Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

1151152154156157333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    xabi wrote: »
    And then what?


    Wait in our caves to die off as a species waiting for a vaccine which may never ever happen :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,498 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Unprofessional to spout what he expects re cases, what if he says 100 tomorrow and its 20

    Its up NPHET/HSE to verify and release figures

    Tell us, what if he said that? World the world end or something?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Dr Glynn coming across as being quite relieved in the press release.
    “The source of transmission for over 90% of cases reported today has been identified. This is a positive development in light of the number of cases reported over the past few days"

    Understandable too. That said we are having growing cases with unknown origin. This is problematic because these cases usually only become known once an infected person becomes symptomatic. Cases that show no symptoms only get detected if they're part of a known cluster. It's quite possible there's a growing number of infections simmering under the surface that we are missing. The recent trend in community transmission is a concern.

    Any mathematician out there know if randomised testing of the population could help detect and suppress these cases?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,888 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    froog wrote: »
    we need to go back to full lockdown for a few weeks at least to nip this in the bud.

    Rubbish. What do you think is going to happen once that ends. We need to get a fcukin grip and start livibg with it. If you want zero risk you stay at home away from everyone and everything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I reckon the pubs will open to be honest


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,688 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    froog wrote: »
    we need to go back to full lockdown for a few weeks at least to nip this in the bud.

    And then as soon as you reopen again it will be the same situation after a few weeks. Once hospital numbers stay low and manageable thats all that matters. That was the point of lockdown, not eradication.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    froog wrote: »
    we need to go back to full lockdown for a few weeks at least to nip this in the bud.

    And then when we reopen you get a repeat as people mix again. Rinse and repeat until we destroy society and the economy. Good plan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    I reckon the pubs will open to be honest


    Perhaps the answer is a 9pm closing time for them, leave it like that for a month, see how things go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,252 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Unprofessional to spout what he expects re cases, what if he says 100 tomorrow and its 20

    Its up NPHET/HSE to verify and release figures

    Obviously he's kept in the loop about all things related to tests and projections etc, etc. And you'd expect him to be, he is the minister for health.

    We all expected figures within the 40-60 ball park tonight. The minister for health is obviously privy to more accurate information than us and gave a pretty accurate prediction based on the most up to date info he had, on a matter of public health, and he was right. I really fail to see the issue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    froog wrote: »
    we need to go back to full lockdown for a few weeks at least to nip this in the bud.

    And then when we reopen you get a repeat as people mix again. Rinse and repeat until we destroy society and the economy. Good plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    IMO, today has illustrated the publication of our COVID cases is pre viewed and pre determined by government.

    Can we please have an honest day to day release of numbers and not this shambles?

    If our Health Minister gets a pre look at numbers, be honest and tell us

    All we want from this government is honesty and full disclosure

    :confused::confused:

    Is this a serious post, of course he gets a pre-look at the number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    xabi wrote: »
    And then what?

    then when the figures stabilise we start opening up again. and we repeat this cycle until such time as we get a vaccine or a solid suite of therapeutic drugs. it's the only way to deal with this thing unfortunately.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 111 ✭✭Wild Field 1831


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Well, Glynn seems pleases that 90% of cases can be linked to clusters. He was also the one who said contract tracing is working very well. Even when these numbers subside we'll still find new clusters. Apart from the messy government efforts to restore a level of normality some people will need to face the perhaps tougher challenge of living with this.

    Today he's happier, yesterday he was concerned. What way will he feel tomorrow? He doesn't have a crystal ball to tell him who's spreading the virus to who presently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    froog wrote: »
    then when the figures stabilise we start opening up again. and we repeat this cycle until such time as we get a vaccine or a solid suite of therapeutic drugs. it's the only way to deal with this thing unfortunately.


    And how will the country finance this approach?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    giphy.gif

    The guy in the middle is like George Lee at a press conference.

    Hasn't a clue what's going on or why he is even there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    And how will the country finance this approach?

    we'll manage. the economy can deal better with a cycling approach of lockdowns, 2-4 weeks lockdown, 2-4 weeks mostly full reopening. the alternative is many more dead people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    :confused::confused:

    Is this a serious post, of course he gets a pre-look at the number.

    It is the impression given off, let's have some honesty and stop the ****e.

    We are in this together or not.

    He simply trying to grab some headlines and lead the agenda

    I dont like it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    Using first dibs at public health data to try and drive the news agenda etc is to me unacceptable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    froog wrote: »
    we'll manage. the economy can deal better with a cycling approach of lockdowns, 2-4 weeks lockdown, 2-4 weeks mostly full reopening. the alternative is many more dead people.
    You clearly don't have any economist experience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Ohmeha wrote: »
    7 averages for the past 3 weeks, if numbers start to drop during the week I'd be optimistic a hold is getting on these latest outbreaks, if numbers maintain at 40-50 then we are on the wrong trajectory

    Day Month Date Cases 7 Day
    Monday July 13th 11 19.14
    Tuesday July 14th 32 20.29
    Wednesday July 15th 14 20.71
    Thursday July 16th 21 20.43
    Friday July 17th 34 21.71
    Saturday July 18th 21 21.43
    Sunday July 19th 10 20.43
    Monday July 20th 6 19.71
    Tuesday July 21st 36 20.29
    Wednesday July 22nd 17 20.71
    Thursday July 23rd 7 18.71
    Friday July 24th 20 16.71
    Saturday July 25th 24 17.14
    Sunday July 26th 12 17.43
    Monday July 27th 11 18.14
    Tuesday July 28th 40 18.71
    Wednesday July 29th 14 18.29
    Thursday July 30th 85 29.43
    Friday July 31st 38 32.00
    Saturday August 1st 45 35.00
    Sunday August 2nd 53 40.86

    What a difference a week makes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,674 ✭✭✭touts


    I reckon the pubs will open to be honest

    Can't see it. If opening the pubs in August in any way endangers the opening of schools in September then the pubs will stay shut. If that means they go out of business then the attitude will be so be it. It's the lesser of two evils. Opening the schools enables hundreds of thousands of parents to get back into the economy. The pubs employ a fraction of that. And in 2-3 years there will be a vaccine and most pubs will have reopened with new owners and staff. It will be a no brainier really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Anyone who is unhappy with daily numbers can just make them 'reliable' by doing a seven day rolling average. No real arguing with that.

    As for the state of affairs it feels like it's time for a return to daily briefings and some stern words from the minister for health at the very least. Too many are drifting from the message.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I reckon the pubs will open to be honest

    I think that would be too much of a risk. Priotise schools first. Get them open as much as possible and engaging proactively with blended learning. Opening the pubs would also lessen the opportunity to better understand the risks that schools bring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,007 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    They really need to start breaking down the dublin numbers for everyone to see. Everything ive heard is the real problems in dublin are north off the liffey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,888 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    And how will the country finance this approach?

    Something about the ECB printing money or something to that effect


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭xabi


    froog wrote: »
    then when the figures stabilise we start opening up again. and we repeat this cycle until such time as we get a vaccine or a solid suite of therapeutic drugs. it's the only way to deal with this thing unfortunately.

    What if we don’t find a vaccine?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    You clearly don't have any economist experience

    i know dead people don't contribute much to the economy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,888 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I think that would be too much of a risk. Priotise schools first. Get them open as much as possible and engaging proactively with blended learning. Opening the pubs would also lessen the opportunity to better understand the risks that schools bring.

    So house parties continue instead? With absolutely no measures or social distancing in place


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    Once the existing clusters are under control there more than likely will be new ones.

    Many are ignoring that the number of clusters are increasing. Hence the number of cases.
    Will be more no doubt but all aren't as troublesome as the clusters in the last week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,637 ✭✭✭votecounts


    a bunch of selfish muppets, think they could do something better and think of other people:(


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement