Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Masks

1252253255257258328

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭v638sg7k1a92bx


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Of course there is.
    Welcome to August 2020, perhaps you could update your frame of reference from March 2020.
    It's the same evidence that has persuaded multiple health authorities to change their guidance on masks.
    It's been repeated again and again on this thread and has not been rebutted.

    I'm sorry but unless you have time machine there is zero conclusive evidence that supports your suggestion that if people wore face masks the number of deaths would be less than 706k.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    and there's no evidence that wearing a mask would have reduced or prevented those 706k deaths.

    There is plenty of evidence that Coronavirus is altogether a pretty bad thing that kills people and its spread can be prevented by..... wait for it......

    wearing a mask

    Now if your epidemiological expertise is greater than that of the 3 professors and 2 doctors who recently wrote to the government stating the same thing, please tell me more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,070 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The reality is that they don't know.

    It's the CDC and the ECDC. T
    They know more about infectious diseases than you ever will.
    The evidence is definitive enough to convince them masks should be used.
    In contrast you have no rebuttals just weasel words like "they don't know".
    They are the ones there to make these kinds of determinations during a pandemic.
    And they have made that determination.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭v638sg7k1a92bx


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    It's the CDC and the ECDC. T
    They know more about infectious diseases than you ever will.
    The evidence is definitive enough to convince them masks should be used.
    In contrast you have no rebuttals just weasel words like "they don't know".
    They are the ones there to make these kinds of determinations during a pandemic.
    And they have made that determination.

    It's not definitive enough at all, it's just a precaution. Try to think for yourself instead of being blindly compliant and agree to wear a muzzle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,298 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    Yes: valved
    The reality is that they don't know.

    Man was gonna post you some picture, but feck it, lost all my faith in you :D Thank fcuk my reality is different than yours. Big respect for guys who still keep replying to you with some clear evidence on masks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,070 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's not definitive enough at all, it's just a precaution. Try to think for yourself instead of being blindly compliant and agree to wear a muzzle.

    It's as definitive enough as it is possible to be during a pandemic without conducting unethical and dangerous experiments on unvaccinated subjects.
    In contrast to the evidence they (both US CDC and ECDC) have presented... there's no attempt at a rebuttal.
    Just weasel words and dog whistling about muzzles.

    Muzzle? Take your dog whistling nonsense to the conspiracy theory thread.
    Your posts have embarrassed this thread for long enough.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,237 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Yes: homemade
    odyssey06 wrote: »
    It's as definitive enough as it is possible to be during a pandemic without conducting unethical and dangerous experiments on unvaccinated subjects.
    In contrast to the evidence they (both US CDC and ECDC) have presented... there's no attempt at a rebuttal.
    Just weasel words and dog whistling about muzzles.

    Muzzle? Take your dog whistling nonsense to the conspiracy theory thread.
    Your posts have embarrassed this thread for long enough.

    The IGNORE option has just tidied the thread nicely for me. Now, if people would stop quoting him, the nonsense will disappear altogether.

    Like it or not face coverings are here to stay for some time. I don't like wearing them and find interaction in shops difficult, as we can't hear each other properly. But so be it. It's a small thing to do, in the grand scheme of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭v638sg7k1a92bx


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    The IGNORE option has just tidied the thread nicely for me. Now, if people would stop quoting him, the nonsense will disappear altogether.

    Like it or not face coverings are here to stay for some time. I don't like wearing them and find interaction in shops difficult in shops, as we can't hear each other properly. But so be it. It's a small thing to do, in the grand scheme of things.

    Why would you not question the rational and effectiveness of this measure and blindly accept these decrees that nobody can debate or question which are also a form of compelled speech where anyone who disagrees or stops to question the reality around them is ostracized even though we know that the chances of infection and death are extremely low yet people continue to treat this as a lethal pathogen when the number of deaths, cases, recovery rates, rates of transmission and ICU admissions clearly show us a different reality.

    It beggars belief how people have been whooped up into a frenzy when we can clearly see what the mortality rates are yet this younger generation will accept whatever notification they get from their smart phone without question.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭v638sg7k1a92bx


    xhomelezz wrote: »
    Man was gonna post you some picture, but feck it, lost all my faith in you :D Thank fcuk my reality is different than yours. Big respect for guys who still keep replying to you with some clear evidence on masks.

    If you can't articulate your reasons for wearing a muzzle in your own words other and need to use pictures for it to be explained to you like we would do with a 4 yo child then it reflects badly on you, not me. It's a pity muzzle advocates wouldn't follow "expert advice" when it comes to smoking and lifestyle as they do when it comes to wearing a muzzle to show how compliant they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,590 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Hopefully you're right and mandatory masks will solve the problem but if they don't and cases increase, will you change your position that wearing a mask doesn't reduce the number of cases?
    They will not likely solve the problem but they could help slow down and reduce the spread especially in combination with other measures.
    As things to back to normal, more people going back to work, schools probably soon enough the numbers are likely to go up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,899 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Yes: surgical
    Well with no festival or concert tee shirts to buy this year I might invest in this next week, I can't resist, the Aphex Twin Richard. D, James smile, creepy mask aye! ur,mask_flatlay_front,product,600x600.jpg

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,464 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    No: I don't care enough
    If you can't articulate your reasons for wearing a muzzle in your own words other and need to use pictures for it to be explained to you like we would do with a 4 yo child then it reflects badly on you, not me. It's a pity muzzle advocates wouldn't follow "expert advice" when it comes to smoking and lifestyle as they do when it comes to wearing a muzzle to show how compliant they are.
    Do not post in this thread again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,202 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    No: other
    Well with no festival or concert tee shirts to buy this year I might invest in this next week, I can't resist, the Aphex Twin Richard. D, James smile, creepy mask aye! ur,mask_flatlay_front,product,600x600.jpg

    Where can I buy? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,899 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Yes: surgical
    Stark wrote: »
    Where can I buy? :)

    Here Its 14.23 Euro if you buy an individual one but you can get them for 11.38 if you buy 4. Its quite pricey but I want to get one for the craic. :)

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭one armed dwarf


    No: other
    Added benefit is everyone else becomes much more compliant with social distancing I imagine.

    If not then just make the Windowlicker noise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,702 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    old skool

    m5aekswmupj41.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,751 ✭✭✭mirrorwall14


    Yes: valved
    Can I ask for anyone wearing masks for long periods in work what ones have you found most comfortable?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,298 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    Yes: valved
    Can I ask for anyone wearing masks for long periods in work what ones have you found most comfortable?

    I'm using cotton three ply with filter pocket since the start. No issues, don't have to wear it whole day tho. So far had it on for say 2 hrs without taking it off and didn't bother me at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Yes: surgical
    This is a non commercial presentation but -

    I've tried a load of masks because I wear glasses so trying to get one that's comfortable but doesn't fog up my lenses was a bit of a nightmare.

    For a while I was going with a bandit style bandana, which was excellent at preventing fog up but left a lot to be desired, I imagine, in that you're still largely free n' easy at the bottom of it.

    The one I'm using now is one I got from Groupon with two filters, and I'm quite impressed with it for the price - https://www.groupon.ie/deals/face-mask-filters-1?nlp=&CID=IE&uu=ef3f0c54-bfec-427b-8dd9-bef110377c8a&utm_source=groupon_transaction_succeeded-goods&utm_medium=email&sid=groupon_transaction_succeeded_20200623&date=20202306&sender=rm&s=body&c=link&d=deal-url

    It doesn't look like the image, it's cotton with a white lining rather than the neopreney-looking image, and the plastic "filter" nubbin is basically cosmetic. It has a pocket for changing filters, and closes well under the chin. There's a wire over the top so you can keep it flush to your nose and it won't fog, and there are neat little ear adjustment things you can see in the picture.

    It's Groupon, so it's probably possible I lucked out and got a particularly good one, but I'd recommend it again, I've seen people pay more for less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,255 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    This is a non commercial presentation but -

    I've tried a load of masks because I wear glasses so trying to get one that's comfortable but doesn't fog up my lenses was a bit of a nightmare.

    For a while I was going with a bandit style bandana, which was excellent at preventing fog up but left a lot to be desired, I imagine, in that you're still largely free n' easy at the bottom of it.

    The one I'm using now is one I got from Groupon with two filters, and I'm quite impressed with it for the price - https://www.groupon.ie/deals/face-mask-filters-1?nlp=&CID=IE&uu=ef3f0c54-bfec-427b-8dd9-bef110377c8a&utm_source=groupon_transaction_succeeded-goods&utm_medium=email&sid=groupon_transaction_succeeded_20200623&date=20202306&sender=rm&s=body&c=link&d=deal-url

    It doesn't look like the image, it's cotton with a white lining rather than the neopreney-looking image, and the plastic "filter" nubbin is basically cosmetic. It has a pocket for changing filters, and closes well under the chin. There's a wire over the top so you can keep it flush to your nose and it won't fog, and there are neat little ear adjustment things you can see in the picture.

    It's Groupon, so it's probably possible I lucked out and got a particularly good one, but I'd recommend it again, I've seen people pay more for less.

    Has Covid 19 forced you to wear a mask and glasses at the same time....if so you might be entitled to condensation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭ginoginelli


    Yes: surgical
    In lidl today, happy to report 100 % customer compliance. Couldn't say the same for the staff unfortunately, the check out girls were behind screens at least, but one employee was sauntering about the aisles with no protection.

    Hopefully all will be masked up monday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭bush


    No: other
    Can I ask for anyone wearing masks for long periods in work what ones have you found most comfortable?

    Ive been wearing them for 8 - 10 hours a day and honestly they are all annoying to wear. Pisses me off more every day rather than me getting used to it but what can you do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Yes: surgical
    https://n95maskco.com/collections/most-popular-products/products/respokare-niosh-n95-respirator-mask-20-pack

    Anybody heard of above mask ? Supposed to be very good at protecting person wearing and others from that person in terms of transmission. Also, supposed to be more comfortable then normal N95


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 336 ✭✭nw1dqsv7amx026


    So face masks are mandatory in shops and shopping centers from Monday?

    But where is the legislation?

    https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/1f150-view-statutory-instruments-related-to-the-covid-19-pandemic/

    I was under the impression that all it took was the Minister for Health's signature?

    Why do they keep doing this, implying a law when in fact there is no legislation. I'm referring to quarantine after returning from a "red list" country.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    I understand it's going to be a new Statutory Instrument under the Irish Health Act.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 336 ✭✭nw1dqsv7amx026


    Graham wrote: »
    I understand it's going to be a new Statutory Instrument under the Irish Health Act.

    Yes so then it should show up at the url I posted?

    Why are they delaying?

    Just copy, paste and edit from
    S.I. No. 244 of 2020 Health Act 1947 (Section 31A – Temporary Restrictions) (Covid-19) (Face Coverings on Public Transp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    No: I don't care enough
    Can I ask for anyone wearing masks for long periods in work what ones have you found most comfortable?

    You can also buy/print these:

    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4249113

    They relieve pressure and abrasion off the ears, though I haven't printed one or tried it myself this and similar .STLs are getting rave gratitude from the healthcare industry. We wanted to fire up all the Clemson University printers to make shedloads of them but the Trustees were having none of it because of 'liability' this and that, they were concerned as they wouldn't be sterile (this was before nurses were running around in trash bags, are those sterile!?) but I digress.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    No: I don't care enough
    Drumpot wrote: »
    https://n95maskco.com/collections/most-popular-products/products/respokare-niosh-n95-respirator-mask-20-pack

    Anybody heard of above mask ? Supposed to be very good at protecting person wearing and others from that person in terms of transmission. Also, supposed to be more comfortable then normal N95

    Seems like an awful lot of money to spend on them, $180 for a pack of 20 that are not rewashable? Pass. Normal N95 rewashing guidelines from Mayo Clinic etc. will not apply to this multilayered alternative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Yes: surgical
    Overheal wrote: »
    You can also buy/print these:

    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4249113

    They relieve pressure and abrasion off the ears, though I haven't printed one or tried it myself this and similar .STLs are getting rave gratitude from the healthcare industry. We wanted to fire up all the Clemson University printers to make shedloads of them but the Trustees were having none of it because of 'liability' this and that, they were concerned as they wouldn't be sterile (this was before nurses were running around in trash bags, are those sterile!?) but I digress.

    Out of interest to Dublin boardies, they sell these in some of the Asian stores, like the one on Abbey Street. I've long hair so they don't really suit, but seem to be the business for anyone else.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭ginoginelli


    Yes: surgical
    Overheal wrote: »
    Seems like an awful lot of money to spend on them, $180 for a pack of 20 that are not rewashable? Pass. Normal N95 rewashing guidelines from Mayo Clinic etc. will not apply to this multilayered alternative.


    They do seem decent tho. And u can sterolize with a cheap nail uv light.

    I've been using the covaflu ffp2 masks lately. Good material and easy enough to breathe in, but seal could be a bit tighter around the nose though.

    I might try these new n95s out.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement