Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVI- 21,983 in ROI (1,339 deaths) 3,881 in NI (404 deaths)(05/05)Read OP

1289290292294295323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    iguana wrote: »
    That is the plan with the most promising vaccines though isn't it. Mass production before it's known if they are definitely effective. If they are proven effective, then great we are ready to go. If not they are scrapped. It's a massive waste of money if they have to be scrapped but the time saving if they work is worth so much more that the risk is worth it. We did all this 11 years ago. The turn around on the H1N1 vaccine was so rapid that if the Covid vaccine was as fast, mass vaccines would be starting in a few weeks. Which they won't. But if they are ready in the next few months it won't be historically fast.
    It won't be historically and yet it could be.
    This is very nuanced. H1N1 was really similar to previous flu strain in 1977 so vaccine production was comparatively easy. That said there were still issues. Swine flu caused narcolepsy in some cases. People who were given the live vaccine were exposed to this potential, albeit at a much lesser risk.

    This is a novel virus. Many of vaccines in development are using novel methods. In that context their production and development would be historically fast. One of the biggest positives that may come from this pandemic is the effective development of RNA vaccines. That it took a global pandemic for it happen however should be held as a constant black mark against us.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,011 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Strumms wrote: »
    To do a job, which in the instance shown they didn’t have the required resources to do.

    Like sending Roger Federer into Wimbledon without a racket.

    Maybe if they didn't have so many pointless checkpoints it would free up Gardai to deal with the real issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,149 ✭✭✭✭Gael23




  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    In an interview with the Indo Cillian de Gascun says the plan for widespread antibody testing so they can gauge how widespread the infection is in the community is to start doing it in June

    Sorry it's actually the IT https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/cillian-de-gascun-team-sports-are-going-to-be-in-a-very-difficult-position-1.4243847?mode=amp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    GT89 wrote: »
    So you are admitting what I'm saying is true basically. It's only killing the elderly and people with under lying health conditions that's the truth. The response to this is completely riddiculous and over exagerated

    No, I replied with actual proof that the vast vast majority of COVID patients died because of the disease, not with COVID. versus your 'hunch' that they would die anyway and just happened to have COVID.

    Elderly and having health conditions means relatively little without further clarification, you can have underlying conditions which put you at much greater risk but the diseases themselves have no impact on lifespan in normal circumstances when treated correctly such as hypertension, and you can be elderly and have 20 years left to live under normal circumstances. COVID is taking many years of life from these groups of people


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    iguana wrote: »
    That is the plan with the most promising vaccines though isn't it. Mass production before it's known if they are definitely effective. If they are proven effective, then great we are ready to go. If not they are scrapped. It's a massive waste of money if they have to be scrapped but the time saving if they work is worth so much more that the risk is worth it. We did all this 11 years ago. The turn around on the H1N1 vaccine was so rapid that if the Covid vaccine was as fast, mass vaccines would be starting in a few weeks. Which they won't. But if they are ready in the next few months it won't be historically fast.
    It won't be historically and yet it could be.
    This is very nuanced. H1N1 was really similar to previous flu strain in 1977 so vaccine production was comparatively easy. That said there were still issues. Swine flu caused narcolepsy in some cases. People who were given the live vaccine were exposed to this potential, albeit at a much lesser risk.

    This is a novel virus. Many of vaccines in development are using novel methods. In that context their production and development would be historically fast. One of the biggest positives that may come from this pandemic is the effective development of RNA vaccines. That it took a global pandemic for it happen however should be held as a constant black mark against us.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 557 ✭✭✭yew_tree


    alexv wrote: »
    Less used back roads around towns should be pedestrianized to encourage people to safely exercise while respecting social distancing measures.

    This should become a permanent arrangement.

    That’s one of the worst ideas I’ve ever seen. Every back road has homes and farm land along them...are you gonna stop people driving to their homes and farmers to their land? You didn’t think that one out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭ChelseaRentBoy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭yogmeister


    cloudatlas wrote: »
    https://news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-scientists-conclude-people-cannot-be-infected-twice-11981721

    Coronavirus: Scientists conclude people cannot be infected twice :pac:

    No they don't. They conclude they haven't relapsed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    You've never made a mistake ?

    I've put colours in with whites, is my mistake in the same category as giving a grieving family the wrong body?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,050 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    You've never made a mistake ?


    That's some mistake.

    Sincerest sympathies to deceased family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭alexv


    yew_tree wrote: »
    That’s one of the worst ideas I’ve ever seen. Every back road has homes and farm land along them...are you gonna stop people driving to their homes and farmers to their land? You didn’t think that one out.

    I've walked plenty of stretches of road in Ireland with not one residential or farm entrance. Presumably you'd have no objection to closing those off to traffic?
    Speaking of farms, it's about time Ireland adopted a measure similar to Sweden's freedom to roam principle.

    https://visitsweden.com/what-to-do/nature-outdoors/nature/sustainable-and-rural-tourism/freedomtoroam/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    alexv wrote: »
    I've walked plenty of stretches of road in Ireland with not one residential or farm entrance. Presumably you'd have no objection to closing those off to traffic?
    Speaking of farms, it's about time Ireland adopted a measure similar to Sweden's freedom to roam principle.

    https://visitsweden.com/what-to-do/nature-outdoors/nature/sustainable-and-rural-tourism/freedomtoroam/

    I've ran marathons all over Ireland most of them are on quite country roads yet every single road I ran on had houses or field entrances, where are these roads you have walked that someone just decided to lay for no purpose?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    I've ran marathons all over Ireland most of them are on quite country roads yet every single road I ran on had houses or field entrances, where are these roads you have walked that someone just decided to lay for no purpose?


    Parts of the military roads in Dublin and Wicklow have virtually no houses on them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Parts of the military roads in Dublin and Wicklow have virtually no houses on them.

    No entrances to fields or forest? The state didn't and doesn't lay roads for the crack, it's an expensive undertaking.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Gael23 wrote: »

    Nope. There is no accountability in Ireland.
    Same will happen when an inquiry is opened on why nursing homes were prioritised so late.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Nope. There is no accountability in Ireland.
    Same will happen when an inquiry is opened on why nursing homes were prioritised so late.

    Not just nursing homes,


    Covid-19 outbreaks confirmed in 100 disability settings https://jrnl.ie/5090731


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    Not just nursing homes,


    Covid-19 outbreaks confirmed in 100 disability settings https://jrnl.ie/5090731

    Always the last mental health settings.... still haven't even implemented the vision for change document... My thoughts with them and their familys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,855 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Just heard on RTE radio 1 that authorities mixed up the remains of a covid victim and gave their family the wrong body for burial at Mullingar hospital.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭alexv


    I've ran marathons all over Ireland most of them are on quite country roads yet every single road I ran on had houses or field entrances, where are these roads you have walked that someone just decided to lay for no purpose?

    *I've run


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭Silent Running


    magic17 wrote: »
    All the scaremongers will be gutted

    That's a bit harsh... but I could get behind it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    alexv wrote: »
    *I've run

    Ok you corrected my post now maybe you can tell me where are all these roads that have no houses or field entrances on them? Or can I assume you just posted nonsense?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,612 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    I'm here in the US, 5 states are going to be fecked for quite a while from why i can gather, and I'm in one of them. Giving it till the end of May and I'm fecking home then.


    What 5 states


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,612 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Here we go ramp up testing ramp up testing weekly mantra.


    The swab up the nose is bad enough, this Ramp up testing is far worse


    No6OVcg.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    Laugh if you want to... anybody know easiest way to cook rhubarb?


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    alexv wrote: »
    *I've run
    Cut out the grammar naziism and discuss the topic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    speckle wrote: »
    Laugh if you want to... anybody know easiest way to cook rhubarb?

    Steam it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    iguana wrote: »
    Well that's a bullshït article. Take this for example, "We've never accelerated a vaccine in a year to 18 months," Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, tells CNN. "It doesn't mean it's impossible, but it will be quite a heroic achievement." And yet in 2009, the H1N1 vaccine was created, tested and mass vaccination began in 5 months. Yes, the creation of a flu vaccine is different, because it's an adaptation of an existing flu vaccine but clinical trials and mass production were all done and completed in that time.

    Yeah but, and I say this as a passionate proponent of vaccines, rushing through the H1N1 vaccine was not without problems. I doubt very much that the testing done on H1N1 was as rigorous as it should have been. In fact, it would be impossible to carry out the full amount of testing needed in the timescale you mention. Putting pressure on companies and researchers to whittle down their testing is hardly something to celebrate. Rushing through thalidomide with insufficient testing was what caused the issues with foetuses. Thalidomide isn't a vaccine of course but any kind of medication or preventative medicine that is introduced to the body should be rigorously tested. It's not just for the craic. I realise they are allowing covid19 to bypass some of the testing and, honestly, that really concerns me.

    And the article is also right that whilst a vaccine is likely, it's not a given and it's not just the intractable HIV virus that there hasn't been a vaccine developed for. I don't see what's so controversial about stating that. Surely contingency plans should be made for the possibility that a vaccine won't be found?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Yeah but, and I say this as a passionate proponent of vaccines, rushing through the H1N1 vaccine was not without problems. I doubt very much that the testing done on H1N1 was as rigorous as it should have been. In fact, it would be impossible to carry out the full amount of testing needed in the timescale you mention. Putting pressure on companies and researchers to whittle down their testing is hardly something to celebrate. Rushing through thalidomide with insufficient testing was what caused the issues with foetuses. Thalidomide isn't a vaccine of course but any kind of medication or preventative medicine that is introduced to the body should be rigorously tested. It's not just for the craic. I realise they are allowing covid19 to bypass some of the testing and, honestly, that really concerns me.

    And the article is also right that whilst a vaccine is likely, it's not a given and it's not just the intractable HIV virus that there hasn't been a vaccine developed for. I don't see what's so controversial about stating that. Surely contingency plans should be made for the possibility that a vaccine won't be found?

    Thalimonide is such an interesting example if any one has anytime I suggest they read up on Frances Kelsey.
    tl;dr Amazing Woman in U.S who resisted pressure from politicans, pharma and lobby groups to approve Thalomide.

    A vaccine most probably will be found because for most things vaccines haven't been found for it's a matter of cost. Simply put vaccines don't make really money. A vaccine for SARS nCoV-2 would. Only for viruses like HIV where it mutates on a daily basis would a vaccine prove difficult. Nothing to suggest the current novel coronavirus has such characteristics. Regardless, contingency planning for a vaccine not being available for at least 36 months is very much happening. Realistically, if a novel vaccine or antiviral has to be designed and tested it would be at least two years before any such viable treatment would be available. Right now all that's happening is pre-existing treatments, or those already in developmment, are being repurposed for this virus and we hope they work.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement