Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXI-27,908 in ROI (1,777 deaths) 6,647 in NI (559 deaths)(22/08)Read OP

15354565859328

Comments

  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    fritzelly wrote: »
    This thread has become a b*tching match the past few days

    Always been an element of that in all the previous threads, and still will be until they end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,147 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Always been an element of that in all the previous threads, and still will be until they en

    Past few days is another level - not enjoyable to read


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    True, but how do you know if someone is ' unsick' or an asymptomatic spreader , without regular testing ?

    We don't test for all other things that make people sick why single out Covid.
    Would it make more sense to test for undiagnosed underlying health conditions, a national diabetes, heart disease program for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭DevilsHaircut


    That just means the virus got in but caused no symptoms, meaning disease was avoided, which is a good sign.
    New studies suggest that immunity is sustained.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-00423-9

    If true (i.e. a reinfection), it is 'disease', which could spread to others.

    It's impossible for any studies to suggest immunity is sustained for very long as the virus has been in humans for less than a year.

    However, conclusive proof of reinfection would come only from genome sequencing, i.e. the original and new genetics of the virus samples are different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    If a vaccine is approved ( looking more likely there will be than not) and provided you take it you’ll be safe enough to do what you want including travelling again.

    Yes I intend to take a vaccine as soon as I can get one safely


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    The numbers our medical experts such as Dr Glynn, Prof Nolan focus on is the 14 day average which is 65 cases per day currently and the 5 day average which is 58 cases per day.

    Community transmission numbers which was 99 confirmed cases out of 910 total from the last 2 weeks. Hospital confirmed figures are key also, currently 13 in hospital and 6 in ICU

    Finally a big focus on having the spread from troublesome clusters like the Kildare ones to be contained. It will be another week or two before that is known.


  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We don't test for all other things that make people sick why single out Covid.
    Would it make more sense to test for undiagnosed underlying health conditions, a national diabetes, heart disease program for example.

    You don't pass diabetes or heart disease onto random people in the street, work etc

    https://www.diabetes.ie/free-diabetes-tests-screenings-ireland/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    If a vaccine is approved ( looking more likely there will be than not) and provided you take it you’ll be safe enough to do what you want including travelling again.

    Don't you need 60/70% of the world to take it as well though, could take a while.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    One step back is Phase two

    Two steps back is Phase One

    That's certainly lockdown

    To be fair he/ she said step, as in close hairdressers or gyms , for example , not Phases .
    That's what I took it to be anyhow . Maybe it could have been phrased clearer so it wouldn't still be an issue for some , pages later !
    But you read whatever suits you into the comment , and pillory the poster . Like others on the other side have been pilloried for a slip of the keyboard .
    That is what is going on here . Point scoring .

    Let's get back to discussing the issue instead of semantics .


  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sconsey wrote: »
    No Idea what you are on about or why you are quoting me.

    All guarantees from the poster you quoted so not really surprised at them ignoring the studies mentioned.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    These threads would make a fascinating Sociology case study

    On one hand, we have people like ACE and another few posters (Stephen is one of them? Can't recall their user name) posting here, giving great information and dumbing down various numbers and aspects so that idiots like me can understand things better. Quite helpful, providing us with their time and figures that some of us, myself included, are either too lazy to go and get or just not arsed in general. Very thankful to those posters and it's much appreciated :)

    Then, we have people who are worried and scared.
    Some of these, I totally understand and totally get and it's not a criticism of them at all. Unknown times etc. Some are nervous when someone coughs because of a harmless nasal drip, others because of Hayfever sniffles. I get it, it's unknown, you don't wanna spread it if you get it and I totally relate and understand.

    But, there's the other group of bat **** (ironic description not intended) mentalists who are equally as frightening as they are entertaining.
    There are some posters constantly trying to contradict people like ACE and the data he provides and then get really aggressive in their posting when they can't sway him/her.
    Then, there were posters in the previous thread demanding to know why he/she wasn't worried and were demanding to know when he/she will start worrying (That was hilarious :D )
    And then, I saw someone posting about going into a restaurant and people were eating and drinking at tables without wearing a mask. They were horrified, livid by this and some agreed :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    I don't know about any of you but, I'd imagine it to be fairly impossible to eat or drink whilst wearing a mask :confused:

    In conclusion, it's highly entertaining. Keep it up!
    And, if there are any Sociology students about, Boards.ie have just written your thesis for you ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    @ACitizenErased, what's your take on this from Ivor Cummins..

    I don't really know what to think of this tbh. He's not wrong that we haven't seen any real increased deaths even with the increase in cases over the past few weeks, however I really don't know enough about PCR testing to comment on whether he's right or not. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Somebody asked earlier about cinemas.

    I’m just out of a screening of Intersteller and it was a great experience. Very well monitored, people (only 4 in screen to be fair) kept good distance , wore masks in and out and I’m looking forward to going again.

    Seen this movie several time’s but it’s just superb on the big screen. Loved it every bit as much as when I first saw it, prob one of the best movies I’ve seen in ages in the cinema. I highly recommend it, especially to those who haven’t seen it..

    Felt nice to do something pre COVId “normal” And didn’t have a care at any stage. Well done cinema....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Don't you need 60/70% of the world to take it as well though, could take a while.

    That would be to help eradicate the virus or keep cases to a minimum. But as an individual and you take it at least it will protect you from getting it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Somebody asked earlier about cinemas.

    I’m just out of a screening of Intersteller and it was a great experience. Very well monitored, people (only 4 in screen to be fair) kept good distance , wore masks in and out and I’m looking forward to going again.

    Seen this movie several time’s but it’s just superb on the big screen. Loved it every bit as much as when I first saw it, prob one of the best movies I’ve seen in ages in the cinema. I highly recommend it, especially to those who haven’t seen it..

    Felt nice to do something pre COVId “normal” And didn’t have a care at any stage. Well done cinema....

    Yeah, having the cinema back is great isn't it? Can't get enough of it now myself :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    I don't really know what to think of this tbh. He's not wrong that we haven't seen any real increased deaths even with the increase in cases over the past few weeks, however I really don't know enough about PCR testing to comment on whether he's right or not. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.

    That 'Casedemic' argument doesnt seem to hold for all countries. If you take the top 10 countries from Worldometers it only really holds for Spain and maybe Chile. Possibly some of the other countries in the top 10 are still in the epidemic stage. But look at countries like USA and for an extreme example look at Iran.

    It is still an interesting take on the whole thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Yes I intend to take a vaccine as soon as I can get one safely

    Be careful what you take, the state rushed through a swine flu vaccine 10yrs ago and it's only now in the High Courts, https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/high-court/second-legal-action-over-swine-flu-vaccine-listed-for-november-1.4305550
    Could make the Governments case for a rushed mandatory vaccine very difficulty depending on the outcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Sconsey wrote: »
    That 'Casedemic' argument doesnt seem to hold for all countries. If you take the top 10 countries from Worldometers it only really holds for Spain and maybe Chile. Possibly some of the other countries in the top 10 are still in the epidemic stage. But look at countries like USA and for an extreme example look at Iran.

    It is still an interesting take on the whole thing.
    It is a really interesting take yeah. It would be great to see the asymptomatic rate of our cases right now, and we also need to see whether deaths increase here in the next few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    That would be to help eradicate the virus or keep cases to a minimum. But as an individual and you take it at least it will protect you from getting it.

    It won't, you can still get it and it may be a milder case. It definitely doesn't provide immunity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,981 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    We don't test for all other things that make people sick why single out Covid.
    Would it make more sense to test for undiagnosed underlying health conditions, a national diabetes, heart disease program for example.


    Setting up any national health screening would be an excellent idea but would take time and money . Some are screened for already eg . Colon cancer.
    It also doesn't follow that those people diagnosed are the only people at risk from Covid .
    Covid is the immediate risk, an infectious disease causing a pandemic aand it is relatively cheap and easy to test for , compared to diagnosing other illnesses.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,039 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Somebody asked earlier about cinemas.

    I’m just out of a screening of Intersteller and it was a great experience. Very well monitored, people (only 4 in screen to be fair) kept good distance , wore masks in and out and I’m looking forward to going again.

    Seen this movie several time’s but it’s just superb on the big screen. Loved it every bit as much as when I first saw it, prob one of the best movies I’ve seen in ages in the cinema. I highly recommend it, especially to those who haven’t seen it..

    Felt nice to do something pre COVId “normal” And didn’t have a care at any stage. Well done cinema....

    i would risk getting a dose watching that masterpiece on the big screen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    It is a really interesting take yeah. It would be great to see the asymptomatic rate of our cases right now, and we also need to see whether deaths increase here in the next few weeks.

    Weren't the meat factory workers mostly asymptomatic. We should have stats on health care workers as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    It won't, you can still get it and it may be a milder case. It definitely doesn't provide immunity.

    So what is the point of a vaccine then? I’ll take a milder case anyway if it brings back some normality.
    The vaccines have been proven to work they are in phase iii to get approval to prove they are safe, did you do any research on them at all or did you pull your comment out of your arse?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    MOR316 wrote: »
    These threads would make a fascinating Sociology case study

    On one hand, we have people like ACE and another few posters (Stephen is one of them? Can't recall their user name) posting here, giving great information and dumbing down various numbers and aspects so that idiots like me can understand things better. Quite helpful, providing us with their time and figures that some of us, myself included, are either too lazy to go and get or just not arsed in general. Very thankful to those posters and it's much appreciated :)

    Then, we have people who are worried and scared.
    Some of these, I totally understand and totally get and it's not a criticism of them at all. Unknown times etc. Some are nervous when someone coughs because of a harmless nasal drip, others because of Hayfever sniffles. I get it, it's unknown, you don't wanna spread it if you get it and I totally relate and understand.

    But, there's the other group of bat **** (ironic description not intended) mentalists who are equally as frightening as they are entertaining.
    There are some posters constantly trying to contradict people like ACE and the data he provides and then get really aggressive in their posting when they can't sway him/her.
    Then, there were posters in the previous thread demanding to know why he/she wasn't worried and were demanding to know when he/she will start worrying (That was hilarious :D )
    And then, I saw someone posting about going into a restaurant and people were eating and drinking at tables without wearing a mask. They were horrified, livid by this and some agreed :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    I don't know about any of you but, I'd imagine it to be fairly impossible to eat or drink whilst wearing a mask :confused:

    In conclusion, it's highly entertaining. Keep it up!
    And, if there are any Sociology students about, Boards.ie have just written your thesis for you ;)

    Great post. I was thinking very similar thoughts earlier. It is a great representation of how different people react to the exact same information. It's fascinating in many ways. I am unsure though if some people are being sencere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Setting up any national health screening would be an excellent idea but would take time and money . Some are screened for already eg . Colon cancer.
    It also doesn't follow that those people diagnosed are the only people at risk from Covid .
    Covid is the immediate risk, an infectious disease causing a pandemic aand it is relatively cheap and easy to test for , compared to diagnosing other illnesses.

    I recall reading that part of Americas problem is got to do with obesity, those would be pre or already have diabetes and heart problems many probably undiagnosed. Diabetes would leave you wide open to complications with Covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭DevilsHaircut


    So, is Casedemic the new Plandemic?

    It doesn't really scan as a term, but triers will be triers... :rolleyes:

    BTW what are people's thoughts on hydroxychloroquine and Bill Gates :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Weren't the meat factory workers mostly asymptomatic. We should have stats on health care workers as well.

    They were asymptomatic at the time, but that was well within the typical incubation period.

    So, no. Not really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    So what is the point of a vaccine then? I’ll take a milder case anyway if it brings back some normality.
    The vaccines have been proven to work they are in phase iii to get approval to prove they are safe, did you do any research on them at all or did you pull your comment out of your arse?

    We don't have a vaccine yet so we don't know it's effectiveness, is it incorrect to compare it to the flu vaccine, here's some light reading for you https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭DevilsHaircut


    I recall reading that part of Americas problem is got to do with obesity, those would be pre or already have diabetes and heart problems many probably undiagnosed. Diabetes would leave you wide open to complications with Covid.

    None of that in Ireland, of course,

    or the UK,

    or Italy,

    or Spain...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    To be fair he/ she said step, as in close hairdressers or gyms , for example , not Phases .
    That's what I took it to be anyhow . Maybe it could have been phrased clearer so it wouldn't still be an issue for some , pages later !
    But you read whatever suits you into the comment , and pillory the poster . Like others on the other side have been pilloried for a slip of the keyboard .
    That is what is going on here . Point scoring .

    Let's get back to discussing the issue instead of semantics .

    That poster has certainly not clarified

    You read into it as closing hairdressers or gyms

    Thats effectively Phase Two Plus

    Here's a reminder of what that would entail

    https://www.thejournal.ie/phase-two-restrictions-whats-allowed-today-5116215-Jun2020/

    That poster has also not clarified on what basis we should be stepping back

    Apparently it's the rise in cases

    I fail to see why the entire country requires a step back or two when there is absolutely no need

    Many counties are doing very well in terms of cases

    Here's a good breakdown of cases

    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1293967199959494656/photo/1


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement