Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

18586889091334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    How was this calculated and where does the info come from?

    There was a post a couple if days ago saying that cases the next day would be announced as 350+ but that was wrong.

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Holy Moly, please say this is just an anecdote

    “Just the facts ma’am, just the facts”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    dashoonage wrote: »
    maths

    Woah woah, slow down egg head..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 111 ✭✭Double O Seven


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Holy Moly, please say this is just an anecdote

    How is that number a surprise? Sure we were told back in February that inevitably up to 70% of the population would get Covid 19.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    spookwoman wrote: »
    Or an outlier

    I'm starting to believe that the original outlier wasn't an outlier at all. The days of 10-15 cases was the outlier


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    spookwoman wrote: »
    Or an outlier

    In fairness, I think he will end up being correct, just not in the direction he thought!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    How is that number a surprise? Sure we were told back in February that inevitably up to 70% of the population would get Covid 19.
    Even with these increases it'd be the year 2100 before we hit 70%!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1f3-special-measures-in-place-for-dublin/


    I have read this three times and I am still not sure about the “ one other household “

    Can you have one household with 6 people visit on a Monday and 6 from another visit you on a Thursday ?
    As long their visit doesn’t coincide thats ok ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    Could be around ~450 cases announced this evening if they clear the backlog


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Even with these increases it'd be the year 2100 before we hit 70%!

    So best to hold off any plans until then.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    So best to hold off any plans until then.
    For some people yes!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,965 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1f3-special-measures-in-place-for-dublin/


    I have read this three times and I am still not sure about the “ one other household “

    Can you have one household with 6 people visit on a Monday and 6 from another visit you on a Thursday ?
    As long their visit doesn’t coincide thats ok ?

    I took it that it was just the one household , full stop, you should be mixing with until cases settle?
    Or you could have a different group every night , if you go with the second option, but that wouldn't limit your contacts .

    Is it badly written , or what ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1f3-special-measures-in-place-for-dublin/


    I have read this three times and I am still not sure about the “ one other household “

    Can you have one household with 6 people visit on a Monday and 6 from another visit you on a Thursday ?
    As long their visit doesn’t coincide thats ok ?
    Do you really have the conundrum of multiple visits at present? The main message is the 6! At Level 2 that can be up to 3 households and Level 3 only 1.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    I took it that it was just the one household , full stop, you should be mixing with until cases settle?
    Or you could have a different group every night , if you go with the second option, but that wouldn't limit your contacts .

    No but it would limit them meeting ? Oh now I don’t know either ?
    Such a shambles of a briefing today . I am non the wiser at all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    Could be around ~450 cases announced this evening if they clear the backlog

    Of course they will, take the spotlight off the absolute shambles this morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1f3-special-measures-in-place-for-dublin/


    I have read this three times and I am still not sure about the “ one other household “

    Can you have one household with 6 people visit on a Monday and 6 from another visit you on a Thursday ?
    As long their visit doesn’t coincide thats ok ?

    Forget about the detail... accept the general intent - restrict your movements and limit your social contacts. Apply that across all situations, not just household visits.

    That's the intention, the endless listing of situations and applicable scenarios are all ways designed to enforce the basic principles - but they usually fail as people to find their own specific loophole to blow holes in the letter of the guideline, as opposed to observing the spirit of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,965 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    No but it would limit them meeting ? Oh now I don’t know either ?
    Such a shambles of a briefing today . I am non the wiser at all

    Any journos on here who could ask the question and clarify for us?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Do you really have the conundrum of multiple visits at present? The main message is the 6! At Level 2 that can be up to 3 households and Level 3 only 1.

    Yes i do . So you tell me what it actually means ? I have had multiple texts asking the same
    The wording is “ at any given time “


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,172 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I cannot comprehend how they went ahead with the press conference when they clearly couldn't verbalise the message and the document was still a work-in-progress?
    What other organisation would do that? Why not delay and do the press conference at a later time or day.
    Our political system is reaching new lows with this government. We are only on Day 80.

    I thought a PR company was hired, if so they should be fired after that press conference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    Yes i do . So you tell me what it actually means ? I have had multiple texts asking the same
    The wording is “ at any given time “
    Which means no more than 6 at a time. It's just writing down what the CMO has been saying.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,965 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    Forget about the detail... accept the general intent - restrict your movements and limit your social contacts. Apply that across all situations, not just household visits.

    That's the intention, the endless listing of situations and applicable scenarios are all ways designed to enforce the basic principles - but they usually fail as people to find their own specific loophole to blow holes in the letter of the guideline, as opposed to observing the spirit of it.

    Its a very valid question though and it shows how easy it is for people not to understand what the guidelines are saying without anyone who has a clue explaining .
    I thought it was the first option until iamwhoiam asked , now i don't know.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1f3-special-measures-in-place-for-dublin/


    I have read this three times and I am still not sure about the “ one other household “

    Can you have one household with 6 people visit on a Monday and 6 from another visit you on a Thursday ?
    As long their visit doesn’t coincide thats ok ?

    Yes. If there is a case in one household, only one other is impacted.
    House A, B and C.

    B visits A Monday
    C visits A Thursday.

    Positive case on Friday
    Positive Case in B. A isolates, C becomes secondary contacts until there is a confirmed cases in A - correction A only required to isolate if B became symptomatic on or before wednesday

    Positive case in C - only A implicated

    Positive Case in A, Only C implicated as B > 48 hours.

    B & C visit A Thursday - everyone goosed for 14 days


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    Well, after reading the plan/framework, I can safely say, that I would have accomplished a better job.(if some one would type/spell check for me)
    In fact, even though many here are, in opposite camps on certain covid issues, I think that even the members of boards, would have come up with a clearer plan. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    No but it would limit them meeting ? Oh now I don’t know either ?
    Such a shambles of a briefing today . I am non the wiser at all

    Just as an example, my thinking was that it would be ok for me, my husband and 2 Kids to visit my Mum one day and for my sister, her husband and child to visit a different day. As long as the 2 visits didn't overlap.

    (My Mum doesn't live in Dublin but just using an example)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    I thought a PR company was hired, if so they should be fired after that press conference
    They can only work with what they are given in terms of presenters! However, I did see various TDs and ministers being rolled out in the media from very early to promote this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,965 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes. If there is a case in one household, only one other is impacted.
    House A, B and C.

    B visits A Monday
    C visits A Thursday.

    Positive case on Friday
    Positive Case in B. A isolates, C becomes secondary contacts until there is a confirmed cases in A

    Positive case in C - only A implicated

    Positive Case in A, Only C implicated as B > 48 hours.

    B & C visit A Thursday - everyone goosed for 14 days

    But isn't that just from a contact tracing point of view, not as regards the actual risk of cross infection?
    But well done to you for working that one out !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    It looks like they spent all week just changing it from a 4 phase to colours to now a 5 stage framework. But it seems to all be the same makey-up policies as they go along.

    We don't really know the criteria of each stage, we don't know what the plan is, and there's no mention how to move to lower stages. So basically, 'as you were' ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,172 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    4th Cork school, this time in Ballincollig with a positive case


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Long Covid is an issue without a doubt. Iv'e had two "false dawns" recovering from the virus and if im 100% honest with myself im beginning to wonder if i'll ever feel the way i did last year again.

    I'm back running but struggling at the 3-4 klms mark where i could have ran a marathon this time last year.

    I realise a lot of people who have had it are over it in a matter of days or some feel no effects at all but make no mistake if you get a high viral load of this thing you will suffer.

    Do you know where or how you got it ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    Forget about the detail... accept the general intent - restrict your movements and limit your social contacts. Apply that across all situations, not just household visits.

    That's the intention, the endless listing of situations and applicable scenarios are all ways designed to enforce the basic principles - but they usually fail as people to find their own specific loophole to blow holes in the letter of the guideline, as opposed to observing the spirit of it.

    I have been doing that since March . Unfortunately others haven’t been . I am not looking for a loophole I am looking for clarity . Do you stick to one family visiting for three weeks or have another family visit you next week ? It is absolutely not clear in my opinion


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement