Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

1302303305307308333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    almostover wrote: »
    Why can we do both? Wear masks and focus on the problem areas?

    If people want to wear face masks then leave that to be their personal choice. A blanket ruling is non-sensical though as case numbers dropped from peak levels to **** all despite nobody wearing masks when they went to Tesco to do the weekly shop.

    The unfortunate thing is, with all the talk of masks, good hygiene and social distancing are being forgotten. The clear, simple messaging has been diluted. Even on entering many business premises now, hand sanitiser is less visible and less common.

    We now have the people who want to force masks on everyone coming up with conspiracy theories that clusters in supermarkets were kept hush-hush :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,321 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Arghus wrote: »
    Speaking from experience, there was definitely a culture of of don't say it too loudly or tell too many people about it if there were any cases in supermarkets.

    Trust me on this.

    If I was making such a statement in a post against masks I'd be f**** out of it. Told were the CT forum was.

    People can't refute the empirical evidence that we gained over the last few months so they start making stuff up.

    I don't know you so I won't get personal but let me say this. I've seen a good few posts from you on COVID and I didn't expect such a statement from you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    HSE Daily Operations Update

    14 in hospital, increase of 4 (expect RTE to lead with 40% increase in hospital admissions)
    3 confirmed cases today, one in Mullingar, Portlaoise and UHL.
    6 in ICU and 2 ventilated, +1 in ICU and +1 ventilated.

    ACE usually does these!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    GazzaL wrote: »
    The unfortunate thing is, with all the talk of masks, good hygiene and social distancing are being forgotten. The clear, simple messaging has been diluted. Even on entering many business premises now, hand sanitiser is less visible and less common.
    Nice deflection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,221 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    If I was making such a statement in a post against masks I'd be f**** out of it. Told were the CT forum was.

    People can't refute the empirical evidence that we gained over the last few months so they start making stuff up.

    I don't know you so I won't get personal but let me say this. I've seen a good few posts from you on COVID and I didn't expect such a statement from you.

    I really don't know what you are talking about.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Cases dropped to low levels mainly due to the lockdown. As we want to open up businesses and the economy, we need to live with the virus, masks can reduce spread and help keep cases low. It's one of many measures we can use.

    During the full lockdown, at the peak, we all still went to the shops and to the petrol stations. Numbers dropped down because they are not high risk areas and we used social distancing and good hygiene.

    Renjit wrote: »
    Cases dropped during lockdown. The phased opening has seen the surge already as the influx of people increases and more avenues open.



    Those are the ones which are in limelight now. Hindsight is always 20/20.

    Nursing homes were flagged up very early on, before it became an issue here. Likewise, meat processors were flagged up before the recent clusters as being high risk environments due to the working conditions. We're talking foresight, not hindsight. But let's avoid that because nobody wants to take responsibility for those areas so let's divert attention to making Johnny wear a mask as he runs in and out of an empty petrol station in 30 seconds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,759 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    HSE Daily Operations Update

    14 in hospital, increase of 4 (expect RTE to lead with 40% increase in hospital admissions)
    3 confirmed cases today, one in Mullingar, Portlaoise and UHL.
    6 in ICU and 2 ventilated, +1 in ICU and +1 ventilated.

    ACE usually does these!

    I’m in the pub no time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭almostover


    GazzaL wrote: »
    If people want to wear face masks then leave that to be their personal choice. A blanket ruling is non-sensical though as case numbers dropped from peak levels to **** all despite nobody wearing masks when they went to Tesco to do the weekly shop.

    The unfortunate thing is, with all the talk of masks, good hygiene and social distancing are being forgotten. The clear, simple messaging has been diluted. Even on entering many business premises now, hand sanitiser is less visible and less common.

    We now have the people who want to force masks on everyone coming up with conspiracy theories that clusters in supermarkets were kept hush-hush :rolleyes:

    What's your beef with masks? We can wear masks AND social distance AND practice good hand hygiene. The masks add further risk mitigation and are not mutually exclusive to distancing and hand hygiene.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    GazzaL wrote: »
    During the full lockdown, at the peak, we all still went to the shops and to the petrol stations. Numbers dropped down because they are not high risk areas and we used social distancing and good hygiene.

    No point continuing this when you clearly don't understand the influx now and back then when only essentials were allowed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭almostover


    GazzaL wrote: »
    If people want to wear face masks then leave that to be their personal choice. A blanket ruling is non-sensical though as case numbers dropped from peak levels to **** all despite nobody wearing masks when they went to Tesco to do the weekly shop.

    The unfortunate thing is, with all the talk of masks, good hygiene and social distancing are being forgotten. The clear, simple messaging has been diluted. Even on entering many business premises now, hand sanitiser is less visible and less common.

    We now have the people who want to force masks on everyone coming up with conspiracy theories that clusters in supermarkets were kept hush-hush :rolleyes:

    Your argument is starting to sound something like sure why bother putting an emphasis on wearing seatbelts when people are speeding or drink driving. People can take multiple proactive risk mitigation measures. The more measures taken the lower the risk. Wear a mask, practice physical distancing, limit number of contacts, practice good hand hygiene. This is simple, masks are helpful in the battle against COVID.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    GazzaL wrote: »
    During the full lockdown, at the peak, we all still went to the shops and to the petrol stations. Numbers dropped down because they are not high risk areas and we used social distancing and good hygiene.
    .

    Ah there's no arguing with you. You're the kind of person who would demand shops be exempt to mask wearing as there was no known clusters associated to them. Then we end up having retail stores install a vending machine with food to say they are a shop that sells essential items and should be exempt.

    I swear to god, we're asked to do a simple thing and some people start spewing ****e and refuse to wear a mask.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,321 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Arghus wrote: »
    I really don't know what you are talking about.

    IMO one of the strongest arguments against the flawed rationale of masks in retail are the non existing incidents and the minuscule staff infection rates reported during the non-mask months when community spread was supposedly at its highest.

    You just basically said this these reports were doctored and you know this because of 'Shush shush. Trust me on this.'

    Talking about that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I’m in the pub no time

    HAHA!
    Remember it's technically a restaurant, not a pub!
    Enjoy your pint anyways!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,558 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    We should consider a very strict lockdown, in co operation with northern ireland, with nobody allowed into the Island(bar inports and exports). Make the island COVId19 free then re-open everything internally. We could become the workshop of Europe, thus any job losses in hospitality and tourism could be offset by jobs created in manufacturing,, ala Taiwan

    100% would be fully behind this but it isn’t going to happen. Gov have no interest. Instead we will fumble along with no idea what our ultimate goal is until someone from somewhere else comes up with a vaccine or effective treatment. We’re on a path to nowhere currently but oh well, we’re all in it together aren’t we.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭almostover


    IMO one of the strongest arguments against the flawed rationale of masks in retail are the non existing incidents and the minuscule staff infection rates reported during the non-mask months when community spread was supposedly at its highest.

    You just basically said this these reports were doctored and you know this because of 'Shush shush. Trust me on this.'

    Talking about that.

    Nope that rationale is like stating that driving without a seatbelt is safe as I've done so all my life and have never crashed.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,440 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Ah there's no arguing with you. You're the kind of person who would demand shops be exempt to mask wearing as there was no known clusters associated to them. Then we end up having retail stores install a vending machine with food to say they are a shop that sells essential items and should be exempt.

    I swear to god, we're asked to do a simple thing and some people start spewing ****e and refuse to wear a mask.

    Despite everyone going into supermarkets and petrol stations without masks at the peak of the pandemic, and no evidence of any clusters from these low risk settings, we're now talking about €2,500 fines and 6 months in prison for someone who spends less than 30 seconds running in and out of an almost empty garage shop to pay for a tank of fuel. Sheer lunacy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    We should consider a very strict lockdown, in co operation with northern ireland, with nobody allowed into the Island(bar inports and exports). Make the island COVId19 free then re-open everything internally. We could become the workshop of Europe, thus any job losses in hospitality and tourism could be offset by jobs created in manufacturing,, ala Taiwan

    Get the DUP to align with us and go against Great Britain, the DUP are more British than the British ffs?
    Are you off your head, it's never going to happen.

    There's plenty of manufacturing going on in Europe, the main casualty will be the hospitality sector, not something you can export.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    I’m in the pub no time


    A man walks into a bar......










    Lucky bastard.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,321 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti



    :eek: not going in there again


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 837 ✭✭✭John O.Groats


    GazzaL wrote: »
    During the full lockdown, at the peak, we all still went to the shops and to the petrol stations. Numbers dropped down because they are not high risk areas and we used social distancing and good hygiene.




    Nursing homes were flagged up very early on, before it became an issue here. Likewise, meat processors were flagged up before the recent clusters as being high risk environments due to the working conditions. We're talking foresight, not hindsight. But let's avoid that because nobody wants to take responsibility for those areas so let's divert attention to making Johnny wear a mask as he runs in and out of an empty petrol station in 30 seconds.
    Going by your logic why should Johnny bother to wear a seatbelt when he is only going to be driving down the road for 5 minutes. Sure what could possibly go wrong in such a short amount of time?


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    gabeeg wrote: »
    Yeah, restaurants are subject to the 105 minute rule too.

    Nope, only if they can't do the 2m distancing.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Going by your logic why should Johnny bother to wear a seatbelt when he is only going to be driving down the road for 5 minutes. Sure what could possibly go wrong in such a short amount of time?

    Not the same thing. There is no doubt that you can die in an accident within 4 minutes or 20 seconds. There is merit, regardless of how much it annoys people, in saying that supermarkets were populated regularly in the same way all along this pandemic without masks and during this no mask period, community transmission got to zero. So they are not high risk outlets. I am not saying masks are no good, and fully agree in confined areas and public transport, but I'd imagine it's just as easy for the authorities to make a rule that you wear them in all retail as it would be impossible to start making different rules for different types of outlet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,675 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    We are figuring it out as we go along. Or not..... we don’t have the large scale fear now that we had in March/April, but the authorities are telling us the situation is even worse and we have to do this and that for even longer. The truth is that until a vaccine comes along we will be dealing with this, it’s not going away. It’s a very, very bad form of flu, and there is a lot of unknowns with it. It is very scary, but we cannot eliminate it unless we decide to close our borders for a few months. And then it will come back anyway when we reopen. In hindsight I think we made a bit of a balls of it. We should have been more hardline with the airports, like Conor McGregor was saying. And our testing was, and still is, a joke. I think the scientists, medical staff and politicians have worked their arses off but ultimately some things are not possible, so we are where we are. We are in the shi+s till America, GB or (Russia!!) create the virus and make it available to us.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge




    Jaap van Dissel is a Dutch virologist and infectiologist.

    He is the director of the Centrum Infectieziektebestrijding (CIb) of the Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). He is also professor at the Leiden University with specialization Internal Medicine, in particular infectious diseases.

    Jaap T. Van Dissel, MD, PhD – During specialization in internal medicine and infectious diseases at Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Netherlands, he got his PhD on intracellular (Salmonella and Listeria) infections, and was NWO-Talent fellow at Duke University Medical Center and Cold Spring Harbor laboratories. In 1999, he was appointed professor of Medicine and head of dept Infectious Diseases at LUMC. Prof Van Dissel set up a referral centre for immunodeficiency disorders, and an infectious diseases research network of regional clinics and GPs around LUMC. Research activities include immunogenetic studies on host-pathogen interactions, vaccine trials, and biomarker studies in infectious disease. He is promotor of some 30 PhD theses and (co-)author of ~350 peer reviewed publications and some 80 educational bookchapters. For over ten years, he was member and vice-chair of the Dutch Medicine Evaluation Board and SAG Anti-infectives at EMA in London, and member of the Medicine Litigation Court, and of the infectious diseases working group of the Dutch Health Council. For two years, he was director of the medical residency training program in Internal Medicine at LUMC.
    In 2013, he was appointed director of the Centre for Infectious Disease Control at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) of the Dutch Ministry of Health, and continues to work part-time in clinical patient care at LUMC.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    A Swedish Doctor's perspective

    https://sebastianrushworth.com/2020/08/04/how-bad-is-covid-really-a-swedish-doctors-perspective/

    Ok, I want to preface this article by stating that it is entirely anecdotal and based on my experience working as a doctor in the emergency room of one of the big hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden, and of living as a citizen in Sweden. As many people know, Sweden is perhaps the country that has taken the most relaxed attitude of any towards the covid pandemic. Unlike other countries, Sweden never went in to complete lockdown. Non-essential businesses have remained open, people have continued to go to cafés and restaurants, children have remained in school, and very few people have bothered with face masks in public.

    Covid hit Stockholm like a storm in mid-March. One day I was seeing people with appendicitis and kidney stones, the usual things you see in the emergency room. The next day all those patients were gone and the only thing coming in to the hospital was covid. Practically everyone who was tested had covid, regardless of what the presenting symtom was. People came in with a nose bleed and they had covid. They came in with stomach pain and they had covid.

    Then, after a few months, all the covid patients disappeared. It is now four months since the start of the pandemic, and I haven’t seen a single covid patient in over a month. When I do test someone because they have a cough or a fever, the test invariably comes back negative. At the peak three months back, a hundred people were dying a day of covid in Sweden, a country with a population of ten million. We are now down to around five people dying per day in the whole country, and that number continues to drop. Since people generally die around three weeks after infection, that means virtually no-one is getting infected any more. If we assume around 0.5 percent of those infected die (which I think is very generous, more on that later), then that means that three weeks back 1,000 people were getting infected per day in the whole country, which works out to a daily risk per person of getting infected of 1 in 10,000, which is miniscule. And remember, the risk of dying is at the very most 1 in 200 if you actually do get infected. And that was three weeks ago. Basically, covid is in all practical senses over and done with in Sweden. After four months.

    In total covid has killed under 6,000 people in a country of ten million. A country with an annual death rate of around 100,000 people. Considering that 70% of those who have died of covid are over 80 years old, quite a few of those 6,000 would have died this year anyway. That makes covid a mere blip in terms of its effect on mortality.

    That is why it is nonsensical to compare covid to other major pandemics, like the 1918 pandemic that killed tens of millions of people. Covid will never even come close to those numbers. And yet many countries have shut down their entire economies, stopped children going to school, and made large portions of their population unemployed in order to deal with this disease.

    The media have been proclaiming that only a small percentage of the population have antibodies, and therefore it is impossible that herd immunity has developed. Well, if herd immunity hasn’t developed, where are all the sick people? Why has the rate of infection dropped so precipitously? Considering that most people in Sweden are leading their lives normally now, not socially distancing, not wearing masks, there should still be high rates of infection.

    The reason we test for antibodies is because it is easy and cheap. Antibodies are in fact not the body’s main defence against virus infections. T-cells are. But T-cells are harder to measure than antibodies, so we don’t really do it clinically. It is quite possible to have T-cells that are specific for covid and thereby make you immune to the disease, without having any antibodies. Personally, I think this is what has happened. Everybody who works in the emergency room where I work has had the antibody test. Very few actually have antibodies. This is in spite of being exposed to huge numbers of infected people, including at the beginning of the pandemic, before we realized how widespread covid was, when no-one was wearing protective equipment.

    I am not denying that covid is awful for the people who do get really sick or for the families of the people who die, just as it is awful for the families of people who die of cancer, or influenza, or an opioid overdose. But the size of the response in most of the world (not including Sweden) has been totally disproportionate to the size of the threat.

    Sweden ripped the metaphorical band-aid off quickly and got the epidemic over and done with in a short amount of time, while the rest of the world has chosen to try to peel the band-aid off slowly. At present that means Sweden has one of the highest total death rates in the world. But covid is over in Sweden. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected any more. I am willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. If that is the case, then there won’t have been any point in shutting down in the first place, because all those countries are going to end up with the same number of dead at the end of the day anyway. Shutting down completely in order to decrease the total number of deaths only makes sense if you are willing to stay shut down until a vaccine is available. That could take years. No country is willing to wait that long.

    Covid has at present killed less than 6000 in Sweden. It is very unlikely that the number of dead will go above 7,000. An average influenza year in Sweden, 700 people die of influenza. Does that mean covid is ten times worse than influenza? No, because influenza has been around for centuries while covid is completely new. In an average influenza year most people already have some level of immunity because they’ve been infected with a similar strain previously, or because they’re vaccinated. So it is quite possible, in fact likely, that the case fatality rate for covid is the same as for influenza, or only slightly higher, and the entire difference we have seen is due to the complete lack of any immunity in the population at the start of this pandemic.

    This conclusion makes sense of the Swedish fatality numbers – if we’ve reached a point where there is hardly any active infection going on any more in Sweden in spite of the fact that there is barely any social distancing happening then that means at least 50% of the population has been infected already and have developed immunity, which is five million people. This number is perfectly reasonable if we assume a reproductive number for the virus of two: If each person infects two new, with a five day period between being infected and infecting others, and you start out with just one infected person in the country, then you will reach a point where several million are infected in just four months. If only 6000 are dead out of five million infected, that works out to a case fatality rate of 0.12 percent, roughly the same as regular old influenza, which no-one is the least bit frightened of, and which we don’t shut down our societies for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,427 ✭✭✭Wolf359f




    Jaap van Dissel is a Dutch virologist and infectiologist.

    He is the director of the Centrum Infectieziektebestrijding (CIb) of the Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). He is also professor at the Leiden University with specialization Internal Medicine, in particular infectious diseases.

    Jaap T. Van Dissel, MD, PhD – During specialization in internal medicine and infectious diseases at Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Netherlands, he got his PhD on intracellular (Salmonella and Listeria) infections, and was NWO-Talent fellow at Duke University Medical Center and Cold Spring Harbor laboratories. In 1999, he was appointed professor of Medicine and head of dept Infectious Diseases at LUMC. Prof Van Dissel set up a referral centre for immunodeficiency disorders, and an infectious diseases research network of regional clinics and GPs around LUMC. Research activities include immunogenetic studies on host-pathogen interactions, vaccine trials, and biomarker studies in infectious disease. He is promotor of some 30 PhD theses and (co-)author of ~350 peer reviewed publications and some 80 educational bookchapters. For over ten years, he was member and vice-chair of the Dutch Medicine Evaluation Board and SAG Anti-infectives at EMA in London, and member of the Medicine Litigation Court, and of the infectious diseases working group of the Dutch Health Council. For two years, he was director of the medical residency training program in Internal Medicine at LUMC.
    In 2013, he was appointed director of the Centre for Infectious Disease Control at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) of the Dutch Ministry of Health, and continues to work part-time in clinical patient care at LUMC.

    Have you any thoughts on it yourself or just dumping links?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,887 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




    Jaap van Dissel is a Dutch virologist and infectiologist.

    I prefer to HEED the words of VIN DIESEL



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Have you any thoughts on it yourself or just dumping links?

    Thought people would find the links interesting. If you have a problem with me "dumping links" report me. :rolleyes:

    But if you go back just a few posts you'll see some views I expressed.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nope, only if they can't do the 2m distancing.

    Pubs aren’t either, if they do the 2 metres instead. I’ve had a couple of much longer stays in my local when there has been plenty of space

    That the 105 minutes applies to all pubs is a very common misconception


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement