Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXI-27,908 in ROI (1,777 deaths) 6,647 in NI (559 deaths)(22/08)Read OP

1146147149151152328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,878 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    This is how I feel about our present governments actions in this pandemic. :)

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Frankie19


    What are you on about?

    259 postive swabs in last 48hrs. 122 cases announced

    137 outstanding / unaccounted for in announced cases. Bit of a backlog there for whatever reason.

    Its not conspiracy but for some reason not all new cases have been reported yet for the last 48hrs. There's no getting around that.

    The number of positve swabs vs the number of positive cases are not the same thing. The same person could be tested 7 days later and be positive again...not a new case .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,047 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Fair enough but as I wasn't replying to you I am at a loss as to why you are replying to me?

    And yes, fair enough.
    You said posters, so I was making sure I was not being misquoted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    Arghus wrote: »
    It's a conspiracy theory that's become widely accepted in the thread. Along the lines of NPHET are massaging the numbers to suit themselves depending on what outcome they want. Apparently there's some reason why they want to do this. It's all part of some deliberate nefarious plan, because they are big meanies who hate us. As opposed to just being plan old quirks in how these things are reported.

    Haha. I really don’t get why there’s so many up in arms over this.

    It’s easy to count positive swabs and report them, no clarification needed. Those results probably come straight from the lab and are added up easily.

    Obviously then the results need to be delivered and profile of patient taken or accessed to get an idea of age/gender/location, etc, whether it was a retest or a new case. That’s the bit that takes longer, to hit whatever they have specified as a “reported case”. Clearly that slows down at the weekend and catches up mid week. If they didn’t publish positive tests, we wouldn’t know.

    Considering the backlog gets cleared repeatedly, it’s not some cover up to drive an agenda, if it was they could just fudge the positive test results too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Frankie19 wrote: »
    The number of positve swabs vs the number of positive cases are not the same thing. The same person could be tested 7 days later and be positive again...not a new case .

    Yes we all know swabs v cases isn't the same. They're broadly in line when up to date. Not out by 137 in 48hrs.

    If you test postive in Ireland your not tested again for the vast majority, this was confirmed previously by the CMO. 1 test 14 days isolation if positive no further test for the vast majority, once 14 days is up the case is classified as recovered. In hosptial yes you could be tested twice of course before discharge.

    Close contacts who test negative day 0 are the only ones tested day 7.

    This happened last week & has happened again this week. No surprise if tomorrow is upwards 160+ when every case is reported


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    1 in Clare this week I think.

    Linked to the Cratloe cases.

    The Kilkee party and limerick cluster all linked to Cratloe. Local(s) went to the party in Kilkee with crowd from limerick and brought it back, apparently. Cases in lahinch too linked to the same party


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭Polar101


    There is a surge plan within the HSE for 1000 extra beds. It says this in the HSE daily update.

    That's quite reassuring actually.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    seamus wrote: »
    In the week of 21st - 27th March, 13,300 tests picked up roughly 1,500 cases. on a positivity rate of 10-11%

    In the week of 6th - 12th April (just picked one at random), we did just shy of 20,500 tests, and had a positive rate of 21%. There's no decimal point missing there. Twenty-one percent of all people tested, had Coronavirus.

    In the last seven days, we did just short of 47,000 tests, with a positivity rate of 1.2%.

    The raw new case numbers are scary perhaps, but we are still a million miles away from the conditions we had in March.

    In many respects it's like in March we were out with a small torch looking for cockroaches and finding them everywhere. Now we're searching with a massive spotlight and only finding them in isolated corners, and in small numbers.


    Great post. Deserves a re-post


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    How many clusters associated with bars or restaurants?
    I'd really like to know currently. Those sorts of values don't seem to be provided except to media requests from the HPSC Clusters have definitively been linked to reopened pubs across Britain for example, the current Aberdeen lockdown was linked to 20 pubs and restaurants.

    A newsrag article claimed there's been 5 pub-related clusters in Ireland, once since lockdown happened.

    Though people are emphasising low levels of community transmission, it's still happening on an ongoing basis. It's not happening from people just staying at home or carefully social distancing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Frankie19


    Where are you seeing the positive swab results released?. Be interested to look at that myself.

    There is alot of rumours going around about positive tests that don't end up being true. I was told yesterday that 4 players in simonstown Gaa club in Meath tested positive. Club released a statement to say 1 had tested positive. Same happened with the Creche in Navan. Was told 5 kids had tested positive. Only 3 had.

    This is causing confusion as people then don't see the cases being announced so would be good to be able to look into the positive swab numbers in more detail.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'd really like to know currently. Those sorts of values don't seem to be provided except to media requests from the HPSC Clusters have definitively been linked to reopened pubs across Britain for example, the current Aberdeen lockdown was linked to 20 pubs and restaurants.

    A newsrag article claimed there's been 5 pub-related clusters in Ireland, once since lockdown happened.

    Though people are emphasising low levels of community transmission, it's still happening on an ongoing basis. It's not happening from people just staying at home or carefully social distancing.

    It’s happening in homes and workplaces. People visiting each other, and to some extent having party’s , and people working closely to each other with poor or inadequate ventilation such as meat plants and mushroom tunnels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,613 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    6 wrote: »
    Great post. Deserves a re-post
    Well so does the best post of the day. The truth being told here.
    NO,,,, NO,,,,,NO, that statement is over simplifying the situation.

    There are indeed 19 CONFIRMED Hospitalised cases of Covid, with 8 of them in intensive care.

    There are ALSO 136 SUSPECTED Hospitalised cases of Covid, with 7 of them in ICU.

    At the same time, there were a total of 412 general beds available across the health service, and 42 ICU beds available .

    The people at the sharp end of the health service have been working under massive pressure and stress for nearly 6 months, and they really need to see some improvements in the numbers, not more people becoming victims as a result of an increase in cases.

    There is very little spare capacity, in terms of beds, and more importantly staff to cope with a surge in numbers, and some of the issues that are causing the spikes need to be addressed.

    Pubs/Restaurants need to be being monitored very closely, as there are known weak spots in the system that can result in an increase in infection/spread.

    There are specific issues in the meat processing plants (and other large processing companies) that are contributing to risk. Too many people living in shared accomodation and sharing vehicles to travel to and from work, so they are effectively an extended family bubble that is not just work related, it's also then travel and living situations, and I'm not just talking about direct provision, which is another issue.

    The spike in cases across Europe is making the whole holiday travel situation even more non viable than it was, and at the same time, there are new community transmission cases showing up in all of the 26 counties, so even travelling within Ireland is starting to look like an issue.

    The economy can't be allowed to shut down, and the schools need to get back into action, for the sake of the mental health of the students, as well as their long term education, so in the absence of an effective vaccine, we have to urgently try and find a way to live with this virus that really does work to limit the spread.

    I don't know if it's Covid fatigue, or if the virus has somehow mutated, whichever it is, the relevant medical professionals need to make sure they are getting their analysis right, and that they don't allow the politicians to dilute their recommendations in ways that will cause even more ongoing problems that make the situation worse.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Well so does the best post of the day. The truth being told here.

    That was a post with absolutely zero understanding of the facts they were posting. 136 suspected cases in hospital? Anyone following this with any degree of understanding knows that figure is the number of people in hospital awaiting test results, for any reason, not the number who are actual suspected cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    seamus wrote: »
    In the week of 21st - 27th March, 13,300 tests picked up roughly 1,500 cases. on a positivity rate of 10-11%

    In the week of 6th - 12th April (just picked one at random), we did just shy of 20,500 tests, and had a positive rate of 21%. There's no decimal point missing there. Twenty-one percent of all people tested, had Coronavirus.

    In the last seven days, we did just short of 47,000 tests, with a positivity rate of 1.2%.

    The raw new case numbers are scary perhaps, but we are still a million miles away from the conditions we had in March.

    In many respects it's like in March we were out with a small torch looking for cockroaches and finding them everywhere. Now we're searching with a massive spotlight and only finding them in isolated corners, and in small numbers.

    One little thing about the testing criteria was way tighter back at the end of march so % would be higher


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Frankie19 wrote: »
    The number of positve swabs vs the number of positive cases are not the same thing. The same person could be tested 7 days later and be positive again...not a new case .

    That’s great, I’m sure there is some nuance in the figure discrepancy.

    That doesn’t explain Tipperary mushroom place.

    Think it needs to be communicated. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    spookwoman wrote: »
    One little thing about the testing criteria was way tighter back at the end of march so % would be higher

    You had to be running a temp to get a test back then right? Surely that would drive the positivity rate way up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    spookwoman wrote: »
    One little thing about the testing criteria was way tighter back at the end of march so % would be higher

    Actually I’m surprised it was only 21%, though I suppose some of the 79% may have been close contacts showing no symptoms. The criteria was so tight that you nearly had to be hospitalised before you got a test.

    But yes, comparing positives now to early March is nonsense, when you compare our relatively slow increase over the past three weeks to the near vertical day on day increases we saw in March.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    You had to be running a temp to get a test back then right? Surely that would drive the positivity rate way up.
    Copied because its subscription to see published the 25th March

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/coronavirus-the-latest-major-adjustment-to-testing-eligibility-explained-1.4211788

    Before March 12th, you had to be symptomatic and either be a close contact of a confirmed case of Covid-19 or to have travelled from an affected area.

    Between that date and now, the testing criteria were significantly looser as the health services ramped up their strategy of “community testing”. All you needed to become eligible for testing was to display one symptom.

    Now they have changed the criteria again.
    Firstly, the list of symptoms has changed. Patients now have to have a fever and a symptom of respiratory disease, i.e. a cough or shortness of breath. Testing will also be carried out on those with respiratory symptoms who have been in contact with a confirmed or probable Covid-19 case in the days before symptoms onset.

    If that bar is met, you must then fall into a list of priority categories, which include being a close contact of a confirmed case, a healthcare worker, an at risk group (those with diabetes, chronic lung disease, et cetera), household contacts of those at-risk groups, staff or residents in long-term care facilities, prison staff and inmates where self-isolation may be difficult and pregnant women.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,284 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    How many clusters associated with bars or restaurants?

    Was Galway?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    I firmly believe that we had extremely high case numbers in March and April. Like 10,000 a day at peak. We came through that unknowingly in a way. It would horrify us now.
    It is the only way we can attempt to match seroprevalance results with their implied numbers. (T cells would give numbers like 20,000, 30,000, even 40,000 as a daily tally back at peak if T cell theory is correct (though I await more evidence on the T cell theory). )

    The lockdown brought the virus infections right down. The measures like masks, SD, hygiene etc are helping keep numbers down but what also helps is the virus itself is not rampant like it obviously eas becoming in February. Many Older people are still semi-cocooning. We have much lower numbers now. Really so much lower even though it sounds like 200 is a fifth of peak daily cases. It is more likely a fiftieth of peak daily cases. Really.
    Much higher detection. Reflected in lower hospitalisations. Reflected in almost no deaths. We have done really well.

    There is a recent uptick. Time will tell if it will veer towards the incredible growth rates we saw in March. Contributing factors are quite different now. Less ignorance. More systems in place. But exponential growth could still happen. No one knows. This is almost the only time I have ever wished I had a time machine. I would key in late November in the settings...


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    spookwoman wrote: »
    One little thing about the testing criteria was way tighter back at the end of march so % would be higher

    And the cases missed were multiples of what we are missing now. Why was so little attention payed on asymptomatic spread. We weren’t seeing any, only symptomatic contacts of confirmed cases were getting tested, and even then I know of a case where I work where 5 contacts of a case got some degree of symptoms, but only 1 one got tested, eventually, 8 days later and was negative. In all likelihood he had it.

    That is why 80 cases 7 day average now is not that concerning if we arrest the growth in the next 10 days or so. In late March the true case numbers were in the thousands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    It’s happening in homes and workplaces. People visiting each other, and to some extent having party’s , and people working closely to each other with poor or inadequate ventilation such as meat plants and mushroom tunnels

    so everywhere then?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    spookwoman wrote: »
    Copied because its subscription to see published the 25th March

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/coronavirus-the-latest-major-adjustment-to-testing-eligibility-explained-1.4211788

    Before March 12th, you had to be symptomatic and either be a close contact of a confirmed case of Covid-19 or to have travelled from an affected area.

    Between that date and now, the testing criteria were significantly looser as the health services ramped up their strategy of “community testing”. All you needed to become eligible for testing was to display one symptom.

    Now they have changed the criteria again.
    Firstly, the list of symptoms has changed. Patients now have to have a fever and a symptom of respiratory disease, i.e. a cough or shortness of breath. Testing will also be carried out on those with respiratory symptoms who have been in contact with a confirmed or probable Covid-19 case in the days before symptoms onset.

    If that bar is met, you must then fall into a list of priority categories, which include being a close contact of a confirmed case, a healthcare worker, an at risk group (those with diabetes, chronic lung disease, et cetera), household contacts of those at-risk groups, staff or residents in long-term care facilities, prison staff and inmates where self-isolation may be difficult and pregnant women.

    I saw my doctor on March 9th with extremely bad sinusitius, cough, blocked nose/eyes/sore throat, tiredness

    No temperature, so no test

    Six months and three consultations later "you probably had covid in March, and you are seeing long term effects"

    Still no temperature


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    You had to be running a temp to get a test back then right? Surely that would drive the positivity rate way up.

    Yes but also result in a huge amount of missed cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,088 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Mushroom factory in Tipperary says number of asymptomatic positive results is a 'concern'
    https://m.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/mushroom-factory-in-tipperary-says-number-of-asymptomatic-positive-results-is-a-concern-39457359.html

    Mmm are we concerned a high number of people aren't sick, happier if they were? Not sure what to think...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    Gruffalox wrote: »
    I firmly believe that we had extremely high case numbers in March and April. Like 10,000 a day at peak. We came through that unknowingly in a way. It would horrify us now.
    It is the only way we can attempt to match seroprevalance results with their implied numbers. (T cells would give numbers like 20,000, 30,000, even 40,000 as a daily tally back at peak if T cell theory is correct (though I await more evidence on the T cell theory). )

    The lockdown brought the virus infections right down. The measures like masks, SD, hygiene etc are helping keep numbers down but what also helps is the virus itself is not rampant like it obviously eas becoming in February. Many Older people are still semi-cocooning. We have much lower numbers now. Really so much lower even though it sounds like 200 is a fifth of peak daily cases. It is more likely a fiftieth of peak daily cases. Really.
    Much higher detection. Reflected in lower hospitalisations. Reflected in almost no deaths. We have done really well.

    There is a recent uptick. Time will tell if it will veer towards the incredible growth rates we saw in March. Contributing factors are quite different now. Less ignorance. More systems in place. But exponential growth could still happen. No one knows. This is almost the only time I have ever wished I had a time machine. I would key in late November in the settings...
    Great post by someone who knows what they're talking about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    And the cases missed were multiples of what we are missing now. Why was so little attention payed on asymptomatic spread. We weren’t seeing any, only symptomatic contacts of confirmed cases were getting tested, and even then I know of a case where I work where 5 contacts of a case got some degree of symptoms, but only 1 one got tested, eventually, 8 days later and was negative. In all likelihood he had it.

    That is why 80 cases 7 day average now is not that concerning if we arrest the growth in the next 10 days or so. In late March the true case numbers were in the thousands.

    Don't know, it seems it was only the end of march they started on about asymptomatic people.
    21st April HIQA published a report https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/files/2020-04/Evidence-summary-for-asymptomatic-transmission-of-COVID-19.pdf


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That’s great, I’m sure there is some nuance in the figure discrepancy.

    That doesn’t explain Tipperary mushroom place.

    Think it needs to be communicated. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy.

    I think it’s trying to get a handle on it before they instill panic. If they announce 19 yesterday, 10 today, 20 tomorrow for example there will be lots of questions as to why tipp isn’t in lockdown. If they say tomorrow however there was a total of 49, everyone is tested and no secondary clusters, that’s a different story. Control the outbreak first through trace isolate and test and then act appropriately and finally communicate based on the next steps required


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,047 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It’s happening in homes and workplaces. People visiting each other, and to some extent having party’s , and people working closely to each other with poor or inadequate ventilation such as meat plants and mushroom tunnels

    Or migrant workers in these factories housed together in cramped conditions .

    Imo this is why they are delaying the numbers from here .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    interesting u-turn on exam results across the water. it seems like they tried to stick all students into a bell curve or similar in dishing out grades. which is probably accurate in most years. after mass uproar and threats of litigation they will now return to teachers grades. students might end up in the same position now with university places as all grades will now almost certainly be overestimated by teachers scared to give bad results.

    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/17/a-levels-gcse-results-england-based-teacher-assessments-government-u-turn


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement