Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

No Time to Die **Spoilers from post #1449 onward**

191012141532

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,628 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Poor James, struck down by Coronavirus.

    Always thought it'd be the clap that'd get him in the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,233 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Big Gerry wrote: »
    It won't be out next month the release date has been pushed back to November.


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8074959/Release-new-James-Bond-film-No-Time-Die-pushed-April-November.html

    I have a feeling there could be reshoots now ,a convenient excuse .


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah, this feels a little out of nowhere; haven't got a sense that outside of big sports or cultural events like St. Patricks, there's much appetite or concern about cancelling every social outlet out there. Does make one wonder if this is masking more reshoots. IIRC the production was pretty hurried to begin with.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,716 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    No Time To Dent Your Box Office Numbers.

    It’s a fairly ridiculous move, but I’d be amazed if it is being driven by anything other than dollar / yuan signs. I was laughing at various fan sites earlier this week passionately urging the producers to delay it to save the film’s precious box office - so strange to me to hear third parties so passionately concerned for a mega blockbuster’s financial take.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Surely of all the brands relatively bulletproof from external events, Bond would be right up there? You might delay a film with an uncertain future, but Bond? Has there even been any sense that Corvid-19 is even eating into cinema attendances or, anything, really? Hell IIRC it's not even clear if the sales of Corona Lager has been effected by the outbreak :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 789 ✭✭✭Big Gerry


    April would have been a weird time to release a Bond movie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    Maybe the Rami Malek character's master plan is to use bio-warfare?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,666 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    surely they should have said delayed release for 007 months

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Surely of all the brands relatively bulletproof from external events, Bond would be right up there? You might delay a film with an uncertain future, but Bond? Has there even been any sense that Corvid-19 is even eating into cinema attendances or, anything, really? Hell IIRC it's not even clear if the sales of Corona Lager has been effected by the outbreak :D

    Sort of off topic but I think they confirmed sales are down 8% and also this

    https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1233406525491814400?s=19

    Honestly, I'd be more worried for the Fast & Furious franchise


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Yeah, this feels a little out of nowhere; haven't got a sense that outside of big sports or cultural events like St. Patricks, there's much appetite or concern about cancelling every social outlet out there. Does make one wonder if this is masking more reshoots. IIRC the production was pretty hurried to begin with.

    Listening to Simon Brew's Film Stories podcast it seems every Craig-Bond production has been hurried due to Eon's habit of announcing a release date before a script has been written. Unfortunately he doesn't cover all the Bonds in one pod but they're worth a listen if you can search through them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,009 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    pixelburp wrote:
    Surely of all the brands relatively bulletproof from external events, Bond would be right up there? You might delay a film with an uncertain future, but Bond? Has there even been any sense that Corvid-19 is even eating into cinema attendances or, anything, really? Hell IIRC it's not even clear if the sales of Corona Lager has been effected by the outbreak

    I think cinemas are closed in parts of China. Closed in Italy now today aswell. Wouldn't shock me if Mulan is also delayed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 798 ✭✭✭Rockbeast2


    Maybe the Rami Malek character's master plan is to use bio-warfare?

    Had heard rumours that plot was related to bio-warfare long before Covid-19 outbreak so wouldn't surprise me.

    The conspiracy theories about the virus being man-made would not play well in China which is a huge market for Bond.

    Simple explanation, though, is the uncertainty of movie theatre closures worldwide.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    Wait, so was Coronavirus some sort of meta-viral marketing campaign for 'No Time To Die' that got out of hand?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    I was really looking to see the film next month :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 WhatGoesUp


    Bit dissapointed to wait but high hopes for this one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Maybe the Rami Malek character's master plan is to use bio-warfare?

    I think you could be on to something.
    That and also more money by delaying it allowing more people to see it. Especially in China.

    All in all from reading the comments I think we are all in agreement it was not for the good of people lol.


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭MintyMagnum


    'James Bond!

    .....no James Bond'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,542 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    38% of Americans wouldn't buy Corona beer "under any circumstances" because of the coronavirus, according to a recent survey.

    That's hilariously depressing.

    Maybe the price will go down to something reasonable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,628 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Tony EH wrote: »
    That's hilariously depressing.

    Maybe the price will go down to something reasonable.

    I wonder though if they asked a similar number of American drinkers before the Coronavirus shenigans would they ever drink Corona beer, I betcha that the amount who never would wouldn't be far off 38% to begin with. It's a clickbaity headline.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Huh, so today, this film should have come out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 133 ✭✭ijohhj


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Huh, so today, this film should have come out.

    Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭king size mars bar


    Think I'm going to bond binge for the few days to make up for it


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    ijohhj wrote: »
    Thanks.

    Hey, it's the first in a line of big films where the release date has now passed. It's kinda surreal. Obviously nowhere near the most important thing right now, but still odd.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 133 ✭✭ijohhj


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Hey, it's the first in a line of big films where the release date has now passed.

    And we all really needed the necrobump reminder of how crappy things are. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    The death has been announced of the English actress Honor Blackman, best know for her roles as Pussy Galore in the James Bond adventure Goldfinger


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,100 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin




  • Registered Users Posts: 224 ✭✭Muller1991


    Looks like a reboot of DR No, Hopefully the cinemas will still be open by the release date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    Don't watch that trailer, it pretty much shows everything!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Muller1991 wrote: »
    Looks like a reboot of DR No.
    Even if there was a character in this called Dr No, I'd suggest borrowing a name does not a reboot make.

    There's no comparison between early Bonds and current Bonds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,233 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    py2006 wrote: »
    Don't watch that trailer, it pretty much shows everything!

    It's a pretty dumb looking trailer .
    All action, not much plot.
    Kind of puts me off wanting to see it .


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The stunt on the bridge, and how Bond avoided being run over, was a neat moment; the glider however was too OTT though; does make one wonder just what tone they're going to aim for - and how consistent it'll be in execution.

    Given what I've heard about Bond movies & how product placement pays back the budget before it even hits cinemas, presumably any box office taking will be pure profit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭OU812


    To be honest, this movie would get me into a cinema this year. (would prefer digital release though). Really looking forward to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Between the glider and some of the other vehicle CGI... getting Die Another Day vibes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Muller1991 wrote: »
    Looks like a reboot of DR No, Hopefully the cinemas will still be open by the release date.

    It's a long time since I've seen Dr. No, but I don't remember quite as many explosions and stunts.

    Generally the last movie made by a Bond actor is terrible (Diamonds are Forever, View to a Kill and Die another Day are all rubbish; I'll ignore Lazenby and Dalton for this theory), so this just has to be ok (or at least less boring than Spectre) to stay ahead of the curve


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Between the glider and some of the other vehicle CGI... getting Die Another Day vibes.

    My thoughts exactly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,542 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    loyatemu wrote: »
    It's a long time since I've seen Dr. No, but I don't remember quite as many explosions and stunts.

    Generally the last movie made by a Bond actor is terrible (Diamonds are Forever, View to a Kill and Die another Day are all rubbish; I'll ignore Lazenby and Dalton for this theory), so this just has to be ok (or at least less boring than Spectre) to stay ahead of the curve

    'Spectre' was rubbish because it tried to be a Bond movie. Whereas the other Craig Bonds made efforts to depart a wee bit from the tired old formula and tried to stand on their own, even if it was only in small ways.

    I'm hoping that for Craig's last outing, they make an effort to complete his run in a sensible way and not try to do a "Bond" again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Tony EH wrote: »
    'Spectre' was rubbish because it tried to be a Bond movie. Whereas the other Craig Bonds made efforts to depart a wee bit from the tired old formula and tried to stand on their own, even if it was only in small ways.

    I'm hoping that for Craig's last outing, they make an effort to complete his run in a sensible way and not try to do a "Bond" again.

    I thought Skyfall had a lot of the old-school Bond tropes as well, and it was really good. From the trailer, this looks very Bondy.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I only saw it the once but "Skyfall" felt like it at least tried to shake up and subvert the franchise a little, without tipping completely overboard into farce. While its last act in Scotland a rather brilliant piece of restrained - but still tense - action mixed with genuine character arcs centring around Judi Dench's M. It was basically Oedipal Complex: the Action Movie and because it committed to the idea, the execution seemed effortless

    But then, where could the series go after that? "Spectre" was then a bit of a confused mess; obviously the same director with Sam Mendes but the script was all over the shop. Tried to balance the depth of, and fallout from, "Skyfall" with more traditional tropes from the franchise - and came off all sorts of broken.

    Perhaps the root of the issue is that there's not enough character within James Bond to sustain this run of "moody" Bond; where most of the time "character" has amounted to sullenness - with 'Skyfall" and "Casino Royale" being the noted exceptions. Bond doesn't have depth to start with - that's kinda the point of him - so realistically there's only bandwidth for the occasional transformative twist or shock in his life. The rest of the time Craig mopes around. "No Time to Die" could go either way but looks like they're still trying for some moodiness in place of character.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Would it kill them to have Bond fight a new bad guy who is nothing to do with previous ones, who wants to execute his world domination plan from a hollowed out volcano?

    Casino Royale is Craigs best and we didn't need a baddie multiverse to have a cracking game of wits. Retconning all these guys together like they did with the DNA in Spectre is more Bourne than Bond.

    Just give me:

    Girls
    Cars
    Gadgets
    Exotic locations (including evil lair)
    & John Barry

    Maybe throw in a tux and a casino.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Dades wrote: »
    Would it kill them to have Bond fight a new bad guy who is nothing to do with previous ones, who wants to execute his world domination plan from a hollowed out volcano?

    Casino Royale is Craigs best and we didn't need a baddie multiverse to have a cracking game of wits. Retconning all these guys together like they did with the DNA in Spectre is more Bourne than Bond.

    Just give me:

    Girls
    Cars
    Gadgets
    Exotic locations (including evil lair)
    & John Barry

    Maybe throw in a tux and a casino.

    there has been a lack of hollowed out volcanoes in the recent films alright. Blame Austin Powers for that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,233 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    That trailer is giving off a kind of a woke vibe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,844 ✭✭✭py2006


    That trailer is giving off a kind of a woke vibe.

    Not as much as first one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,283 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Won't watch the trailer as I plan on seeing the film anyway, but every time I see this thread title I always read it as "No Time to Die Hard"


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    no plot given away in the trailer.

    a lot of action though...

    suspect that Craig may finish up like Brosnan with only 1 good bond movie - the first one that they did!

    I know that they are trying to stoke up interest due to the Covid situation and in fact most likely also feed trailer view metrics into the decision to release or not but it's pretty much never a good sign when a movie shows a lot of the key action sequences in a trailer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    glasso wrote: »
    suspect that Craig may finish up like Brosnan with only 1 good bond movie - the first one that they did!
    That's a little harsh: Skyfall is widely liked.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    mikhail wrote: »
    That's a little harsh: Skyfall is widely liked.

    mixed at best I would say.

    personally I would say bloated with a lot of rubbish parts in it that ruined it

    the extended scene at the end in particular where Dench kicked the bucket (didn't even care at that point) but even the court / tube stuff and the silly island place - i.e. large parts of it

    went back and actually watched Quantum of Solace a while ago and I would argue that it's better - much tighter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    You're entitled to your opinion, but you stated it like it was a fact. Casino Royale has an imdb score of 8, Skyfall is 7.7. The only other Bond movie in that bracket - ever - is Goldfinger (also 7.7). Claiming that Craig only has one good Bond film is a nonsense. He only has one Bond film you like.

    And I say that as someone who doesn't love Skyfall either.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    mikhail wrote: »
    You're entitled to your opinion, but you stated it like it was a fact. Casino Royale has an imdb score of 8, Skyfall is 7.7. The only other Bond movie in that bracket - ever - is Goldfinger (also 7.7). Claiming that Craig only has one good Bond film is a nonsense. He only has one Bond film you like.

    And I say that as someone who doesn't love Skyfall either.

    not sure how accurate metacritic can be for a 1964 film tbh..... not exactly a great argument

    personally I think that Skyfall got a higher rating that it deserved when it came out due to the beloved Dench being killed-off effect (big part of it imo - sort of an appreciation for her role over the years) and Bardem in the cast (good actor but pretty cartoonish even for bond villan)

    in retrospect it's a pretty bad movie

    so I'll stick to one


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Nevertheless, most people would agree that Skyfall was (at the very least) "good".

    If NTTD is anyway decent, I'll be giving Craig a 3/5 for his Bonds.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Dades wrote: »
    Nevertheless, most people would agree that Skyfall was (at the very least) "good".

    If NTTD is anyway decent, I'll be giving Craig a 3/5 for his Bonds.

    Only one that didn't do it for me was Quantum of Solace. Didn't enjoy that at all. I felt it just dragged, which is unlike Bond films.

    Cant compare Craig's outing as Bond to Brosnan's in my opinion. I felt there was nothing likeable about Brosnan's Bond. Bit of a smart-ass. But at least Daniel Craig has brought a bit of personality to the character. Performances aside, Brosnan's films were rather shallow. All about driving tanks, sky-diving, ticking bomb etc.


Advertisement