Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

1245246248250251331

Comments

  • Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This whole 'people aren't complying' narrative is complete and utter bull****.
    It's a ****ing virus, doing what a virus does. It's going to spread whether people comply or not.
    How hard is that to get?

    Do you believe in that case having restrictions is futile?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    This whole 'people aren't complying' narrative is complete and utter bull****.
    It's a ****ing virus, doing what a virus does. It's going to spread whether people comply or not.
    How hard is that to get?

    By complying we can at least slow the spread, the numbers are getting high again fast


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    So we rinse and repeat and lock down again for ****ing what end.to open up again and go tru the same bs all over again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    This whole 'people aren't complying' narrative is complete and utter bull****.
    It's a ****ing virus, doing what a virus does. It's going to spread whether people comply or not.
    How hard is that to get?

    It clearly spreads more if people aren't making an effort to social distance and cut their contacts. Viruses can't replicate on their own, they need a host to infect. A lack of compliance will increase the reproductive rate above 1.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,969 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Do you believe in that case having restrictions is futile?
    I think it's going to spread either way, to be honest.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Well, the powers that be seem to find it acceptable and given how absolutely hyper-cautious they've been throughout this that for now is good enough. On a personal level I've seen how happy kids are to be back at school and one not-COVID event in the family aside, the adults are happy too.

    Hyper cautious, come on :pac: we have had a soft lockdown from may (and even march to may was nothing compared to other eu countries) everything has been opened back up.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    It has less chance of spreading if people do as asked of them . Two metres apart , wear masks , stay out of crowded situations , have less people in your home
    Big gathering at family occasions is a hot bed for any virus to spread

    The problem is, you can't measure how much it would still spread even if everyone complied 100%. Perhaps it's spreading in spite of the restrictions rather than by people flouting them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,969 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    OscarMIlde wrote: »
    It clearly spreads more if people aren't making an effort to social distance and cut their contacts. Viruses can't replicate on their own, they need a host to infect. A lack of compliance will increase the reproductive rate above 1.
    So let's sit on boards and blame everyone except ourselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭Dayor Knight


    This whole 'people aren't complying' narrative is complete and utter bull****.
    It's a ****ing virus, doing what a virus does. It's going to spread whether people comply or not.
    How hard is that to get?

    Ah no, actually. If people follow the guidelines, the virus will have less chance to spread. It can't spread on its own. That's what the public health guidelines are all about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,298 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Strange then we have such variability in spreading from country to country... does the virus know it's in Germany and not France?

    You think every country has the same level of testing, demographics, and system of counting?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭Santy2015


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    So we rinse and repeat and lock down again for ****ing what end.to open up again and go tru the same bs all over again

    And constantly leave the population in limbo indefinitely! We just can’t do that!


  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Santy2015 wrote: »
    If NPHET recommends to go to level 4 country wide..
    I actually fear for everyone! Our country’s economy will be destroyed!
    NPHET can’t keep on with this. The amount of people that’ll be left without work once again will be horrendous!!
    I actually can’t deal with it again myself. We’ve been treated like bold children.
    I’ve adhered to rules about masks not seeing friends, parents, sisters, my nephew and niece not going out to a championship game, no pints for how ever long and they want to take this all away once again. It’s a fûcking disgrace

    It is hard but if we do nothing cases will be like NI qickly. Their cases for last 3 days is like 1500 per day here. The virus wants us all to socialise like before. Im angry at the government but this is the path they have set. Liveing with the virus means locking down when numbers increase dramatically and then unlock when they fall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    So we rinse and repeat and lock down again for ****ing what end.to open up again and go tru the same bs all over again

    Until we have a vaccine id imagine, we can't do a china style lockdown so what other option is there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,762 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Fúck this I'm off to the pub


  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    So we rinse and repeat and lock down again for ****ing what end.to open up again and go tru the same bs all over again

    The cavalry is on the horizon apparently says Luke O'Neill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,969 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Ah no, actually. If people follow the guidelines, the virus will have less chance to spread. It can't spread on its own. That's what the public health guidelines are all about.
    It's a virus, what do you mean it can't spread on its own? It doesn't just disappear when people stop socialising. Very strange way of thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,298 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    The virus wants us all to socialise like before.

    The virus has a mind now?

    When did this happen?

    This is huge news!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭Santy2015


    Fúck this I'm off to the pub

    And let’s hope this day next week that over 50,000 aren’t out of work again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Ah no, actually. If people follow the guidelines, the virus will have less chance to spread. It can't spread on its own. That's what the public health guidelines are all about.

    With the virus now so prevalent again, our current restrictions will do little, even of adhered to fully by everyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    So we rinse and repeat and lock down again for ****ing what end.to open up again and go tru the same bs all over again

    There could be an argument, if one or more vaccines show good results this month or next, for another 6 weeks or so with strong restrictions aiming to prevent as much disease as possible and then a gradual reopening similar to the summer with the hope to begin a vaccine roll out during the reopening period. A lot depends on what we learn about vaccine efficacy in the next two months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 651 ✭✭✭440Hertz


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    The virus has a mind now?

    When did this happen?

    This is huge news!!!!!

    Stranger things have evolved! https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-parasite-that-makes-a-rat-love-a-cat-86515093/

    Extremely unlikely in a novel virus though as we don’t know it and isn’t very well adapted to us either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,298 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    There could be an argument, if one or more vaccines show good results this month or next, for another 6 weeks or so with strong restrictions aiming to prevent as much disease as possible and then a gradual reopening similar to the summer with the hope to begin a vaccine roll out during the reopening period. A lot depends on what we learn about vaccine efficacy in the next two months.

    The next two months are crucial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    Until we have a vaccine id imagine, we can't do a china style lockdown so what other option is there.

    Let those who are in the vulnerable age bracket, underlying health conditions take it easy for a few months, and let everyone else get on with life. It's the only quick way out of this.


  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    The virus has a mind now?

    When did this happen?

    This is huge news!!!!!

    It wants to find new hosts with no immunity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,762 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Santy2015 wrote: »
    And let’s hope this day next week that over 50,000 aren’t out of work again

    If that happens just wave goodbye to the hospitality sector


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    Michael O'Leary was right. We'd all be better off getting the **** out of the country for a few weeks to get away from NPHET's catastrophic mismanagement. They have made a complete balls of testing and contact tracing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,173 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    When is the next NPHET meeting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,441 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    It's a virus, what do you mean it can't spread on its own? It doesn't just disappear when people stop socialising. Very strange way of thinking.

    A virus needs a host to pass onto . If it meets no hosts within its range of attaching to a new host it cannot spread ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,523 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's a virus, what do you mean it can't spread on its own? It doesn't just disappear when people stop socialising. Very strange way of thinking.

    I don't know what this means tbh.
    It doesn't explain the variation in cases between countries, or within the same countries at different stages of restrictions.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement