Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXVII- 62,002 ROI (1,915 deaths) 39,609 NI (724 deaths) (02/11) Read OP

1124125127129130320

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,108 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    hmmm wrote: »
    I'm hopeful that Level 3 is proving to be the level at which we can hold the numbers steady. This would make sense as it closes the places where superspreading events can happen.

    It would mean that after Level 5 has brought the numbers down in a few weeks time, we can run the country at Level 3 until we have vaccines and better treatments. Perhaps 6 months of restrictions.

    It's obviously not good for the businesses affected and we will have to support them, but better to find a level we can live at and make the best of it instead of a cycle of opening and rushed lockdowns.

    Level 3 for 6 months isn’t really sustainable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Italy really pushing those big numbers now, even after they picked up pace in September they had some suppression, but now it's building very fast.

    https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1319667404486619136?s=20

    The most worrying thing about Italy is that it's positivity rate has been increasing by over 1% every consecutive day for a week now

    I don't understand what it is about Western Europe that makes this virus so spread so ridiculously quickly. Of course we know why deaths are pretty high in Western Europe because of an elderly population, but it doesnt explain why so many people are catching it. Western Europe is densely populated but you would think with Western standard of living with pretty spacious homes and small families and not overly densly populated cities that infection would not spread so quickly, especially with the many precautions also being taken in addition


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    You can smell the disappointment in the air on here of people disappointed with a good number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    froog wrote: »
    contact tracing collapses = less people who might be infected get tested = less positive cases.
    That's not how it works, at all. Contact tracing collapsing leads to a rise in community transmission = rise in cases.
    By your logic if we just stop tracing then positive cases just drop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭ShayNanigan


    jojofizzio wrote: »
    A reason to celebrate in itself....George Lee reporting positive news!!

    Looks like my neighbours think so too as they already started... Saw a taxi pull up in front of their house with flower arrangements and cakes being carried in earlier, now cars arriving and people outside sounding quite cheerful. Not sure if it's a wedding, a birthday party or what but clearly a celebration. Doubt they're celebrating Level 5!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    What does the track and trace (HSE) have to do with reported cases (HPSC)? There's zero correlation.

    I've said it before so I'll just quote.
    I believe the estimation is that it's unimportant.

    Let's say we missed contact tracing 2k people over the weekend and asked them to do their own contact tracing. An average person has 5.6 contacts. The average positivity rate among contacts is 13%.

    11,200 people who should have gotten a test over the last few days didn't get one. This probably means 1450 cases was missed over a few days. Now they may have been picked up again by people doing their own contact tracing. Or people doing their own contact tracing misses close contacts and instead tests a lot of extra casual contacts.

    Either way I feel that the last few days of results are heavily distorted and am refusing to get too tied into the stats of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I've said it before so I'll just quote.
    The fact you're assuming that no contacts came forward for testing says it all tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    froog wrote: »
    track and trace has completely collapsed. that easily accounts for the sudden 300-400 drop.

    sorry all, but it's clear as day what's happened.

    Good. Long may it continue


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭jackboy


    2. Will Dr Tony Holohan be questioned tonight on the Late Late Show as to how a nursing home in Galway has become overrun with Covid? How have these areas not been the focus of NPHET's strategy? Are staff there tested routinely? If not, why not?.

    He is not going to be questioned, it’s a propaganda piece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,446 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    What does that have to do with the HPSC underreporting swabs for today? There was 1000+ positive swabs today. With a decreasing positivity rate.

    I don't understand you.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    You can smell the disappointment in the air on here of people disappointed with a good number.

    Don't sense that at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    I don't understand you.
    There was 1000 positive swabs today. 777 reported. Cases aren't miraculously decreasing in massive numbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    Looks like my neighbours think so too as they already started... Saw a taxi pull up in front of their house with flower arrangements and cakes being carried in earlier, now cars arriving and people outside sounding quite cheerful. Not sure if it's a wedding, a birthday party or what but clearly a celebration. Doubt they're celebrating Level 5!

    We might look back in a few years and laugh at comments we made like this. Hopefully anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    That's not how it works, at all. Contact tracing collapsing leads to a rise in community transmission = rise in cases.
    By your logic if we just stop tracing then positive cases just drop.

    contact tracing results in a large number of asymptomatic positives being caught that otherwise wouldn't. do you seriously not understand that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,000 ✭✭✭Russman


    That's not how it works, at all. Contact tracing collapsing leads to a rise in community transmission = rise in cases.
    By your logic if we just stop tracing then positive cases just drop.

    Would it not work the other way also though ? If tracing collapses fewer people will be informed they (may) need a test so you’d potentially be missing asymptomatic cases, no ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,445 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Looks like my neighbours think so too as they already started... Saw a taxi pull up in front of their house with flower arrangements and cakes being carried in earlier, now cars arriving and people outside sounding quite cheerful. Not sure if it's a wedding, a birthday party or what but clearly a celebration. Doubt they're celebrating Level 5!

    Well if you have an issue with it, report to the guards :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    The fact you're assuming that no contacts came forward for testing says it all tbh.

    Some will have but a lot will have been missed.

    Upto 1450 will have been missed. Some will have been caught but a lot of them won't have.

    I won't celebrate good figures with a cloud hanging over it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    The house parties are continuing. On LUAS earlier - group of lads with about 6 slabs of beer. Absolutely no shame.

    Budweiser FFS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,090 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    froog wrote: »
    contact tracing results in a large number of asymptomatic positives being caught that otherwise wouldn't. do you seriously not understand that?

    Exactly, if a more random selection of people get tested then the chances of positives drops compared to people who are known to be close contacts how are more likely to be infected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,519 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    From reading last few posts everyone is assuming that none of the people who would have been told by a confirmed case that their a close contact have come forward for testing.

    Now you'd hope that those who were told by a confirmed case that they were a contact, have contacted their GPs, based on what GPs were reporting earlier in the week they got swamped by people ringing up looking for a test after being told they were close contacts.

    Maybe its just my hope that people have a bit of social responsibility that they'd have gone for a test, so track and trace might not have missed out on too many in the end and maybe others are reckless. We'll soon see

    Anyway regardless we're still doing around 17k tests a day during the week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,498 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    It's certainly great to see a dramatically lower number of notified cases, but I'm holding off on popping the champagne corks yet. Whether the issues of testing and tracing and questions about lab availability are actually as serious as they say, or are overblown and misunderstood by the media is not something I can figure out, but such a dramatic fall when there appears to be such whisperings of chaos and collapse with the tracing system, and, what is it, another roughly 300 positive swabs unaccounted for? I'd be cautious enough reading too much into todays figure tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    froog wrote: »
    contact tracing results in a large number of asymptomatic positives being caught that otherwise wouldn't. do you seriously not understand that?
    I honestly can't believe you think the entire contact tracing system has collapsed. There's being realistic and there's being ignorant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,445 ✭✭✭mloc123


    People saying Level 3 is working now, is likely true.. But, IMO level 3 will see cases level out and maybe even drop slightly but that rate is probably still too high for hospitals to cope longer term.

    I *assume* the plan will be - level 5 to get the rates back in the 1-200 cases a day range and then level 3 to keep it there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,446 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    There was 1000 positive swabs today. 777 reported. Cases aren't miraculously decreasing in massive numbers.

    I still don't understand you at all. The 777 are up to midnight last night, yes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,519 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    The house parties are continuing. On LUAS earlier - group of lads with about 6 slabs of beer. Absolutely no shame.

    Budweiser FFS.

    Should be fined for just having budweiser


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I can't believe there's actually people on here who think none of the cases identified last weekend have notified their contacts. Like seriously?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    I still don't understand you at all. The 777 are up to midnight last night, yes?
    Cases reported yes, not positive tests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭ShayNanigan


    manniot2 wrote: »
    We might look back in a few years and laugh at comments we made like this. Hopefully anyway

    I know... I love a good party as much as anyone and I know people cannot put their entire lives on hold because of a pandemic. Not enjoying the situation at all and kinda hate the fact I get negative feelings because someone is celebrating. :(

    About the numbers, if I didn't know better and had my tinfoil hat on, I'd say someone punched the numbers in before the weekend and got their finger stuck at 7. :p:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Russman wrote: »
    Would it not work the other way also though ? If tracing collapses fewer people will be informed they (may) need a test so you’d potentially be missing asymptomatic cases, no ?
    You're assuming that every single contact at the weekend is not getting tested, a bizarre and unbelievable assumption.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    I can't believe there's actually people on here who think none of the cases identified last weekend have notified their contacts. Like seriously?

    who said that?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement