nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Is it just me or have SF vanished?

Pkiernan

I haven't seen or heard anything from Mary Lou, Slab Murphy and other good Republicans in ages.

What's going on?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Poor_old_gill

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Just aswell im no way connected with shinners

Quite,why your taking offence at verona murphy,being closer in outlook to gemma odoherty than any shinners is somewhat beyond me....

but that is your own cross to carry mate

You’re an odd character.

Read back your own posts- you’ve claimed that I was ok with Verona Murphy & I’ve never said this, now you’re childishly doubling down on something you’ve made up as you can’t untangle yourself from the web of loon balls you’ve wrapped yourself in.

ThunbergsAreGo

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Just aswell im no way connected with shinners

Quite,why your taking offence at verona murphy,being closer in outlook to gemma odoherty than any shinners is somewhat beyond me....

but that is your own cross to carry mate

She got kicked out though didn't she?

[Deleted User]

Poor_old_gill wrote: »

You’re an odd character.

Read back your own posts- you’ve claimed that I was ok with Verona Murphy & I’ve never said this, now you’re childishly doubling down on something you’ve made up as you can’t untangle yourself from the web of loon balls you’ve wrapped yourself in.

Where have i said you were ok with her??

Pretty sure i included seemingly?

[Deleted User]

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

She got kicked out though didn't she?

I have never said she didnt?

Though,why is it,she was invited to government formation talks,as were the anti abortion aontu

(whos waterford member stood on anti immigrant point,while being an english doctor,married to a polish woman :pac: )iirc

Poor_old_gill

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Where have i said you were ok with her??

Pretty sure i included seemingly?

As I said this is just childish nonsense whereby you are constantly contradicting your own posts & making stuff up just to shut down what anyone else is saying.

I don’t know are you playing dumb or are you just (seemingly) very, very dumb.

Have a good day and don’t burn down too many 5G towers

[Deleted User]

Poor_old_gill wrote: »

As I said this is just childish nonsense whereby you are constantly contradicting your own posts & making stuff up just to shut down what anyone else is saying.

So infact i didnt say,what has set yous off

....ive shut nobody down,infact i have engaged entirely with yous, your free to hold a point of view,just it deosnt seem based in reality,and thats ok too

I don’t know are you playing dumb or are you just (seemingly) very, very dumb.

Yay for personal.insults,you must be the guy the irish times was on about yesterday

Have a good day and don’t burn down too many 5G towers

Quite,what this has to do with anything in our conversation is beyond me

smurgen

markodaly wrote: »

Is there an Irish media outlet that is not biased towards SF?

So far we have:
RTE
Sindo
Irish Independent
Irish Times
Newstalk

Am I missing any?

Trump and SF, one step closer to a perfect marriage.

Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?

Bishop of hope

smurgen wrote: »

Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?

The biased press sackcloth is worn by SF equally as well by SF as Trump.
Some of the looney stuff SF posters put up here to try to support their bias claims is ridiculous.
Afraid to post their own favourable publications, because we all know what they are, they throw out absolute drivel of opinion pieces from very questionable opinion sources

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

The biased press sackcloth is worn by SF equally as well by SF as Trump.
Some of the looney stuff SF posters put up here to try to support their bias claims is ridiculous.
Afraid to post their own favourable publications, because we all know what they are, they throw out absolute drivel of opinion pieces from very questionable opinion sources

This id love to see what everyone knows?

Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá

JohnnyFlash

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

This id love to see what everyone knows?

Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá

The time for what?

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

This id love to see what everyone knows?

Fact of matter is, the more people have a go at SF and talk them down, means more relevant and in the head of FFG they are.

The time is coming, Tiocfaidh ár Lá

Actually, I don't doubt that. But what difference do you expect that to make.
Like what will SF offer that will be that much different to What FG and FF are offering, or promising anyway?

dundalkfc10

Bishop of hope wrote: »

Actually, I don't doubt that. But what difference do you expect that to make.
Like what will SF offer that will be that much different to What FG and FF are offering, or promising anyway?

For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

Bishop of hope

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

You'd imagine?
I doubt you know how taxes work so.
It will take more than electing a SF Govt to change that. Like raising the corporate tax rate.
Do you think that is a good idea?

ThunbergsAreGo

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

No they didnt

dundalkfc10

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

No they didnt

Yes they did, What % of the vote did FG and the independents receive?

What did the rest get?

More people voted against the Govt than for them

markodaly

smurgen wrote: »

Really isn't it Varadkar and Trump that have the great relationship? Didn't he promise to teach him how to golf and didn't Varadkar sort out that pesky windfarm application for him?

I see you didn't answer the question.
What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?

dundalkfc10

markodaly wrote: »

I see you didn't answer the question.
What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?

Expect a reply along the lines of

But but but the IRA

Poor_old_gill

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

I love the tax argument to be honest.

Why do you think Apple are here? Do you think Tim Cook used go to bed as a young fella dreaming about the north part of Cork City & utter to himself "One day Timmy boy, one day"?

Google didnt move here because of their executives love of coddle either, in case you are wondering

ThunbergsAreGo

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Yes they did, What % of the vote did FG and the independents receive?

What did the rest get?

More people voted against the Govt than for them

When was the last time any sitting government got over 50% of the vote in Ireland?

The people voted for a range of parties, a number of which dont seem to be able to form a government together

dundalkfc10

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

When was the last time any sitting government got over 50% of the vote in Ireland?

The people voted for a range of parties, a number of which dont seem to be able to form a government together

I said people voted for change.

your words

"No they didn't"

So are you now saying they did?

smurgen

markodaly wrote: »

I see you didn't answer the question.
What media outlet do you think is NOT biased against SF?

The Guardian for one. Really thought their coverage of the elections were good. Also the Currency.

Edgware

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

For a start the people in the election voted for change, SF in some type Govt would be just that.

FFG do not want change though, but we all know FF could change their mind at any stage

First off, id imagine the likes of Apple etc would pay their fair share of tax

Your imagination causes you a lot of difficulty. It will probably improve in your teenage years

dundalkfc10

Edgware wrote: »

Your imagination causes you a lot of difficulty. It will probably improve in your teenage years

Another one who just thinks they can talk down to people.

FG supporters seem to be good at that, wonder where they get it from?

aido79

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

I said people voted for change.

your words

"No they didn't"

So are you now saying they did?

Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.

dundalkfc10

aido79 wrote: »

Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.

Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt

dundalkfc10

aido79 wrote: »

Every election is a vote for a change. It's the inherent reason for an election.

Can you explain what change you wanted when you voted for SF and how they are going to change Ireland for the better?

Bear in mind also that 75% of voters didn't vote for SF.

Well they want to sort the homeless crisis out, which FG have no intention of.

They want to push for a United Ireland, which FG have no intention of.

They want to stop renters getting robbed with no chance ever of a mortgage, which Fg have no intention of.

I could go on

aido79

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt

I doubt everyone who voted for FF did so because they didn't want a FF/FG coalition. Some probably did but not the full 25%

aido79

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Well they want to sort the homeless crisis out, which FG have no intention of.

They want to push for a United Ireland, which FG have no intention of.

They want to stop renters getting robbed with no chance ever of a mortgage, which Fg have no intention of.

I could go on

Please go on. I'm definitely not going to stop you and I will read everything you have to say on how they can do all of these things and more.

My daughter wants a purple unicorn for her birthday. I have no intention of getting it. That's similar to what you are asking FG to do.

None of these these things have the easy solutions that SF and their supporters seem to think they have.

dundalkfc10

aido79 wrote: »

I doubt everyone who voted for FF did so because they didn't want a FF/FG coalition. Some probably did but not the full 25%

Well if i voted for a party who stated "We will not go into Govt with FG" and then changed their mind as soon as the results were out (even though we all knew they were lying all along) Id be pretty upset.

Same way FG have broken election promises since 2011 like they are going out of fashion.

I want a party who will fight for the people not themselves

ThunbergsAreGo

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Well 25% voted for FF, as they stated they would not go into Govt with FG.

Thats 50%. So at least half the country do not want FG in Govt

Who both in turn stated they would not go in with SF.

So we can't form a government