Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Schools closed until February? (part 3)

16869717374323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,667 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Give over. All those workers are not parents. Lol.

    Once and for all, Jinglejangle: Blended. Remote. Learning. Plan. = one solution

    Rotating work schedules = another solution

    Childcare subsidy for people if the gov't would get off their árses = another solution.

    If homeschooling is so easy, then why are we paying teachers in schools?

    We could make all the teachers redundant, produce one centralised plan for remote learning, pay every family a small amount for remote schooling and save the country a fortune.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 962 ✭✭✭irishblessing


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If homeschooling is so easy, then why are we paying teachers in schools?

    We could make all the teachers redundant, produce one centralised plan for remote learning, pay every family a small amount for remote schooling and save the country a fortune.

    Point out where it was said it was easy. You can't because it wasn't said. Your whole post is irrelevant hyperbole.

    Also, you obviously have zero understanding of what blended remote learning (via the school teacher) actually is.

    Edited: and what of their social development?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,667 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Point out where it was said it was easy. You can't because it wasn't said. Your whole post is irrelevant hyperbole.

    Also, you obviously have zero understanding of what blended remote learning (via the school teacher) actually is.

    Edited: and what of their social development?

    Well, then we agree. It is vitally important to keep the schools open for the education and social development of children.

    Where an outbreak occurs, local measures appropriate to the particular situation should be taken.

    All pretty much what the Department is doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭frank8211


    JimmyVik wrote: »
    If we continue as we are now, schools will be closed for long periods without a proper plan in place for remote learning.
    I dont understand why so many people have a problem with preparing for remote learning, so it can work when in inevitably becomes necessary.

    Theyre all well able to order clothes online, check bank accounts online, download Netflix etc. Theyre just having mental block about school online. Stuck in the dark ages


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If homeschooling is so easy, then ...

    Anybody promiced it will be easy? Nothing is easy with lockdown. Schools should be closed for the duration of L5. If somebody unable to organise homeschooling this is not their fault, they should have opportunity to make up later, after re-opening.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If homeschooling is so easy, then why are we paying teachers in schools?

    We could make all the teachers redundant, produce one centralised plan for remote learning, pay every family a small amount for remote schooling and save the country a fortune.

    Sure we can all grow our food and rear our own animals for slaughter. No need for shops or farmers so. No need for truck drivers either seeing as we all grow our own produce.

    I've heard and seen alot of rubbish spouted on boards over the years but the above takes the biscuit.

    If you are going to try and have a discussion at least have some semblance of reality to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,667 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Thats me wrote: »
    Anybody promiced it will be easy? Nothing is easy with lockdown. Schools should be closed for the duration of L5. If somebody unable to organise homeschooling this is not their fault, they should have opportunity to make up later, after re-opening.

    Why should schools be closed for the duration of Level 5?

    Hospitals are open, fire stations are open, meat factories are open, police stations are open, physiotherapists are open, essential retail is open. On the same basis, education, which is an essential service should also be open, especially when the risks in schools are less than in many of those other places, especially when the correct protocols are followed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Why should schools be closed for the duration of Level 5?

    To minimise chances for virus to spread across population and to prevent closure of services enumerated by you... Aren't you teacher BTW? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Why should schools be closed for the duration of Level 5?

    Hospitals are open, fire stations are open, meat factories are open, police stations are open, physiotherapists are open, essential retail is open. On the same basis, education, which is an essential service should also be open, especially when the risks in schools are less than in many of those other places, especially when the correct protocols are followed.

    Did you see the report from the north today where official figures say that half of the schools have had cases? Contrast that with Norma saying that officially 10% have had Covid incidents down here. Someone somewhere is massaging numbers, question is it north or south of the border?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,392 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    blanch152 wrote:
    Well, then we agree. It is vitally important to keep the schools open for the education and social development of children.
    There's such a thing as temporary measures.
    We call want our kids in school getting educated and having social interaction with their peers.
    We all want them to be healthy and safe too.
    Keeping schools open at this time is very questionable. We have no definitive proof that it's safe. This virus isn't even a year old so we don't know anything about long term affects from it.

    blanch152 wrote:
    Where an outbreak occurs, local measures appropriate to the particular situation should be taken.

    All pretty much what the Department is doing.
    We are seeing huge errors made by every department. We are seeing secrecy come to the fore in the department of education.
    How can you trust people who are trying to keep secrets which seem to be with the intent of not letting us know the true nature of covid cases in schools?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 962 ✭✭✭irishblessing


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Well, then we agree. It is vitally important to keep the schools open for the education and social development of children.

    Where an outbreak occurs, local measures appropriate to the particular situation should be taken.

    All pretty much what the Department is doing.

    We agree to a point. I also think that when transmission is so high, we need to use the tools available to us. I also think that in general, we should implement a hybrid remote learning plan. There are students, staff and families at high risk. There is constantly going to be a need to quarantine and recover from illness. People need choice. We need to reduce class sizes. Do you agree with that?

    Do you know if the government has stated as part of the exit strategy that local measures will be undertaken going forward? It seems so contradictory. On the one hand I agree local measures are needed, but there is so much mixing in society I'm not sure it's effective.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 962 ✭✭✭irishblessing


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Why should schools be closed for the duration of Level 5?

    Hospitals are open, fire stations are open, meat factories are open, police stations are open, physiotherapists are open, essential retail is open. On the same basis, education, which is an essential service should also be open, especially when the risks in schools are less than in many of those other places, especially when the correct protocols are followed.

    Because schools are places shown to have transmission of the virus full of students and staff able to pass on the virus as well as anybody else. Here in Ireland our classrooms are often small, overcrowded, unventilated, and especially in primary, not masked. Many (or most?) schools could not properly implement the 1m distance of desks as required. Hence the "where possible" language every other paragraph in that document. Pods are a joke. The risks in school are not less, they are increased.
    Dropped my children off this morning to school in their costumes. You know what I saw in 2 of the class rooms as I walked by? Almost every single child up and about moving around the classroom looking at each other's costumes, running around, passing balls and touching each other's costume parts. I saw two girls together fixing one's hair. Controlled environment adhering to protocols my f-g eye.

    Oh and the usual unmasked mammies in the carpark having their daily morning chats in each others faces.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 12,552 Mod ✭✭✭✭byhookorbycrook


    Because schools are places shown to have transmission of the virus full of students and staff able to pass on the virus as well as anybody else. Here in Ireland our classrooms are often small, overcrowded, unventilated, and especially in primary, not masked. Many (or most?) schools could not properly implement the 1m distance of desks as required. Hence the "where possible" language every other paragraph in that document. Pods are a joke. The risks in school are not less, they are increased.
    Dropped my children off this morning to school in their costumes. You know what I saw in 2 of the class rooms as I walked by? Almost every single child up and about moving around the classroom looking at each other's costumes, running around, passing balls and touching each other's costume parts. I saw two girls together fixing one's hair. Controlled environment adhering to protocols my f-g eye.

    Oh and the usual unmasked mammies in the carpark having their daily morning chats in each others faces.

    Up to and including 2nd aren’t required to be socially distant . I’d put money on it that 99% of schools can’t do 2 m distance , never mind 1 .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 962 ✭✭✭irishblessing


    Up to and including 2nd aren’t required to be socially distant . I’d put money on it that 99% of schools can’t do 2 m distance , never mind 1 .

    Madness.

    My kids and the classrooms I saw this morning were both older groups, by the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭mvl


    frank8211 wrote: »
    Theyre all well able to order clothes online, check bank accounts online, download Netflix etc. Theyre just having mental block about school online. Stuck in the dark ages
    and then they might wonder why chinese students based in china would be way ahead of theirs on certain subjects (like Maths) ... makes you wonder allright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    See Gillian De Gascun told RTE that the shutting of the lab is due to a Covid outbreak in one of the two lab teams.

    Wonder are those posters who have been on here suggesting that outbreaks in schools must be down to teachers not following or breaking the protocols, also going to level the same accusation at the NVRL staff?

    Maybe they were licking the swabs..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    Up to and including 2nd aren’t required to be socially distant . I’d put money on it that 99% of schools can’t do 2 m distance , never mind 1 .

    This distance just a red herring. It does not guarantee any safety any way. With each exhalation infected person does exhale millions of virions and this aerosol can hang in the air for very long time. If the room ventilated this aerosol will move with air streams narrowing the threat to those who are down stream only. But no guarantee of absolute safety any way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭Lillyfae


    Madness.

    My kids and the classrooms I saw this morning were both older groups, by the way.

    You were in the school this morning?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Lillyfae wrote: »
    You were in the school this morning?

    Wondered that myself. We have a strict no parents inside the gate policy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Wondered that myself. We have a strict no parents inside the gate policy.


    We can see inside the windows as we walk by our school.
    Would have thought that would be fairly common.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    JimmyVik wrote: »
    We can see inside the windows as we walk by our school.
    Would have thought that would be fairly common.

    Is the school building directly on the road?

    We have signs at all the gates saying no admittance to parents beyond this point along with the school number and email address.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Is the school building directly on the road?

    We have signs at all the gates saying no admittance to parents beyond this point along with the school number and email address.


    Its probably about 30 or 40 meters from the fence to the wall of the school.
    You can clearly see into the rooms walking home. When mine was in a classroom on that side of the school he used to wave out to me as i was walking home.
    Now im not the one who made that post by the way.

    I just didnt think that was unusual for a school at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,023 ✭✭✭Deeec


    Thank god it is the mid term break and we all dont have to worry about school next week. Thank you to all the teachers on here and out there that have worked so hard to keep our children as safe as possible in the current climate. I know it has been very challenging. I hope you all enjoy a well deserved break next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,472 ✭✭✭MOH


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Well, then we agree. It is vitally important to keep the schools open for the education and social development of children.

    Where an outbreak occurs, local measures appropriate to the particular situation should be taken.

    All pretty much what the Department is doing.

    No


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,667 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Did you see the report from the north today where official figures say that half of the schools have had cases? Contrast that with Norma saying that officially 10% have had Covid incidents down here. Someone somewhere is massaging numbers, question is it north or south of the border?

    The North has three times the number of cases per head of population than us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,465 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The North has three times the number of cases per head of population than us.

    Then using that logic, the north should be 30%, instead they are another 66% higher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,157 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    See Gillian De Gascun told RTE that the shutting of the lab is due to a Covid outbreak in one of the two lab teams.

    Cillian's lesser known but equally accomplished virologist sister


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭treade1


    Because schools are places shown to have transmission of the virus full of students and staff able to pass on the virus as well as anybody else. Here in Ireland our classrooms are often small, overcrowded, unventilated, and especially in primary, not masked. Many (or most?) schools could not properly implement the 1m distance of desks as required. Hence the "where possible" language every other paragraph in that document. Pods are a joke. The risks in school are not less, they are increased.
    Dropped my children off this morning to school in their costumes. You know what I saw in 2 of the class rooms as I walked by? Almost every single child up and about moving around the classroom looking at each other's costumes, running around, passing balls and touching each other's costume parts. I saw two girls together fixing one's hair. Controlled environment adhering to protocols my f-g eye.

    Oh and the usual unmasked mammies in the carpark having their daily morning chats in each others faces.

    Oh the horror of it all. Kids having fun playing together. The virus is no worse than a bad flu and for younger people the flu actually poses a greater risk. School's are back a few months now and everything is going very well. Yes there have been a few cases but the symptoms for the vast majority of people under 45 are no worse than that of a common cold. The hysteria and fear mongering needs to end.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭Smacruairi


    treade1 wrote: »
    Oh the horror of it all. Kids having fun playing together. The virus is no worse than a bad flu and for younger people the flu actually poses a greater risk. School's are back a few months now and everything is going very well. Yes there have been a few cases but the symptoms for the vast majority of people under 45 are no worse than that of a common cold. The hysteria and fear mongering needs to end.

    Kids have less symptoms. What about the workers though?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,392 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    treade1 wrote:
    Oh the horror of it all. Kids having fun playing together. The virus is no worse than a bad flu and for younger people the flu actually poses a greater risk. School's are back a few months now and everything is going very well. Yes there have been a few cases but the symptoms for the vast majority of people under 45 are no worse than that of a common cold. The hysteria and fear mongering needs to end.
    You really are clueless.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement