Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

15758606263331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,086 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I had moved past that specific conversation and was speaking in the more general sense. And I do think I had a very similar conversation on Gupta with growleaves months ago on another thread where I essentially argued the she was talking out of her hole position in slightly more nuanced terms. But just because Gupta and the oxford teams conclusion may be wrong, does not mean we can dismiss all that they bring to the conversation. The oxford have huge experience and aspects of their message may offer better ways of managing this in the long run, even if the overall conclusion is wrong

    Since we are relying on scientists from Oxford University to create a vaccine, a blanket dismissal of their opinions isn't even coherent.

    There may even be an overlap between the Oxford Infectious Diseases Lab team whose research contra Imperial College was dismissed by the Guardian and Financial Times (those unimpeachable bastions of correct science) back in March and the team working on the vaccine now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,149 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Epidemiology report from yesterday , one of the deaths was in the age range 25-34 the other was 65-74.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    FF as usual no idea what the either is saying, what a government

    At least they are consistent in being inconsistent!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,658 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    US2 wrote:
    On 2fm news there. A significant rise in cases or over 65s and a significant rise in "younger" people hospitalized. Why don't they just realease the ages of these people? My guess is it wouldn't be scary enough.
    Or maybe it's the exact opposite and they are afraid that people might stop working and pull their kids out of school?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Goldrickssan


    US2 wrote: »
    On 2fm news there. A significant rise in cases or over 65s and a significant rise in "younger" people hospitalized. Why don't they just realease the ages of these people? My guess is it wouldn't be scary enough.

    Those spooky u65s getting sick!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,309 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    growleaves wrote: »
    Since we are relying on scientists from Oxford University to create a vaccine, a blanket dismissal of their opinions isn't even coherent.

    Good job no one is doing that.

    The lady in question would have absolutely nothing to do with vaccine development anyway.

    There is 15,000 people working for the university, I imagine they probably have never even heard of her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    xhomelezz wrote: »
    Did you read it? Doubt Belgium media will pay any attention to it.

    Most of it. Im a changed man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    spookwoman wrote: »
    Epidemiology report from yesterday , one of the deaths was in the age range 25-34 the other was 65-74.


    Must be a typo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,960 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1309466968836263936

    1 Donegal 148.2
    2 Dublin 144.5
    3 Louth 107.8
    4 Waterford 86.9
    5 Wicklow 74.4
    6 Kildare 72.8
    7 Roscommon 62
    8 Offaly 59
    9 Monaghan 53.8
    10 Westmeath 49.6
    11 Carlow 42.2
    12 Cork 42.2
    13 Clare 41.2
    14 Laois 40.1
    15 Galway 39.1
    16 Meath 37.9
    17 Limerick 35.9
    18 Leitrim 34.3
    19 Longford 31.8
    20 Cavan 30.2
    21 Mayo 29.1
    22 Wexford 24
    23 Kilkenny 22.2
    24 Kerry 19
    25 Sligo 18.3
    26 Tipperary 15.7

    i was looking at the 14 day map and the areas were showing 30 cases per 100,000 for SW Donegal, through the 333 per 100,000 for stanolar lifford area, which equated to 8 cases in SW donegal and 82 cases in stranolar lifford not saying we didnt need to be locked down but it does show a few family groups spreading infections could quickly bump up the numbers when each region has 25,000 people in it

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    What is driving the increase of cases in donegal, does anyone know?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭dashoonage


    owlbethere wrote: »
    What I'd driving the increase of cases in donegal, does anyone know?

    smuggling moonshine over the county bounds from the north.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Mistakes are the portals of discovery - James joyce

    Not all mistakes are portals of discovery.

    527416.jpg


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Good job no one is doing that.

    The lady in question would have absolutely nothing to do with vaccine development anyway.

    There is 15,000 people working for the university, I imagine they probably have never even heard of her.

    You believe the vaccine team working on Covid at Oxford don’t talk to the epidemiology team?

    https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-03-18-coronavirus-researchers-at-oxford


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,258 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    owlbethere wrote: »
    What I'd driving the increase of cases in donegal, does anyone know?

    Nordies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭ginoginelli


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Every shop I go into these days has a Perspex screen at the check out desk. The screens are about 1 meter high and have no sidescreens. They also have an opening for passing purchases through to be scanned.
    Do people actually believe that these screens achieve anything at all. Do they believe that if there is virus in the air that it won’t go around the sides, or over the top or through the hole in the middle of these screens?
    Are these screens there just to pretend to the staff and customers that there is some protection afforded by these nonsensical screens.
    The same, of course, applies to face visors, (sometimes worn on the top of the head).


    Its appalling that most of these screens are allowed, they offer very limited protection, and worse still, most people behind them dont wear a mask.

    On the visors - its infuriating that the government have not clamped down on them. They have been showing to be more or less useless and are banned in several countries now. Our own acting cmo said people should only be wearing them under certain circumstances if they cant wear a face covering. Yet it seems he has been completely ignored.

    We really need better education, communication and litigation if we are going to beat this virus.


  • Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Good job no one is doing that.

    The lady in question would have absolutely nothing to do with vaccine development anyway.

    There is 15,000 people working for the university, I imagine they probably have never even heard of her.

    Isn't she the ex wife of the guy in charge of the Jenner Institute, the place that developed the vaccine? He's well rid I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    For people who are of the opinion that governments are wrong to implement restrictions, what are your alternative solutions?

    Do you think Israel is a special case or that the increase in cases and ICU admissions across Europe will turn out to be no big deal? Can you not consider that this is start of something bigger than the few cases we are currently seeing?

    Why would our governments implement something that will severely damage our economy if it wasn't necessary and do you think your random articles from the depths of the internet make you more informed than their advisors, who are all plugged into information being shared among people on the frontline across Europe?

    The government isn't out to get you or purposely run our economy into the ground, there is rationale behind what they do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    US2 wrote: »
    On 2fm news there. A significant rise in cases or over 65s and a significant rise in "younger" people hospitalized. Why don't they just realease the ages of these people? My guess is it wouldn't be scary enough.
    They publish it every day, the media just don't bother their holes getting into the details.

    https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/casesinireland/epidemiologyofcovid-19inireland/COVID-19_Daily_epidemiology_report_(NPHET)_20200924%20-%20Website.pdf

    People over 65 represent 54% of hospitalisations, 36% of ICU admissions and 93% of deaths.

    If that ICU number seems weird it's because there's a huge cohort of 85+ people who never make it to hospital, and those who do basically never go to ICU.

    494 people over 85 were admitted to hospital with covid, and just 6 (yes, six) of them were admitted to ICU.

    The situation for 75-84 cohort is equally grim, though they are at least more likely to be admitted to hospital rather than left to fend for themselves.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    it does show a few family groups spreading infections could quickly bump up the numbers when each region has 25,000 people in it
    Yep - it doesn't take much. Take Dublin North Central - it's gone from a 79.4 to a 132 per 100k in just one week. Sounds crazy but ultimately it's 28 new cases in an LEA with over 50k people. Obviously, the concern is that it's 28 this week, 50 the next, etc but a small number of people can quickly make the figures seem very frightening.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not all mistakes are portals of discovery.

    527416.jpg

    Tell that to all those who learned not to eat that particular mushroom


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Tell that to all those who learned not to eat that particular mushroom

    Equally tell that to those that learned not to catch that virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,309 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You believe the vaccine team working on Covid at Oxford don’t talk to the epidemiology team?

    https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2020-03-18-coronavirus-researchers-at-oxford

    There is no "epidemiology team".

    I imagine the "team" working on the Covid vaccine would liaise with Oxford Public health department, both of which who have their own selection of epidemiologists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Taoiseach says NPHET may advise Govt on restrictions in cities such as Cork, Waterford, Limerick and Galway, where number of cases continues to rise

    Haven't cases deceased in the last week in Limerick and Surely Louth are in line for restrictions before Cork, Galway?

    Hospital case numbers have to be factor also in cities, 5 in Cork hospitals and 3 in Galway as of last night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Intrigue in respect to the goings on in Donegal

    https://twitter.com/kilclooneyjohn/status/1309371885503877121?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    At least they are consistent in being inconsistent!

    :D true


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,160 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Donegal’s 14 day figure now higher than Dublin.


  • Posts: 939 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    For people who are of the opinion that governments are wrong to implement restrictions, what are your alternative solutions?

    Do you think Israel is a special case or that the increase in cases and ICU admissions across Europe will turn out to be no big deal? Can you not consider that this is start of something bigger than the few cases we are currently seeing?

    Why would our governments implement something that will severely damage our economy if it wasn't necessary and do you think your random articles from the depths of the internet make you more informed than their advisors, who are all plugged into information being shared among people on the frontline across Europe?

    The government isn't out to get you or purposely run our economy into the ground, there is rationale behind what they do.

    This is something I can't understand, we have almost exclusively centrist politicians in charge that lean a little right. They have spent their careers prioritising the economy, often at the expense of the health service. They haven't suddenly had a road to Damascus moment. They simply recognise the threat to public health is significant enough to require measures that will have an economic impact, and that if the virus is not controlled the economic impact will be devastating in any event. Probably more so than the present light touch restrictions (which are mostly advisory).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,086 ✭✭✭growleaves


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    For people who are of the opinion that governments are wrong to implement restrictions, what are your alternative solutions?

    Do you think Israel is a special case or that the increase in cases and ICU admissions across Europe will turn out to be no big deal? Can you not consider that this is start of something bigger than the few cases we are currently seeing?

    Why would our governments implement something that will severely damage our economy if it wasn't necessary and do you think your random articles from the depths of the internet make you more informed than their advisors, who are all plugged into information being shared among people on the frontline across Europe?

    The government isn't out to get you or purposely run our economy into the ground, there is rationale behind what they do.



  • Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Must be a typo

    Do people really have their heads that much in the sand?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    For people who are of the opinion that governments are wrong to implement restrictions, what are your alternative solutions?

    Do you think Israel is a special case or that the increase in cases and ICU admissions across Europe will turn out to be no big deal? Can you not consider that this is start of something bigger than the few cases we are currently seeing?

    Why would our governments implement something that will severely damage our economy if it wasn't necessary and do you think your random articles from the depths of the internet make you more informed than their advisors, who are all plugged into information being shared among people on the frontline across Europe?

    The government isn't out to get you or purposely run our economy into the ground, there is rationale behind what they do.
    Do you accept that governments are not infallible? They may not purposely be running the economy into the ground, but they still are.

    I accept we need restrictions but they are at times over the top and without much scientific merit. Right now I'm not particularly against Dublin level 3 due to the current trends being pretty bad, but I am absolutely against the idea we shouldn't question them. The €9 meals were nonsense, the 2km/5km were nonsense, much of retail being closed for months was nonsense also.

    I just find it a bit mad that (and not talking about you here) many people I know who spend their lives telling me how bad our governments are, now take everything they say about this to gospel.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement