Gerry Hatrick wrote: » Not them all no.
MadYaker wrote: » I guess that explains why you don't really know what's going on so. Biden isn't senile and unlike Trump is capable of answering normal questions in a normal interview.
ELM327 wrote: » Demonstrably, from the posts above.
Leroy42 wrote: » Slighly OT, but how can Laura Ingraham call herself, not even a journaist but even a presenter, when she nasically covered for POTUS last night? She had the chance of actually getting a real story there, abeit the mutterings of a conspiracy theorist, but instead tried to cover up for Trump. What is wrong with these people?
LessOutragePlz wrote: » https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1300644036307369984?s=19 Just in case anyone wasn't able to understand what Biden said in those clips here it is in black and white.
namloc1980 wrote: » It's sad that the Trumpists can't point to any achievements of their guy and have to resort to repeating the same Fox News talking point endlessly. Although Trump kind of blew a hole in the "Biden is encouraging the violence" theory last night by suggesting that unseen dark forces are actually controlling things. Also interesting to hear Trump suggest that a planeload of domestic terrorists flew in to disrupt the RNC. Doesn't say much for the "Law & Order" president if Homeland Security and the TSA allowed a planeload of domestic terrorists fly into the nation's capital city with impunity. In fact that should terrify the republican voters.
PropJoe10 wrote: » This "Law and Order" mantra that he now seems to want to run on is a total joke. His America is the one we're seeing right now. He's been in power for 4 years. It's about time someone called him out on that - he's basically trying to run as the challenger now rather than the incumbent. Makes it pretty obvious how pointless his 4 years in office has been, that he's now effectively running as the challenger.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Whats your thoughts on Trumps constant rambling and messing up while he's reading from a teleprompter? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE9BXkQ-SRc
LessOutragePlz wrote: » America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1300520249196978176?s=19
LessOutragePlz wrote: » America is in the state it's currently in because Dems have been encouraging people to take to the streets and this has spectacularly backfired on them as support for Trump has increased over the last few weeks.
Leroy42 wrote: » Yeah we know, nothing is ever under the control of Trump. The virus, the c=economy, law and order. Since he has such little control, why would you want to give him another 4 years to continue to fail to do anything?
namloc1980 wrote: » Um. The right to take to the streets is pretty much enshrined in the the US constitution and in US history. Were you whinging when armed militias took over US state capitol buildings? No, didn't think so.
LessOutragePlz wrote: » Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance. I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.
namloc1980 wrote: » Oh no he butchered a teleprompter line. Good job the other candidate for president is very strong with the aul teleprompter.
MisterAnarchy wrote: » I only saw a few minutes of his speech but he looked like he had someone prompting him in his ear by the way he was talking and pausing so frequently.
LessOutragePlz wrote: » Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance. I never said that he had such little control but there are some things that he can't control such as the actions of Democratic mayor's in cities that are burning.https://twitter.com/StreetVet100/status/1300064323449098242?s=09
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Imagine if famous Conservatives and Republican members of congress had said stuff like this during Obama's tenure. Insane the blindspot liberals have when it comes to their own behaviour and the consequences of it.
LessOutragePlz wrote: » Very true one rule for them and one rule for everyone else and if you disagree with them on any issue the mob won't take too long to come along and attack you.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Imagine if famous Conservatives and Republican members of congress had said stuff like this during Obama's tenure. Insane the blindspot liberals have when it comes to their own behavior and the consequences of it.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Pointing out the irony of your posts is not "attacking" you! If you are going to post a video of Biden making a slip up during an otherwise perfect speech then why are you so upset when people point out that Trump does the exact same thing on a much worse and much larger scale? How is that an "attack" on you?
LessOutragePlz wrote: » That statement wasn't in relation to boards.
Tell me how wrote: » Where was it in relation to?