Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

1175176178180181331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Not them all no.

    I guess that explains why you don't really know what's going on so. Biden isn't senile and unlike Trump is capable of answering normal questions in a normal interview.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    MadYaker wrote: »
    I guess that explains why you don't really know what's going on so. Biden isn't senile and unlike Trump is capable of answering normal questions in a normal interview.
    Demonstrably, from the posts above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    At the end of the day it's all just talk, but at least Biden can string a sentence together. https://www.c-span.org/video/?475311-1/joe-biden-delivers-remarks-public-safety-law-enforcement&live=


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,856 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Demonstrably, from the posts above.

    Whats your thoughts on Trumps constant rambling and messing up while he's reading from a teleprompter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Slighly OT, but how can Laura Ingraham call herself, not even a journaist but even a presenter, when she nasically covered for POTUS last night?

    She had the chance of actually getting a real story there, abeit the mutterings of a conspiracy theorist, but instead tried to cover up for Trump.

    What is wrong with these people?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Slighly OT, but how can Laura Ingraham call herself, not even a journaist but even a presenter, when she nasically covered for POTUS last night?

    She had the chance of actually getting a real story there, abeit the mutterings of a conspiracy theorist, but instead tried to cover up for Trump.

    What is wrong with these people?

    Well she’s a very biased Republican and there’s no secret about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1300644036307369984?s=19

    Just in case anyone wasn't able to understand what Biden said in those clips here it is in black and white.

    Oh no he butchered a teleprompter line. Good job the other candidate for president is very strong with the aul teleprompter.

    Trump on the Revolutionary War in the 18th Century:

    "Our army manned the air, it rammed the ramparts, it took over the airports, it did everything it had to do..."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    It's sad that the Trumpists can't point to any achievements of their guy and have to resort to repeating the same Fox News talking point endlessly. Although Trump kind of blew a hole in the "Biden is encouraging the violence" theory last night by suggesting that unseen dark forces are actually controlling things.

    Also interesting to hear Trump suggest that a planeload of domestic terrorists flew in to disrupt the RNC. Doesn't say much for the "Law & Order" president if Homeland Security and the TSA allowed a planeload of domestic terrorists fly into the nation's capital city with impunity. In fact that should terrify the republican voters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    It's sad that the Trumpists can't point to any achievements of their guy and have to resort to repeating the same Fox News talking point endlessly. Although Trump kind of blew a hole in the "Biden is encouraging the violence" theory last night by suggesting that unseen dark forces are actually controlling things.

    Also interesting to hear Trump suggest that a planeload of domestic terrorists flew in to disrupt the RNC. Doesn't say much for the "Law & Order" president if Homeland Security and the TSA allowed a planeload of domestic terrorists fly into the nation's capital city with impunity. In fact that should terrify the republican voters.

    This "Law and Order" mantra that he now seems to want to run on is a total joke. His America is the one we're seeing right now. He's been in power for 4 years. It's about time someone called him out on that - he's basically trying to run as the challenger now rather than the incumbent.

    Makes it pretty obvious how pointless his 4 years in office has been, that he's now effectively running as the challenger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    This "Law and Order" mantra that he now seems to want to run on is a total joke. His America is the one we're seeing right now. He's been in power for 4 years. It's about time someone called him out on that - he's basically trying to run as the challenger now rather than the incumbent.

    Makes it pretty obvious how pointless his 4 years in office has been, that he's now effectively running as the challenger.

    America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.

    https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1300520249196978176?s=19


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Whats your thoughts on Trumps constant rambling and messing up while he's reading from a teleprompter?


    Judging by the frequency of posting the same Biden clip, this will be a deal breaker. They've made their position on poor speech-craft clear and since these are principled and consistent posters, I expect that they will be turning their backs on Trump, any minute now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.

    https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1300520249196978176?s=19

    Yeah we know, nothing is ever under the control of Trump.

    The virus, the c=economy, law and order.

    Since he has such little control, why would you want to give him another 4 years to continue to fail to do anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.

    Um. The right to take to the streets is pretty much enshrined in the the US constitution and in US history. Were you whinging when armed militias took over US state capitol buildings? No, didn't think so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Yeah we know, nothing is ever under the control of Trump.

    The virus, the c=economy, law and order.

    Since he has such little control, why would you want to give him another 4 years to continue to fail to do anything?

    Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

    I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.

    https://twitter.com/StreetVet100/status/1300064323449098242?s=09


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.

    https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1300520249196978176?s=19

    That's a funny one. It's just a clip with scary music and quotes from people lacking any context.

    Common right-wing fear bait but I guess that this is what they're into.

    Where do you come across this stuff anyway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Um. The right to take to the streets is pretty much enshrined in the the US constitution and in US history. Were you whinging when armed militias took over US state capitol buildings? No, didn't think so.

    Never said it wasn't their right not take to the streets. They are doing the Dems no favours by rioting and looting when they are the very ones that encouraged them to get out onto the streets.

    Sure they didn't tell them to loot and riot but their calls for them to get out onto the street has resulted in rioting and looting among the groups that had no interest in protesting at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

    I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.
    Once could be ignored as a slip but you've done it twice now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Oh no he butchered a teleprompter line. Good job the other candidate for president is very strong with the aul teleprompter.

    I only saw a few minutes of his speech but he looked like he had someone prompting him in his ear by the way he was talking and pausing so frequently.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I only saw a few minutes of his speech but he looked like he had someone prompting him in his ear by the way he was talking and pausing so frequently.

    Oh my, moving into conspiracies now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,585 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    I only saw a few minutes of his speech but he looked like he had someone prompting him in his ear by the way he was talking and pausing so frequently.

    George Soros?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.

    https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1300520249196978176?s=19

    Imagine if famous Conservatives and Republican members of congress had said stuff like this during Obama's tenure. Insane the blindspot liberals have when it comes to their own behaviour and the consequences of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

    I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.

    https://twitter.com/StreetVet100/status/1300064323449098242?s=09



    Can you show me a single contemporary news report of rioting taking place in Atlantic City or Phoenix for instance? Don't be lazy and just throw up more Portland stuff. How many of those cities are actually "Rioting Cities"? There an awful smell of BS off that tweet.

    Presume this is to show how bad Democrats are so not sure why Fort Worth is on it - Republican in charge there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Imagine if famous Conservatives and Republican members of congress had said stuff like this during Obama's tenure. Insane the blindspot liberals have when it comes to their own behaviour and the consequences of it.

    Very true one rule for them and one rule for everyone else and if you disagree with them on any issue the mob won't take too long to come along and attack you.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Very true one rule for them and one rule for everyone else and if you disagree with them on any issue the mob won't take too long to come along and attack you.

    It's very telling that you ignore certain posts asking you for proof...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,856 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Very true one rule for them and one rule for everyone else and if you disagree with them on any issue the mob won't take too long to come along and attack you.

    Pointing out the irony of your posts is not "attacking" you!

    If you are going to post a video of Biden making a slip up during an otherwise perfect speech then why are you so upset when people point out that Trump does the exact same thing on a much worse and much larger scale?

    How is that an "attack" on you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Imagine if famous Conservatives and Republican members of congress had said stuff like this during Obama's tenure. Insane the blindspot liberals have when it comes to their own behavior and the consequences of it.

    Tea Party took to the streets encouraged by Republican conservatives and Fox News and right wing media. Armed militia taking over democratic institutions and state capitols was cheered and roared on by Republicans. But yes of course it's the evil Dems all the time. Rinse and repeat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Pointing out the irony of your posts is not "attacking" you!

    If you are going to post a video of Biden making a slip up during an otherwise perfect speech then why are you so upset when people point out that Trump does the exact same thing on a much worse and much larger scale?

    How is that an "attack" on you?

    That statement wasn't in relation to boards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,034 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    That statement wasn't in relation to boards.

    Where was it in relation to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

    I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.

    https://twitter.com/StreetVet100/status/1300064323449098242?s=09

    But you accept that over law and order he has no control, which is strange because that is the very line that he is running on.

    He couldn't control the virus because of individual states either.

    That is perfectly fine to take the line that it is outside his control, but the conclusion of that is surely it is time to get in someone who can control or influence it.

    Who better to control Democratic governors, than a democratic POTUS. So if you are so concerned then the only natural vote is for Biden.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Where was it in relation to?

    Other online discussion sites and social media.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement