming and cheap meat and our diets need to change.


    Sir, this is a Wendy's


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    Water John wrote: »
    It was good luck that MERS had a low infectivity as it had a 33% mortality. In ways we missed a bullet. Covid 19 could have been a lot worse.

    I always thought because MERS had a high mortality rate it burned out by killing its host too quickly?

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I always thought because MERS had a high mortality rate it burned out by killing its host too quickly?

    MERS big weakness is that it never quite mastered human to human transmission. Certainly not to the extent of of other coronaviruses. A majority of cases are from camel to human.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,398 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    I always thought because MERS had a high mortality rate it burned out by killing its host too quickly?

    Exactly, isn't the issue with covid that many people aren't that sick or are asymptomatic and therefore tend to get on with things and spread it around


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    begbysback wrote: »
    Don’t worry, I never take financial advice from someone who can’t spell anonymous :)

    532925.PNG

    Up 13% since I gave you the tip. Pity. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,021 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Whatever happened to the Russia vaccine? After the initial announcement I've seen nothing popping up in the media

    Another "we're better than America" lie from Putin?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/nov/02/coronavirus-live-news-who-chief-tedros-in-quarantine-as-global-deaths-near-12m


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 355 ✭✭46 Long


    Avian flu now spreading in Belgium. Factory farming and cheap meat and our diets need to change.

    Except this has nothing to do with factory farming. Three wild birds that stayed in a bird sanctuary in Ostend tested positive for H5N8.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    News emerging this morning from the UK that authorities are considering taking action against social media companies which fail to remove anti-vax material from their outlets.
    I agree there is no place for it in a thread like this but I wonder if such a move could prove counter productive. I can just hear the narrative now, e.g. "What's to hide ?etc."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 177 ✭✭Westernworld.


    Marhay70 wrote: »
    News emerging this morning from the UK that authorities are considering taking action against social media companies which fail to remove anti-vax material from their outlets.
    I agree there is no place for it in a thread like this but I wonder if such a move could prove counter productive. I can just hear the narrative now, e.g. "What's to hide ?etc."

    I think this time the authorities have to act to get a high uptake on the vaccine

    Mixed messaging and fake news will drag the % right down if not countered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,398 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Marhay70 wrote: »
    News emerging this morning from the UK that authorities are considering taking action against social media companies which fail to remove anti-vax material from their outlets.
    I agree there is no place for it in a thread like this but I wonder if such a move could prove counter productive. I can just hear the narrative now, e.g. "What's to hide ?etc."

    Good, the anti vaxx morons should have no platform to peddle their rubbish.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭Voltex


    Voltex wrote: »
    Sputnik V data looking really good too.
    Not sure how they work out 92% efficacy out of 20 confirmed cases though.:confused:

    https://sputnikvaccine.com/newsroom/pressreleases/the-first-interim-data-analysis-of-the-sputnik-v-vaccine-against-covid-19-phase-iii-clinical-trials-/

    Russian vaccine has a efficacy of 92%....


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement