Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Schools closed until February? (part 3)

199100102104105323

Comments

  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    is_that_so wrote: »
    A summary of evidence on schools transmissions.




    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02973-3

    Wasting your time I’m afraid. Fact free zone


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭Smacruairi


    Wasting your time I’m afraid. Fact free zone

    Don't start... Or I'll repeat your "facts" which you had to back track on recently..


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Smacruairi wrote: »
    Don't start... Or I'll repeat your "facts" which you had to back track on recently..

    You will not find any. Facts are facts. Interpretations can change as more data is observed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Why schools probably aren’t COVID hotspots

    Title is reassuring anyway.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Title is reassuring anyway.

    Everyone knows Nature is only a rag. Good thing Boggles knows best


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Everyone knows Nature is only a rag. Good thing Boggles knows best

    I don't follow. :confused:

    The title of the article is quite odd, can I not make the observation or any observation without you constantly getting personal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,392 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Everyone knows Nature is only a rag. Good thing Boggles knows best
    That makes no sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    All I will say is it is a good thing the Dept issued instructions not to steal the cleaning products:pac::pac::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    khalessi wrote: »
    All I will say is it is a good thing the Dept issued instructions not to steal the cleaning products:pac::pac::pac:

    They were only something anyway!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    Boggles wrote: »
    I don't follow. :confused:

    The title of the article is quite odd, can I not make the observation or any observation without you constantly getting personal?

    Would not bother arguing there. Some people have got way too much confidence.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    I don't follow. :confused:

    The title of the article is quite odd, can I not make the observation or any observation without you constantly getting personal?

    The odd thing is the ability to attempt to ridicule every source which does not tow the accepted view on schools, no matter how reputable the source. Yesterday it was the BMJ , today Nature, who knows what it will be tomorrow. And the equally odd thing on here is that the “accepted view” here is essentially the view of the thread and the occasional Facebook group. The wider view developing in articles such as those in the BMJ, Nature, and the German and Norwegian study that everyone has assiduously ignored, is that the opening of schools has been safe, relative to other areas of society, and while nowhere people gather is free from transmission of the virus, the opening of the schools in and of themselves has not driven the wider societal increase.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    The odd thing is the ability to attempt to ridicule every source which does not tow the accepted view on schools, no matter how reputable the source. Yesterday it was the BMJ , today Nature, who knows what it will be tomorrow. And the equally odd thing on here is that the “accepted view” here is essentially the view of the thread and the occasional Facebook group. The wider view developing in articles such as those in the BMJ, Nature, and the German and Norwegian study that everyone has assiduously ignored, is that the opening of schools has been safe, relative to other areas of society, and while nowhere people gather is free from transmission of the virus, the opening of the schools in and of themselves has not driven the wider societal increase.

    Hadn't seen the German or Norwegian studies, linky please


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Purplewaters


    The odd thing is the ability to attempt to ridicule every source which does not tow the accepted view on schools, no matter how reputable the source. Yesterday it was the BMJ , today Nature, who knows what it will be tomorrow. And the equally odd thing on here is that the “accepted view” here is essentially the view of the thread and the occasional Facebook group. The wider view developing in articles such as those in the BMJ, Nature, and the German and Norwegian study that everyone has assiduously ignored, is that the opening of schools has been safe, relative to other areas of society, and while nowhere people gather is free from transmission of the virus, the opening of the schools in and of themselves has not driven the wider societal increase.

    Funny how this second wave coincided with the reopening of schools all over Europe....must be a coincidence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 245 ✭✭MelbourneMan


    The odd thing is the ability to attempt to ridicule every source which does not tow the accepted view on schools, no matter how reputable the source. Yesterday it was the BMJ , today Nature, who knows what it will be tomorrow. And the equally odd thing on here is that the “accepted view” here is essentially the view of the thread and the occasional Facebook group. The wider view developing in articles such as those in the BMJ, Nature, and the German and Norwegian study that everyone has assiduously ignored, is that the opening of schools has been safe, relative to other areas of society, and while nowhere people gather is free from transmission of the virus, the opening of the schools in and of themselves has not driven the wider societal increase.

    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭combat14


    if I was a principal I would tell them I'm on holidays till Monday ��


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    Can you answer my earlier question please?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,767 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    Tell me Hubert, why is the definition of a close contact in school different to the definition of a close contact in the wider community?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Purplewaters


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    Melbourne closed schools right? They're down to zero cases in oz because they did a strict lock down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    You can string a pointless paragraph together I'll give you that :pac:

    My rebuttal would be: corona num nums go big big whence schools open, num nums hidden well so peeps all confused, oh lazy teachers too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Purplewaters


    Tell me Hubert, why is the definition of a close contact in school different to the definition of a close contact in the wider community?

    I can answer this.....if they tested every contact in the class then each school case would have 30 contacts in school alone. They can't handle this number so they ignore the contacts and hope it didn't spread.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    I read that in a Borat voice in my head and it was very entertaining indeed !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Purplewaters


    combat14 wrote: »
    if I was a principal I would tell them I'm on holidays till Monday ��

    100 percent. Let the work from home dept of education staff sort this out.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Blondini wrote: »
    Would not bother arguing there. Some people have got way too much confidence.

    There are some people expressing certainty here, i and those who express similar views on this thread are not in that group


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 962 ✭✭✭irishblessing


    Hello. I can confirm this is correct, and that the opening of schools has, by overwhelmingly authoritative analysis not adversely contributed to the deterioration of the corona virus situation. As you observe, there seems a great reluctance in Ireland to accept the considered expert view, and to prefer instead, the unreasoned and uninformed views of the incorrect.

    Let's have the analysis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    There are some people expressing certainty here, i and those who express similar views on this thread are not in that group

    The only certainty i see expressed here is that schools do not abide by public health advice with regards covid-19, every measure in place elsewhere has been thrown to the side to get schools open, clearly theres transmission in schools, and the rate of transmission detected seems to be increasing week on week. If children are asymptomatic and spreaders (as has been proven in studies in other countries) then they are contributing to the current problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 194 ✭✭Purplewaters


    The only certainty i see expressed here is that schools do not abide by public health advice with regards covid-19, every measure in place elsewhere has been thrown to the side to get schools open, clearly theres transmission in schools, and the rate of transmission detected seems to be increasing week on week. If children are asymptomatic and spreaders (as has been proven in studies in other countries) then they are contributing to the current problem.

    Exactly.

    If schools have no transmission then we can all go around maskless and 1m apart.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭combat14


    ‘Schools are safe. They are safer than being outside of schools’ – Taoiseach adamant classes will resume despite ASTI threat

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/schools-are-safe-they-are-safer-than-being-outside-of-schools-taoiseach-adamant-classes-will-resume-despite-asti-threat-39683194.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    All the tweets yesterday telling us how exceptional Norma is all make sense now.

    They knew this further debacle with the products was coming down the tracks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,539 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    I wonder what excuse they will have if cases go up in the next few week


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    All the tweets yesterday telling us how exceptional Norma is all make sense now.

    They knew this further debacle with the products was coming down the tracks.

    Actually I think there is more to come out. That push yesterday was very deliberate and calculated.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement