Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Covid 19 Part XXVII- 62,002 ROI (1,915 deaths) 39,609 NI (724 deaths) (02/11) Read OP

1216217219221222320

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 477 ✭✭AlphaDelta1


    32 deaths this month in Nursing homes

    So sad. What an awful way to end your days :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭shinzon


    It might matter to thousands who were made unemployed if the justification for the move is suspect.

    It seemed the government felt it was justified at the time tbh.

    Shin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    Jeez L5 and mid term really kicking in now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Wow Israel saying it like it is. I wonder will Leo still quote them as to what can be achieved.
    Of course Irish schools are different.

    The issue of schools being open is now a settled issue in Ireland. We now know that level 3 is enough to keep numbers under control (falling gradually), so there is no reason to close schools.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    shinzon wrote: »
    It seemed the government felt it was justified at the time tbh.

    Shin

    Seemed St Tony felt it was justified and was calling for it even before his first day back. Many here was calling for level 5 even when the Government wanted to give level 3 a chance. Looks like the modelling presented by Nphet may also be very wrong.
    Ah well at least the banks will help out troubled mortgage holders eh?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    shinzon wrote: »
    It seemed the government felt it was justified at the time tbh.

    Shin
    NPHET more so. The government were very reluctant to agree. If this is a trend downwards, questions will begin to emerge about the length of the plan in the next 2-4 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Wow Israel saying it like it is. I wonder will Leo still quote them as to what can be achieved.
    Of course Irish schools are different. My 'Hunch' starting to be backed up by science. Let's hope our fearless leaders act on this pertinent information.
    I won't hold my breath.

    https://twitter.com/AliNouriPhD/status/1321144800666652674?s=20

    Compare Ireland, 2.5% in kids vs 10% positivity in adults with close contacts. Total opposite than Israel. I'm sure there's some significant difference between schools in Ireland and Israel. Could be the fact they were closed in Israel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,792 ✭✭✭PowerToWait


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Philip Nolan's midelling prediction of the number of cases notified daily would be in the range of 1,800 – 2,500 cases by October 31st is looking to be very far off the mark going on current trend

    Is this a serious post, by an adult?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,237 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Jeez L5 and mid term really kicking in now

    How do people still think case numbers kick in a few days after mid term???

    Like after all this time please Educate yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,237 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    is_that_so wrote: »
    NPHET more so. The government were very reluctant to agree. If this is a trend downwards, questions will begin to emerge about the length of the plan in the next 2-4 weeks.

    But once Leo looked wrong.

    That's all that seemed to matter to some.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,792 ✭✭✭PowerToWait


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Compare Ireland, 2.5% in kids vs 10% positivity in adults with close contacts. Total opposite than Israel. I'm sure there's some significant difference between schools in Ireland and Israel. Could be the fact they were closed in Israel?

    Yeah, the difference is they're not testing kids in schools in the majority of schools. No test, no case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭LilyShame


    The only reason the numbers are falling is because HSE track trace cannot keep up with the level of contact tracing. The only reason!! Altho it makes The Doctor look good... And detracts from any unsavoury news item about cervical screening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,074 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    When is the 1st review of level 5 restrictions and do posters feel we will be moved back to level 3 than?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    billyhead wrote: »
    When is the 1st review of level 5 restrictions and do posters feel we will be moved back to level 3 than?

    Not a chance. 4 weeks into level 5. We are about 1 week now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Wow, primary school much more likely to be asymptomatic. Called it 2.5 days ago.
    The pink bar is the proportion asymptomatic. If this does not shock you then you don't understand it.

    70% of aged 3-5 were asymptomatic

    530826.png

    25/10/20

    https://twitter.com/DrZoeHyde/status/1321078141410889730?s=20
    So what goes into a positivity rate?

    It is a function of two main things I would think.

    1) The amount of people tested
    2) The probability of some who who is tested having the virus.

    Kids are more likely to have mild symptoms or be asymptomatic. Therefore they are less likely to be tested.

    In the context of schools we know that close contacts are not the same as in the wider world. I.e if someone tests positive we don’t then go on and test the whole group who spent 7 hours in doors for the last 5 days or whatever. You could argue there is a high probability that this would return many more asymptomatic cases if so. Contact tracing breakdown is affecting our numbers massively. My mate calls me and says you should get tested , “yeah defo but I feel grand” Asymptomatics missed = spread continues.

    I think the main driver of this is the average number of contacts per household. The households with kids can’t keep this number down. Now we can mitigate in schools but not eliminate the risk.

    If cases don’t drop or. Increase 4 weeks after midterm it’ll be obvious.

    This is already happening.

    https://twitter.com/samhold21632854/status/1320121347826208768?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,326 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    billyhead wrote: »
    When is the 1st review of level 5 restrictions and do posters feel we will be moved back to level 3 than?

    Think government said they would review after 4 weeks. I'd say not very likely at that stage but hopefully after the 6 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    billyhead wrote: »
    When is the 1st review of level 5 restrictions and do posters feel we will be moved back to level 3 than?
    Supposed to be in about 4 weeks and the answer to the other one depends on NPHET.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    How do people still think case numbers kick in a few days after mid term???

    Like after all this time please Educate yourself.
    goodfellas-laugh-Henry-Hill.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 982 ✭✭✭alentejo


    I suspect the reductions are not necessarily with Level 3, rather than 2 weeks ago, the general population where very conscious of NEPID's recommendation for putting the country into level 5. I think Tony H referred to this as "anticipatory behavior".

    So the reductions seen now is a mix of Level 3 with anticipatory behavior driving down numbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Could or should be a much lower number reported today. 185 are backlog cases included in 720 number.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 245 ✭✭MelbourneMan


    LilyShame wrote: »
    The only reason the numbers are falling is because HSE track trace cannot keep up with the level of contact tracing. The only reason!! Altho it makes The Doctor look good... And detracts from any unsavoury news item about cervical screening.

    Tracing resources are quite ample for the current demand on its services.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,256 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    GT89 wrote: »
    Not a good look if they are making tik tok videos whilst the hospitals are supposedly overwhelmed. It goves the insight into the job that they spend most of the day doing f all and are bored at work. Also most employers have a social media at work policy which means posting stuff of your workplace in uniform is prohibited.

    Doesn’t give that insight at all.

    You’d want to be requiring a psychological evaluation to form a view that healthcare workers “spend most of their day doing fûck all” based on a minute or so video of them enjoying part of their day, a minuscule part of their day.

    If they work for say 8 hours, 400 working minutes after lunch and tea break, they are seen having fun for two minutes on YouTube, maybe you need to find other things to be upset about, seriously. All they have to deal with and people are criticizing them for a two minute bit of craic on YouTube... Jesus wept.

    They go and in covid times are going seriously over and above, yet they need to endure criticism because they want to relax and have a laugh for a minute ?, right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    alentejo wrote: »
    I suspect the reductions are not necessarily with Level 3, rather than 2 weeks ago, the general population where very conscious of NEPID's recommendation for putting the country into level 5. I think Tony H referred to this as "anticipatory behavior".

    So the reductions seen now is a mix of Level 3 with anticipatory behavior driving down numbers.
    It's a nice nebulous concept although he's been inclined to refer to other behaviour of late.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    LilyShame wrote: »
    The only reason the numbers are falling is because HSE track trace cannot keep up with the level of contact tracing. The only reason!! Altho it makes The Doctor look good... And detracts from any unsavoury news item about cervical screening.
    Average contacts now down to about 3, was up at 20 and 50 at times. It can deal with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Just seen a Belgium hospital on TV. God it looked rough. Like something you would see in Sweden in the 80s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    7-day average is 936.1, this time last week was 1165.6


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Wow, primary school much more likely to be asymptomatic. Called it.
    The pink bar is the proportion asymptomatic. If this does not shock you then you don't understand it.

    And we have data in Ireland (where most of us live) which shows we can keep numbers under control with schools open. Congratulations to our government for making the right choices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,100 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Is this a serious post, by an adult?

    I'll report back on Sunday but his prediction is looking very far from reality

    Those worse case scenarios were used by NPHET to advocate for level 5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    I'll report back on Sunday but his prediction is looking very far from reality

    Those worse case scenarios were used by NPHET to advocate for level 5

    His prediction was based on the existing case growth at the time he mentioned it.

    Since then we have had the effects of level 3. The effects of additional restrictions tagged on to level 3. The effects of anticipatory behaviour ahead of level 5.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    And we have data in Ireland (where most of us live) which shows we can keep numbers under control with schools open. Congratulations to our government for making the right choices.

    LOLZ I live in the free state utopia amen.

    So I think people would want to know if their kids were going to contract something that causes long term morbidity. We may have to revisit this decision in 5 years before we pop the champagne there Merlin.

    How many people who were close contacts of schools did have issues?
    All those nana and grandads.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement