Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2020-21 - Mod Notes in 1st post. [Updated 17/12/20]

1114115117119120326

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    The problem is, that there are too many games. Straight back into CL and Europa this week. PL again the following week and repeat with another midweek CL and Europa. Whilst the mighty Leeds, Villa and Everton get a nice rest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    RasTa wrote: »
    The problem is, that there are too many games. Straight back into CL and Europa this week. PL again the following week and repeat with another midweek CL and Europa. Whilst the mighty Leeds, Villa and Everton get a nice rest.

    If only United had funds to afford a big squad that would make it a bit easier


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    To be fair two league titles in Norway does not equate worthy to any job in the PL nevermind United

    Right but this happens all of the time, particularly at big clubs. Pirlo is manager of Juve, Arteta at Arsenal, Zidane at Real, Lampard at Chelsea. And if Klopp was to leave tomorrow, would anybody bet against Gerrard taking over there?

    None of this makes Ole the right man for the job, but it just seems trite to say that he wouldn't have been in with a chance of the job if it weren't for his association woth the club, as that is how so many managers have gotten those jobs in the first place. Yeah, no **** he wouldn't have been in with a sniff of the job with his CV, but this isn't unique to Ole or some weird thing that happened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Right but this happens all of the time, particularly at big clubs. Pirlo is manager of Juve, Arteta at Arsenal, Zidane at Real, Lampard at Chelsea. And if Klopp was to leave tomorrow, would anybody bet against Gerrard taking over there?

    None of this makes Ole the right man for the job, but it just seems trite to say that he wouldn't have been in with a chance of the job if it weren't for his association woth the club, as that is how so many managers have gotten those jobs in the first place. Yeah, no **** he wouldn't have been in with a sniff of the job with his CV, but this isn't unique to Ole or some weird thing that happened.

    Your claim of many mangers getting positions in big clubs because of this is completely untrue. It's only recently that this has become a thing that I'm aware of? Pep the first that I recall?

    Pirlo - People said he only got the job because of his time at the club.
    Zidane - People said the same. He went on to be one of the most successful managers ever at Madrid

    There is less noise about those two as they are not in the premier league.

    Lampard - EVERYONE is saying he's out of his depth etc.

    Arteta - Not as much noise about this because he was an assistant manager for so long in the PL and also he's won a trophy.

    Edit: In regards Gerrard, would I be surprised if he got the job? Nope, would it be a terrible appointment? Yup.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    If only United had funds to afford a big squad that would make it a bit easier

    Yeah I know, that's our owners fault tbf. Most of our money goes on debt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Your claim of many mangers getting positions in big clubs because of this is completely untrue. It's only recently that this has become a thing that I'm aware of? Pep the first that I recall?

    Pirlo - People said he only got the job because of his time at the club.
    Zidane - People said the same. He went on to be one of the most successful managers ever at Madrid

    There is less noise about those two as they are not in the premier league.

    Lampard - EVERYONE is saying he's out of his depth etc.

    Arteta - Not as much noise about this because he was an assistant manager for so long in the PL and also he's won a trophy.

    Edit: In regards Gerrard, would I be surprised if he got the job? Nope, would it be a terrible appointment? Yup.

    How can my claim be untrue when 6 current managers of big clubs have gotten their starts that way to varying degrees of success? Also a new thing? How do we reckon Graeme Souness and Kenny Dalglish got the top jobs at the best team in the league in the 80s? Ancelotti had one season at Reggiana before moving to a prime Parma team. Where did he start his career as a player? You guessed it.

    There is no magic path for a manager to turn out to be the right fit. But claiming that having an association with the club isn't a well trodden path is crazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,945 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    RasTa wrote: »
    Yeah I know, that's our owners fault tbf. Most of our money goes on debt.

    You've spent 688m in the last five years according to Transfermarket (back to 16/17)

    In comparison these are amounts spent by other teams.

    Liverpool - 473
    City - 841
    Chelsea - 805
    Arsenal - 533
    Spurs - 429
    Everton - 526

    So in that time United have spent the third most on transfers (was second until Chelsea went mad this summer). The problem isn't that money hasn't been spent, rather it's been spent poorly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nunu


    Getting back to the crux of this conversation about Solskjær and his appointment. To the posters suggesting it was madness etc I don’t get you at all?

    He was a club legend as player who throughout his career as player displayed great football intelligence. Added to that on his retirement he was actively involved at the club managing the reserves very successfully. He then went into managing professionally in his home country winning 2 league titles & a cup. His Cardiff experience blots his cv alright but seems to be all anyone remembers.

    And as has been said loads of examples of ex players getting these positions for years. Some fail miserably, some are runaway successes and some fall in between just like regular appointments.

    Do I think there were better candidate’s around when he got the top job? Of course I do, but this snarky attitude towards his appointment as if it was some outrageously dumb move is without foundation in my opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    You've spent 688m in the last five years according to Transfermarket (back to 16/17)

    In comparison these are amounts spent by other teams.

    Liverpool - 473
    City - 841
    Chelsea - 805
    Arsenal - 533
    Spurs - 429
    Everton - 526

    So in that time United have spent the third most on transfers (was second until Chelsea went mad this summer). The problem isn't that money hasn't been spent, rather it's been spent poorly.

    Imagine we had no debt though, we could have blown everyone out of the water and all the money would have been generated by the club itself. Glorious, the way football should be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,945 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    RasTa wrote: »
    Imagine we had no debt though, we could have blown everyone out of the water and all the money would have been generated by the club itself. Glorious, the way football should be.

    And the only difference that may have happened is you waste even more money on players.

    Club need to sort out the structure from the top down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    You've spent 688m in the last five years according to Transfermarket (back to 16/17)

    In comparison these are amounts spent by other teams.

    Liverpool - 473
    City - 841
    Chelsea - 805
    Arsenal - 533
    Spurs - 429
    Everton - 526

    So in that time United have spent the third most on transfers (was second until Chelsea went mad this summer). The problem isn't that money hasn't been spent, rather it's been spent poorly.

    Liverpool are the only major outlier here. Klopp is a great manager and is getting great value for money out of his players. United came 3rd last year and are being outset by two other teams. The rest of the teams are all performing around where their money spent dictates barring Pool. Good job Klopp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Liverpool are the only major outlier here. Klopp is a great manager and is getting great value for money out of his players. United came 3rd last year and are being outset by two other teams. The rest of the teams are all performing around where their money spent dictates barring Pool. Good job Klopp.

    Everton are definitely not performing considering the money they've spent recently.

    The money they spent would indicate challenging top 4 and that hasn't been the case at all unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Everton are definitely not performing considering the money they've spent recently.

    The money they spent would indicate challenging top 4 and that hasn't been the case at all unfortunately.

    True but I think they are on an upward trajectory this season and will be in the hunt for top 4. Manager was their issue up until now. They were also doing what City did at the start and spending huge money on questionable signings to try to get a push up the league after getting the sugar daddy. That has calmed a bit, and there is a bit more structure, as it did with City.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,945 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Liverpool are the only major outlier here. Klopp is a great manager and is getting great value for money out of his players. United came 3rd last year and are being outset by two other teams. The rest of the teams are all performing around where their money spent dictates barring Pool. Good job Klopp.

    That was last year, at that point only City had spent more over the previous 4/5 years. The year before United didn't get top 4.

    19/20 - 3rd - 66 points.
    18/19 - 6th - 66 points.
    17/18 - 2nd - 81 points.
    16/17 - 6th - 69 points.

    That's United finishes for the same time period I put the transfer spending up for. Average points were 70.5. The average points total that the winners got over that period was 97.5. Average points of the fourth place team was 72, so United haven't been miles off top 4 but that 81 points from Jose really is the outlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭Liamalone


    - Liam, Plasterer, Ballygobackwards

    I'd probably be as good at plastering as Ole is at managing to be fair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    James fit for the game thankfully

    Iwobi and Siggy tho :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭eh i dunno


    James fit for the game thankfully

    Iwobi and Siggy tho :(

    Gomes has been average all season so no harm giving siggy a chance. Iwobi is probably better than Bernard but Gordon can count himself unlucky.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Everton to win this handy 1-3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    6 wrote: »
    Everton to win this handy 1-3

    Ambitious


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Redmond should have scored there or at least hit the target


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Great effort by Siggy, off the cross bar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    JWP with a good finish that

    1-0


  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nunu wrote: »
    Getting back to the crux of this conversation about Solskjær and his appointment. To the posters suggesting it was madness etc I don’t get you at all?

    He was a club legend as player who throughout his career as player displayed great football intelligence. Added to that on his retirement he was actively involved at the club managing the reserves very successfully. He then went into managing professionally in his home country winning 2 league titles & a cup. His Cardiff experience blots his cv alright but seems to be all anyone remembers.

    And as has been said loads of examples of ex players getting these positions for years. Some fail miserably, some are runaway successes and some fall in between just like regular appointments.

    Do I think there were better candidate’s around when he got the top job? Of course I do, but this snarky attitude towards his appointment as if it was some outrageously dumb move is without foundation in my opinion.

    He isnt a brand new to management like all the other names being mentioned he is in the game 10 years maybe more now and failed at Cardiff did good at molde.

    He was brought in as interim for the season that was fine,no problem the real issue was he got the job full time when there was no need to, like we could have waited untill the summer, had ed waited there is a good chance ole doesnt get the job.

    So here we are 18 months or so later with a manager who many agree looks out of his debt tactically who wouldnt be at the club had ed waited.

    A mistake was made and every week he stays at the club the mistake gets compounded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    JWP with a good finish that

    1-0

    2-0 at HT and Ings hasn't even scored yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭amber69


    2-0 at HT and Ings hasn't even scored yet.

    So what you're saying is Ings can only get better


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭thelad95


    This has to be the most unpredictable start to a season in a long time. Although it was generous to consider Everton genuine title contenders especially with Richarlison out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,239 ✭✭✭This is it


    thelad95 wrote: »
    This has to be the most unpredictable start to a season in a long time. Although it was generous to consider Everton genuine title contenders especially with James and Richarlison out.

    James is playing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,945 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    thelad95 wrote: »
    This has to be the most unpredictable start to a season in a long time. Although it was generous to consider Everton genuine title contenders especially with James and Richarlison out.

    James is playing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,681 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    thelad95 wrote: »
    This has to be the most unpredictable start to a season in a long time. Although it was generous to consider Everton genuine title contenders especially with James and Richarlison out.

    Saints must be now though:p:p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭thelad95


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    James is playing.

    Ninja edit and frankly he could have fooled me!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement