Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it just me or have SF vanished?

1…188189191193194…333

Comments

  • #5702
    Poor_old_gill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Just aswell im no way connected with shinners


    Quite,why your taking offence at verona murphy,being closer in outlook to gemma odoherty than any shinners is somewhat beyond me....

    but that is your own cross to carry mate

    You’re an odd character.

    Read back your own posts- you’ve claimed that I was ok with Verona Murphy & I’ve never said this, now you’re childishly doubling down on something you’ve made up as you can’t untangle yourself from the web of loon balls you’ve wrapped yourself in.


  • #5703
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Just aswell im no way connected with shinners


    Quite,why your taking offence at verona murphy,being closer in outlook to gemma odoherty than any shinners is somewhat beyond me....

    but that is your own cross to carry mate

    She got kicked out though didn't she?


  • #5704
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Poor_old_gill wrote: »
    You’re an odd character.

    Read back your own posts- you’ve claimed that I was ok with Verona Murphy & I’ve never said this, now you’re childishly doubling down on something you’ve made up as you can’t untangle yourself from the web of loon balls you’ve wrapped yourself in.

    Where have i said you were ok with her??

    Pretty sure i included seemingly?


  • #5705
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »
    She got kicked out though didn't she?

    I have never said she didnt?

    Though,why is it,she was invited to government formation talks,as were the anti abortion aontu

    (whos waterford member stood on anti immigrant point,while being an english doctor,married to a polish woman :pac: )iirc


  • #5706
    Poor_old_gill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Where have i said you were ok with her??

    Pretty sure i included seemingly?

    As I said this is just childish nonsense whereby you are constantly contradicting your own posts & making stuff up just to shut down what anyone else is saying.

    I don’t know are you playing dumb or are you just (seemingly) very, very dumb.

    Have a good day and don’t burn down too many 5G towers


  • Advertisement
  • #5707
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Poor_old_gill wrote: »
    As I said this is just childish nonsense whereby you are constantly contradicting your own posts & making stuff up just to shut down what anyone else is saying.

    So infact i didnt say,what has set yous off :)....ive shut nobody down,infact i have engaged entirely with yous, your free to hold a point of view,just it deosnt seem based in reality,and thats ok too
    I don’t know are you playing dumb or are you just (seemingly) very, very dumb.
    Yay for personal.insults,you must be the guy the irish times was on about yesterday
    Have a good day and don’t burn down too many 5G towers

    Quite,what this has to do with anything in our conversation is beyond me :confused:


  • #5708
    smurgen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    markodaly wrote: »
    Is there an Irish media outlet that is not biased towards SF?

    So far we have:
    RTE
    Sindo
    Irish Independent
    Irish Times
    Newstalk

    Am I missing any?

    Trump and SF, one step closer to a perfect marriage.

    Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?


  • #5709
    Bishop of hope
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,303 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    smurgen wrote: »
    Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?

    The biased press sackcloth is worn by SF equally as well by SF as Trump.
    Some of the looney stuff SF posters put up here to try to support their bias claims is ridiculous.
    Afraid to post their own favourable publications, because we all know what they are, they throw out absolute drivel of opinion pieces from very questionable opinion sources


  • #5710
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    Bishop of hope wrote: »
    The biased press sackcloth is worn by SF equally as well by SF as Trump.
    Some of the looney stuff SF posters put up here to try to support their bias claims is ridiculous.
    Afraid to post their own favourable publications, because we all know what they are, they throw out absolute drivel of opinion pieces from very questionable opinion sources

    This id love to see what everyone knows?

    Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

    The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá


  • #5711
    JohnnyFlash
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    This id love to see what everyone knows?

    Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

    The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá

    The time for what?


  • Advertisement
  • #5712
    Bishop of hope
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,303 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    This id love to see what everyone knows?

    Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

    The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá

    Actually, I don't doubt that. But what difference do you expect that to make.
    Like what will SF offer that will be that much different to What FG and FF are offering, or promising anyway?


  • #5713
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    Bishop of hope wrote: »
    Actually, I don't doubt that. But what difference do you expect that to make.
    Like what will SF offer that will be that much different to What FG and FF are offering, or promising anyway?

    For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

    FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

    First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax


  • #5714
    Bishop of hope
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,303 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

    FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

    First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

    You'd imagine?
    I doubt you know how taxes work so.
    It will take more than electing a SF Govt to change that. Like raising the corporate tax rate.
    Do you think that is a good idea?


  • #5715
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

    FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

    First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

    No they didnt


  • #5716
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »
    No they didnt

    Yes they did, What % of the vote did FG and the independents receive?

    What did the rest get?

    More people voted against the Govt than for them


  • #5717
    markodaly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,315 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    smurgen wrote: »
    Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?

    I see you didn't answer the question.
    What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?


  • #5718
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    markodaly wrote: »
    I see you didn't answer the question.
    What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?

    Expect a reply along the lines of

    But but but the IRA


  • #5719
    Poor_old_gill
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

    FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

    First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

    I love the tax argument to be honest.

    Why do you think Apple are here? Do you think Tim Cook used go to bed as a young fella dreaming about the north part of Cork City & utter to himself "One day Timmy boy, one day"?

    Google didnt move here because of their executives love of coddle either, in case you are wondering


  • #5720
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    Yes they did, What % of the vote did FG and the independents receive?

    What did the rest get?

    More people voted against the Govt than for them

    When was the last time any sitting government got over 50% of the vote in Ireland?

    The people voted for a range of parties, a number of which dont seem to be able to form a government together


  • #5721
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »
    When was the last time any sitting government got over 50% of the vote in Ireland?

    The people voted for a range of parties, a number of which dont seem to be able to form a government together

    I said people voted for change.

    your words

    "No they didn't"

    So are you now saying they did?


  • Advertisement
  • #5722
    smurgen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    markodaly wrote: »
    I see you didn't answer the question.
    What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?

    The Guardian for one. Really thought their coverage of the elections were good. Also the Currency.


  • #5723
    Edgware
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

    FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

    First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax
    Your imagination causes you a lot of difficulty. It will probably improve in your teenage years


  • #5724
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    Edgware wrote: »
    Your imagination causes you a lot of difficulty. It will probably improve in your teenage years

    Another one who just thinks they can talk down to people.

    FG supporters seem to be good at that, wonder where they get it from?


  • #5725
    aido79
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    I said people voted for change.

    your words

    "No they didn't"

    So are you now saying they did?

    Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

    Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

    Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.


  • #5726
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    aido79 wrote: »
    Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

    Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

    Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.

    Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

    Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt


  • #5727
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    aido79 wrote: »
    Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

    Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

    Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.

    Well they want to sort the homeless crisis out, which FG have no intention of.

    They want to push for a United Ireland, which FG have no intention of.

    They want to stop renters getting robbed with no chance ever of a mortgage, which Fg have no intention of.

    I could go on


  • #5728
    aido79
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

    Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt

    I doubt everyone who voted for FF did so because they didn't want a FF/FG coalition. Some probably did but not the full 25%


  • #5729
    aido79
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    Well they want to sort the homeless crisis out, which FG have no intention of.

    They want to push for a United Ireland, which FG have no intention of.

    They want to stop renters getting robbed with no chance ever of a mortgage, which Fg have no intention of.

    I could go on

    Please go on. I'm definitely not going to stop you and I will read everything you have to say on how they can do all of these things and more.

    My daughter wants a purple unicorn for her birthday. I have no intention of getting it. That's similar to what you are asking FG to do.

    None of these these things have the easy solutions that SF and their supporters seem to think they have.


  • #5730
    dundalkfc10
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,719 ✭✭✭dundalkfc10


    aido79 wrote: »
    I doubt everyone who voted for FF did so because they didn't want a FF/FG coalition. Some probably did but not the full 25%

    Well if i voted for a party who stated "We will not go into Govt with FG" and then changed their mind as soon as the results were out (even though we all knew they were lying all along) Id be pretty upset.

    Same way FG have broken election promises since 2011 like they are going out of fashion.

    I want a party who will fight for the people not themselves


  • Advertisement
  • #5731
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    dundalkfc10 wrote: »
    Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

    Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt

    Who both in turn stated they would not go in with SF.

    So we can't form a government


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement