Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

1164165167169170331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,337 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    And if you are of the opinion - after considering all information available, that the guidelines are not right, and far from wise? What then?

    There is a growing number of people not mindlessly accepting what the media is being fed to dispense.

    And it’s not conspiracy nonsense, as much as it would suit many to dismiss it as such. It’s valid questioning of policies that have drastically altered society to mostly its detriment over six or eight months.

    These restrictions may indeed feel like a punishment to those doing their best to follow the moving goalposts of government/NPHET, and denying themselves human interaction for the foreseeable future.

    If drastic change was needed in the face of a dangerous virus to save lives, then restrictions would be warranted, the majority would comply.

    They are not warranted. This virus is not what we were possibly arming ourselves against.

    Meh.

    If you have a grasp of basic maths you can easily determine what happens if things gets out of control.

    Blaming the media or the man doesn't alter reality I'm afraid.

    You just have a bad dose of pandemic denial, which is understandable TBF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,641 ✭✭✭auspicious


    There is no vaccine and no time line in which to expect one let alone 3 or 4 months. Still, I dont believe in lockdowns. War a mask, wash hands, social distance and get on with life.

    +1
    Although 3 to 4 years maybe..
    I'd add reduce interactions also, until we get a semblance of control over the spread.

    Regarding the Spanish Arch scenes from a couple of days ago: I often partied there years ago and there is plenty of space to stand apart. By all means party but very last one of us has a responsibility to cop on.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    The hard reset in the Aus and New Zealand about to bear fruit.

    What would that look like for our hospitality and tourism sectors if safe travel could resume? I know most of our flights come and go from UK. I’d say we’d get a massive uplift in visitors across the Irish Sea if it Ireland was the only allowed travel destination. Would probably help the airport use more than the current 10% capacity. It would also probably save thousands of jobs.

    Worth thinking about.


    https://twitter.com/nzherald/status/1310285769383305216?s=21

    As I think just about every country in Europe is going to have to go through another lockdown at some stage this winter/spring, I'd absolutely back something like this in an attempt to get as much value from the lockdown as possible.

    If a vaccine arrives - great!

    I don't see much sign of appetite for it though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Boggles wrote: »
    Meh.

    If you have a grasp of basic maths you can easily determine what happens if things gets out of control.

    Blaming the media or the man doesn't alter reality I'm afraid.

    You just have a bad dose of pandemic denial, which is understandable TBF.

    No I don’t have pandemic denial. I have more than a grasp of basic maths, which is what I’m basing the average persons risk from this virus on.

    Miniscule.

    And yes I blame both the man and the media for spreading fear needlessly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Goldrickssan


    If people refuse the vaccine that's fine.

    I'll likely not take the first round either. But if I do catch it and end up needing a hospital bed (very very very very very unlikely) I will allow the doctors to throw me in a bin instead of treating me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,228 ✭✭✭growleaves


    My team of scientists are working around the clock on a machine which will detect toxicity levels in masculine men. They don't have time to work on the pandemic sorry.

    The mandemic is much more pressing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    growleaves wrote: »
    My team of scientists are working around the clock on a machine which will detect toxicity levels in masculine men. They don't have time to work on the pandemic sorry.

    The mandemic is much more pressing.

    I am interested in your mandemic. How do I send my money?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Dashboard has updated. 511 positive swabs, 14524 test. Positivity rate = 3.51%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Should be a campaign here on Vitamin D, the evidence is clear. It will save many lives

    https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1311664668843204608


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,641 ✭✭✭auspicious


    Financial Times

    -Stéphane Bancel told the Financial Times on Wednesday that Moderna would not be ready to seek emergency use authorisation from the Food and Drug Administration before November 25 at the earliest.

    He added that he did not expect to have full approval to distribute the drug to all sections of the population until next spring, undermining Mr Trump’s claim at Tuesday’s presidential debate that a jab would be available “a lot sooner”.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    froog wrote: »
    Big T is a natural leader that exudes calmness and decisiveness. Dr Glynn is good but he's no leader.

    And this is at a time when there is a complete lack of leadership unless somehow egghead and mehole fill you with confidence.

    I'd say it is very unlikely that population at this stage will suddenly row in with continuing restrictions just because he's back. Restriction fatigue is well and truly in place at this stage and no going back imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,337 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    No I don’t have pandemic denial. I have more than a grasp of basic maths, which is what I’m basing the average persons risk from this virus on.

    Hate to break this to you but there is enough "average persons" in the country to overwhelm the hospitals.

    God forbid, but you may be one of them. You never know.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Dashboard has updated. 531 positive swabs, 14524 test. Positivity rate = 3.65%

    Backlog anywhere between 0 and 175

    hopefully zero

    not looking good though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Backlog anywhere between 0 and 175

    hopefully zero

    not looking good though

    No. We seem to moving upwards again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Boggles wrote: »
    Hate to break this to you but there is enough "average persons" in the country to overwhelm the hospitals.

    God forbid, but you may be one of them. You never know.

    Possibly there are enough to overwhelm the hospitals. But that is more a reflection on the dire state of our numbers of available hospital beds.

    I have assessed my risk according to stats available and am satisfied it is negligible that I am in danger.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Dashboard has updated. 531 positive swabs, 14524 test. Positivity rate = 3.65%

    Bollocks. We are not stabilising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    NH2013 wrote: »
    Possibly could have made sense earlier on in the pandemic had we had the benefit of hindsight and with buy-in from the UK as well.

    At this stage now however, we're now so close to the vaccine being approved and distribution being commenced that it probably makes better sense now to just try and minimise and surpress COVID as much as possible for the next 5-6 months until the most vulnerable can all be vaccinated.

    By the time we actually erradicate Covid to the levels NSW and NZ have done would probably be about 3-4 months anyways of a severe lockdown, and the first tranches of people will already be starting to be vaccinated by that point and be ready to open up fully, but having destroyed many other businesses along the way to erradicate it.

    Had we known about how this would all turn out at the very start, a UK/IRL bubble no doubt would have made a lot more sense.

    There is no way of knowing how close we are to a working vaccine at the moment. We are close to trials reaching advanced stages, but no one knows how effective anything might be, yet.

    NSW and NZ didn't 'eradicate' the virus. They did reduce, maybe even stop, it's circulation within their borders (as they had done previously), but it could return at any time, until it actually is eradicated.

    'Eradicate' definition - to destroy completely, put an end to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,337 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Possibly there are enough to overwhelm the hospitals. But that is more a reflection on the dire state of our numbers of available hospital beds.

    Indeed it is certainly a major factor in how we approach it.

    That was part of the reality I spoke of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    I'd say it is very unlikely that population at this stage will suddenly row in with continuing restrictions just because he's back. Restriction fatigue is well and truly in place at this stage and no going back imo.

    I disagree. People will fall in line when it begins to affect them, or those around them. Unfortunately, the effects will be well underway by then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,801 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Dashboard has updated. 531 positive swabs, 14524 test. Positivity rate = 3.65%

    Its actually 511 (not a whole lot better admittedly!)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭billybonkers


    Dashboard has updated. 531 positive swabs, 14524 test. Positivity rate = 3.65%

    Oooof


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Bollocks. We are not stabilising.

    We were never going to stabilise with the way things were at the time of placing us in phase 3, the cat was well and truly out of the bag.

    Restaurants obviously aren't the big driver that they're being made out to be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    How and why is there a possibility of such a backlog?

    Nobody seems to know but someone mentioned a delay in positive swab results being signed off. Some say its the puppet master or the lizard people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    froog wrote: »
    Big T is a natural leader that exudes calmness and decisiveness. Dr Glynn is good but he's no leader.

    And this is at a time when there is a complete lack of leadership unless somehow egghead and mehole fill you with confidence.

    They don't, but I don't want to live in a society where the CMO is the leader.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Benimar wrote: »
    Its actually 511 (not a whole lot better admittedly!)

    Apologies, thanks for the correction. Positivity rate should read 3.51%


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 192 ✭✭Deshawn


    Benimar wrote: »
    Its actually 511 (not a whole lot better admittedly!)

    Where are you getting this information


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Boggles wrote: »
    Indeed it is certainly a major factor in how we approach it.

    That was part of the reality I spoke of.

    Yes fair enough but then should the emphasis not be solely on our the miserable state of our healthcare system - hence the need to protect it.

    Make it known without obfuscation exactly how many beds available, what’s the surge capacity and where we stand?

    Everything else is fear-driven and divisive nonsense. Might have a chance of compliance then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭billybonkers


    Deshawn wrote: »
    Where are you getting this information

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    We were never going to stabilise with the way things were at the time of placing us in phase 3, the cat was well and truly out of the bag.

    Restaurants obviously aren't the big driver that they're being made out to be.

    Restaurants never really were the problem. The elephant in the room is schools and we know that Events in private homes would also be a risk.

    Many mistakes were made over the summer - the mistakes were not the opening up which happened. The messaging and decision making process has been terrible since the change of regime.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭billybonkers


    Highest number in hospital since mid June

    This curve is not good


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement