Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part V - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

14344464849329

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 917 ✭✭✭MickeyLeari


    Is it conceivable that the actual infection rate in Ireland was 250,000?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,587 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Is it conceivable that the actual infection rate in Ireland was 250,000?

    No. There have been no studies yet that have indicated a rate of asymptomatic Infection anywhere near as high as would be necessary for that to be true. And while we definitely missed thousands of cases in late March and April due to testing capability; not in the tens upon tens of thousands.

    50k would be a somewhat supportable upper end guess imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,587 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    road_high wrote: »
    Yes we need a new angle dont we. Seen as it’s killing nobody

    Who’s “we”? You can continue rejecting the science of this all you like. Statnews isn’t the type of publication that likes to engage in scare mongering to serve an agenda ime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,858 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    Who’s “we”? You can continue rejecting the science of this all you like. Statnews isn’t the type of publication that likes to engage in scare mongering to serve an agenda ime.

    Who’s rejecting any science? The fact is this virus is killing hardly anyone now.
    And lockdowns don’t work they only delay the inevitable. Absolutely none of my standpoints reject science- very much the opposite in fact. Those believe you can lockdown to suppress/get rid of a virus are they only ones rejecting science. Especially with no vaccine available


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Have any other countries taken our genius approacj of nine worth pf food to halt the spread of covid 19 approach?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,228 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    No. There have been no studies yet that have indicated a rate of asymptomatic Infection anywhere near as high as would be necessary for that to be true. And while we definitely missed thousands of cases in late March and April due to testing capability; not in the tens upon tens of thousands.

    50k would be a somewhat supportable upper end guess imo.

    Rubbish. People with symptoms who wanted a test couldn't get one in March and April. Nowadays 60% (according to CMO Today) of positive cases are asymptomatic but caught by track and trace.
    Clearly according to all stats including hospitalisation and deaths compared to then and now we missed at least 10 times the number of infections at the peak.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Thierry12


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    No. There have been no studies yet that have indicated a rate of asymptomatic Infection anywhere near as high as would be necessary for that to be true. And while we definitely missed thousands of cases in late March and April due to testing capability; not in the tens upon tens of thousands.

    50k would be a somewhat supportable upper end guess imo.

    Wrong

    Antibody tests recently put us at 5%

    300k cases there then

    We all know antibody tests are rubbish and miss loads of cases

    T spot testing puts prevalence at 2/3 times antibody testing

    We at 600k - 900k cases

    Experts are putting IFR at 0.5%

    We have 1750 deaths or so

    That puts cases at 350k

    Its anywhere between 300k and 900k imo

    Loads of people have had it unfortunately


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,121 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Thierry12 wrote: »
    Wrong

    Antibody tests recently put us at 5%

    300k cases there then

    We all know antibody tests are rubbish and miss loads of cases

    T spot testing puts prevalence at 2/3 times antibody testing

    We at 600k - 900k cases

    Experts are putting IFR at 0.5%

    We have 1750 deaths or so

    That puts cases at 350k

    Its anywhere between 300k and 900k imo

    Loads of people have had it unfortunately

    That's some maths there chief.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 917 ✭✭✭MickeyLeari


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    No. There have been no studies yet that have indicated a rate of asymptomatic Infection anywhere near as high as would be necessary for that to be true. And while we definitely missed thousands of cases in late March and April due to testing capability; not in the tens upon tens of thousands.

    50k would be a somewhat supportable upper end guess imo.

    Thanks. I asked this as it was mentioned previously that about (less than) 5% of people had tested positive in the HSE Antibody study which would indicate that approx 250k could have had the virus.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/coronavirus-ireland-has-no-significant-herd-immunity-study-shows-1.4308216%3fmode=amp

    I have also read that the antibodies fade over time (a non technical term) and therefore it may have been higher. Interesting to look at the numbers from the Spanish study at 10% in Madrid (pop of 6.5m).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Rubbish. People with symptoms who wanted a test couldn't get one in March and April. Nowadays 60% (according to CMO Today) of positive cases are asymptomatic but caught by track and trace.
    Clearly according to all stats including hospitalisation and deaths compared to then and now we missed at least 10 times the number of infections at the peak.

    Thanks for that Norman.

    I wonder how sick are the other 40%? How many are tested because they cant taste their cornflakes?

    When did save lives become stay home until we look for people who arent sick?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Am I right in assuming the U.K. now followed by Spain, France, Germany & perhaps Croatia have decided to let this virus circulate at a certain level for the rest of the Summer/Autumn so pressure on GP’s and hospitals won’t be severely overwhelmed come Winter. I think we should follow suit as this virus has a huge amount of asymptomatic’s and very mild symptoms in all recent cases found, it isn’t killing or hospitalising anyone, and will destroy the economy if we continue with this hysteria.
    The US clearly have gone the Sweden route, only they have many unhealthy & vulnerable members of their population.
    Is there any recent data out there to show the virus has become less virulent?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,719 ✭✭✭celt262


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Have any other countries taken our genius approacj of nine worth pf food to halt the spread of covid 19 approach?

    Had you a bit of grub yourself last night?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Thierry12


    Am I right in assuming the U.K. now followed by Spain, France, Germany & perhaps Croatia have decided to let this virus circulate at a certain level for the rest of the Summer/Autumn so pressure on GP’s and hospitals won’t be severely overwhelmed come Winter. I think we should follow suit as this virus has a huge amount of asymptomatic’s and very mild symptoms in all recent cases found, it isn’t killing or hospitalising anyone, and will destroy the economy if we continue with this hysteria.
    The US clearly have gone the Sweden route, only they have a many unhealthy & vulnerable members of their population.
    Is there any recent data out there to show the virus has become less virulent?

    Seems so

    Weve had 900 cases in the last 2 weeks

    Still about 10 in hospital and 5 in ICU


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,495 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    Am I right in assuming the U.K. now followed by Spain, France, Germany & perhaps Croatia have decided to let this virus circulate at a certain level for the rest of the Summer/Autumn so pressure on GP’s and hospitals won’t be severely overwhelmed come Winter. I think we should follow suit as this virus has a huge amount of asymptomatic’s and very mild symptoms in all recent cases found, it isn’t killing or hospitalising anyone, and will destroy the economy if we continue with this hysteria.
    The US clearly have gone the Sweden route, only they have a many unhealthy & vulnerable members of their population.
    Is there any recent data out there to show the virus has become less virulent?

    Yes. Countries/regions that were hit significantly hard earlier in the year are now experiencing more cases due to more testing and less restrictions but the deaths aren’t following as they did in the initial wave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,228 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Thanks for that Norman.

    I wonder how sick are the other 40%? How many are tested because they cant taste their cornflakes?

    When did save lives become stay home until we look for people who arent sick?

    It’s all from tracing people in the meat factories and their contacts etc.
    Apparently of those with symptoms a lot have very mild symptoms and it’s reasonable to assume a lot of them would have brushed it off and not asked for a test if they had not been part of a mass testing process.

    In any case of the recent positives, very few if any of them would have been even tested back in March/April.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,337 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Am I right in assuming the U.K. now followed by Spain, France, Germany & perhaps Croatia have decided to let this virus circulate at a certain level for the rest of the Summer/Autumn so pressure on GP’s and hospitals won’t be severely overwhelmed come Winter. I think we should follow suit as this virus has a huge amount of asymptomatic’s and very mild symptoms in all recent cases found, it isn’t killing or hospitalising anyone, and will destroy the economy if we continue with this hysteria.
    The US clearly have gone the Sweden route, only they have a many unhealthy & vulnerable members of their population.
    Is there any recent data out there to show the virus has become less virulent?

    I guess if you have no idea what’s actually happening in the world this might seem like a solid idea. Viruses don’t become less “virulent” (that doesn’t even mean anything)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MadYaker wrote: »
    I guess if you have no idea what’s actually happening in the world this might seem like a solid idea. Viruses don’t become less “virulent” (that doesn’t even mean anything)

    What an unbelievably condescending post.

    Given that you are clearly an epidemiologist, can you explain the three charts posted above and why hospitalisations are so low despite there having been enough lag time for infections to lead to hospitalisations and deaths? It’s a genuine question. And if this trend continues, why should we not relax restrictions further?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    MadYaker wrote: »
    I guess if you have no idea what’s actually happening in the world this might seem like a solid idea. Viruses don’t become less “virulent” (that doesn’t even mean anything)


    Virulent definition - marked by a rapid, severe, and destructive course a virulent infection. b : able to overcome bodily defensive mechanisms. There are many more meanings if you want to learn of its use in other contexts by hitting Google before posting rubbish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    What an unbelievably condescending post.


    Aye i don’t bother replying to clueless expert posters anymore


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,495 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    And if this trend continues, why should we not relax restrictions further?

    This trend has been continuing since May almost everywhere. Its staring us in the face now.

    Cases that don't result in hospitalisations or ICU/deaths are meaningless when the main wave has passed.

    But cases are even more misleading than that. PCR tests are not perfect, it can detect both active infection or viral debris as a positive, so someone who recovered who had covid 2 months ago and didn't know it can test positive today. This was where the south Korea re-infection fear came from a few months ago and in 2009 with the swine flu panic.

    This becomes a real issue with testing is dramatically ramped up like here in Ireland. 60,000 tests a week with a false positive rate of 0.5% results in 300 extra cases that are completely benign and create needless panic.

    But...because theres no deaths to report its all about cases now.

    Sources:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-explain/explainer-south-korean-findings-suggest-reinfected-coronavirus-cases-are-false-positives-idUSKBN22J0HR

    https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/reconstruction-of-a-mass-hysteria-the-swine-flu-panic-of-2009-a-682613.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,066 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    This trend has been continuing since May almost everywhere. Its staring us in the face now.

    Cases that don't result in hospitalisations or ICU/deaths are meaningless when the main wave has passed.

    But cases are even more misleading than that. PCR tests are not perfect, it can detect both active infection or viral debris as a positive, so someone who recovered who had covid 2 months ago and didn't know it can test positive today. This was where the south Korea re-infection fear came from a few months ago and in 2009 with the swine flu panic.

    This becomes a real issue with testing is dramatically ramped up like here in Ireland. 60,000 tests a week with a false positive rate of 0.5% results in 300 extra cases that are completely benign and create needless panic.

    But...because theres no deaths to report its all about cases now.

    Sources:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-explain/explainer-south-korean-findings-suggest-reinfected-coronavirus-cases-are-false-positives-idUSKBN22J0HR

    https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/reconstruction-of-a-mass-hysteria-the-swine-flu-panic-of-2009-a-682613.html

    Add to that deaths now can be from people who tested positive and made a complete recovery after. All those people infected in nursing homes weren't going to live forever...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,679 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Sadly a 32 year old woman passed away today in Co. Antrim. They're putting it down as a Covid death but it wasn't mentioned if she had any underlying health issues...

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭snowcat


    120k sick people on waiting lists since the lockdown. An economy devastated. What have we done? A disease that hospitalises 1 in 150 people and has a fatality rate of .1% at most.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    snowcat wrote: »
    120k sick people on waiting lists since the lockdown.

    Are they sick from some irrelevant illness like cancer etc?

    If so, they don't matter to most it seems, only Covid is a real illness, worthy of any concern


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    My friend passed away yesterday from Leukemia. He was scheduled to have a bone marrow transplant from his brother but the operation was postponed because of Covid, it may not have saved him but it certainly wouldn't have made things worse.. When it was deemed ok to go ahead with the operation it was too late. At least his death will not be recorded as a Covid casualty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,455 ✭✭✭Beanybabog


    My friend passed away yesterday from Leukemia. He was scheduled to have a bone marrow transplant from his brother but the operation was postponed because of Covid, it may not have saved him but it certainly wouldn't have made things worse.. When it was deemed ok to go ahead with the operation it was too late. At least his death will not be recorded as a Covid casualty.

    I’m so sorry. That’s just terrible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,215 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    My friend passed away yesterday from Leukemia. He was scheduled to have a bone marrow transplant from his brother but the operation was postponed because of Covid, it may not have saved him but it certainly wouldn't have made things worse.. When it was deemed ok to go ahead with the operation it was too late. At least his death will not be recorded as a Covid casualty.

    so sorry to hear, my condolences

    When you're ready and if u want you, you should contact the papers/radio about the experience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,858 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    My friend passed away yesterday from Leukemia. He was scheduled to have a bone marrow transplant from his brother but the operation was postponed because of Covid, it may not have saved him but it certainly wouldn't have made things worse.. When it was deemed ok to go ahead with the operation it was too late. At least his death will not be recorded as a Covid casualty.

    That’s just awful to hear, I’m so sorry to hear that happened. It may not have saved him as you say but at least he might have had a chance. But was denied it thanks to mania. Crazy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    snowcat wrote: »
    120k sick people on waiting lists since the lockdown. An economy devastated. What have we done? A disease that hospitalises 1 in 150 people and has a fatality rate of .1% at most.

    This should be stickied really.

    It's bad enough that the economy will struggle badly because of our dependency on FDI and the whims of the global market, but we've made the damage significantly worse by our overreaction to what has turned out to be a very manageable disease.

    The number of people who catch it is irrelevant. It's how many get seriously ill or die because of it, and those numbers are (thankfully I might add!) extremely low.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/outpatient-waiting-list-rose-by-17000-in-one-month-1014088.html

    Over 800,000 people on waiting lists!
    And it will only get worse with the coming recession. ‘Every life matters’ my arse.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement