Coronavirus

Cheerful Spring2 · 20-05-2020 9:40pm

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

in the heat of what moment exactly? before today they have only ever posted once in the CT forum.

He made one post and 5 users swarmed him attacking his viewpoint :eek:

ohnonotgmail · 20-05-2020 9:40pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Reddit has it but not sure how it work here. They tell you to slowdown and put you on timer and you to wait to reply again. Probably not workable on a forum?

but you want to limit it based on what side of the argument you are on. which is just ridiculous.

ohnonotgmail · 20-05-2020 9:40pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

He made one post and 5 users swarmed him attacking his viewpoint :eek:

they disagreed with him. people are such snowflakes these days they consider disagreement as an attack

Cheerful Spring2 · 20-05-2020 9:42pm

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

but you want to limit it based on what side of the argument you are on. which is just ridiculous.

We should just change the forum name then and accepted for what is a debunking echo chamber.

Irish Skeptics forum I still post here, but the forum needs to be representative of its user base.

Ted_YNWA · 20-05-2020 9:43pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Stop the bullying of posters is my point

People are getting annoyed and say silly things in the heat of the moment and this poster did. I can see why he did it, the same gang in every thread attacks a poster with a differrent view and they leave.

Nobody is bullying here.

Anyone who has an alternative view to the 'truthers' has it rightly discussed to see how valid it may be.

This is not an echo chamber to state anything as fact.

If I was to claim it was leprachauns who hid explosives in pots of gold & snuck in on St Patricks Day to plant them. it would rightly be questioned to see if there could be truth in it.

Cheerful Spring2 · 20-05-2020 10:10pm

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

Nobody is bullying here.

Anyone who has an alternative view to the 'truthers' has it rightly discussed to see how valid it may be.

This is not an echo chamber to state anything as fact.

If I was to claim it was leprachauns who hid explosives in pots of gold & snuck in on St Patricks Day to plant them. it would rightly be questioned to see if there could be truth in it.

That's true, but the debunkers ignore alternative evidence.

Example.
I showed them the Fe- Spheres melting point is 1500 degrees Celsius ( can look this up yourself)
NIST the body that investigated the collapses on 9/11 said the fires were 1000 degrees Celsius.
RJ Lee Group said the were made inside the building!
Ask the debunkers- Explanation to how they were made inside the building. You met with silence!
They do not see why the 1000 degrees Celsius fire would be problem here?

Timberrrrrrrr · 20-05-2020 10:10pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Reddit has it but not sure how it work here. They tell you to slowdown and put you on timer and you to wait to reply again. Probably not workable on a forum?

Be a handler way for you to avoid answering any questions, you don't answer them with unlimited posts so if you had a limit there would be even less replies from you.

Timberrrrrrrr · 20-05-2020 10:13pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

That's true, but the debunkers ignore alternative evidence.

Example.
I showed them the Fe- Spheres melting point is 1500 degress Celsuis ( can look this up)
NIST the body that investigated the collapses on 9/11 said the fires were 1000 degrees Celsius.
RJLee Group said the were made inside the building!
Ask the debunkers how do you think they were made inside the building. You met with silence!
They do not see why the low temp fire would be problem here?

No, you were asked questions, you dodged the questions (as usual) and went off on yet another tangent. Its what you do, you do not debate honestly.

Cheerful Spring2 · 20-05-2020 10:18pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

No, you were asked questions, you dodged the questions (as usual) and went off on yet another tangent. Its what you do, you do not debate honestly.

You don't answer me. How were they made explain it in your words.

6 percent of the dust that dropped over Manhattan had them. Your talking thousands maybe hundreds of thousands of these pure Iron spheres found in the
WTC dust.

Ted_YNWA · 20-05-2020 10:20pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

That's true, but the debunkers ignore alternative evidence.

Example.
I showed them the Fe- Spheres melting point is 1500 degress Celsuis ( can look this up)
NIST the body that investigated the collapses on 9/11 said the fires were 1000 degrees Celsius.
RJLee Group said the were made inside the building!
Ask the debunkers how do you think they were made inside the building. You met with silence!
They do not see why the low temp fire would be problem here?

Sorry, didn't mean to drag 9/11 into this thread.

You have posted a spiders web of numerous theories jumping between them at will. This is why a lot of what you are posting is not being taken seriously.

Cheerful Spring2 · 20-05-2020 10:21pm

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

Sorry, didn't mean to drag 9/11 into this thread.

You have posted a spiders web of numerous theories jumping between them at will. This is why a lot of what you are posting is not being taken seriously.

Lets see if anyone will provide a good answer. to my question posted. You can watch this, and see if they are actually responding in good faith.

4068ac1elhodqr · 20-05-2020 10:22pm

While don't agree with some of CS2 stuff (the 911 stuff all tiresome, and won't have any resoloution, for 50yrs or so).
But CS2 is still 100% correct on the above point.

The CT here is guarded by x5 or so 24/7 available quick reaction 'actors' (many not even in Ireland), to thumb down anything and everything.

Suspect they're on the payroll of someone (not boards) for this service. 6am posts are not unusual (like wft, it's 6am lol).
Still 'tis what it is.

Give them a plausable or moderate CT, and it's all...
"but hey what's the wilder CT part, like lizard men on the moon" (i.e. silly stuff).
Followed by active de-railing.

'Tis what it is: "100% echo chamber", and maybe best to close it down.

Worth noting that other folks that were told relentlessly by media they're all wrong (from brexiteers to trumpsters),
actually got what they were told they couldn't have (in the ultimate longer term).

Thus 1st Jan 2021 will likely start with the demonstration of hard brexit policy activation, not to mention 4 more years of Donald.

ohnonotgmail · 20-05-2020 10:24pm

Alena Tangy Someone wrote: »

While don't agree with some of CS2 stuff (the 911 stuff all tiresome, and won't have any resoloution, for 50yrs or so).
But CS2 is still 100% correct on the above point.

The CT here is guarded by x5 or so 24/7 available quick reaction 'actors' (many not even in Ireland), to thumb down anything and everything.

Suspect they're on the payroll of someone (not boards) for this service. 6am posts are not unusual (like wft, it's 6am lol).
Still 'tis what it is.

Give them a plausable or moderate CT, and it's all...
"but hey what's the wilder CT part, like lizard men on the moon" (i.e. silly stuff).
Followed by active de-railing.

'Tis what it is: "100% echo chamber", and maybe best to close it down.

Worth noting that other folks that were told relentlessly by media they're all wrong (from brexiteers to trumpsters),
actually got what they were told they couldn't have (in the ultimate longer term).

Thus 1st Jan 2021 will likely start with the demonstration of hard brexit policy activation, not to mention 4 more years of Donald.

would you ever cop on to yourself.

20-05-2020 10:35pm

I'm clearly actively posting on liveline threads because Bill Gates requires me to maintain my deep cover.

Dohnjoe · 20-05-2020 10:43pm

Alena Tangy Someone wrote: »

The CT here is guarded by x5 or so 24/7 available quick reaction 'actors' (many not even in Ireland), to thumb down anything and everything.

Suspect they're on the payroll of someone (not boards) for this service. 6am posts are not unusual (like wft, it's 6am lol).

Maybe..

or perhaps posters come here with extreme beliefs seeking validation, and when they don't receive that or worse, have those beliefs challenged, then they react like this

From chemtrails, to lizard people, to 9/11, to the moon landings, to David Icke, to 5G and Coronavirus, and so on, let's face it, a vast amount of stuff on conspiracy forums is complete nonsense. So perhaps it's unsurprising that it gets challenged.

Much to the annoyance of the propagators apparently..

/The Bill Gates counter-information rapid reaction squad

EyesClosed · 20-05-2020 11:36pm

Dohnjoe wrote: »

/The Bill Gates counter-information rapid reaction squad

I've always wanted to be in the breakfast club

King Mob · 21-05-2020 1:01am

Dohnjoe wrote: »

/The Bill Gates counter-information rapid reaction squad

So when do we get our checks from the lizard people again?

Timberrrrrrrr · 21-05-2020 6:34am

Alena Tangy Someone wrote: »

While don't agree with some of CS2 stuff (the 911 stuff all tiresome, and won't have any resoloution, for 50yrs or so).
But CS2 is still 100% correct on the above point.

The CT here is guarded by x5 or so 24/7 available quick reaction 'actors' (many not even in Ireland), to thumb down anything and everything.

Why does this matter?

Suspect they're on the payroll of someone (not boards) for this service. 6am posts are not unusual (like wft, it's 6am lol).
Still 'tis what it is.

Ah the old "they must be paid" lol, also not everyone works 9-5 you know, I start work at 6 am most days hence 6 am (even earlier) posts.

Give them a plausable or moderate CT, and it's all...
"but hey what's the wilder CT part, like lizard men on the moon" (i.e. silly stuff).
Followed by active de-railing.

'Tis what it is: "100% echo chamber", and maybe best to close it down.

It just don't visit the forum.maybe?

Worth noting that other folks that were told relentlessly by media they're all wrong (from brexiteers to trumpsters),
actually got what they were told they couldn't have (in the ultimate longer term).

Thus 1st Jan 2021 will likely start with the demonstration of hard brexit policy activation, not to mention 4 more years of Donald.

That remains to be seen.

Dohnjoe · 21-05-2020 10:57am

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Why does this matter?

False and misleading information = OK
Pointing out that it's false and misleading = Not OK

Apparently

Cheerful Spring2 · 25-05-2020 10:21pm

Rattle a few chains!

Corbett published a 4 part series about Gates.

How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

Timberrrrrrrr · 25-05-2020 10:23pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Rattle a few chains!

Corbett published a 4 part series about Gates.

How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

Another youtube dump, what's pertinent to this? Timestamps to the important parts please.

Cheerful Spring2 · 25-05-2020 10:26pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Another youtube dump, what's pertinent to this? Timestamps to the important parts please.

Its for viewing, not segments pulled from it. It's for people to watch in its entirely to see if the claims add up
The first 2 minutes is a fascinating insight to the type of personality he has.

The Nal · 26-05-2020 9:38am

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Its for viewing, not segments pulled from it. It's for people to watch in its entirely to see if the claims add up
The first 2 minutes is a fascinating insight to the type of personality he has.

Translate that as - Cheerful has only watched the first two minutes

Timberrrrrrrr · 26-05-2020 10:12am

The Nal wrote: »

Translate that as - Cheerful has only watched the first two minutes

I watched the 1st 2 minutes, it tells you nothing about Gates nor does it give any sort of "fascinating insight to the type of personality he has."

The Nal · 26-05-2020 10:27am

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I watched the 1st 2 minutes, it tells you nothing about Gates nor does it give any sort of "fascinating insight to the type of personality he has."

I retract my earlier comment about Cheerful only watching two minutes of the video. Just looked at the first 3 minutes and its apparent that Cheerful hasn't watched any of the video.

What a time waster

The Nal · 26-05-2020 10:56am

Good old Bill for his part just brushes off the stupidity and moves on.

Cheerful Spring2 · 26-05-2020 2:31pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I watched the 1st 2 minutes, it tells you nothing about Gates nor does it give any sort of "fascinating insight to the type of personality he has."

The US government sued Microsoft for breaking anti-trust laws in 1998 and the lawyer on the government side in the deposition asked Gates- what other browsers competing against Microsoft were you concerned about? (simple question) Gates pretended to not understand the lawyer question. Gates played the dumpy card (confused look) and acted like he done nothing wrong, and it shows, does not care about the rule of law and will never say sorry for his actions. Gates Microsoft lost the court battle and the ruling at the time Microsoft was an illegal monopoly and was broken up into a two part entity.

Gates now monopolised the healthcare system worldwide instead through the Bill and Melinda foundation, and used his vast wealth, to fund small and large pharma companies, and provided grants to health care bodies, and profited from the products and services they provided to the public. The Foundation also owns a percentage of the assets of the companies they invested in over the last decade.

Gates is the second largest donor to the WHO with the United States at number one. Dr Fauci research was backed by Gates in the past and there is a conflict of interest, and any vaccine, that will emerge, will have Gates stamp of approval on it. Gates paid off people in newspapers and those involved in global media to provide him with good public image press and told them to not print negative stories about him.

Gates is not one of the most generous men on earth. He actually is two times richer today then he was a decade ago (stats provided). He's lost none of his wealth. The Foundation is not a charitable organisation like the press claims, it has a dual function , and is profiting, off the assets and when grants are given. Money is not given away for free for nothing- the foundation earning in return. Foundation trust is profiting from health. No surprise, the media is promoting him as the new face for the covid-19 vaccine. This what I took from the first part of the series.

My position
I don’t believe Gates leaked covid-19 to profit from it and allegations are not made here in the first video. My personal own believe is an accident occurred inside one of the labs in China. The lab studied bat coronavirus diseases. The lab in Wuhan was partly funded by US scientists, and this was a dual project probably funded by the WHO?

Ipso · 26-05-2020 2:44pm

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Rattle a few chains!

Corbett published a 4 part series about Gates.

How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health

Oh no, only four parts. I never realized that global health was monopolized.

The Nal · 26-05-2020 2:52pm

Ipso wrote: »

Oh no, only four parts. I never realized that global health was monopolized.

Its not. Clearly. Cheerful just copied and pasted the title of the video. A video he hadn't even watched.

Its incredible stuff.

Cheerful Spring2 · 26-05-2020 3:27pm

Ipso wrote: »

Oh no, only four parts. I never realized that global health was monopolized.

Snide post again by Ipso.

I not anti- vaccine supporter. There is an obvious health benefits here, and Vaccines have prevented diseases and helped people who are sick.

When you’re a critic of Bill Gates you assumed to be anti vaccine person, this is the ridiculous debunker mindset.

Coronavirus

Comments