Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

17475777980333

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    For sure!

    Are the treatments getting better?

    There needs to be more discussion about treatments tbh. Not just on here, but in general

    The nursing/care homes have been secured.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭jv2000


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    For sure!

    Are the treatments getting better?

    There needs to be more discussion about treatments tbh. Not just on here, but in general

    I think it is more a case of a younger demographic getting infected and mostly asymptomatic cases. Also you have a point about medical care being better now (more experience) and I would guess that most people are now taking daily doses of vitamin C and D which will also help in fighting the virus. Also social distancing and masks probably means less viral load exposure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Isn't the number in hospital now less than 1% of what it was at its peak?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Kinda mad that nearly half of today's cases were asymptomatic :confused:
    If we weren't testing contacts they'd be roaming.

    Once they got to grips with the nursing/care homes and elderly/vulnerable people took care it was never going to be as dangerous. The very tactic that some were vilified for suggesting at the beginning of all this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    El Sueño wrote: »
    Isn't the number in hospital now less than 1% of what it was at its peak?
    It is indeed yes, something like 830 was max as far as I know


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Is today the first Wednesday there has been a big difference between the number of positive tests (46) and cases announced? I know we have had this for a few weeks with the Monday/Tuesday figures, but weren’t wednesdays always fairly close?

    If they are retests then great, if not then the weekly average isn’t down (would be very similar to last weeks if 15-20 of the ‘missing’ tests should have been in today’s figure). Not a major concern as cases would still be stable, but unusual to see this midweek.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Benimar wrote: »
    Is today the first Wednesday there has been a big difference between the number of positive tests (46) and cases announced? I know we have had this for a few weeks with the Monday/Tuesday figures, but weren’t wednesdays always fairly close?

    If they are retests then great, if not then the weekly average isn’t down (would be very similar to last weeks if 15-20 of the ‘missing’ tests should have been in today’s figure). Not a major concern as cases would still be stable, but unusual to see this midweek.
    I think I might stop posting the testing figures tbh, because either we're completely misinterpreting them or there's actually an issue. It causes a lot of confusion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    polesheep wrote: »
    Once they got to grips with the nursing/care homes and elderly/vulnerable people took care it was never going to be as dangerous. The very tactic that some were vilified for suggesting at the beginning of all this.
    It was running rampant in the community and that rightly had a higher priority. There was also an assumption that care homes were doing things right back then. Many were not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,243 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    I think I might stop posting the testing figures tbh, because either we're completely misinterpreting them or there's actually an issue. It causes a lot of confusion.

    No offence intended whatsoever but I was just thinking that. It's very confusing to see the testing figures early in the day and then get the positive cases at announced. Maybe we should just wait for the announced figures. It's a shame, as the testing figures were of great interest when they reflected positive fases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    No offence intended whatsoever but I was just thinking that. It's very confusing to see the testing figures early in the day and then get the positive cases at announced. Maybe we should just wait for the announced figures. It's a shame, as the testing figures were of great interest when they reflected positive fases.
    No you're right. There was a stage where they were accurate but now it's a toss of the coin.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    I think I might stop posting the testing figures tbh, because either we're completely misinterpreting them or there's actually an issue. It causes a lot of confusion.

    In fairness, they tend to be pretty close Wednesday to Saturday. Also Sunday-Tuesday overall total tends to be close too.

    Unusual to see such a difference midweek. Suppose we will find out tomorrow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭blade1


    A feck, and I was in Clare Sunday. How long have I got?

    14 days in the pen!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It was running rampant in the community and that rightly had a higher priority. There was also an assumption that care homes were doing things right back then. Many were not.

    But who ends up needing hospitalisation? Going by the hospital figures we could let this virus go through the healthy population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,346 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    So one serology study in India invalidates all the others which are trending towards 0.65%?

    I wouldnt say that but its certainly part of the overall picture.

    Its insofar interesting as at a 57% rate it appears that it went right through those slums. Not sure we have that kind of data from anywhere else yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,500 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Where are the panicked posters from yesterday? They surely must be cracking open the champagne today with a massive 65% decline in cases today from yesterday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Where are the panicked posters from yesterday? They surely must be cracking open the champagne today with a massive 65% decline in cases today from yesterday.

    One or two have already been on to tell us that apparently no one makes a 100% recovery from Covid


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,257 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    How many days is that with 0 deaths now? 3/4?

    In NI, it's 16. Hopefully get that length without a covid death soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    Only 8 in hospital in a country of 5 million is truly brilliant and really should be highlighted more. It's been less than 15 for ages now, but is largely ignored when the media and everyone else is in panic mode.

    Just for comparison of how badly things could be, Oklahoma with a population of 1 million less than Ireland currently has 663 in hospital due to COVID.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭xabi


    What’s half of 11?

    7


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Great job by everyone for observing the usual rules. It really isn't that difficult, boring for sure, but hopefully we are all working together, as most are. Fair play to everyone.

    Go on to the Restriction thread and see how this might all end in tears though. They are manic over there!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    I think I might stop posting the testing figures tbh, because either we're completely misinterpreting them or there's actually an issue. It causes a lot of confusion.

    Out of pure interest I'd still like to see them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    Great job by everyone for observing the usual rules. It really isn't that difficult, boring for sure, but hopefully we are all working together, as most are. Fair play to everyone.

    Go on to the Restriction thread and see how this might all end in tears though. They are manic over there!

    I've noticed a lot more mask wearing in my local supermarket. It was fairly busy this evening and I don't think I saw a single person without a mask, including staff.

    A few weeks ago, only a minority were wearing masks. Great to see, tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    polesheep wrote: »
    But who ends up needing hospitalisation? Going by the hospital figures we could let this virus go through the healthy population.
    Not a risk any public heath authority would take. It's based on far too many variables.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Great job by everyone for observing the usual rules. It really isn't that difficult, boring for sure, but hopefully we are all working together, as most are. Fair play to everyone.

    Go on to the Restriction thread and see how this might all end in tears though. They are manic over there!

    The real test will be when the schools and universities open. The obvious plan is to keep the numbers as low as possible but it could easily balloon again once more things open.

    Having a mandatory quarantine for arrivals will be seen as essential soon so I don't know why they're not doing it now? Perhaps trying to get the last few dollars from the Americans during tourist season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,904 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    A feck, and I was in Clare Sunday. How long have I got?

    Why all the cases in Clare is it because of all the trad musicians there.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    Great job by everyone for observing the usual rules. It really isn't that difficult, boring for sure, but hopefully we are all working together, as most are. Fair play to everyone.

    Go on to the Restriction thread and see how this might all end in tears though. They are manic over there!

    If you want to see manic, try this thread yesterday evening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    The last time I checked the 14-day cumulative number of COVID-19 cases per 100k on the ECDC's website was 23/07. Ireland was at 5.6 and now we are 5.3 today, so at least it is decreasing. It is currently the 10th lowest in the EU.

    Spain has really jumped out at me. It has gone from 30.9 on 23/07 to 49.2 today. Just nine days ago it was 18.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,079 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Analysis of cases as of midnight Monday 27th July - 25,928 cases (+38)

    Healthcare Workers +6
    Clusters +9
    Cases associated with clusters +16

    Age Range Affected
    0-4 +1
    5-14 +3
    15-24 +7
    25-34 +11
    35-44 +7
    45-54 +5
    55-64 +3
    65-74 No Change
    75-84 +1
    85+ No Change

    Cases by County
    Cavan +1
    Clare +8
    Donegal +1
    Dublin +14
    Galway +2
    Kildare +3
    Laois +3
    Leitrim +1
    Louth +1
    Meath +1
    Sligo +1
    Westmeath +1

    I thought Mondays case were 11?

    https://www.rte.ie/amp/1155831/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Kazuma


    polesheep wrote: »
    But who ends up needing hospitalisation? Going by the hospital figures we could let this virus go through the healthy population.

    The problem is that this virus has long term health implications beyond hospitalisation (link).

    Letting it run through the population naturally is going to have serious long term impacts beyond the immediate ones.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    The real test will be when the schools and universities open. The obvious plan is to keep the numbers as low as possible but it could easily balloon again once more things open.

    Having a mandatory quarantine for arrivals will be seen as essential soon so I don't know why they're not doing it now? Perhaps trying to get the last few dollars from the Americans during tourist season.

    Agree, opening of schools after such a long time is a big issue. Over to Norma Foley now to steer it through.

    The US market is gone now, well for this year anyway, and if you think I feel sad for the gouging Jarveys in Killarney, I don't anymore. As if any native Irish person would be caught dead in one of them things. Plenty more lovely places in Ireland for the natives.

    Stay in Ireland, wash your hands, keep your distance and avoid crowded places.

    Or get the virus and pass it on. Over to you.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement