Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

16465676970334

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭smellyoldboot


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    Jeez, that's some image and a poor reflection on a society that's supposed to be trying to close down a virus. Travelling out of Dublin to have a couple in less than two hours. Do you really think that would happen to any discernible level?

    Yes. Absolutely. And I don't mean to "just" tar Dublin with this, it just happens to be the largest population centre. But we have an awful lot of seriously questionable "citizens" in this country. If you don't bolt every loophole closed tight, you can be guaranteed plenty will take the piss even if just for the sake of doing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    So we're moving to the EU list when it becomes active but until then 25 per 100k is the green list, so we don't make our own greenlist and neither do plenty of counties in Ireland. Can already see tomorrow turning into a disaster that not even hiring a PR company can sort out

    Completely nuts. A guard or a nurse coming back from Italy or Greece (far lower cases) to Dublin On Saturday will be required to take two weeks unpaid leave.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Is there somewhere with a decent summary of the proposed 5 levels?

    I read somewhere that it needs Level 5 for restaurants to have to close except for takeaway, but an article in the examiner said only Level 3 was required to close them except for takeaway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,740 ✭✭✭Naos


    Yup in level 1 & 2, up to each employer then what they want to do in line with the return to work protocol

    Thanks for that, although still a bit confusing:

    "Under the plan, working from home where possible will remain the advice up to level three, at which level people will be told to stay home unless absolutely necessary."


    So WFH advised up to level three, yet four & five are worse than three so they would also be WFH if possible? Unless I'm reading this sentence completely wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Naos wrote: »
    Thanks for that, although still a bit confusing:

    "Under the plan, working from home where possible will remain the advice up to level three, at which level people will be told to stay home unless absolutely necessary."


    So WFH advised up to level three, yet four & five are worse than three so they would also be WFH if possible? Unless I'm reading this sentence completely wrong.

    4 and 5 are essentially back to March and April in terms of WFH, offices closed etc thats my reading of 4 & 5.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Happy4all wrote: »
    The original point I made stands. People will send in receipts innocently expecting a rebate, and oblivious to the underpayment accruing under the wage subsidy scheme. They will trigger a P21 balancing statement, that might never have issued if the receipts were never submitted.

    Nonsense. Why would anyone give you money when you owe them more?

    Would any individual or any business do this?

    Nor would revenue. They are a collector of taxes. That is their job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭majcos


    Question,

    If i get run down by a bus tonight and have to go to ICU, they test me and find I have COVID, do I get added to the COVID ICU stats even though I am in hospital for totally unrelated issue?
    For most people in hospital with Covid, having Covid is the reason for their admission or a significant factor in their admission. At current incidence rates, you are very, very unlucky if you happen to get knocked down by a bus and also happen to be carrying Covid at the same time. (Maybe it’s really bad karma for not staying at home!) That may explain the odd anecdotal case but not the majority.

    Happening to have Covid while being admitted for a completely unrelated issue does not explain the rising number of people in hospital with Covid. Patients were also in hospital for other reasons in June and July and numbers of patients in hospital with Covid dropped to about 10.

    Even if Covid is not the reason for admission, it could end up being a major determining factor in a patient’s outcome. If someone is in hospital with exacerbation of heart failure or sepsis or after a stroke, Covid may be the final straw. They may have recovered without Covid but because of Covid don’t recover or have a longer hospital stay with more complications.

    People are often in hospital for more than one reason. One illness is often a major factor in the severity of another. Maybe you would not end up in hospital with a chest infection if you didn’t have emphysema or asthma. Maybe you would not have gone in to a diabetic coma if you didn’t have an ulcer that got infected and drove your blood sugars crazy. Doesn’t mean you don’t have both an ulcer and diabetes and that both don’t need treatment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Jaded Walker


    Big treatment news in the last few hours.

    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists have isolated the smallest biological molecule to date that completely and specifically neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the cause of COVID-19. This antibody component, which is 10 times smaller than a full-sized antibody, has been used to construct a drug—known as Ab8—for potential use as a therapeutic and prophylactic against SARS-CoV-2.

    The researchers report today in the journal Cell that Ab8 is highly effective in preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice and hamsters. Its tiny size not only increases its potential for diffusion in tissues to better neutralize the virus, but also makes it possible to administer the drug by alternative routes, including inhalation. Importantly, it does not bind to human cells—a good sign that it won’t have negative side-effects in people.

    https://www.pittwire.pitt.edu/news/pitt-scientists-discover-tiny-antibody-component-highly-effective-preventing-and-treating-sars
    Great news, now let's go lockdown.until.irs ready.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭screamer


    Happy4all wrote: »
    The original point I made stands. People will send in receipts innocently expecting a rebate, and oblivious to the underpayment accruing under the wage subsidy scheme. They will trigger a P21 balancing statement, that might never have issued if the receipts were never submitted.

    No this is not true. Revenue are tracking all taxes owed to them, and once back to work, recipients of the pup or the first subsidy scheme will have tax credits reduced to recoup the cost. The money is owed to Revenue, and they will collect it. Difference is that it will be recouped over a couple of years rather than just one.....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭smellyoldboot


    screamer wrote: »
    No this is not true. Revenue are tracking all taxes owed to them, and once back to work, recipients of the pup or the first subsidy scheme will have tax credits reduced to recoup the cost. The money is owed to Revenue, and they will collect it. Difference is that it will be recouped over a couple of years rather than just one.....

    Could always just pack in the job. That'll learn em.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    screamer wrote: »
    No this is not true. Revenue are tracking all taxes owed to them, and once back to work, recipients of the pup or the first subsidy scheme will have tax credits reduced to recoup the cost. The money is owed to Revenue, and they will collect it. Difference is that it will be recouped over a couple of years rather than just one.....

    It will still cause people to grumble and phone Liveline . :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,978 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    majcos wrote: »
    For most people in hospital with Covid, having Covid is the reason for their admission or a significant factor in their admission. At current incidence rates, you are very, very unlucky if you happen to get knocked down by a bus and also happen to be carrying Covid at the same time. (Maybe it’s really bad karma for not staying at home!) That may explain the odd anecdotal case but not the majority.

    Happening to have Covid while being admitted for a completely unrelated issue does not explain the rising number of people in hospital with Covid. Patients were also in hospital for other reasons in June and July and numbers of patients in hospital with Covid dropped to about 10.

    Even if Covid is not the reason for admission, it could end up being a major determining factor in a patient’s outcome. If someone is in hospital with exacerbation of heart failure or sepsis or after a stroke, Covid may be the final straw. They may have recovered without Covid but because of Covid don’t recover or have a longer hospital stay with more complications.

    People are often in hospital for more than one reason. One illness is often a major factor in the severity of another. Maybe you would not end up in hospital with a chest infection if you didn’t have emphysema or asthma. Maybe you would not have gone in to a diabetic coma if you didn’t have an ulcer that got infected and drove your blood sugars crazy. Doesn’t mean you don’t have both an ulcer and diabetes and that both don’t need treatment.

    Absolutely true. Good answer .
    But how many more times will that question come up here about the person with Covid being admitted to hospital for something else, not Covid ?
    As if that explains why there are more cases in hospital. %/
    It is doubly bad luck for any person who is ill in hospital with one thing to be also diagnosed with Covid . Risks of clots and strokes and cardiac, kidney , neurological, and renal complications , not to mention pneumonia and respiratory failure .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 942 ✭✭✭pheasant tail


    Big treatment news in the last few hours.

    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists have isolated the smallest biological molecule to date that completely and specifically neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the cause of COVID-19. This antibody component, which is 10 times smaller than a full-sized antibody, has been used to construct a drug—known as Ab8—for potential use as a therapeutic and prophylactic against SARS-CoV-2.

    The researchers report today in the journal Cell that Ab8 is highly effective in preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice and hamsters. Its tiny size not only increases its potential for diffusion in tissues to better neutralize the virus, but also makes it possible to administer the drug by alternative routes, including inhalation. Importantly, it does not bind to human cells—a good sign that it won’t have negative side-effects in people.

    https://www.pittwire.pitt.edu/news/pitt-scientists-discover-tiny-antibody-component-highly-effective-preventing-and-treating-sars

    Caveat emptor, I’m shocked you didn’t find this positive, good news story to post from the day. Guess you must have just missed it, right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Caveat emptor, I’m shocked you didn’t find this positive, good news story to post from the day. Guess you must have just missed it, right.
    Wait until they find out that I found it on Twitter...
    Hilarious how they don't like the post either, by the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Wait until they find out that I found it on Twitter...
    Hilarious how they don't like the post either, by the way.

    I do find it interesting that you’ll never see any likes put on positive info posts from a certain cohort on here but you’ll see them put on the ‘we’re all doomed ‘info posts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    4ec9696ff26c8f4e6f1cd2994b6dc3a0.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    spookwoman wrote: »
    4ec9696ff26c8f4e6f1cd2994b6dc3a0.png

    Yes it could explain the fetish for misery.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Seeing as there was briefly a discussion about how the PUP recipients will be shafted in coming years, let's take a look at how the other side are doing.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/oliver-callan-swift-covid-19-action-exposes-state-dithering-on-misbehaving-industries-1.4354592

    A lot of salient points here about corporate landlords, meat plants, insurance companies and tech firms - the real winners in all this heinous sh!t. If I were coming out significantly financially better from this, at the expense of a huge segment of the population, I'd regard it as an utterly pyrrhic victory. But that ethical standpoint doesn't even enter the equation for those at the top, who leech off the population and are protected at every turn from accountability. Maybe it's a victimless crime to them; like punching someone in the dark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    s1ippy wrote: »
    Seeing as there was briefly a discussion about how the PUP recipients will be shafted in coming years, let's take a look at how the other side are doing.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/oliver-callan-swift-covid-19-action-exposes-state-dithering-on-misbehaving-industries-1.4354592

    A lot of salient points here about corporate landlords, meat plants, insurance companies and tech firms - the real winners in all this heinous sh!t. If I were coming out significantly financially better from this, at the expense of a huge segment of the population, I'd regard it as an utterly pyrrhic victory. But that ethical standpoint doesn't even enter the equation for those at the top, who leech off the population and are protected at every turn from accountability. Maybe it's a victimless crime to them; like punching someone in the dark.

    Yep. Here in the US Amazon, target, Walmart etc profits are off the charts. In Amazon's case, its up 100%. Target and Walmart not far off. Meanwhile, as early as May it was estimated that 100000 small businesses had already shut down permanently. Its a money grab and unsurprisingly, the rich get richer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    200 good


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,147 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Is there somewhere with a decent summary of the proposed 5 levels?

    I read somewhere that it needs Level 5 for restaurants to have to close except for takeaway, but an article in the examiner said only Level 3 was required to close them except for takeaway?

    1: tis grand
    2: we're looking a bit fecked but tis grand
    3. Bloody house parties
    4: Trampolines can kill ye
    5: Where's Leo and Simon?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭moonage


    majcos wrote: »
    For most people in hospital with Covid, having Covid is the reason for their admission or a significant factor in their admission.

    Do the "hospitalised with covid" numbers include anyone in hospital who is Sars-Cov-2 positive?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    Polar101 wrote: »
    I don't think getting a drink is very difficult in Dublin at the moment.

    It's not. 10 pints and 2 red breast had tonight. Happy Monday.

    Not looking forward to work tomorrow.

    Latest Indo is out In 10 minutes, I'll know from that what is happening with the Covid and whatever decisions need to be made.

    They are usually on the ball.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,978 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    They're supposed to. Glynn was asked that question last week and he sounded surprised at the idea that it wasn't happening

    Yes.
    It was recommended to be done when hospitals reopened back in June to electives again .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭fits


    Big treatment news in the last few hours.

    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists have isolated the smallest biological molecule to date that completely and specifically neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the cause of COVID-19. This antibody component, which is 10 times smaller than a full-sized antibody, has been used to construct a drug—known as Ab8—for potential use as a therapeutic and prophylactic against SARS-CoV-2.

    The researchers report today in the journal Cell that Ab8 is highly effective in preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice and hamsters. Its tiny size not only increases its potential for diffusion in tissues to better neutralize the virus, but also makes it possible to administer the drug by alternative routes, including inhalation. Importantly, it does not bind to human cells—a good sign that it won’t have negative side-effects in people.

    https://www.pittwire.pitt.edu/news/pitt-scientists-discover-tiny-antibody-component-highly-effective-preventing-and-treating-sars

    Someone in my family has a condition and it seems like every few months there is news about some treatment that works on mice. This is going on years. Mice aren’t humans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Yes.
    It was recommended to be done when hospitals reopened back in June to electives again .

    Being honest I am shocked that they were not doing it .Surely they could come up with it themselves even without a recommendation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,528 ✭✭✭✭Busi_Girl08


    According to the Journal there's a press conference expected before 12 to announce the plan and restrictions.

    National 'Living with Covid' plan to be announced this morning, but Dublin pubs reopening to be paused again https://jrnl.ie/5204441


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Big treatment news in the last few hours.

    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists have isolated the smallest biological molecule to date that completely and specifically neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the cause of COVID-19. This antibody component, which is 10 times smaller than a full-sized antibody, has been used to construct a drug—known as Ab8—for potential use as a therapeutic and prophylactic against SARS-CoV-2.

    The researchers report today in the journal Cell that Ab8 is highly effective in preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice and hamsters. Its tiny size not only increases its potential for diffusion in tissues to better neutralize the virus, but also makes it possible to administer the drug by alternative routes, including inhalation. Importantly, it does not bind to human cells—a good sign that it won’t have negative side-effects in people.

    https://www.pittwire.pitt.edu/news/pitt-scientists-discover-tiny-antibody-component-highly-effective-preventing-and-treating-sars

    Very encouraging. It is worth noting that an impact in mice is no way proof that this will be safe and effective in humans. The time to demonstrate safety for a treatment such as this would be quite lengthy I would imagine. Up to now a lot of the treatment efforts have being focused on existing drugs where have established safety studies. Qualifying a new biological molecule as safe for use in treatment is in no way a trivial matter. Its quite different to vaccines where a lot of the adjuvants and vectors are already established, its just adding a different genetic material


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    According to the Journal there's a press conference expected before 12 to announce the plan and restrictions.

    National 'Living with Covid' plan to be announced this morning, but Dublin pubs reopening to be paused again https://jrnl.ie/5204441

    It's a trap for MM, Leo won't be long pulling the rug from underneath him once it's published. There's little appetite out there for more restrictions and he knows the numbers have been fudged.

    Looking forward to Jennifer Zamparelli at 9am twitter is in outrage mode were even having a discussion. Can only be a good thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Cabinet meeting getting underway now so should be an early enough press conference.

    Whatever the levels are they come in from midnight tonight


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement