Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXII-30,360 in ROI(1,781 deaths) 8,035 in NI (568 deaths)(10/09)Read OP

18081838586322

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    owlbethere wrote: »
    Look, we are living in a time where we are asked to keep our close contacts low. That is going beyond some people with their massive sense of entitlement for a regular high social life. Many people here in Ireland believes they are living their lives like Kim kardashian and are entitled to a social life - every.single.weekend.

    Get me off this planet.

    Where the **** are we headed? Its 'entitled' for people to enjoy socialising? We're social creatures. We're now at a point where society are very happy for me to sit in my room working 40 hours a week but meeting friends is beyond the pale. That just isn't a life worth living.

    You're making it out as if socialising every weekend is weird? Its ****ing not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,178 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Any powers relating to private homes will need to go before the Dáil in terms of Gardaí entering without a warrant as far as I'm aware unless they've found a loophole but it was widely reported a sitting of the Dáil would be required.

    Secondly no they don't have the resources at all. One of my friends is a Garda as I've mentioned before and he said any calls like there's x number of people in this house are bottom of the queue and its essentially they'll get to them whenever they can. Could be an hour could be 4 hours but they are and will be bottom of the pile

    Yeah constituental protection of home quite strong. On second point I agree, I meant more the State is trying to give the impression that they have enough resources to to do it. It's a token gesture really which is more about pr than anything. Lot more areas need focus tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ixoy wrote: »
    Washing shopping has never really been advised, although fine if you wish. If you want to, just leave it in storage somewhere for a few days.

    Have a look at the delivery drivers who also have to stock the shelves jumping out of the truck, pull up the chin strap from the front, adjust it from the front, man handle every item going on the shelf. I'm after witnessing it a few times getting my morning coffee.
    With the mandatory masks it's made the danger of your shopping being contaminated a lot higher. Too much mask touching going on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    AdamD wrote: »
    Get me off this planet.

    Where the **** are we headed? Its 'entitled' for people to enjoy socialising? We're social creatures. We're now at a point where society are very happy for me to sit in my room working 40 hours a week but meeting friends is beyond the pale. That just isn't a life worth living.

    You're making it out as if socialising every weekend is weird? Its ****ing not.

    It's no problem to go on the piss socialise with friends at the weekends if you social distance. Unfortunately, many people think it's okay to go on the piss socialise and not social distance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Yeah constituencal protection of home quite strong. On second point I agree, I meant more the State is trying to give the impression that they have enough resources to to do it. It's a token gesture really which is more about pr than anything. Lot more areas need focus tbh

    Yeah today purely seems to focus on pubs, RTE and Independent both saying it'll be measures to close them down for the rest of the day if found in breach, Garda contacts local superintendent for approval.

    The legislation for that will still need Dáil approval when its back next Wednesday.

    I agree purely a token gesture, to make people think twice probably about going to someone else's house or having a few people over, when realistically nothing will actually happen.

    Restaurants/pubs are just the easy one to pick when as you say alot more areas need focus. This is just to distract from the shockingly low numbers of inspections carried out on meat plants etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    hawkwing wrote: »
    Maybe the reason is more people are being tested and it was rampant everywhere before. People died in nursing homes because it was already all over the place and they were vulnerable and now because one meat factory which could have easily been any type of factory was found to have a cluster more meat factory workers were tested and lots of people who have nothing at all wrong with them tested positive.
    I don't think there was any failure etc regarding nursing homes because it was way more widespread than anyone said. Now I think a lot of the most liable to die are already dead as seems to be the case with deaths down everywhere compared to cases. But at this stage that to me is the only logical explanation for most of it,either way it's my last post on de virus as I have very little interest in the "experts/rte/boards" talking about it anymore.

    Enjoy and mind yourself!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    1 thing that I have been wondering about is Casinos, I thought they were in phase 4 ? Did they get moved into 3 ?

    I know of 3 that are open and have been for weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,178 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    1 thing that I have been wondering about is Casinos, I thought they were in phase 4 ? Did they get moved into 3 ?

    I know of 3 that are open and have been for weeks.

    The funny thing is Varadkar and even government press releases on phases called them that but technically casinos are illegal here but places get around it by being private members clubs that people pay to be a member of. Very Irish solution. Ha I think they were moved to phase 3 alright bit could be wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    AdamD wrote: »
    Get me off this planet.

    Where the **** are we headed? Its 'entitled' for people to enjoy socialising? We're social creatures. We're now at a point where society are very happy for me to sit in my room working 40 hours a week but meeting friends is beyond the pale. That just isn't a life worth living.

    You're making it out as if socialising every weekend is weird? Its ****ing not.

    Its not weird, its just uncommon for probably a majority of the population. Esp. People with young kids.

    Time to be creative when it comes to socialising.

    Keep in mind theres a global pandemic a happening, worst since 1918.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    5 people in a whole country in ICU. Yet here we are.

    The country has lost its mind


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    AdamD wrote: »
    Get me off this planet.

    Where the **** are we headed? Its 'entitled' for people to enjoy socialising? We're social creatures. We're now at a point where society are very happy for me to sit in my room working 40 hours a week but meeting friends is beyond the pale. That just isn't a life worth living.

    You're making it out as if socialising every weekend is weird? Its ****ing not.

    When lockdown was lifting NPHET asked us to keep our close contacts low. They really aren't putting out these recommendations for the craic to dump on us. I double think everything now and ask myself
    Do I need to see this person?
    Do I need to do xyz?
    Is there an alternative?

    I kept my close contacts low and minimised socialising. I don't feel my left is deprived and its a lot more richer rooting out unique experiences that's pretty much nearly on my doorstep and it was a delight to discover so much.

    In my locality I know of some cases where its socialising and mixing every week and every weekend since lockdown lifted. One party one weekend a month isn't enough. They want it every weekend.

    That is entitlement considering we have to reduce movements and mixing to curb the spread of the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    5 people in a whole country in ICU. Yet here we are.

    The country has lost its mind

    Ironic that your name is sweet science


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    5 people in a whole country in ICU. Yet here we are.

    The country has lost its mind
    It's the large numbers of active cases, which might lead to higher hospitalisations, that are the concern. It's called good planning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It's the large numbers of active cases, which might lead to higher hospitalisations, that are the concern. It's called good planning.

    Ah this oul chestnut. We keep repeating this for another 12 months


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Ah this oul chestnut. We keep repeating this for another 12 months

    And longer, if necessary. It's not that "old' a chestnut at all. Patience!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    Ah this oul chestnut. We keep repeating this for another 12 months

    And what are your thoughts on the proof that even asympotmatic cases cause heart damage?


    https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1299027542272172032?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    And what are your thoughts on the proof that even asympotmatic cases cause heart damage?


    https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1299027542272172032?s=19

    That's life...

    Maybe the virus will knock 20 year's off everyone's life expectancy, at some point we will just accept that lower life expectancy is the 'new normal'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Ah this oul chestnut. We keep repeating this for another 12 months
    Nah, this is the factual science stuff. It may ultimately be proved wrong but can't see you proving much of anything with this type of posting/ranting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    And what are your thoughts on the proof that even asympotmatic cases cause heart damage?


    https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1299027542272172032?s=19

    According to many of the boards.ie experts, the virus is just a little cold causing a little cough and damage to hearts is just outliers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    mloc123 wrote: »
    That's life...

    Maybe the virus will knock 20 year's off everyone's life expectancy, at some point we will just accept that lower life expectancy is the 'new normal'.

    Not saying you may not have something of a point when it becomes endemic though 20 years is a big over estimation. A new endemic virus like this might bring life expectancy back a few years and be added into actuarial calculations etc But be merciful now - you will be kind and give us a wee bit of time agonising back and forth arguing before we might have to adjust to a 25% shorter life expectancy, won't ya? :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    mloc123 wrote: »
    That's life...

    Maybe the virus will knock 20 year's off everyone's life expectancy, at some point we will just accept that lower life expectancy is the 'new normal'.

    Seeing that the great majority of those who have died from the virus had already exceeded the current ‘normal’ life expectancy, how would the virus have any impact on life expectancy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Gruffalox wrote: »
    Not saying you may not have something of a point when it becomes endemic though 20 years is a big over estimation. A new endemic virus like this might bring life expectancy back a few years and be added into actuarial calculations etc But be merciful now - you will be kind and give us a wee bit of time agonising back and forth arguing before we might have to adjust to a 25% shorter life expectancy, won't ya? :)

    I am obviously picking a random number. 20 is probably quite high. But at some point I think people will just accept the virus and that it will knock a few years off the end of their life.

    No more golden years, living in a care home being washed, dressed and helped to the toilet by a care assistant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    Government didn't bother to do anything to prevent outbreaks in meat factories.

    It was easier to threaten lockdowns and blame people for having house parties.

    Those meat factories then resulted in several clusters around the country. Some really big clusters.

    Still allowing flights in from the US probably doesn't help either, although I have no idea how much that impacts the numbers.

    More testing also means we are finding more cases but a lot of them are not even sick.

    Why so many outbreaks in meat factories though? Before they stated popping up, we were at our lowest levels. If it’s barely out there in the community, how does it become so rampant in certain settings?

    In my opinion, it came back in the same way it came into the country in the first place - travel. I would imagine a lot of workers in the meat factories went home to see their families for their holidays, caught the virus but were asymptomatic, didn’t self isolate for 14 days upon return and went straight back into work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Nah, this is the factual science stuff. It may ultimately be proved wrong but can't see you proving much of anything with this type of posting/ranting.

    Surely in 2 weeks time it will all be proved wrong . All this big increases in cases are to lead to an increase in ICU figures and deaths . If they dont well then ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Seeing that the great majority of those who have died from the virus had already exceeded the current ‘normal’ life expectancy, how would the virus have any impact on life expectancy?

    From the longer term affects on heart, lungs and kidney function among those younger patients .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    mloc123 wrote: »
    I am obviously picking a random number. 20 is probably quite high. But at some point I think people will just accept the virus and that it will knock a few years off the end of their life.

    No more golden years, living in a care home being washed, dressed and helped to the toilet by a care assistant.

    I can tell you have a dark turn of mind. It is amusing. There might be upsides. Actuaries may be befuddled. Fewer preterm births during lock down. More people exercising. More general hygiene awareness in the population thus less disease. People on diets. Less fretful people going to the doctor or emergency room who don't really need to and thus avoiding excess meds. (Not talking about those who need medical care). My granny lived long and used to say avoid the doctor and the priest and I like her advice.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    5 people in a whole country in ICU. Yet here we are.

    The country has lost its mind

    It doesn't mean we can go back to way things were before all this. Increase of cases can lead to increase of hospitalisation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Surely in 2 weeks time it will all be proved wrong .
    It's only due to run for two weeks anyway with a possible review. If cases come down it's good, if they stay as they are it'll extend. This is what managing the disease looks like. We are not going back to March.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Gerry Hatrick


    mloc123 wrote: »
    That's life...

    Maybe the virus will knock 20 year's off everyone's life expectancy, at some point we will just accept that lower life expectancy is the 'new normal'.

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    And what are your thoughts on the proof that even asympotmatic cases cause heart damage?


    https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1299027542272172032?s=19

    Amongst other viruses. Nothing new there, even the flu has been known to cause heart problems.The flu can even cause a heart attack. There have been cases where people discovered heart problems and never knew they had a virus. Thankfully the people i know fully recovered from Covid 19.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement