Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

1…183184186188189…334

Comments

  • #5552
    hometruths
    Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Boggles wrote: »
    So what you are saying is, here is a bunch of crazy racist shít Trump has said and done, but he is not racist because it was done for personal gain.

    Rudy?

    No. Read it again.


  • #5553
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    Wow, you read through that fast. Could you explain the flaws in his methodology here so?

    https://twitter.com/We_Have_Risen/status/1325129915709104129

    It's possible that he actually did since he could have flicked through them quite quickly as the things being described have been debunked already and have been discussed ad nauseum in this thread already, including the one you picked out.


  • #5554
    Christy42
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Court cases tumbling like dominoes say he isn't.

    Its just Trump's tactic from the last 4 years repeated.

    People are saying it is corrupt but I don't know. People are saying it but I don't know which means I get to start a rumour without ever needing proof of it.


    If there was any evidence of vote rigging they would have brought it forward by now. They have not.

    If they had serious suspicion about something going on there would consistency to the cases. There is none. What was the plan from evil Biden campaign that they are alleging. Is it burning Trump votes, is it counting them in the wrong pile, is it hacked machines, is it counting machines is it adding more votes from a clearly marked Biden/Harris van?

    It is an obvious scattershot campaign to desperately generate smoke so all people need to do is try to spread more and more obviously false rumours. Then people try and debunk them and there is 20 more rumours generated in that time.


  • #5555
    sabat
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Deleted User wrote: »
    It's possible that he actually did since he could have flicked through them quite quickly as the things being described have been debunked already and have been discussed ad nauseum in this thread already, including the one you picked out.

    Where?


  • #5556
    meep
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭meep


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Its just Trump's tactic from the last 4 years repeated.

    People are saying it is corrupt but I don't know. People are saying it but I don't know which means I get to start a rumour without ever needing proof of it.


    If there was any evidence of vote rigging they would have brought it forward by now. They have not.

    If they had serious suspicion about something going on there would consistency to the cases. There is none. What was the plan from evil Biden campaign that they are alleging. Is it burning Trump votes, is it counting them in the wrong pile, is it hacked machines, is it counting machines is it adding more votes from a clearly marked Biden/Harris van?

    It is an obvious scattershot campaign to desperately generate smoke so all people need to do is try to spread more and more obviously false rumours. Then people try and debunk them and there is 20 more rumours generated in that time.

    And don't forget that all of this is keeping the window open to allow them milk the base for contributions to the 'fight the steal' fund (50% of which goes to paying down election debts). The last con.


  • Advertisement
  • #5557
    Cody montana
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,585 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Trump campaign adviser Corey Lewandowski tests positive for coronavirus

    Womp womp.


  • #5558
    MadYaker
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,343 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    its been a hell of a year


  • #5559
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    Where?

    It was human error rather than a software error. This has been known for the past 5 days.

    "The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.
    The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses."

    https://www.truthorfiction.com/did-an-antrim-county-michigan-software-glitch-send-6000-trump-votes-to-biden/

    https://nbc25news.com/news/local/secretary-jocelyn-benson-says-false-claims-from-ronna-mcdaniel-have-no-merit

    Edit: And here is one example of it being discussed here before.


  • #5560
    Overheal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What was I saying: Comedy of Errors?

    https://twitter.com/lawcrimenews/status/1326942410153353223?s=20

    Oddly satisfying


  • #5561
    sabat
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Deleted User wrote: »
    It was human error rather than a software error. This has been known for the past 5 days.

    "The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.
    The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses."

    https://www.truthorfiction.com/did-an-antrim-county-michigan-software-glitch-send-6000-trump-votes-to-biden/

    https://nbc25news.com/news/local/secretary-jocelyn-benson-says-false-claims-from-ronna-mcdaniel-have-no-merit

    You said:
    the things being described have been debunked already and have been discussed ad nauseum in this thread already, including the one you picked out.

    I asked where. Your links have nothing to do with the twitter thread I linked (which I only did to answer someone's question.) Your post is hereby debunked.


  • Advertisement
  • #5562
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    You said:



    I asked where. Your links have nothing to do with the twitter thread I linked (which I only did to answer someone's question.) Your post is hereby debunked.

    I included a link to a previous discussion in my edit.

    In what way are my links not related to the Twitter thread? It's discussing the Dominion software which he claims is flawed based on the Antrim error, but my links demonstrate than the Antrim error has nothing to do with that software at all.


  • #5563
    sabat
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    Deleted User wrote: »
    I included a link to a previous discussion in my edit.

    In what way are my links not related to the Twitter thread? It's discussing the Dominion software which he claims is flawed based on the Antrim error, but my links demonstrate than the Antrim error has nothing to do with that software at all.

    Your "evidence" post was from 6/11; that twitter thread began on 7/11.


  • #5564
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    Your "evidence" post was from 6/11; that twitter thread began on 7/11.

    Yes, but he's responding to a video that was posted on the 6th (or earlier)? A video which my evidence post was a direct response to also? A video that claimed that there was an error due to software which has since been shown to instead be human error? So his analysis of the software is pointless?


  • #5565
    The_Brood
    Closed Accounts Posts: 838 ✭✭✭The_Brood


    lmao They can hire a top comedy writer they could not improve one bit on Trump's twitter account right now, if nothing else the man is spoof-proofing himself, calling himself the "Golden Goose" and screaming in all caps how computer systems deleted millions of votes for him - and this is just the last hour. America elected a troll - I know there are quite a handful who actually unironically support him, the same who fall for prosperity gospel preachers - but a complete and total troll he was from the beginning; he was elected mainly by trolls; and he's been having the most legendary troll meltdown for the past week any political leader can imagine. It's one of the rare times in world political history that the voters have gotten exactly what they voted for.


  • #5566
    Movementarian
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭Movementarian


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Yes, but he's responding to a video that was posted on the 6th (or earlier)? A video which my evidence post was a direct response to also? A video that claimed that there was an error due to software which has since been shown to instead be human error? So his analysis of the software is pointless?

    I think you are wasting your time trying to argue with him/her to be honest, they won't accept anything being debunked and will just keep posting new random things.


  • #5567
    ChikiChiki
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    is_that_so wrote: »
    No idea where he's getting these numbers!

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326926226888544256?s=19

    Pulling them out of his hole. Throw enough mud and some of it will stick.


  • #5568
    briany
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,040 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Movementarian wrote: »
    I think you are wasting your time trying to argue with him/her to be honest, they won't accept anything being debunked and will just keep posting new random things.

    It is a waste of time trying to convince that person. It's not a waste of time to debunk what they're posting and therefore prevent them from convincing others.


  • #5569
    ChikiChiki
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    The_Brood wrote: »
    lmao They can hire a top comedy writer they could not improve one bit on Trump's twitter account right now, if nothing else the man is spoof-proofing himself, calling himself the "Golden Goose" and screaming in all caps how computer systems deleted millions of votes for him - and this is just the last hour. America elected a troll - I know there are quite a handful who actually unironically support him, the same who fall for prosperity gospel preachers - but a complete and total troll he was from the beginning; he was elected mainly by trolls; and he's been having the most legendary troll meltdown for the past week any political leader can imagine. It's one of the rare times in world political history that the voters have gotten exactly what they voted for.

    Just had a look. He's retweeting tweets from 100 person followed accounts. Obviously he is seeking out via the search bar tweets to retweet as he has his hissy fit.

    What a time to be alive


  • #5570
    sabat
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    So many deboonkers...

    Someone asked where the Trump campaign got those numbers of alleged frauds. I posted where they got them and admitted honestly I don't understand it at all, with no other commentary. A standard pile-on followed of people pretending they both knew what they were talking about and that it had been discussed here before-both untrue.


  • #5571
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    A standard pile-on followed of people pretending they both knew what they were talking about and that it had been discussed here before-both untrue.

    In what way is it untrue? The Twitter thread and my link to a previous discussion are both in reference to the same video? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • #5572
    Boggles
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,493 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326920264203046915

    A "Republican President" attacking Fox.

    Holy Shít, we really are Through the Looking Glass.


  • #5573
    KilOit
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭KilOit


    Boggles wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1326920264203046915

    A "Republican President" attacking Fox.

    Holy Shít, we really are Through the Looking Glass.

    America in full blown pandemic and all he cares about is ratings


  • #5574
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,120 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    He has some stratospheric ego. "The golden goose". Never seen anything like it.


  • #5575
    PropJoe10
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    KilOit wrote: »
    America in full blown pandemic and all he cares about is ratings

    That's all he's ever cared about. He was bored of the COVID crisis in June. Why do you think he's been attacking Fauci throughout the campaign? He's jealous of him.


  • #5576
    PropJoe10
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »
    He has some stratospheric ego. "The golden goose". Never seen anything like it.

    He is the most inherently insecure human being I think I've ever seen.


  • #5577
    briany
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,040 ✭✭✭✭briany


    If someone had been frozen in 2012 and was just brought out of stasis now, and you showed them the content of Trump's tweets (especially lately), they'd just assume that he'd gone the way poor auld Jim Corr's gone. The whole being President of the United States thing would come as a massive shock.

    That said, it's been nearly 4 years and I still find it a gobsmacker.


  • #5578
    Billy Mays
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Trump campaign adviser Corey Lewandowski tests positive for coronavirus

    Womp womp.
    That's a real shame


  • #5579
    Gunmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Gunmonkey


    KilOit wrote: »
    America in full blown pandemic and all he cares about is ratings

    Always has. Remember when he threw a strop when the photos of his inauguration were shown to have far far fewer people than Obamas?
    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    He is the most inherently insecure human being I think I've ever seen.

    Has he legitimately ever been told "No!" in his life? The epitome of the spoiled child who has never had to go without and every pathetic whim catered to. And then wrapped up in a delusional fantasy where he is this slick operator, the smartest man in the room and can run rings round everyone with his business savvy.


  • #5580
    Tony EH
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,731 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Overheal wrote: »
    What was I saying: Comedy of Errors?

    https://twitter.com/lawcrimenews/status/1326942410153353223?s=20

    Oddly satisfying

    "Obvious lies and spam"

    Everything Trump in one easy sentence. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • #5581
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sabat wrote: »
    So many deboonkers...

    Someone asked where the Trump campaign got those numbers of alleged frauds. I posted where they got them and admitted honestly I don't understand it at all, with no other commentary. A standard pile-on followed of people pretending they both knew what they were talking about and that it had been discussed here before-both untrue.

    You should to be able to provide evidence of them being brought to court and having an effect. You've started off from a position of assuming there's fraud and are resorting to twitter accounts of randomers as proof. Meanwhile all the actual court cases are having zero success. :rolleyes:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement